Incontrol (2017) Poster

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Should Contain A 'No Answers' Warning At The Start
lewisgraycofely13 May 2019
Watching Incontrol was like reading a good book, only to find that the final pages are missing.

It's not an original idea and the film itself will leave you with many many questions,which I suspect will never be answered.

Its a real shame as it had so much potential but it felt like the writer(s) just gave up towards the end.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Confusing, and lacked tension and suspense
ChrisLFinch17 July 2018
It had strong language, alcohol, drugs, adult scenes, gore, murder, guns and sharp weapons.

I think it could have been more interesting if there was more developed. It had a slow paste at the start and quickly became boring to watch, the first half of the Movie was boring, and predictable, I found the characters developed was half finished. I would of liked a little bit more.

I didn't really like The main character, Samantha who used the device in a selfish way. She made her boss at work say things, so that she could have more time to be addicted to the machine. but I did liked that she tried to get her Mum out of the negative slump she was in, but we never really saw how that played out.

The Movie was kinda of choppy and it felt like there was too many gaps missing and that made it Confusing. I think it needed an ending that explained more about the experiment, and I found that there was a lack of tension and suspense in the Movie because that what I love about Sci-fi Movies that's what I look forward too. I would say if I watched another Movie with the same idea, with the technology but if the story was better, I would be happy to watch it.

I think I saw a little scene with an lgbt charter which I liked but I would of like to see more of it within the Movie. I liked the music that was used and I think it went well with the scenes. The other thing I liked was the acting. I think the people who played victor and mark did a really good job.

This Movie kinda of reminds me of a book which also has a Movie which is called everyday. Its about this thing that calls itself A and each day A wakes up in a diffident body, but with everyday its not A's chose. It just happens and A doesn't know how to stop it.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Taking control
TheLittleSongbird18 June 2018
Was drawn into seeing 'Incontrol' with a cool poster/cover, a very intriguing and creative premise (one of the most innovative for any film seen recently) and as someone with a general appreciation for the genre. That it was low-budget, which from frequent personal experience is rarely a good sign due to that there are so many poor ones out there, made me though apprehensive.

'Incontrol' is a film it doesn't do enough with its potential (although there are far bigger wastes of potential in film) and could have been much better, can't say that it is a great film because it isn't. It is not a terrible film though, as far as recent low-budget film viewings go it's one of the better and more watchable ones easily. It certainly could have been far worse, considering the large number of films seen recently being mediocre at best and irredeemably terrible at worst.

Lets start with the positives. The scenery is atmospheric and spooky and 'Incontrol' is surprisingly well shot and easy on the eye, was expecting a cheap looking film and to me that wasn't the case here. The music is suitably ominous.

Found that the acting was not bad, found it better than average if not much more.

Also that there were a few nice moments that intrigued and there was tension, suspense and creepiness, the first half is very promising and has a good deal of unsettlement. At least the film was not hard to follow and the story structure was generally coherent.

Unfortunately, the story does feel paper thin, disjointed and over-stretched and after the promising first half the film became duller, more predictable, more senseless and less scary in the second, with the outcome revealed too early and the ending not feeling tied up enough. The characters are too sketchy and with nowhere near enough to make one want to endear to them and some of the decision making and behaviour induces face-palming. The effects are ropy at best.

Dialogue can be stilted and rambling, with lots of clichés and no depth whatsoever (definitely one of the worst assets), while the pace goes to a standstill very quickly and drags with very little going on worth caring about. Found too many the supposedly shocking moments not surprising or scary and the supposedly creepy atmosphere dreary, due to the excessive obviousness, a lot of dumb and vague moments and explanations and the lack of tension and suspense. Tonally, it feels unfocused and muddled from trying to do too much.

There are too many underdeveloped plot elements and often nonsensical character motivations, while too many of the things to make you jump or shocked are far from creative or scary and are pretty tame. There is not enough threat here and what there is of it tends to be used poorly, too much of the second half is unimaginative and more odd than creepy, with little sense of horror or urgency. Momentum sags later on and the direction has its assured moments but inexperience also shows. There is a general lack of creativity and shocks.

The sound editing can be on the obvious and over-loudly recorded side. The editing is haphazard at times, but really it's the script and the second half that are most problematic here.

Overall, not great but worth a one time watch. 5/10 Bethany Cox
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Missed opportunity.
deloudelouvain8 June 2018
I have mixed feelings after watching Incontrol. The good points were that the story is innovative and the actors were'nt bad. But unfortunately even if the story was innovative it clearly missed the chance to bring a good sci-fi movie. It's a missed opportunity because it could have been much more interesting if developped better. Now you just get a mediocre story, that quickly becomes boring to watch, while the potential to have an intriguing story was there. I didn't get the end at all. Maybe it was open for interpretation but at that point I was already bored with this movie and so I couldn't care less. But I would watch another movie with the same concept if only the story was better.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Rating purely for the premise
Mykewood18 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The acting is meh. The editing & dialogue are borderline terrible. The ambiguous ending would be far more acceptable if the overall film was better. But it's still good enough to discuss, simply because of the premise.

I would love to see this film remade with a better cast, director, & editor.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bland, undeveloped, slow, but watchable.
medlandt-618164 March 2020
In control had potential to be an interesting film. The premise of migrating your mind to another's body is a well tested concept, but in controls rendition of this wasn't too cliché.

Unfortunately the film went nowhere, there was no suspense, excitement or intrigue - well...there was intrigue but this relates more to the feeling of watching the last 10 minutes in bemusement thinking "cmon! Just explain...SOMETHING!?"

The music was very tedious...stylistically you can see what they were aiming at: a fugue like state. But the music ended up just slowing the film down...the plot is slow enough already. A well composed score would have really helped this film realise its considerable potential, emphasising the "post modern" dream state. If they had achieved this sylistic concept more successfully - in score as well as every other element of the film - it may not have mattered that there was woefully written dialogue, cheap cinematography, no real character development and a very lazy plot.

Despite all this I actually enjoyed it in a funny way. As a technical exercise in film making, however, it did not succeed; and as an exercise in "feels" it didn't do too well either, watching it was basically a pleasant way to pass time!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A waste of time!
abdelrahmanhima18 May 2018
A Creepy ending, i really didn't get it! Why does she committed the accident?
4 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some things left up to viewer interpretation
informant-8431828 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The premise behind this movie was pretty interesting, but the story could have been better than 4 young adults using a mysterious piece of technology to hijack rich kids at parties. It seems pretty shallow but I think that most people would do similar things if they could take over someone else's body. Money, sex, drugs and other vices would naturally be the focus of alot of people. The main character Samantha used the device in both a selfish but also virtuous way. She manipulated her boss at work so she could have more time addicted to the machine. But she also tried to get her mother out of the addicted slump she was in, which we never really see how that plays out. Samantha obviously is envious of Marissa's relationship with Mark so she hijacks her for long periods of time, just to live in her shoes.

But to get to the explanation of the movie, it is sort of like the movie Inception, a dream inside a dream thing which is confusing at first to grasp. What is really going on is some kind of experiment to see if people who are observed will act differently than people who are not being watched. Jenny and I think Mark are not who you think they are. They are actually people who are having their bodies being controlled by others whom we do not see. The comment by Jenny at the end when she offers Mark coffee, gives this away. So obviously the machine they have is not the only machine in existence. Someone is using another machine to control them and make them hook up to the machine in Jenny's place. Confused yet? Whomever the people are behind this experiment are, they do not want to leave any lose ends, hence the ending where they make Mark kill Victor, Samantha, Jenny and then himself. But not before he collects the research data and puts it in a box for a shady looking delivery van to pick up. Regarding Victor, I am not entirely sure if he is being controlled. I believe he is not just like Samantha which is why he tries to die in the simulation. Then he tries to escape because he says he can't trust anyone. He was also suspicious of Samantha and where she came from. Anyways, apparently if the host dies while you are hooked up to them, you yourself do not die, as was shown in Victor's case. However, the opposite is not true. When Samantha was hijacking Marissa and was killed by Jenny, her consciousness was trapped forever in Marissa. At first she panics and tries to call Mark, whose voice we can hear mumbling about cleaning up Samantha's body. Samantha is so freaked out by being trapped in Marissa's body that she is distracted and wrecks the car. We later discover that Marissa is indeed Samantha by her jogging routine and eating peanut butter.

Overall the movie I think needed an ending that explained more about the experiment although I think the writers left enough breadcrumbs as to what type of experiment it was. They mentioned rats addicted to morphine when they are caged, but once free act differently. So observing how people acted while hooked to the addictive machine was a large part of the experiment although I am not sure what benefit it is to the scientists.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very intelligent movie that will require you to think
abisio13 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Let's clarify from the beginning. This movie requires you to pay attention to details in order to fully understand it. Sam nerd girl in studying in an university is invited by friend, Mark to hang out with him and two friends. When she arrives to the house she is invited to use a machine (stolen from the university) that allow to get inside the mind of another person and share the body (not the memories). The four invade other richer or badder peoples bodies and experient with things they will never could or dare to do, spoiled rich parties, drugs, orgies or violent acts. After a while they become addicted and some of them leave their lives behind to keep playing with the machine. Until some unexpected events happen; most of them barely explained that requires your fully attention to tie them up.

Many people complained the movie is unfinished or unclear; well it is not. It is not over explained and tries to make public to think and even create some paranoia.

If you are intrigued go to see the movie. If you keep reading there will be some spoilers after that. ****SPOILER ALERT**** The movie hint you that everything was an experiment and some of the peoples were being used as Guinea Pigs and then discarded. The information is hinted in a few dialogs that if you pay proper attention will clarify why things happen.

As a drawback, there are some pacing issues, and some unnecessary romantic movie scenes that has very little to do with the real story but it is the only complain about a very interesting and unexpected movie
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unfinished
cotterpolt6 September 2018
I've never watched a movie that seemed so unfinished. What they had was pretty good. Perhaps they can get the bucks to clear up all the loose ends. Give it a watch because it is interesting and acting is decent, but beware you may feel unsatisfied when it's over.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Premise = many points. Execution and story = points lost
jamesalmos26 April 2018
I have to say up front that the basic theme of the film - being able to experience existence in any other physical state than being in one's own body - is of great personal interest to me, both personally and, at one point, professionally.

So, the filmmakers were at a simultaneous advantage and disadvantage, with respect to me.

That said: from an objective view, they did pretty well with what one can assume of their budget, and the script largely worked with the concept of exploring the meaning of the self alongside the potential trappings brought by the ability to manipulate the reality of that self.

Again, in context of what the cast and crew had to work with, the acting is above b-movie mediocre, albeit not so much as to distract from the obvious and expected dropped lines or unrealized punch points in the script.

Speaking of which, the script laid out a scenario with great potential only to get too bogged down in minutiae and unnecessary dialogue.

I still go back to the ambition and creativity of the premise - body-swapping-type stories have been done many times, but this falls outside the norm due to the psycho-physical interaction and heavier philosophical questions that ensue. This isn't low-budget Face-Off or another failed attempt at the ideas behind Transcendence. These guys went for the gold.

They didn't hit gold due to budget, but at least they tried.

A worthy watch for any sci-fi or sci-leaning fantasy fan. A solid 6 rating - that rating meaning at least 60% of all I've ever seen were lesser than this in some way.

Then again, that's out of at least 10k, so you do the math.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Really enjoyed this... But
wbafan-4140130 March 2024
I came across this film advertised as a cross between 'Looper" and Inception. I also saw its rating, and despite being on the low side, both these films are my cup of tea so gave it a go.

And do you know what. I really enjoyed it. The premise was interesting, the acting definately above average and it was a well made film So why does this not hit the mark whilst Inception and Looper did? Both these films had closure, as simple as that. Despite their budget, I thought this film was potentially up there. But for me this felt like it was only the first third of a very good film. I was watching it, wondering where it was going next in the middle part of the film and then boom.... It's all over. Questions which were just about being asked received no answer whatsoever. Such a shame. Who? Why? What? Still don't know. I would love this to be the beginning of a trilogy personally but because of a twist at the end, I can't see this being the case.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Samantha's Mom
robbrichey17 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a complete review. I simply wanted to correct a single small plot point that others totally missed.

In a number of scenes we see Samantha interacting with her mother, whom she lives with. It is obvious that there is something wrong with the mother. Nothing nefarious, but mom is ill.

Another reviewer stated that Samantha "tried to get her mother out of the addicted slump she was in, which we never really see how that plays out." This statement is incorrect.

Samantha's mother is obviously severely depressed. She is not addicted to anything. A common misconception is that all depressed people are suicidal. This is absolutely not true. Samantha's mom just can't get past the depression and do anything with her life. In one scene Samantha comes into the apartment and finds her mother sitting on the floor sobbing. When asked what's wrong the mother replies that they are out of milk.

After Samantha enters her Mom's thoughts, we see the mom dressed in a business suit and getting into her car. If you are not paying attention you may not understand what happened. But in the end it is good news.

In a scene near the end of the movie we see a young woman, using crutches, leaving a medical clinic. As she passes the reception desk we can hear another woman talking. The young woman briefly looks at that woman. It is Samantha's Mom. So we might surmise that Samantha gave her mother a gentle mental nudge, to clean herself up, get dressed in business attire and go apply for a job. This is truly the one really good thing that happens in this whole movie. Enjoy.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very intriguing and enjoyable movie.
mulcahyj-0754524 May 2020
If you are after a thought provoking film this may be good view. If you are after action or flashy scifi avoid. It made me think so deeply that I rated it 6/10 after viewing then thought it through again and raised it to 7/10. As I read a quick summary of plot I was expecting what I got and it delivered. The film is quite slow moving hence my initial 6/10. But on review I appreciate this was intentional by the film makers to draw you into the story. I had my suspicions on how the movie would conclude but certainly not completely and more than enough to think back through the film for characters actions and intentions. It certainly made you consider how you would react to being within a group of people who could control the minds of others. Made you wonder whether they had only performed actions in control of people, who are unaware they are being controlled, that the people would normally do anyway and to what extent they could push the moral boundaries of what they would do themselves. For me this was explained at the conclusion sufficiently though I can understand why this has left some viewers confused and feeling that they needed more explained at the end. For this movie to fully explain what exactly was going on it would have required to double it running time. And it would also ruined parts of it conclusion as they were the main things to be focused on from the beginning. So yes there is an element of mystery to it. The fact I enjoyed watching it, liked the central and for want of a better words emotional element, then left me wondering about the unexplained and imagining possible explanations made it a very good experience. It is the type of movie that is hard to write a review for as I always do so for anyone who reads this has or has not seen so try to give away too much details of the plot. So I hope those who have viewed the film see where I am coming from in my thoughts of the film and give enough, just, information for those who are considering watching it.

Deep thinking, pun intended, thought proving experience.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watch but don't expect sense
justdisaster12 May 2019
It felt like an unfinished film, so much of it wasn't explained. Despite that I enjoyed it and thought the idea behind it was good
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You still need to eat.
nogodnomasters15 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Samantha (Anja Savcic) is a sociology major. She has been invited to join a small group of people to use a box stolen from a university. When you hook up to the box you can project your consciousness into someone else's mind and control their action, feeling what they feel. Samantha becomes addicted to the box as she is obsessed with being a privileged cheerleader and lives an uninhibited life. Her personal life spirals downward.

Brittany Allen is topped billed but has a minor role as Samantha's employer at a coffee shop. It was a mildly entertaining and interesting low budget film. The ending seemed to have been cut short as I would have expected some sort of revenge factor.

Guide: F-word, sex, nudity.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting
andra-5220827 August 2018
The movie was quite intriguing and kept my attention spanned. The end though was quite confusing and they left us in the air...
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good idea
JimGadget9 May 2019
Good concept and enjoyable to watch, but terrible sound track
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed