"Once Upon a Time" Sisterhood (TV Episode 2018) Poster

(TV Series)

(2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A tale of two sisters
TheLittleSongbird4 August 2020
Any episode centring around Drizella is more than welcome. As far as Season 7 of 'Once Upon a Time' goes, she is the character with the most depth to her and is one of the show's best and most rootable characters at this point. Especially when it gives her further development and advances her character and what is already known about her, which cannot be said for too much of the season's character and story writing.

Personally do not agree that Season 7 of 'Once Upon a Time' got worse with "Sisterhood" and not for the reasons given. Actually thought that with "Sisterhood" the season and show got better. It is not close to being my definition of a great episode and has a good deal of problems, but after such a quality dip with the previous four episodes ("A Taste of the Heights" especially) it was the best episode since "The Eighth Witch" in my view and in the high middle of the season's ranking quality-wise. Enough of the season's general flaws are evident but there are signs too of prime-'Once Upon a Time', more so than the previous four episodes.

There is still the feeling of being rather over-stuffed in "Sisterhood", from having too much going on in the story and having too many characters. Meaning that the pace felt rushed, not everything felt followed through enough and some of the content was more interesting than others. Samdi's motivations still don't come over very clearly, being not sure whether he's good or bad, although there is less of the "belonged in another episode" quality that there was in "The Girl in the Tower" his role just muddles what's already going on and he is a bit annoying too.

Henry and Jacinda's subplot, unsurprisingly and as always, is a complete waste of time and serves no purpose. It is pure cliched soap opera, it is as dull as the most lukewarm of dishwater, there is no chemistry between them and the show clearly didn't know what to do with Henry at this point and merely used him as an accessory. The less said about Dania Ramirez the better, Jacinda always will hold the dubious distinction of "worst 'Once Upon a Time' character ever." The big revelation on the identity of the Candy Killer doesn't make an awful lot of impact, as it involved a character that doesn't, and didn't up to this point, have much personality or development. Was mixed on everything with the coven, it was intriguing but somewhat convoluted too.

"Sisterhood" however does start off on a truly heartfelt note and anybody who has a close bond with their sister will relate to it and the subplot. Everything involving Drizella and Anastasia has tension and emotional impact, likewise with their chemistry. Ivy's character arc is one of the few of Season 7 to have a significant amount of depth. Ivy and Gothel together is very tense and intriguing, and the emotional impact carries over with Ivy and Regina. A lot of depth to Ivy here and Regina's feelings are understandable. It was great to see Weaver play a big role, and a fun one at that, and there is a little progression with the mystery, not much which the story itself acknowledges deliberately with the investigation being slow.

Gothel is suitably sinister, a formidable threat in the flashback story. A vast majority of the character relationships are handled extremely well, especially in the flashbacks and namely Drizella/Ivy-Anastasia and Gothel's conflicts with both sisters. Anastasia is a very interesting and relatable character. Much of the storytelling in involving, less disjointed and the tension and emotion is more than most of the episodes forming the season's second half. Excepting Dania Ramirez, the performances are strong with Adelaide Kane getting top honours. As ever, the episode is well made and scored appropriately, while the writing is very uneven it is improved upon the previous five episodes and what came afterwards.

Overall, decent. 6/10
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Well I loved it very much!?
vincentlucia-377008 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The fact that Gretel was talking about her Brother losing his way and going all crazy just because Witches were ruining his life, I just didn't expect for Nick. A.K.A. Jack or A.K.A. Hansel would be The Who was trying to kill Drizzela or A.K.A. Ivy that he was trying to kill. And trying to kill the other witches as well. Also it was really sad when Ivy or I should say Drizzela had to kill Gretel but she had too so Gothel can let her in the Coven Group.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
After two better episodes the worst low so far
supermaggie16 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The two preceding episodes almost led me to make peace with this show sinking to rockbottom, but the 15th episode was the definitive low so far. I thought I understood the thinking behind the motive to make Cinderella non-white, what the casting directors/producers do not understand or do not care about, however, is that this is not at all the right way to bring all people together peacefully. Why? Because it comes with too high a cost. Twisting traditional characters instead of creating fitting new ones not (only/if at all) gives somebody something, it mainly takes something away (from other people). It's good that you care about African-American and Hispanic children, but discriminating/forgetting about the white ones does not make things better. Taking away from blondes is like an eye for an eye: it leaves the whole world blind/unhappy/discriminatd/unsatisfied. This is NOT the way to go. And not only are you taking away the good from blond girls/people, you even make them the villains: Rapunzel, Gretel - and Gothel, well, yes, she was never the good one, but she was not blond before either, so you twist everything and turn the good blondes into good dark-haired ones or into evil blondes and the evil brunettes (or not-specified) into evil blondes (or in the case of Dr. Facilier into good ones)- equally obvious and heinous. If you want to claim you are doing this against discrimination and propaganda - well, guess again, this is just a different form of discrimation and propaganda. Just because you are too uncreative and lazy in order to come up with new characters and a balanced/natural/ unbiased (in any direction)/politically correct (for everybody) way. And it is obvious that Hollywood nowadays is not only casting blondes merely for villain roles (bonus if they have German or European names - obvious), they do rarely cast them at all, at least in the case of actresses - funnily enough, there is a noticeable increase in (male) blond lead actors over the last years. If you want to cut down on the SUPPOSEDLY privileged (something you do not get to decide!!), you should start with men, if somebody is/has always been privileged, it is rather men - and that in all shapes, forms, colors. But I guess male writers/producers/casting directors are not keen to heed this truth, right? Shame on you, bereaving and defaming and ignoring the truth- good job, makes everybody unhappy.
1 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed