Hollywood elite's liberal agenda on full display, backed by distortion and misrepresentation of facts.
Early on, Danny pulls out the tired liberal line about the 2nd amendment being just for "well regulated militia" which is clearly disputed both by the construction of the sentence (the need for the militia being cited as an example of why the keep and bear arms needs to be protected comes first, not after, the declaration of the right) and the deliberate change of wording (it says the "right of the people" NOT "the right of the militia"). If the drafters had meant it just for the militia, they would NOT have granted the right to "the people" as in "We the People".
Secondly, they keep talking "assault rifles" as being legal, but the weapons they use for this discussion are fully automatic weapons which are already illegal. What the gun control lobby typically refers to as an "assault rifle (political term, not a real gun description) is simply a .22 or similar rifle which has cosmetic parts added to make it look like a military rifle. It is totally incapable of the "spray" firing depicted in this show. One trigger pull = one round fired. Just like a handgun or any other rifle or shotgun. True "military weapons" have the ability (rarely used in battle) for emptying the entire magazine at once by holding the trigger down. This is what Hollywood usually shows, but not what the civilian version does.
The entire concept of the father of a mass shooter, being so overcome by grief as to become a mass shooter himself to protest against guns is so ludicrous that only Hollywood could come up with it.
I find it particularly idiotic, but all too commonplace that Hollywood, which makes it's fortune glorifying gun violence, constantly seeks to place the blame on the guns and on legal, responsible owners, instead of on an entertainment culture that has spent billions of dollars portraying violent movie characters as heroes!