Warpath (2020) Poster

(2020)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
I watched it all the way through
jvache1 July 2020
I can't say this is a good movie. It's low budget, with laughable special effects ands a motley group of Indians that look like they come from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds. But, still, I watched it all the way through, partly because it was so funny , both deliberately and unintentionally, but mainly because of Sasha Higgins, who plays Alice Erickson, a Swedish immigrant married to Lucky Erickson, a philanderer who has abandoned her to work a gold mine up in the hills of Colorado.

When Alice hears that an Indian war has broken out in the area of Lucky's mine and that he hasn't been heard from in three months, she sets off to find him, picking up a bounty hunter along the way to help her.

In addition to being beautiful, Ms. Higgins plays the role with just the right amount of absurdity. The movie is so ridiculous that there were actually places where I laughed out loud. Ms. Higgins plays her role for comic effect but manages to be captivating at the same time.

To be honest, I had never heard of her before but I commend her courage in taking up this project.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
LoL!!! one of the worst westerns i've ever seen... so bad i couldnt stop watching
jerrytubb27 September 2020
LoL!!! one of the worst westerns i've ever seen... so bad i couldnt stop watching. I actually enjoyed it in some strange way. The two main characters were actually quite good, but the script, sets, wardrobe, was ultra cheeap. too bad, with a budget and proper editing, camera work & meaningful dialog, it might have been a good movie.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Doesn't get better so give up now.
andyonmob24 July 2020
Poor acting, scenery repeats and bison grazing in the distance while plodding down the same wooded country lane seemed weird. The indians were totally unconvincing as was the choice of musical score. A disappointing portrayal of what probably started off as a decent storyline. A film worth missing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
13 minutes
pwilliams-168252 July 2020
13 minutes is how long I could stand to watch this movie. I've seem high school plays with better acting. I can't say much about the plot, I didn't make it far enough to form an opinion. Seriously, the acting is just plain BAD
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
horrible
zoombroom8615 July 2020
Cheesy special effects, acting, and dialogue. I could only take the first 10 or so minutes. I think the budget for the movie was $47.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Comedy?
joepcampbell6 July 2020
Could not make my mind up if it was meant to be a comedy or not was thinking all the way through they're not serious lol. Was the first western? I have every seen with overweight Indians. So bad it was almost good. The things you watch in lockdown!!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I am looking for my husband
nogodnomasters1 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Alice (Sasha Higgins) decides to go to Colorado to locate her loser husband looking for gold. She is assisted by bounty hunter Cole (Thom Mathews) to traverse dangerous Indian territory.

The plot and dialogue were downright bad. It made it tough for anyone who might have had any acting ability. Not the worst western I have seen, but it comes close. Sasha as a blonde reminded me of Susan Oliver. The film takes place in 1878, decades before "Frankie and Johnny" was composed.

Guide: F-word. Implied sex. Butt nudity (Sasha Higgins)
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If you like community theater....
themelbrown3 January 2021
If you like community theater, but think their budget is too high and their acting is too good, then you have come to the right place. You'll also appreciate the egregious historical inaccuracies. It appears at one point they fully ran out of money for costume and makeup so they told the cast to wear their own jeans and do their own hair/makeup. If you stay until the end you are required to clap politely just like when your fifth grader made the back row chorus. Enjoy!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
comparing apples to apples
A_Different_Drummer7 April 2021
Makes the shlock films from the early 70's art houses look like Oscar material in comparison. The opening segment is a close up of a tape recorder spinning while the audio plays the material in the spinning tape. That is your only warning. Heed it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wasting of time
glozovoy5 December 2021
Extremely poor movie. Looks like student producer and director work. High school drama club level acting. Perhaps, was made to wash somebody's dirty money.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed