Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
East/West (1999)
10/10
Cinematic Gesamtkunskwerk
11 September 2000
The cathartic nature of this film was such that found myself unable even to cry until the credits began their long slow march across the screen, and even then getting up out of my seat was not an option. I don't think any other film has made such a profound and immediate impact on me.

Set in the years following Stalin's invitation to former expatriates to return to their native Russia –a call many answered, blissfully unaware of the dire consequences their decision would have- it is filled with the Russian spirit that sees people stubbornly persevering, and touched with the French one that not only looks for escape but insists upon it.

Some films would be rendered incomprehensible simply by the sheer amount of quiet action that here, thankfully, only adds to the audience's investment in the film, without losing focus. It was unquestionably the best film I have seen in recent memory. It is the closest I have ever felt to experiencing a Gesamtkunstwerk in a movie theatre.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hamlet (2000)
4/10
No special providence in fall of this sparrow
15 July 2000
Perhaps in an attempt to make up for the lack of roles for women in Hamlet (and Shakespeare in general), the producers of this version of Shakespeare's play have decided that the minor character of Marcellus should be made female and be seen with much greater frequency. And while it sounds good on paper, it actually compounds the problem of a lack of strong women, especially since she is made out as Horatio's girlfriend: Suddenly, Marcella (as she is now called) has no purpose. As a man, he was in maybe two scenes, and after Horatio is established as Hamlet's only confidant, he ceases to matter. Now, however, she repeatedly appears in scenes where she has nothing to do except stand dumbly by her man; because her character does not appear in the script (and because the filmmakers never came up with a justifiable reason for keeping her) she still doesn't matter. Only now we are painfully aware that she doesn't matter, because we continue to see her. This sort of careless revision that ultimately sacrifices story and character (two of Shakespeare's strong points) for gimmick does much to contribute to the downfall of the movie.

While I fully support a "naturalization" of Shakespeare's words in the mouths of modern actors, much of the cast simply mumbled what's left of the text without ever embodying the rich meaning behind the words. Case in point: Ethan Hawke's best delivery of his dialogue comes when he is forced to raise his voice to be heard over the dance music in a club. The rest of the time he's pretty much content to murmur to himself without ever actually letting us inside his head. Julia Stiles' Ophelia isn't much better off when it comes to projecting real emotion (big problem for almost everyone), but she is at least partially redeemed by her quite brilliant mad scenes. I think this is actually the best handling of those scenes it has ever been my privilege to witness, especially her reunion with brother Laertes (Liev Schreiber, on his game yet again). And despite an exasperatingly pause-heavy delivery, Bill Murray actually manages more genuine warmth is his handling of Shakespeare's language than most of the leads.

Aside from that, the most interesting scene in this modern adaptation of Shakespeare's play, both for its clever updating of the text and its "cool factor" was the chase after the ghost of Hamlet Sr. through the back stairways, complicated elevator systems, and up to the roof of the Hotel Elsinore. Unfortunately, it never happened. It was set up just right: Horatio, Marcella, and security guard Bernardo are anxiously awaiting the young prince's arrival upon the platform where they watch (an empty hall of fancy elevators) while they look for signs of the ghost's activity on their security monitors, when Bernardo calls Hamlet on the phone and wakes him. But he never gets him on the phone: the ghost in this version is considerate enough to come right to Hamlet's room without having to separate him from his comrades (although Sam Shepard does give an engaging performance as the elder Hamlet).

But Shakespeare was smarter than that. Again, the filmmakers have tried to justify their tampering with the script by introducing new gimmicks, but I wonder how they expect a surprising tweaking of the text can ultimately make up for the excitement of human interaction "upon the platform" of which we have been deprived. (The end sequence suffers most heavily from this careless cleverness.) In fact, in spite of the reasonably skillful butchering of the text, the movie moves along at a surprisingly dull pace. What the recent Romeo and Juliet may have lacked in acting skill, it made up for in spectacle, thereby assuring a satisfying ride. This Hamlet never quite makes it. The music, for example, although annoyingly incessant, rarely helps to push the action, as it did very well in, say, Lola Rennt (Run Lola Run). If you make the choice to disregard the unbroken rhythm of Shakespeare's text, you'd better be prepared to offer us something else that moves the action along just as efficiently, which these moviemakers have unfortunately failed to do.

Nor is there any attempt made to cash in on the significant humor of the script; even Bill Murray's Polonius rarely comes off as funny, and we are cruelly teased with -and then robbed of- the gravedigger scene. Indeed, the only laughs when I saw it came just as the King was revealing his crafty grand plan (ho hum) to the enraged Laertes, and only then because a boom microphone was momentarily seen hanging over their heads as the camera angle changed!

The movie is not a total loss. It has its share of clever ideas and nice moments (from Polonius tying his rebellious daughter's shoe, to Ophelia's early contemplation of suicide) and scores high points with its updates of Ophelia's handing out of flowers, and Hamlet's carefully crafted video he calls "The Mousetrap." It also has a handful of strong performances, although with such a disappointing Hamlet, no one could have saved the movie. But ultimately, as the climactic duel reaches is feverous intensity, and motives and resolutions are inexplicably struck from the text (and new improbabilities are added – why is the last shot of the security guy his sudden awareness of a threat, if we never see him again once the bloodshed starts? Why does he not even try to stop the attack?), it becomes painfully clear that the movie is literally falling apart under it's own bloated cleverness. And their safety net –Shakespeare's text, presumably, since nothing was offered in place of it- has long since been filled full of irreparable holes.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Closest Thing to Heaven may be just that
3 July 2000
The Closest Thing to Heaven may be just that, especially for those of us who live in Charlotte, NC, where the film is set. It is a quirky, heartfelt, and at times magical foray into life in the underbelly of the city, away from the slick banking centers and pro-sports arenas the city planners would prefer to hype. While it may not have quite the polish of a big feature film, it makes up in humor and charm what it may lack anywhere else. The characters inhabiting the five interwoven tales are alternately just silly enough to deny them a place in the "real world," and just sincere enough to firmly touch the heart and stir the soul. Likewise, their situations (ranging from an unwillingly nursing-home bound Greek restaurant owner who is advised by his dead wife, to a sibling pair who independently add the death of their mother to the growing list of low points of their day) are slices of a life so ordinary and incredible that they edify without patronizing and amuse without degrading. Uniting the disparate stories is Howard, a bicycle-riding Southern Gentleman in a White Suit who, as a narrator, chats to us as he unhurriedly pedals his way through their stories and lives, offering us quirky trivia on local history, and advice (and at least once, the thrilling combination of headache powder and ginger ale) to the characters who most need his almost angelic shoulder to cry on. Although lines and scenes from the movie have found themselves surviving in catch phrases in my daily conversation ("We go!"), what impressed me the most upon a recent viewing were the subtle but insistent images of transportation, of moving on and being better for the journey. After being accompanied by a sometimes raucous and rowdy Bluegrass score, it is still a movie you suspect will end like the sound of a lonely train whistle somewhere in the distance: mournful perhaps, but also a peaceful and joyous reminder that this life really is the closest thing to heaven. And that's a very good thing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed