"Chicago Fire" The People We Meet (TV Episode 2017) Poster

(TV Series)

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
No. Just no.
drnikic7 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoy Chicago Fire, and suspend disbelief most of the time, but the bone marrow storyline? Nuh uh. There is no reason Severide couldn't have a general anaesthetic instead of regional. Plus, a student doctor doing the procedure? Sigh.

Also a bit over the adoption story, but that's because I don't have a maternal instinct, not for humans anyway.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice Unbelievable Storyline
smartinezmd25 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, it's a nice show. Enjoy the characters. However, it is not realistic that they allow a medical student do the bone marrow harvest. Granted, an attending doctor is supervised but especially in such a painful procedure done without an epidural, there's no way that a student would be allowed. A resident physician, yes; but not a student which is evident by his short white coat.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Suspension of Disbelief Strained
labenji-1216311 March 2024
This episode left me grappling with some glaring issues regarding believability, particularly in its opening scene. The episode opens with the rescue of a young adult who was hiding in a closet during a fire. While I can understand a child's fear leading to such actions, the character appeared to be between 18 and 22 years old, which made the scenario hard to digest.

By the age of 13, common sense should dictate that if one can't escape a burning house, they should seek refuge near a window or on the roof. It strains credulity to think that any adult, especially one of this age range, would opt to hide in a closet during such a life-threatening situation, couple this with the former firefighter turned medical student leading a bone marrow case and procedure. This lack of realism detracted from my enjoyment of the episode, as it felt like a forced plot device rather than a natural progression of the story.

This initial misstep was hard to overlook. I hope that future episodes pay closer attention to maintaining believability, as it is crucial for keeping audiences invested in the narrative.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
My patience with Chicago Fire may run out before the end of this season. Season 5
ronswilliams-031715 April 2024
I'm a huge fan of Chicago PD having recently binged the entire show start to finish. Chicago PD led me to watch Chicago Fire. (Same producers) So I figured it would be the same high quality. Plus I was eager to see how the PD/FIRE crossover episodes played out on "Fire."

I have several quarrels with season 5, but the one pushing my discontent over the cliff is with the actor playing the foster child, Louie. Actually it's two actors as the character is played by twins. (This is a legal production requirement and usually not a problem.) The twins are adorable, so cute to look at.00 But actors they are not. As a result, the character has exactly one facial expression which is somewhat puzzled or scared. I have yet to see the child smile. There is zero personality coming through. And this rings false as all the other characters sing his praise as the most amazing child ever born. The child delivers very few lines, and when he does they are dubbed... his head is turned away from the camera or he is not on screen.

This show has delivered episodes with excellent performances by child actors in the past. In particular, check out season 4 episode 20, "The Last One for Mom." Maxwell Jenkins, a child actor, plays a central part in this episode. This kid turns in a brilliant performance which will move you to tears. My point is, the Chicago Fire casting Department could have done much better in casting this foster child. Especially since the character appears in so many episodes.

The first four seasons of Fire kept my attention but by season 5, the intensity of the soap opera is working my nerves. I don't mind occasional soapy drama but preferably when it's believable and not too melodramatic. Chicago Fire hit this balance, for the most part, until season 5.

Others writing critiques of this episode have noted the ridiculous aspects of the bone marrow storyline. So I won't elaborate on that point.

Most of the actors on Chicago Fire turn in quality, believable performances. In my opinion, only two of the main characters disappoint. Those are Monica Raymund as Gabrielle Dawson, and the station chief, Wallace Boden played by Eamon Walker.

Superficially, Chief Boden is Central-Casting-Perfect as the gruff yet caring leader of this firefighting family. My only objection is that without the subtitles turned on, I can rarely understand everything the actor is saying. He speaks in a raspy whisper. Granted this is his actor's vocal style, but I find it frustrating to follow.

Monica Raymund, as Dawson, is not a bad actress but I find her performance less than believable too much of the time. This may be the fault of the writers who swing her character's behaviour in wildly different directions with each new storyline.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed