I'll start with the positives:
1. The acting. The lead and most of the supporting cast do a phenomenal job, they sold their roles exceptionally well, so well in fact, I still felt the tremendous impact of the twist that the main lead was actually the one chosen to give birth to the antichrist, despite it being so obvious from the first scene between her and her roommate.
2. The cinematography. The way they shot many of the scenes and the environment, the lighting they choose were top tier and a masterclass in mood and atmosphere setting.
3. The sound design, I mean, the slow methodical scenes would only work half as well if you didn't feel the squelches, or the pulling of the hammer back on a double-barrel shotgun, and the weight that holds as a danger if it wasn't for the sound design being top tier.
Okay, now that the three phenomenal things are out of the way, there were retcons galore between this movie and the one it is meant to be a prequel to, which left many fans upset with this film.
Another point of contention for sure was the long drawn-out sections particularly near the end which lasted forever, and the very questionable special effects. If they spent half the time on incoherent flashes of imagery they did, and devoted that into developing the characters more, it would have been excellent, and made the ending part make more sense. What ending part? Well in the end the antichrist's twin sister and his mom survive, and are hiding out with another human-jackal-or-something hybrid, the priest dude with a cool voice shows up to warn them that the cult has found out they survived, and the main character's reaction is to pull out a shotgun and threaten to kill him. Does she resent him for not saving her from the cultists? Does she blame herself for not being able to kill the antichrist child, and simply projecting her anger onto him? Is she trying to be a "girl boss" manhater? She knows where his allegience lies, and he is an ally for sure, expanding on things like that to fill the runtime would be better than the random flashses of wacky imagery and long-drawn out scenes we didn't need. But even with those complaints the strong parts were so strong I give this an 8 out of 10.
2. The cinematography. The way they shot many of the scenes and the environment, the lighting they choose were top tier and a masterclass in mood and atmosphere setting.
3. The sound design, I mean, the slow methodical scenes would only work half as well if you didn't feel the squelches, or the pulling of the hammer back on a double-barrel shotgun, and the weight that holds as a danger if it wasn't for the sound design being top tier.
Okay, now that the three phenomenal things are out of the way, there were retcons galore between this movie and the one it is meant to be a prequel to, which left many fans upset with this film.
Another point of contention for sure was the long drawn-out sections particularly near the end which lasted forever, and the very questionable special effects. If they spent half the time on incoherent flashes of imagery they did, and devoted that into developing the characters more, it would have been excellent, and made the ending part make more sense. What ending part? Well in the end the antichrist's twin sister and his mom survive, and are hiding out with another human-jackal-or-something hybrid, the priest dude with a cool voice shows up to warn them that the cult has found out they survived, and the main character's reaction is to pull out a shotgun and threaten to kill him. Does she resent him for not saving her from the cultists? Does she blame herself for not being able to kill the antichrist child, and simply projecting her anger onto him? Is she trying to be a "girl boss" manhater? She knows where his allegience lies, and he is an ally for sure, expanding on things like that to fill the runtime would be better than the random flashses of wacky imagery and long-drawn out scenes we didn't need. But even with those complaints the strong parts were so strong I give this an 8 out of 10.
Tell Your Friends