Enemy Lines (2020) Poster

(2020)

User Reviews

Review this title
68 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
its to clean
ops-5253525 April 2020
Is my first impression, its the lack of determination in their determination, the whole plot are far too smooth, the script is ludicrous and have no actors improvisation to it. the special effects are cheap except for the visuals of the explotions.

this film should have been made with a larger budget, a more misty and grell atmosphere, and i feel a bit let down on the historical accuracy presented to us. . you might wanna have a look cause youre in to the subject of ww2, but lower your expectations. the grumpy old man will not recommend.
25 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Seen worse
sharksfan1429 April 2020
No idea why this movie is rated less than a 4.0 on here. It is not the greatest WW2 movie I've seen, but it is not that bad at all...
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Low budget lines
kosmasp17 July 2021
I reckon one can also make jokes about script lines, shooting lines and other stuff of that nature. But if you keep in mind that this is a low budget effort, you may be able to cut it some slack. This is about war and while it may not be accurate in certain things (someone said something about wardrobe, I have to admit, I didn't even notice, because again it was clear from the start this was not a movie that had a lot of money), the stunts and action scenes are really well done.

So if you are able to suspend your disbelief and just roll with the flow, you may have a bit to enjoy here. At the end we also get some text to put the whole thing in context and tell us what happened ... so while this isn't even close to being the best war movie, it also is far away of being the worst.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Historically lazy
julian-132715 September 2020
I got all of 10 mins into this film before the lazy wardrobe drove me bonkers. The worst being John Hannah wearing ribbons for the Gulf War and the 2002 Golden Jubilee Medal. School play stuff.
28 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Worse than I thought
allijn1 May 2020
What a very poor movie!! Bad acting and even the action in this movie was Like a B-movie.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Good story , poor acting
willemsjimmy2 May 2020
The story is good but the acting is very poor. It could have been a blockbuster if it had A bigger budget and better actors
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enemy Lines
lakes-4906826 April 2020
After reading...Reviewer "Its to Clean",review' of this movie,I almost did not View it...But I decided,I would go Ahead....Totally contrary to this "Review" I found this Movie,especially in this time of Good Movie Drought....To be a most,Thrilling,Entertaining,edge of Seat,ww11 (of which I am a Long time Buff) Movie...there was No Need of extra enhancements...it was/is supposed to BE, in the 1940's (the Year that I was Born)..Great Acting,Cinematography,Sound track,Story Line,Sub Titling where required & Great Ending....I feel that it is a Great Pity that some,So Called reviewers,can Wreck a good movie ,due to their Lack of Good Taste & Patience...Overall..A VERY GOOD MOVIE... Enjoy !!!!
33 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Above-Average World War II Secret Mission Thriller
zardoz-1326 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The above-average World War II action thriller "Enemy Lines" depicts a daring Allied commando raid to snatch a Polish scientist from the clutches of his villainous Nazi captors. Washington wants to add this Pole to the ranks of other scientists toiling over the top-secret Manhattan Project to build an atomic bomb. Not only do the Allies-the British and the Americans-want this Brainiac for his particular genius, but a Soviet undercover squad of NKVD also wants him, too. Although the British, the Americans, and the Soviets waged war against Hitler's nefarious Third Reich, the Soviets are just as anxious to abduct this gifted scientist for Joe Stalin. Swedish director Anders Banke and "Amsterdam Heavy" scenarist Michael Wright, working from producer Tom George's story, have fashioned a competent, death-defying mission movie. The endless horde of Germans never gives them a break. "Enemy Lines" evoked memories of director Walter Grauman's vintage epic "The Last Escape" (1970), where Americans disguised as Germans nabbed a rocket scientist from the Nazis before Joseph Stalin's cronies can claim him themselves. Meantime, Hitler's henchmen were spitting bullets at their heels. Most World War II movies these days like "Enemy Lines" suffer from inadequate budgets, like my earlier review of "We Go in At Dawn." More often than not you had to fill in the gaps between the missing scenes for yourself in "We Go in at Dawn" because the tight budget excluded them. Happily, "Enemy Lines" doesn't suffer from that kind of shortcoming.

"Enemy Lines" is one of those movies that starts in the middle, with our stealthy heroes attacking the sentries outside the house of Dr. Fabien (Pawel Delag of "Schindler's List") during a freezing night. They slay the unsuspecting guards silently with their knives. Abruptly, however, the movie reverts back to the beginning. U.S. Army General McCloud (Corey Johnson of "The Bourne Legacy") and British Colonel Preston (John Hannah of "Sliding Doors") give U.S. Marine Major Kaminski (Ed Westwick of "Billionaire Ransom") his orders about his suicidal mission. Kaminski will command a quartet of professional British commandos as his team. This quintet will travel by trawler under cover of night to Poland, go ashore and usher rocket scientist Dr. Fabien and his family to the safety of a submarine. The best action movies always complicate the best-laid plans of heroes and enemies, so nobody has a picnic. No sooner have our heroes rescued Dr. Fabian than a lone German officer takes his wife hostage at gunpoint. Although a British sharpshooter kills him with a near impossible shot, the stubborn Nazi lives long enough to put a fatal bullet in Fabien's wife. Our heroes move out on foot, across icy terrain with the scientist and his grieving young daughter, but they lose contact with London when their radio craps out on them. Not only are the Nazis in hot pursuit, but also that lethal NKVD squad is following with their own ideas about grabbing Fabien. Indeed, "Enemy Lines" observes all the clichés and conventions of the war movie genre, especially the self-sacrificial displays of heroism by the British. Few survive the repeated firefights. Meantime, the Nazis mobilize literally everything in their pursuit of the Allies, including a couple of tanks!

Apart from John Hannah, who plays the irritable, tight-lipped Colonel Preston in the tense headquarters scenes, the cast consists entirely of either unknowns or foreigners. You may remember Hannah from the first two Brendan Fraser "Mummy" movies or perhaps the romantic comedy "Four Weddings and a Funeral." Leading man Ed Westwick has appeared in some big-name films, such as "Children of Men" (2006), "Son of Rambow" (2007), "S. Darko" (2009), "J. Edgar" (2011), "Romeo & Juliet" (2013) and "Freaks of Nature" (2015), but he hasn't attained celebrity status. Clocking in at 93 suspenseful minutes, this white-knuckled, wartime thriller delivers nearly everything any armchair general could ask for in a high-octane World War II actioneer. From fade in until fadeout, "Enemy Lines" qualifies as an entertaining, sometimes surprising yarn. The narrative twists and turns in the action will keep you guessing.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bad
kopitetimes8 September 2020
Bad acting. Cheaply made. Basic storyline. Hardly any dialogue. No connection to any character. Souless garbage.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Really good story set in the 40's
brandonmckay826 April 2020
Not much wrong with this film. You know exactly what you're going to get & it delivers. Very good story telling, great acting from most. Action shots are really good for the budget. Very good movie to watch, especially if you like old war movies. Sit back & relax for 90 minutes.
10 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hire a military advisor please
rockhoppermedia6 September 2020
7 Minutes in and the Special operations officer is conducting a briefing, wearing the wrong cut of uniform. The medals are forty years too early, the unit badge he is wearing did not come into play till 1993. The costumes are incorrect, and I just gave up there and then.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining low-budget WWII movie
dereklambe6 May 2020
This film does not deserve the low reviews it is getting. It is low budget, and some of the production values are not exactly top-notch, but is it quite entertaining and a lot of the action is exciting. Also, at 90 minutes it is not as bloated and overlong as so many movies nowadays. Worth a watch.
11 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
WWII Informative
michelle-saunders26 June 2021
A relatively palatable WWII film, not too difficult to understand. The negative reviews are harsh. Given a limited budget, this film does well. You go get financing and create your own dream movie. These actors did good in the freezing cold. The action manoeuvres seemed legit. I was grateful that there is a different film, with some new, informative content that was acceptably "M" rated and not MA15+ like most. My son who's very interested in WWII was able to watch and learn without being too frightened. The little girl in the movie did well and the multi-national team realistically worked well.

Enjoy.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
ericthebee-9765922 September 2020
In sum, a very, very bad movie. Key failings (IMHO): 1. Poor attention to detail (e,g, they clearly ran through the wardrobe grabbing any uniforms they saw - inc John Hannah's 1990s RLC uniform, I mean really?), 2. Weak performances (Ed Westwick spends his entire time just trying to look as angry as he can), 3. Cliched script (the usual Brit/Yank, officer/enlisted tensions that have been done to death), 4. Unrealistic combat scenes (blasting away with automatic weapons at close range with little effect - trust me, an MG42 at those sorts of ranges is both accurate and devastating (as Saving Private Ryan managed to portray without too much difficulty)). So, if you like your war movies to be as realistic as possible, this is well worth avoiding. Clearly John Hannah is having to take every role he can. Shame.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wardrobe sucked
The lack of proper uniform wardrobe ruined this movie for me. The "General's" uniform was tore up from the floor up. The "Major" was wearing enlisted marine blues.

Just pathetic.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Like watching a B grade tele movie
CrazySeff4 May 2020
Bad directing, bad acting, badly implemented and very hard to watch for more than ten minutes at a time.

How did someone as talented as John Hannah get involved in this project?
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Giving three stars is generous
banjofred-414-798734 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
We can really appreciate Great War films when we compare them with dross like this. Fury is an excellent film about a team of menon a mission.. There are dozens of other good examples, not all high budget. This is wooden actors reading wooden lines. It is simply impossible to car about any of the characters. The little girl is about the best. The marine is dreadful.

The sniper is about 10 feet away and he still wounds his target, so that the wife can then be taken out. A real sniper would have removed the SS guys head.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good story ut poor special effect
picslover26 September 2020
Very good story. Especially the sound track is moving. But the special effect is poor. I suppose a higher rating if budgets was a little bit more.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful cliched impossible
austinlowes7 November 2020
Where to start? Never ending magazines, dodging m42 strafing, radios ranging from England to Poland, radar on fishing boat, multi lingual farm peasants, the tough guy but caring yank, the Soviets as a 2nd enemy in '43, long range pistols, the wounded staying behind to sacrifice, the escape exactly on time to the second at the exact place. Based on a true story? Well WW2 did happen. So bad not even funny.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's a steady ww2 film entertaining enough
mheapy26 April 2022
Firstly if you press play on this Netflix film & expect Saving Private Ryan or Band of Brothers level quality then you're an idiot & it really isn't pretending to be, It's a run of the mill ww2 rescue operation, bit ropey & predictable but fun enough & I wanted to see how it ended which is more than can be said for some films, I think sometimes ppl expect to much sometimes.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't want your time and money
orzoomer27 May 2020
There's a reason this film is unrated. It sucks. The plot is a mess, the sea shots are so fake it's insulting. Battle scenes are unbelievable. Couldn't be more disappointed with a 'based on a true story'.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I liked it!
SuperNaturalGrl8729 April 2020
I thought it was great! If you're expecting some big flashy gore fest of a war movie then move along. Not all war stories are going to be a bloodbath with screaming and swearing. If you want a movie with a good plot and action then watch this. If you want a movie like Overlord then go watch that garbage.
10 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Movie-great story and very entertaining
frankwhelan8 September 2020
Don't understand the low rating overall, it's very watchable
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
How can period films be so bad?
richard_markham23 May 2021
I'm no expert, but when the British HQ are using cold war soviet radio sets, you have to wonder...

Lots of reviews commenting on costume errors too.

The scenes at sea were also laughable. Looked like it was filmed in the bathtub.

Weapons all wrong. No ejecting cases. No recoil. Rates of fire all wrong.

Seriously, why bother?

If you are going to make a period film, why would you not bother to make it accurate? It's not like the plot or script is going to carry the film....

I've seen re-enactments at the local village show do a better job of battle scenes.

Does this film have any saving graces? Errrrm. The snow looked real.

Saving Private Ryan it ain't.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Did the writers do any research?
nzuraw4 May 2020
Terrible script and not that great acting. Its 1943, not the 21stcentury. Basic historical references are amiss. Almost borders on distribution as disrespect. Shame really.

1 out of 10. Could have tried harder.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed