I came to Bull a few years after it started airing so I've been recording older shows in early seasons as they come available. I don't agree with other reviewers that it was bad writing or the bathroom scene gave it away. The title gave that away. Bull's comment about how the police were scared with the new way of testing DNA and possible retrials and the police wanted the issue to go away. Bull's clients always get off. I like the challenge of figuring out who really did it.
3 Reviews
Horrible script: bad guest character, massive plot holes
morandb10 May 2017
The script writer - I use that term generously - has the guest character (played by Eliza Dushku) be impossibly perfect with extensive dialogue discussing how superior she is. If this had been Young-Adult fiction, the character would have been derided as a "Mary Sue".
The script has none of the various features that make the show entertaining, for example there is virtually none of Bull & Co analyzing the individual jurors.
Worse, the script has obvious, head-smacking plot holes.
The script has none of the various features that make the show entertaining, for example there is virtually none of Bull & Co analyzing the individual jurors.
Worse, the script has obvious, head-smacking plot holes.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
