Mercury (II) (2018) User Reviews

Mercury Review: A decent thriller with its climax, performances and a few suspenseful moments as the only saving grace.

[Achyut_Prashast_Singh · 6/10 · 13 April 2018]

Movie: Mercury (U): Drama/Horror/Thriller - Silent

MERCURY is simply a well-intentioned movie. It talks about environmental issues well but what it doesn't succeed in, is building up a strong, gripping plot.

Positives:

• Performances are a major plus, especially that of Prabhudheva.
• The second half has some good suspenseful moments.
• The interval blockade is well scripted.
• The technical aspects are top notch.
• The climax turns out to be a game changer for the whole movie, and it's exactly the point when the emotions are heartfelt.

Negatives:

• Even though it's well known that it's a "silent thriller", the sign language is very hard to interpret and this makes the film even more convoluted. The silence needed is not actually present.
• The first half is very slow and almost nothing big happens till the interval blockade.
• The ending is a bit dragged.

Repeat value: No

MERCURY is just a decent thriller which is worth watching for its experimentation with the silent cinema without actually being much silent. The efforts can be seen in every frame and Karthik Subbaraj does pass the test with flying colours. But it's definitely not his best work, and given the way the audience has turned up (I watched the Hindi titled version and including me, there were only two persons in the hall), the box office prospects seem rather dim. Still, give it a try. It's really a refreshing experience, and you can't really deny that.

Worth watching once and really isn't that disappointing

[Vetrrich_Chelvan · 6/10 · 30 May 2018]

The title of the movie and the plot is irrelevant. The movie starts with silence and we actually enjoy it. The place where subtitles are shown, we start feeling of watching completely an alienated film.

The story has plot holes in it but the actors save the show. Kudos to Prabhudheva who was the one man of the show. The story is made flexible.

To earn a wider range of audience and to convince the story, all the people in the movie are made deaf and dumb.

Two stars for acting and One star for nail biting scenes. Three stars for music.

Mercury is worth watching for Subbaraj's direction and its technical excellence.

[shobanchittuprolu · 7/10 · 15 April 2018]

Mercury (2018):

With three acclaimed films in his filmography,Karthik Subbaraj became a favorite for movie-buffs all over India.He once again comes up with a film that is not everyday fare. Karthik Subbaraj once again proves he is gutsy and audacious enough to try his hands at a silent film especially to a modern tech-savvy audience who get restless when a scene goes silent.So how is it?

Plot:

The film is set amidst a group of five deaf and dumb friends who accidentally kill a man(Prabhu Deva) during a road journey. Appalled with their ghostly crime, they cremate the body in a nearby forest. But to their bad luck, the dead man comes live and makes their life hell. Well, how does all this happen forms the entire crux of the film.

My Review:

Surprisingly,Mercury is the weakest in the terms of Subbaraj's writing.While his previous films have terrific writing with intense drama,Mercury is just the regular Hollywood plot but this is where Subbaraj showcased all his direction skills.We can see his mark in every scene of the film.

Disability in films is generally an underdog trait. But here, Subbaraj spends a languid opening twenty minutes establishing their chemistry so that it's not sympathy but empathy that will come to define their circumstances. Even their sign language is shown throughout the film without any subtitles.

This film totally belongs to technical departments who gave their 100% output.Santhosh Narayanan's music elevates the intensity of the scenes put on display. The violins used as part of the BGM, in particular, are beautiful and sounds soothing to the ear.National-award winning cinematographer Tirru is one of the silent heroes of the film. The shot-divisions, camera movement, and the lighting not only set the mood but also set the scary mood.

Performances are good.Indhuja is the show stealer of the film.Rest of the cast is good.

So,Mercury is worth watching for Subbaraj's direction and its technical excellence.

My Rating 7/10

worth watching as an experiment

[beevenkat · 6/10 · 14 April 2019]

#MercuryMovie is a hushed horror film, but it doesnt make your hair stand on end. A group of friends, 4 males n 1 female, meet in an isolated house. A late night drive results in a man getting killed. While trying to dump his body, they enter an abandoned factory where they get slain, one by one. Since there r no dialogues, sound plays a crucial role in the film. Prabudeva impresses, as the revenge-seeking dead man. His makeup is good. Performances r decent. Not a prodigious film, but worth watching as an experimentation. Rating 3/5.

Silent Horror thriller with a warm touch of love

[shabin-sajan · 6/10 · 17 January 2019]

A Silent horror movie , and its very differently and innovative portrayed. Even though it was a Horror movie i didn't scare of any moment/scenes but i did like the concept of the movie and loved the ending with a touch of love. And the first dragged and abit slow. Few sign languages in the movie were not conveyed to me properly as i'm not into the sign language thing. Its a one time watchable movie but a creative movie by Karthik with pretty good performance by Prabhu

Not so good storyline but good to watch

[royalmanideeppaisa · 7/10 · 10 December 2020]

Overall movie was good But I don't like the climax

Vague storyline, does not engage. Good performance saves!

[muthumv · 4/10 · 16 April 2018]

MERCURY: I felt the storyline is very vague, too many loose ends as well. Lots of Hows '?' .. The story doesn't keep you engaged, also draggy. Few portions that needs to be highlighted where just passing moments & portions that should've been short, were very long.

I appreciate the intention though, targeting the corporate hassles that affect the environment & ultimately human-lives. But this could've been easily dealt with through a short-film, if it's going to be a feature film, then audience like me, expect little more clarity, logic & story that justifies the 2 hours run-time.

Mercury : Review

[akassh-04855 · 9/10 · 24 April 2018]

A Silent Film After 30 Years In The Indian Film History. That To From A Bunch Of Youngsters. Karthik Subbaraj Stands Tall. Kudos!!!!!

Review :- PROS:- 1. Actors 2. Technical Department 3.Direction 4.Screenplay & Story

CONS:- 1. Lag @ The First Half 2.Subtitles

Note :- At The Starting You May Not Understand The Film. But Once You Are At The Climax Of The Film, You Will Definitely Appreciate The Film.

Capsule Review: Mercury

[nairtejas · 4/10 · 13 April 2018]

For a silent film, Mercury's soundtrack has enough going on. Unfortunately, that is the only thing going on here as you end up being sermoned by director-writer Karthik Subbaraj about the hazards of mercury poisoning in what feels like a contrived thriller at best. Five youngsters - all both deaf and dumb - are out partying at a farmhouse. It is the adolescent nature in them that drives them to go on a quick outing in the middle of the night. What starts like a merry trip with two of them even introducing their love for each other comes to a screeching halt when they find a dead body (Prabhu Deva). Because none of them can hear, the further proceedings in the film become a bit challenging to follow. With Subbaraj throwing flashbacks at you, there's a constant sense of apprehension in the narrative, which even the smartest viewer will find slightly annoying. The use of ambient score earns brownie points here, but this is no Pushpak Vimana (1987) or Raja Harishchandra (1913) which Mercury boasts of being inspired from. This thriller has been meticulously plotted so as to turn it into a silent film, which is how dictionaries around the world define the term "gimmick", even in cinema parlance. Even as a well-shot thriller, it does suffer from huge plotholes and conceptual issues because at one point you have Deva acting like a victim of mercury poisoning (the main theme) and at other he has shades of paranormal activity. The hybrid may be true but writer Subbaraj hardly hints at their combination, instead always focusing on how the camera captures the actors' emotive faces or forcing the audience stoop at their seats awaiting a jump-scare. Mercury starts off well but quickly goes downhill to become a boring stash of a soundtrack-driven drivel. With unintentional humor scattered all over the place and amateur performances by the lead actors, there is only so much to appreciate in this thriller. Which is not enough to justify a ticket price especially when there are better films out there. TN.

Brilliantly-crafted thriller, but that's not essential!

[myselfninad · 8/10 · 26 May 2018]

Karthik Subbaraj begins with the routine horror built up which has a strong effect over the impactful events. While unfolding at somewhat leisure pace which keeps stimulating the horror effect inconsistently. The sound heavy silent thriller becomes chilling once the thrilling entity enters, we start absorbing and the need of "silence". Although, the scares are less - what builds up scarily and eerily is Karthik's effective handling of the sensory modalities - deprecating us to breathe for a while. The unique conflict between senses - sight and sound trembles into a thrilling cat and mouse game.

It's definitely a brilliantly-crafted thriller but that's not essential. The major tonal shift is abrupt which throws us off the dark track while Karthik tries to get hold of social theme - environmentalism. Nevertheless, it's commendably rendered for the effect along with fine bunch of cast including the gutsy Prabhu Deva.

"Mercury" is a noisy thriller at it's best though marketed as a silent thriller film, it makes us sick with the toxic green hue and Karthik's fearless and gutsy filmmaking sails safely through this interesting cinematic venture.

Worstest

[saru2020 · 2/10 · 20 April 2018]

The worstest movie of the director, totally dissappointed. Could've appreciated if it would've been a documentary or even a short film. Those affected/lost lives don't deserve this crap. I'm thinking: Rajnikanth should stay away from this director.

Just couldnt watch any more of it

[omendata · 2/10 · 27 May 2018]

I suppose some folks can sit through this but I simply found it tedious and switched off after the first 15 mins - crazy idea I guess its an Indian thing just not my bag!

Not only dance but also acting 😲

[sayantan-36960 · 8/10 · 28 October 2018]

Prabhu Deva kills acting this time. Everyone is awesome. Soundtrack is really good. And the best part of this movie is it will take u to the edge of ur seat

The worst movie ever made in the history of cinema.

[zetret · 1/10 · 29 May 2018]

Quite easily the worst screenplay and direction of any movie made in the HISTORY of cinema. The awfulness of the story and screenplay are equally matched by the acting performances. I don't understand how movies like "The Room" are considered the worst, when crap like this exists in the world. Please spread the word and let's make this officially the worst movie ever made.

The director has no clue about the subject. I am sure even middle school children can think better than this. The film is so reductive, and claims that there are ghosts that can enter someone's body and can kill people. What a horrendous film. I just threw up before writing this review.

Karthik Subburaj should officially be named the worst director of Indian and Tamil cinema.

Wow

[Jithindurden · 8/10 · 9 June 2018]

I think this is the first Indian film since Pushpak to use no dialogues in it, although here it is because all the major characters are mute and deaf. The sign language was not completely comprehensible for those who doesn't know it without subtitles but relating to the context it was not that hard to follow. The plot is a very simple horror movie setup but the execution is impressive. The cinematography, the steampunk look, use of shadows etc were brilliant. The atmosphere was really perfect and the sound design is also spectacular, especially the blind v deaf scenes. There's lot of inspirations that can be found here but even when there is no dialogues and the whole setting that can give an other worldly feel at the end it shows how much of an Indian film it still is. For some that must have been a negative but it wasn't that bad in my opinion.