The Bachelor Next Door (TV Movie 2017) Poster

(2017 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Decent Made-For-TV Melodrama...
vnssyndrome895 September 2023
THE BACHELOR NEXT DOOR (TV Movie 2017)

If You Don't Understand MELODRAMAS, QUIT WATCHING AND REVIEWING THEM!

BASIC PLOT: Alex (Haylie Duff) is a thirtysomething artist, still dealing with the ghosts of her past. A sexual assault, by a college boyfriend has left her stuck, reliving the trauma, and unable to move on. It's affected all aspects of her life; her art has stagnated, and her relationship with her long-time boyfriend, Gavin (Steven Bruns), has become filled with insouciance. Alex is desperate for change, anything to alleviate her disenchantment. Little does she realize, change is coming, and the form it will take, will be one of her forgotten ghosts.

A chance meeting with the new neighbor, Donnie (Michael Welch), leaves Alex feeling hopeful. She thinks he might be a good match for her sister, Sage (Brittany Underwood), but at the same time, there's something familiar and unusual about Donnie. Could she have met him some place before? Gavin has an instant dislike for him, although he can't articulate why. Is Donnie's familiarity benign, or is a latent memory, warning them from the past?

WHAT WORKS: *Michael Welch does another excellent job as both a psycho, and an object of pity. His facial expressions relate both venom and pain, as well as self satisfaction.

*Michael Feifer has written and directed some of my favorite guilty pleasures, like Inspired to Kill (2016), Born and Missing (2017), and even 16 and Missing (2015) (cheesy goodness!). But he's also done some real stinkers, like Wrongfully Accused (2019) (how do you screw up a movie with AnnaLynne McCord? Cast her in a victim role, that's how!) This movie falls somewhere in the middle, mainly because your antagonist is more sympathetic, than your protagonists (never a good thing!).

WHAT DOESN'T WORK: *None of the actors look like a college students, in the flashback scenes.

Having them interact with real 18 year olds makes it worse. Why not cast young lookalikes in the flashback scenes?!

*Haylie Duff and Steven Bruns have no chemistry AT ALL! It makes their relationship much less believable.

*What is with all the tight close-ups, and faraway shots? It's distracting, and takes away from the storytelling. I don't know if it was Michael Feifer's decision as director, or Jordi Ruiz Masó, as cinematographer, but either way, it's awkward and discommodious. Also, who thinks it's a good idea to have objects in the way of your characters, in almost EVERY SHOT! This DOES NOT make it more believable, like you're there in the room, IT'S JUST IRRITATING! If done correctly, you should be able to storyboard your entire movie, using individual stills. Not the case here, so your visual storytelling is a FAIL!

*Why is Gavin (Steven Bruns) immediately suspicious of Donnie (Michael Welch)? I understand male jealousies, but his reaction seems excessive and self-indulgent. So, either you're telling us he's weak and petty, or he's a control freak, bordering on abusive, neither are good character traits for the protagonist. Characters have to have believable motivations, and Gavin's "gut instinct", after spending only 20 seconds with the guy, is not enough.

*Have we forgotten so much what it's like to be neighborly, that Gavin's actually mad when Donnie takes out the trash, knowing they are out of town? Or trims the hedges, bordering their two properties? Once again, petty, and not the personality type you'd expect from a financial 'master of the universe'.

*If I thought my neighbor was a stalking psycho, I would NOT go sneaking into his house ALONE!

*Neither Alex or Gavin remember Donnie. They never checked on his well being, never made sure he was ok, nothing. This makes them self-absorbed jerks, NOT qualities you want for your "good guys".

TO RECOMMEND, OR NOT TO RECOMMEND, THAT IS THE QUESTION: *If you're a Haylie Duff or Michael Welch fan, and you like melodramatic thrillers, there are much worse choices out there. There are better ones too, keep that in mind. If you are not a fan of melodramas, or don't understand that they are an art form, going back hundreds of years, then please give this a pass. Otherwise, pop that corn, and enjoy!

CLOSING NOTES: *This is a made-for-tv movie, please keep that in mind before you watch\rate it. TV movies have a much lower budget, and so your expectations should be adjusted.

*I have no connection to the film, or production in ANY way. I am just an honest viewer, who wishes for more straight forward reviews. Hope I helped you out.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very bad TV movie
pat-797-86901516 November 2018
Still the same old story 1000 times retreated, of the poor psychopathic type, in love with a woman who does not even see it. It's poorly constructed, poorly filmed, misinterpreted, it's a total failure!
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Effective and plausible by LMN standards - good acting
phd_travel31 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the better stalker movies. Things start off believable and stay so.

Michael Welch is very effective without overdoing it. He is a good actor and should get better roles - more expressive than some of his Twilight co stars. He plays a man who moves next door to a couple. But he has a past with her unknown to them. He makes the wacko surprisingly sympathetic and creepy at the same time. Hailey Duff is the object of his affection. She is quite alright in this role too.

The final explanation is quite original unlike some Lifetime movies that fail at the crucial moments.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Story
MikeyKup26 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Michael Welch did a great job yet again. I originally knew him from Born Bad, a role he did such a great job with. Anyway, this movie was solid and I thought the depth of his character was interesting. By the end of it, I actually sympathized with his backstory and saw where he was coming from during his final reveal. The villain has got to be the villain, after all, but I understood why he felt the way he did. As for Haylie Duff's character, so much realism there too. I find that many people have no patience for in-depth analysis, so it can quite boring for the average Joe who just wants action and something to happen at every millisecond. This movie takes its sweet time and really delivers most of its substance in the reveal. Either way, a 10/10 in my book. I personally preferred Michael Welch in Born Bad, but being that he played a much less intense character here, I understand it. He's a great actor, and I hope to see him in more roles like this, he makes the perfect villain.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed