Negative (2017) Poster

(I) (2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Negative reaction
TheLittleSongbird4 July 2018
Was drawn into seeing 'Negative', with a cool poster/cover, a promising trailer, an intriguing premise and as someone with a general appreciation for drama/thrillers. That it was low-budget, which from frequent personal experience is rarely a good sign due to that there are so many poor ones out there, made me though apprehensive.

It is sadly however yet another film seen recently, hence some reiteration because the exact same strengths and flaws are here present in those films, that to me was incredibly disappointing considering its potential which it doesn't do anywhere near enough with. 'Negative' is lacklustre, with so many huge flaws and doesn't do enough with its potential, which was hardly small. There is not much to recommend in 'Negative'.

Lets start with the positives.. The scenery is atmospheric and spooky, and is surprisingly well shot.

'Negative' also starts off promisingly, it does intrigue and it does have creepiness in parts.

There is the odd assured directing touches and Katia Winter is quite good.

Going on to the negatives, the story does feel over-stretched and some of it comes over as vague and under-explained in the last third where the film especially became duller, more predictable, more senseless and less unsettled and never gaining momentum. Too many characters are too sketchy and with nowhere near enough to make one want to endear to them. Their annoying and illogical decision making and behaviours frustrates.

Making the film feel bland and forgettable with not enough heart put into it. The effects are ropy at best, the sound quality is obvious and utilised cheaply (being too loud in the build ups and people's reactions) and excepting the quite good Katia Winter the acting isn't great, Sebastian Roche coming off worst, and the chemistry is bland.

Dialogue can be stilted and rambling while the pace and film drags on forever after such an intriguing start and doesn't recover. Even the ending however is botched, due to being so afterthought-like and with no sense of how to end it. Found too many of the supposedly shocking moments not surprising or scary and the supposedly creepy atmosphere dreary, due to the excessive obviousness, a lot of dumb and vague moments and explanations and the lack of tension and suspense.

A lot of 'Negative' has underdeveloped plot elements and often nonsensical and confusing character motivations, while too many of the things to make you shocked are far from creative or unsettling.

There is not enough threat here and what there is of it tends to be used poorly, while it is unimaginative and is more odd than scary or suspenseful, completely failing to show any sense of horror. Some badly sagging momentum too and a lot of weirdness. The direction is uneven, with some assured moments but a lot of ill-at-ease ones too.

Concluding, lacklustre but not without its moments. 4/10 Bethany Cox
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I am saving your life
nogodnomasters8 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Natalie (Katia Winter) has a great opening scene in a Chinese restaurant that we don't see, which is out first clue. In a park, Hollis (Simon Quarterman), a lonely sad sack photographer, snaps a photo of Natalie who somehow manages to find his apartment and demands the photo back. In what amounts to a semi-abduction Hollis goes off with Natalie who has a bag of cash, a gun, and 2 passports, but that is where the Jason Bourne comparisons end. At this point you expect some kind of Bourne tactics, but instead our couple drive a Volvo across the desert and fill us in with background that didn't help the film.

What we find out is that Natalie can take a punch to the face, but the dialogue was Jason Statham bland by design and it lacked the action. Did I mentioned they were driving a Volvo? Who carries a box of strike matches around instead of a Bic? Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you can cut the premise a little slack, you might find a nice little film.
bl-1117 May 2018
Have to write to defend this... it's a perfectly decent film.

Katia Winter (Natalie) is good, captivating even, and everyone else is fine where, except for the photographer, they perform calm, minimalist characters. It fits with the mood of the film, some nice contemplative scenes, and dialog that, while others have said is weak, is also fine. Bits of mundane, predictable conversation isn't so far from real life I suspect, and I think it adds to the film, to keep it 'small'.

Not sure I know what cinematography really is, nor directing for that matter, but it seems relatively well put together.

I would agree that the weakness is the story logic, It almost worked that there was no time spent showing how the pursuers were tracking our leads, but not quite. Even a scene or two of them just asking a shop employee or two would have been enough (there was a nice moment where the male pursuer chats to a little boy tho). But ultimately, never saying how Natalie found our photographer or why it would matter so much to our pursuers kind of gnawed at me.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Absolutely terrible writing and dragged-out unnecessary dialogue
Top_Dawg_Critic20 September 2017
A negative rating for Negative.

I'm not sure what accomplished director/producer/cinematographer Joshua Caldwell was thinking taking on this project.

This film has got to be the epitome of terrible writing and should be a classroom example of 'what not to do' when writing a screenplay. Why would Joshua take on (clearly) amateur writer Adam Gaines script is beyond me. Even his good directing and excellent cinematography could not save this disaster.

Aside from the super obvious plot holes and very poor story overall, the dragged-out unnecessary dialogue made this film unbearable and extremely boring. The way too long 1h 39min film length felt like 4 hours and I found myself saying "get on with it already, who cares!" when the two leads would just ramble on about nothing relevant. This movie may have been interesting if it was a 30 min short film (which oddly enough is the only minimal writing experience Adam Gaines has).

The acting was decent and Katia Winter was very easy on the eyes to look at, but her chemistry with Simon Quarterman was very unconvincing. Maybe it was the boring dialogue they had that made their chemistry absent.

Even the maybe total of 10 minutes of action scenes were overly dragged out. The rest of the film was primarily useless garbage dialogue with absolutely no point to the story - start to finish.

Don't waste your time with this one. See the trailer, and that's all the good and interesting parts you'll need to see.

This gets a 3/10 strictly for the directing and cinematography.
21 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't worry about spoilers nothing happens with this dross
pensterlab21 September 2017
I watch a lot of movies and I like to give them all a chance just in case there is something interesting or exciting to warrant a viewing Unfortunately this movie has none of these features it is pointless and offers nothing in the way of story line,acting or direction The plot is non-existent with the actors just going through the motions and the dialogue is sooo boring its embarrassing. I wish the previous reviewers had posted earlier as this would have saved me 95 mins of my time
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Crap, crap and totally crap
oleingenaess1 December 2018
Crap, crap and totally crap. Did I mention this film was totally crap? Well, it's totally crap 👎
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A bit far-fetched without basic logic
MovieIQTest19 September 2017
The guy still used a cheap, out-dated film camera took pictures? Still got dark room with red light to develop his films? Wow, if the story background is in the 80', I might buy the whole story more willingly. As to the storyline itself, that guy just took pictures randomly in the street, and he randomly took a picture of a woman in the park, then went home to develop what he took that day. Then the woman just showed up, knocked his apartment door and asked him to give her the negative. This is when I WOWed again. Then the so-called two killers, one male and one female Columbian Cartel, just like her showed up at this guy's apartment. Then well, she forced this guy to run away with her to Phoenix, Arizona. The storyline and the scenarios simply got so many loopholes that even a moron would find it difficult to swallow. She had already burnt and dumped everything she used to have, credit cards, phone, SIM card, passports, flash drive...whatever, there's no electronic chip planted under her skin, so why these two Columbian killers could still so easily follow up her trail? Why the British intelligence got to do business with the Columbian Cartel? Why she had to force this deadbeat so-called photographer to run away with her? Just because if without taking a male on the road trip and two assassins chasing after her, the story simply would become impossible to develop?

Bad movies are always full of holes without any logic, this film, although shot with some beautiful road scenes, sunrise and sunset, desert....yet the whole story was just based on a ridiculous ground. The two leading roles, the so-called British agent (Spy? For what?!) and the down-and-out photographer, actually performed pretty good, but again, if the premises of the storyline are ridiculous, there's no way to make them great. When films have to force the viewers to abandon their I.Q. and basic logic senses, they are just BAD films, and this one is no exception.
14 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Total Skip!!
madsyy16 April 2018
I rarely stop watching a movie although how crappy it is. Well for this one I made an exception since its beyond boring. I cant leave long reviews so this is it.. SKIP IT
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Like watching paint dry
oldvinyl22 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
For some reason in this day and age, Hollis is still taking pictures with an old film style camera when he comes across a good looking female in the park and takes her photo. (My first impression was annoyance; I would be pretty annoyed if people took pictures of me on the street and then claimed the right to do so. Without a model release signature such photos are useless.) After developing the pictures in his darkroom the same woman (Natalie) tracks him down and demands the photo and negatives, due apparently to some bad guys chasing her. This is so improbable I began to turn off at this point. The two of them flee to Phoenix. Supposedly Natalie is a former British spy who got mixed up with a Colombian drug cartel and at this point, I realised that I had seen this movie before, 6 times at least, except instead of "Natalie" it was Vin Diesel / Kiefer Sutherland / Van Damme etc. etc., in the part. The movie has very little action and the plot is a waste of time. Give this one a miss.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Understated, psychological thriller
tabuno28 January 2019
Katia Winter star in this understated, psychological thriller about a British operative who ends up having to confiscate a negative from a freelance photographer of a picture he took of her in order to remain as a ghost from those who are seeking to kill her. In the process, both she and the reluctant photographer find themselves on the run. Directed by Joshua Caldwell who also directed Be Somebody (2016), a comedy romance drama that also happens to echo a similar understated tone and offers a refreshing diversion into a more realistic interplay between characters that Negative presents. Negative together with Jennifer Lawrence in Red Sparrow (2018) and Daryl Hannah in The Job (2003) allow female assassin or professional agents that emphasize the psychological drama over the intensity of special effects, explosions, and action scenes of over the top mass killings or hand to hand combat in a choreographed martial arts. At the same time, the sustainability of audience's interest is made much more difficult, especially with the marketing of Negative's trailer with emphasized the action portion of the movie much to the disappointment of a good segment of the audience.

The more authentic characters in this movie provide the audience with a more thoughtful movie about human character though the movie struggles to balance the tension along with the somewhat superficial assumption of how these two people are so easily followed. Other similar movies have been able to incorporate rather more stylized plots or characters in their own psychological drama versions of this genre such as The Numbers Station (2013), The Tailor of Panama (2001), The American (2010), and Eye of the Needle (1981) or comedic versions of this genre such as Miss Meadows (2014), The Matador (2005), Wild Target (2010), Daisy & Violet (2011), and In Bruges (2008). Negative instead remains faithful to its depiction of what might be considered authentic humans whose live intersect in psychologically traumatic ways and how they individually and collectively cope with it.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Unskillful, amateurish, inept movie.
Harfy26 August 2020
Well. What did I just watch ? I'm not sure if I can find words to describe this train wreck.

So, a ramdom dude takes a photo of a random woman in a park. All the mess starts there.

The same woman knocks on the dude' door because...of convenient script. Minutes later, two people (killers) are coming to the dude's door too because of... convenient script.

No action there. Woman and dude take a car and drive away. Still nothing happens.

Half the movie, they finally met an old friend of the woman because of... convenient script.

A few stupid and useless speaking about food or dogs starts there. What's the point ? Guess it's because amateurish script.

There starts a fight between the woman and her "friend". What the what ? The man is way more muscular than her : check their arms o_O The photograph takes a little punch in the face and get instantly knocked out : but the woman can take 3 punches in the face, but no problem at all. Easy peasy because of... convenient script.

Then (because the mess isn't over yet), the two "killers" comes. They are smarter than James Bond, so they park their car in front of the entrance door, because of...convenient script.

The woman gets a plan : we run into the desert, and turn a flashlight on. This way, we will lure the baddies to an empty space. Wait. Seriously, it's your plan ?!? Finally, the photographer shoots the bad lady, because of...convenient script. The woman kills the bad guy who is telling her a few nonsense lines.

OMG. Now, they're safe, and they split. The end.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
MUCH MORE INTRIGUING THAN RATINGS INDICATE!
plasmapilot-9739812 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This psychological thriller was far better than I'd anticipated from posted ratings! The plot was slightly far fetched, but after all it is a movie & certainly did entertain me throughout. The lead actors were unfamiliar to to me, but their portrayals of their characters drew me in so much that I found myself rooting for them during the final scenes! I was glued to the screen until the film's conclusion, and happily surprised and satisfied that I chose to watch!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Contrived, but entertaining with good dialogue.
drewwes-2231422 September 2017
'Negative' is a dialogue film about trust and courage presenting opposite characters on the run from a cartel. There are several well- acted scenes, and others that seem like alternative shots better left out. While some plot elements seem contrived, the direction and choreography work in the movie's favor to drive a sequence of captivating themes by way of conversation that trample the sleaziness and pretentiousness of lesser films, all with the backdrop of a majestic desert that connects Los Angeles and Arizona.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Time wasted
redkass9 July 2018
Give me back my 1.5 hour? Bad in everything. 3 stars for me ( courtesy )
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Reasonable (Ex) Spy thriller ruined by the male lead
acpwebreg25 September 2021
Not a bad movie, typical 'on the run ex-agent' movie with a reasonable storyline. The acting is a bit one dimensional but, at least where Katia Winter is concerned, that seems more down to the script that has her talk like an automaton for the first 75% of the movie. I get get it, she's supposed to be a ruthless professional but it sounds too strained. The single most annoying thing that really spoils the movie though is the male 'lead'. Seriously, a more pathetic excuse for an individual you've never seen, immature, gutless and pathetic he literally does nothing but whinge and bleat throughout the entire movie. Obviously the story needs this individual to be 'normal' and in awe of Natalie but his 'total 24/7 wimp' persona was way overdone and makes him outright annoying to the point of spoiling the movie which would otherwise have been OK, but no more than OK.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just a kind warning for inspired ladies
SaviorsCameraMan20 November 2018
This movie is about a little girl trying to act like a man. This only works in the movies ladies. Try it in real life and that male "hostage" would have you out cold in a heartbeat.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"B" movie perfect for MST3K Rifftrax
onelonedolphin-3838927 December 2020
Everything about this screams "B" movie! The only thing missing are the seats & funny riffs from MST3K
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The female lead is Great; Her costar & the script suck; the plot non-existent
BullMooseWV18 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I can't even muster a sympathy nod for Negative. I'm kind of ticked off that Katia Winter's talents are wasted. Assuming I'm not simply imagining she has said talents - because relative to Simon Quarterman, the plot, (lack of) action. The fluffernutter conversation was the most compelling of the film. Her old buddy studied marshmallow cream???

But even that was more tolerable than Simon's acting. First off, the character is a complete panty waist. Whine whine whine. But part of the time I'm not sure what he's whining about.... it takes him so long to respond to her dialogue, and his lack of inflection, body language, and expressions leave me wondering what his response is.... like when she's having her coming to Jesus moment, spilling her tawdry tale up to then. His expression about the Columbians not exactly being good guy, what the hell.. is he judging her? Is he feigning another bit of inexplicable self righteous indignation which is again completely misplaced. He was the creep snapping strangers pics in the park. He's not blameless. And what I just gave you is as deep as his character gets because the actor and the script are unforgivable. HER character starts having some depth, but the script then inexplicably robs her of it.

Is Simon's comment about his bowels supposed to be funny? How odd and not funny. He's just annoying. He's like the Jar Jar Binks of low budget spy cinema.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring and predictable
stevegill-4431321 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
For most of the movie you can watch them driving down the road. It takes up about half the movie then the rest is just the old Hollywood formula with the very predictable action results and ending pretty much a waste of time no real suspense.

The acting is fair but the plot is laborious and dull. By the time they finally got to the safe house you already knew her friend would turn on them; that is how predictable this film is. I would recommend finding something else to watch though finding a good movie is like looking for lost treasure. This movie was so boring I really am having a hard time meeting the minimum number of words required for a review.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watchable Spy Drama
drewmail-445545 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The previous reviews are not wrong about this movie's far-fetched plot. Basically, a professional photographer takes a random photo of a woman in an LA park. Next thing, the woman shows up at his apartment to claim the photo and negative. Then, bad guys show up and the guy and woman go on the run to Phoenix. The woman turns out to be some sort of english secret agent, who has been declared EOS (execute on sight) by her agency and is also being followed by two Columbian hit men, who also want to kill her. She takes along the photographer to protect him and he does a lot of complaining, until the final showdown when he helps defeat the hit men. It makes little sense why a photograph of the woman spy should be so important and, then, how the bad guys are able to track them so effectively driving across the American west. Nonetheless, the woman secret agent is reasonably well-acted and the pair feel like they are in real danger as rabbits trying to escape from an all-seeing enemy. The movie takes itself a little too seriously, and some better writing could tighten up the plot, but it's not all bad as the two leads do a good job playing off each other and coming to a common understanding to save their lives.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't ask any questions type of script
Xavier_Stone26 August 2023
This is a movie that was pitched and nobody was permitted to ask questions. Such as, how does this woman find the home of a guy, how do the baddies find her so fast?

This is just in the first 5 minutes. More obvious questions arise over and over, and this is what is known as a plot hole, where nothing makes sense, it just happens.

Some cool background film settings but nothing can overcome the poor pointless dialogue. The 10 minute fight scene that's as fake as can be. More bad dialogue. Some action. The end.

This one gets one star, if only to provide a template for what can go wrong when the script writer lacks the mental capacity to think.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent spy thriller
bchaffin2315 October 2018
Loved this movie. Joshua Caldwell actually takes the time for the audience to get to know and understand the characters so you care about them once things get tense. Most Hollywood movies could take note. The action is well done, performances are spot on and I love the little details throughout the movie that add suspense and character. Most films like this would jump straight to the next location. Instead we get to see how things develop for the characters. Very well done, beautifully shot and excellent editing as well.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting movie, but poor quality sound.
enfinity19 February 2022
This was interesting, where it was almost a how-to or how-not-to "spy".

Who and what to trust (no one!) and why.

There were no real surprises, as I watch a lot of these type of movies, but I like watching women kick butt! :) What was the most disappointing in this video, is how BAD the sound was - most especially on the female lead.

As she's having conversations in the same frame with other actors, THEY can be heard all right, but her sound is SO LOW!

Such a poor choice, as she's doing MOST of the talking.

I'd give the video a lower score JUST on this, but I don't want to rob the actors of their kudos for their efforts.

The acting was pretty good, over all.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
No logic to the story...
richard_lindberg5 March 2022
Bad bad story line. Bad acting. The mood is doll and boring. Really dont do this again...i sincerly hope the writer/director can find other work, and a hint dont put this on your CV.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not worth time
numb0239 February 2023
No grip in story. Pathetic acting by main actress. The guy with her more worse. If you have nothing too watch still do not watch it because it has no grip at all. Specially in one scene where they engage to help a damsel in distress looks so awful. Scenes shot are not good to be seen again. Main actor looks tired exhuasted in whole movie. Now she is taken someone along being such hot shot agent she is giving such stupid actions. So loose ends in movies that it makes me think why was it even made. So it is waste. I had to drag movie to see might at some point it be interesting but still it was draging and boring. Even dialogues seem too much annoying.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed