The Courier (2019) Poster

(2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
273 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Wasted Talents
johnhow-8258923 November 2019
What's Kurylenko and Oldman doing in such a poorly scripted and directed movie?

Watch out for:

1. Writers' limited vocabulary is confined to the F word and screaming fits

2. A bunch of henchmen strolling around in circles in a parking structure

3. The heroine, ex-Bond girl is the female version of John McClane.

4. You'll be eager to walk out of the cinema midway through the movie and certainly don't care if the good guys slice or die.

Don't waste your time and money on this movie.
110 out of 145 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Definitely 4/10
mrblue-3033116 January 2020
Bad acting, bad dialogue, stupid action scenes. It's definitely 4 of 10. A lot of irrelevant drama.
34 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Equal Parts Diehard/The Transporter in a Closed Car Park!
spookyrat127 November 2022
I think people are being a little hard on this derivative, but quite entertaining action flick. There's nothing particularly original about it, but I didn't mind a couple of different approaches taken.

We don't have Frank the Transporter in his fancy black car, but we do get the female Courier on her flash motor bike, essentially with the same background and doing the same sort of thing on 2 wheels, instead of 4. She is taken advantage of (which she naturally doesn't like) and now must find a way to survive and lead her unintended target/victim to an escape from a large, locked, hotel car park, whilst pursued by numerous, well - armed villains.

Olga Kurylenko is serviceable as the unnamed titular courier and the onscreen relationship she develops with Amit Shah who plays the witness to a murder, Nick Murch, evolves from initially annoying, to quite entertaining by the end of the film. I have to admit Gary Oldman does overact like I've never seen him overact before, in the role of a notorious crime lord who is under house arrest in New York, who seeks the elimination of Murch in London.

This is clearly not a big budget film, but unlike others on this forum, I thought the production standards were quite reasonable. The set action pieces were pretty good (without being superlative) and at least they were reasonably lit and not overly dependent on close-ups and super - quick editing. Having much of the story take place in just 2 venues, does help I suppose, when you're on a tight budget.

I did appreciate the fact that this movie features a heroine rather than a hero, a factor I feel tends to enrage many of the fanboys of this type of genre. I also liked the fact that she had to be quite inventive in her defensive strategies, as the screenplay gave reasons she frequently couldn't utilise captured automatic weapons. And like the John McClane Diehard character, it was also more realistic, to see her character, get knocked around quite a bit, by the film's conclusion, which does feature a quite unnecessary final twist.

The other obvious plot hole which needs to be overlooked by prospective viewers is that this is a large car park with lots of cars and yet, no one else ever seems to want to get their vehicle, nor contact hotel management or the police, as to why their cars are inaccessible and why an evident extended gunfight is occurring.

Nevertheless, I really don't think action film aficionados should be put off engaging with this film by the current IMDB rating of 4.8. The Courier is a better film than that score would indicate.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad.
bombersflyup14 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The Courier couldn't get much worse to be honest.

Poor characters, horrible dialogue and unbelievable action sequences. I didn't care about anything that was happening and there isn't one positive thing to say about it. There isn't even any lead-in, just this is the situation accompanied with amateur flashbacks. One of the worst characters to ever exist Nick keeps asking why she's doing this, but unfortunately not even the director knows Nick.
70 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A sloppy, choppy mess.
ramfat22 November 2019
Terrible editing, Horrible soundtrack, cardboard characters. The whole movie feels like we are following a film crew around while the actors rehearse their lines. Gary Oldman will apparently take any job he can get. He does wear an eye-patch though...good call by the wardrobe department; they really earned their keep.
156 out of 204 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It's a B-movie gone broke
euhunter-488-47469223 November 2019
I have no idea how they persuaded Olga Kurylenko and Gary Oldman to star in such a waste of time. Interminable motorcycle shots with wrong engine sounds, like someone who's never heard a motorcycle in their life was responsible for the sound effects. Fighting scenes are from the 80's movies and there's a bunch of scenes with (really useless and misplaced) gore. Boring all the way to Mars, don't waste your life watching it. I gave it a two instead of a one because of Kurylenko and Oldman, although i can't imagine why they did it.
83 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining
LoremIpsum32125 November 2019
The low rating is completely off, in my opinion. Some trash productions get praise by fake reviews and sometimes also by real ones, but something like The Courier gets totally smashed? Yeah, suuure...

In terms of action, and hence entertaining, it delivers. The film uses a limited setting and a limited timeframe for its story, not many nonsense distractions, it's rather straight to the point. That's what I personally like in action thrillers.

Kurylenko did a good job, Oldman falls short, Shah is OK, Moseley pretty bad. Aim the hand-to-hand fighting parts for realism or for certain Hong Hong ingenuity? Nope. Do villains make stupid mistakes and sometimes also the heroine? Happens, quite typical for the genre, so who cares, it's fiction and not the reinvention of action cinema.

Of course, the story is simple, characters not complex and dialogues rather basic, but who watches a film like this for that? What do some people expect here, Shakespeare?

You want something simple that won't win Oscars, just to sit back and relax, then you could do a lot worse.

Normally I would give it a very solid 6, but now a 7 it is.

PS: One here compared it to Salt in terms of how it's done right... What on earth? Salt is way more unrealistic in every way, had a much, much higher budget and is still just the inferior flick, but that's my opinion. Anna was recommended instead by another one, which wasn't bad, but also not as entertaining and for sure a lot less believable, just like Salt. Those 2 films were more 'complex', pretentious and stupid, with more money put in and those idiotic spy-'twists' of which I'm sick of. Another one said the soundtrack was bad... Huh? Well, I found it to be atmospheric and fitting. I better don't want to know what that person considers a good OST then.
58 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
ouch
mickb4423 November 2019
Painful to watch, cardboard acting, stupid story, cant believe Oldman and Kurylenko took part in this.
81 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all!
popsalicious23 November 2019
Not sure why some people rate this at below 5, they clearly weren't watching this particular movie! Tbh it started off cheesy, but gradually got better. It's well worth the watch, if it's action you're after!
57 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't Bother..
mrscrispy24 November 2019
What a waste of time, energy & oxygen this film was. You want a Eastern Block Assassin Chick Flick - watch ANNA..
66 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A fun film not to be taken seriously.
crimsontc17 September 2020
The Courier is a typical 80s action with over the top fights and the usual amount of violence. The film itself is fun and paced well. Olga Kurylenko has excellent presence and her ability to portray the role is without a doubt what makes the film entertaining. Amit Shah is little more then a prop during the majority of the film. But the film works by presenting an escape and hunt scenario. A great film if you suspend belief and are looking for a good action.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I don't get the bad reviews, this was a fun action movie.
Beard_Of_Serpico27 July 2020
The Courier stars Olga Kurylenko as a mysterious and unstoppable ex-military operative who has to protect the star witness who is due to testify against Gary Oldman's New York crime lord.

It isn't the deepest story and it's not a tour de force like There Will Be Blood but it isn't trying to be. It aims to be an entertaining action movie with a cool and sexy lead and it's pulls that off with style. Pretty much the whole movie takes place in a multi-story car park and although it's confined to a single location it's never dull and the action is well done and surprisingly brutal and gory. It has it's silly moments and i found Amit Shah's character to be really annoying but is it a bad movie? Hell no, i've seen more well known movies with ten times the budget of this which are absolutely terrible. It's turn your brain off balls to the wall bloody action and since when was that a bad thing?

If you're a fan of action movies especially from the glory days before everyone was so easily offended then check it out, it's a fun time.
20 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Just how did I stick though this?
armelvin735 January 2020
I felt like I was doing my own MST3K commentary during the whole film.
32 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Tediously Boring
nebk2 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The Courier is a by the numbers mediocre action thriller with a few decent actors who can't do anything to elevate the poor script and story. Furthermore the music score which is supposed to be exciting is more annoying than anything else.

The premise of the film is that a witness is supposed to testify via satellite link against a crime boss played by Gary Oldman. A courier played by Olga Kurylenko delivers the equipment for the satellite link up. It turns out that the package is in fact a ciyanide device ment to kill the witness. Surprise, surprise but that doesn't happen. She saves the witness and keeps on fighting against corrupt agents and hired thugs who literally can't find them in a locked down car park. And when they do find them they turn into incompetents and miss every chance to take them out. It is revealed later that the courier is in fact an ex special ops member and there is an inconsequential back story to prolong the movie. Ludicrous doesn't even cover it. And the dialogue as well as the acting by the supporting cast gets worse and worse as the movie goes on.

Overall a poor effort which Gary Oldman probably took on in order to finance his directorial project coming out in a year or two and the others took on for a paycheck and a chance to work with Gary Oldman.
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hard to watch even in fast forward
leon-geyer27 November 2019
As ouch says: painful. Pity Oldmans, Kurylenkos and Shas talent wasted in this. The storyline is plain, the little dialogues absolutely dump, the editing and sound try to force suspense and fail spectacularly. But the worst is the direction. A good example how bad direction can ruin good acting.... Some actors managed to still make their characters acceptable, like the mentioned, but some are, I guess due the directing, insufferable, like Moseley. I am sure the director has better (in the sense of my taste) work, too - overstatement can have humor, but it is easy to mismanage. The only thing I liked in the film was that in the action scenes, the characters were often realistic - not talking of splatter blood, but the acting of pain and fear.
42 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Painful to watch
tanmyc8 December 2019
Painful to watch. Ridiculous story, how the hell they can't kill the 2 rabbits in such a small hole i.e. 3 or 4 level parking garage. Most of the men were huge, lots of guns and had a high tech assassin, still can't kill the rabbits. OMG, she is better than Rambo. If time is of the essence, why waste so much time talking and taunting. Furthermore, some of the dialogue and non violent scenes e.g. Oldman listening to music was agonizing to watch. Cant believe it Oldman Oscar winner involved in this.
29 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
just entertaining
lifelinespublishing22 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was entertaining that I can say, with a lot of action scenes and fight scenes between the Courier and the Bad Guys., Gary Oldman is on point as well though Olga really has a hard time delivering emotions but lucky for her, The Courier did not have that much emotion on her because of what happened to her and her brother.

I would not totally recommend this but if you can watch it, watch it....just to pass the time.
23 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Kurylenko and Shah held the film together.
LordCommandar23 November 2019
Kurylenko and Shah held the film together, from all the no talent European contract killers in the film. Their chemistry was spot on. But what's the deal with Oldman lately? He's becoming the next Nick Cage by taking all these shoddy roles. Mulroney's role came alive in the very last scene....OK, but again, shoddy role. Anyway, good action, but story very meh. Good for a one time watch.
54 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not the best action movie
staunton-gary5 April 2021
However, this movie was entertaining. Some of the acting performances were below average, even for Gary Oldman. By the way, make sure you don't omit the R if you google him. The movie is watchable and I'd recommend it to watch, just don't expect award winning performances.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Transporter it is NOT
surferx-598533 December 2019
Unfortunately, this tries very hard (but fails) to be a TRANSPORTER. Don't get me wrong.I love Olga Kurlyenko and Gary Oldman but the storyline is paperthin. Is it me but does anybody notice that almost ALL movies tend to have at least ONE English character. In this movie, the witness' job is merely to being as obnoxious as possible. Expletives abound but after a while it does get to be kind of tedious. I can only recall one scene - obviously created for the comedic effect but it just fell flat (pardon the pun). There is absolutely no chemistry between Olga and the witness and poor Gary Oldman. What dragged him to do this movie? He is a much-talented actor. The storyline - just because ONE witness saw him kill another baddie - his whole cartel comes crumbling down? Olga and Gary's talents wasted.
25 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Writing bad but they had the talent.
copasetic-x22 November 2019
If you've ever seen Olga K in other films, she's gorgeous & has the ability to pull off action, suspense & wit. This was sadly not the best job done by the writers & directors...and it may have something to do with copying "The Transporter" material. Hot chic riding a sweet bike & kicking ass... I didn't watch this movie for Oldman. I dig Olga & I think she'll bounce back soon!
37 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A decent action movie.
yogeshevolution29 November 2019
The movie is really nice with full action pack performance. The story seems similar to other movies but it really keeps you entertain and interested. The movie surely deserves better rating than 5.A good entertaining one.
12 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Parking Lot Trash
pkdyer196523 November 2019
Trailers are very deceptive, I thought this looked a decent thriller but it turned out to be a low budget dud. I'm a fan of Gary Oldman his last two films have been low budget, whats happened to his career ? Oscar winner to this dross. Olga Kurylenko carries this film to a certain degree as a female John McLean. Watch this after a few pints if you're lucky you will forget it next day.
42 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Does not deliver
juliencrispin11 January 2020
Slow to get going, but when it does you have already wasted more time that you should have. Sorry but it needed editing down to 1 episode of an action series that didn't make it past the 1st episode.
22 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ungodly bad
dspence-420261 December 2019
I'm into cheesy movies with crazy plots, stories and just down right nutty directing but damn... this has got to be a down right shame to the studios and investors. The acting is BEYOND awful.

Don't get me wrong, Gary Oldman is the man and I love his performance in this but everyone else and everything else is not worth the film it's printed on.

If you like BMW bikes changing gears 15 times in a single shot then this movie is for you. Oh, and a BMW getting hot wired, Oh, and a BMW hitting the bad guys and a BMW getting shot 300 times with only 15 bullet holes then this is for you.

Save yourself 1hr 40 mins of your life and move on.
19 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed