Beneath the Leaves (2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
51 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
I liked it
jeniferbehrens28 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I personally liked the movie. Those saying the beginning haf nothing to do with the movie must not have paid attention.*SPOILER ON HOE THEY ARE CONNECTED*

Little boy was obviously Whitley and the little girl was the hotel clerk. In beginning of movie when little girl was outside she had half an apple and was humming while she buried the bird. Fast fwd. To end of movie.. The lady was burying the body and put the apple tree over the body and put in the nails with it while humming the same song she did as a little girl when burying the bird...
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
VIEWS ON FILM review of Beneath the Leaves
burlesonjesse525 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"It's a cyclical pattern". So says the character of PI Erica Shotwell in Beneath the Leaves (my latest review). "Leaves", well it's quite the "sickening" movie.

In "Leaves", an ill-defined psychopath escapes from an elaborate prison fire. Twenty years after being incarcerated, he vows to carry out his mission to kill four boys (now grown men) he had once held captive. Said psychopath also has an obsession with lethal injection needles, drugged alcoholic beverages, and ripped out fingernails. Ouch, ouch, and double ouch!

Starring the likes of Paul Sorvino, Mira Sorvino, and Mira's husband Christopher Backus (talk about a Sorvino family affair), "Leaves" turned a little brown for me On Demand. I will say this though. Mira Sorvino sure is sexy and badass as a mirrored, Mariska Hargitay-style detective. At age 51, she's still a tall drink of water and a darn knockout.

Clocking in at 90 minutes flat and distributed by Eagle Films (various birds tend to show up metaphorically here), Beneath the Leaves is worth watching again even though I couldn't quite bring myself to recommend it. Basically, "Leaves" is part mystery thriller, part Law & Order: SVU episode on steroids, part torture porn, and part Sleepers for the modern day. Look for plenty of grisly killings, a rare Julian, California locale, and the most outlandish overacting since Rod Steiger played a frothing Mayor and Danny Aiello played a douche Captain in 1989's The January Man.

In conclusion, the director of "Leaves" (rookie Adam Marino) fashions a film that is sometimes haunting, sometimes discombobulating (the opening scene in relation to the rest of the flick is kind of head scratching), and sometimes veered into camp. With a weird mixture of barbarity and out of place humor, Beneath the Leaves may make you feel effectively icky but it's still sort of "beneath" me. Rating: 2 and a half stars.
18 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A promising story that never comes together
It's not awful, but it's never entirely clear what's going on. The plot us disjointed and confusing, and it's difficult to keep track of the characters and where they fit in. The writing could have been tightened up a bit which could have made this problem go away. I don't know if the writer was attempting to clever and failed or if he was just being lazy.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Just don't know why...
jmbovan9 June 2019
I don't know why this was made. Poorly acted and bad script. Highlight is watching the cliches fly through the plot. Love Mira Sorvino. But this was just a mess.
34 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Confused and wandering
Kenny9189 June 2019
The movie started out ok. I mean, I knew it was sort of a B movie to begin with, so I was ready for some good B movie action.

It was not to be.

The film quickly lost its way, meandering here and there and never really exploring anything at all.

The acting wasn't bad, but no one really stood out. The characters were shallow and not very well written.

I managed to get through it, but just barely.

I gave it 3 stars, but 2 1/2 of those are just because I like Paul Sorvino.
25 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Why?
haskel-7295115 June 2019
What happened to Mira Sorvino? Why is she taking any role available? We may never get an answer to that but we have an answer to what rock bottom really is: this movie. Poorly written, pathetically directed, hilariously overacted, with effects that make Sci Fi Channel movies look competent, this is garbage. Three out of ten only because I feel sorry for Sorvino - she deserves better.
23 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What in the?....
sjauane10 June 2019
Was the opening totally unrelated to the story?!!! Thee worst. So predictable and pointless. Bad acting and terrible plot. Who was the motel clerk and the killer in the end? A waste of my precious time! And yours too.
22 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Beneath a one star
kennedyshannon31 March 2019
Very boring. Nothing ties together, making no sense. Terrible!
24 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
AWFUL
Ripshin7 July 2019
I lasted fifteen minutes. Just about everything is terrible. Direction. Script. Acting. Lighting. Locations. This is a low-rent, filler film.

The supporting actors keep "mugging" in a juvenile, distracting manner.

These " nine star" reviews are bogus.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Answered HIGH
uncopyrightedandfine16 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The movie starts off looking like a horror movie then it ended up like a TV-show that lasts a whole season for them to solve one murder. Not going to lie after 30 minutes in I started focusing on the Hippy cop's hair until the part where she cut some off and was trying to feel as if it was good enough for a weave . I say this movie is safe to watch blazed but too complex for you too understand .
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unwatchable
uberviking29 March 2019
Eighties cliche characters stuffed into mish mash of cliche scenes also from eighties. Just a waste of time unless you are a film student wanting to learn traps to avoid.
19 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A complicated journey; great actors and strong performances make it well worth the ride.
VCH816 March 2019
Adam Marino's Beneath the Leaves takes you on a complicated journey; strong performances make it worth the ride.

Warning: the subject matter is troubling. Abused foster children, and the perpetuation and outgrowth of that abuse. On the surface, it's a film about a psychotic child killer with a particular class of targets, four of whom escape, grow up, and move on with their lives...kind of...but carry with them layers of damage. When the killer breaks out of prison and begins systematically hunting them down, they are thrust back into the place of their nightmares.

Underlying the plot is a deeper question of family and belonging that is unique to foster children as the unmoored fragments of society. Such children, unless adopted and fully integrated into a family, often remain emotionally unmoored and carry damage from their original abandonment and the mark of being unwanted. Add subsequent abuse, mistreatment and psychosis to that mix, and you have a real problem.

Doug Jones, best known for playing exotic creatures (e.g. the Amphibious Man in The Shape of Water), plays James Whitley, a damaged soul who decides to "rescue" children like himself (orphaned foster children), reuniting them with their birth parents by euthanizing them.

Kristoffer Polaha (Atlas Shrugged, Ballers, Get Shorty, Wonder Woman 1984), Christopher Backus (Bosch, Roadies), SerDarius Blain (Jumanji) and Christopher Masterson (Malcolm in the Middle) play the grown-up versions of the four victims who got away. The back story of their abduction, confinement and escape is told incrementally in well-placed brief flashes inserted into the present timeline.

Polaha's portrayal of the perpetually drunk and frustrated victim turned rescuer - Detective Brian Larson - is emotional and among the strongest of his career.

Academy Award winner Mira Sorvino plays Detective Erica Shotwell, Larson's partner and lover. Her performance is understated and mysterious. Shotwell is an outsider to the community. She has a chip on her shoulder and a past that she keeps from everyone, including her partner. Sorvino shines in the action scenes and is particularly strong in tense gun-drawn sequences, including pursuing and battling an escaped convict early in the film, and similarly pursuing Whitley through the woods in a climactic scene.

When Larson is pulled from working the case of his own childhood abductor, Shotwell goes from working with a partner with whom she had way too much chemistry, to one with whom she has none. The pairing of Mira's Shotwell with Aaron Farb's (Kill the Messenger, The Originals) eccentric Detective Abrams makes for an entertaining contrast. At times, you can't tell if Abram's quirks are Columbo-like put-ons designed to lower the defenses of those with whom he engages in the course of an investigation, or if he's forgotten about the investigation altogether. Shotwell can't tell either.

Farb's Abrams would be the odd man out in the story if not for "Rose," the equally odd hotel manager/madam. Melora Walters - known to Seinfeld fans as George's girlfriend in the classic "shrinkage" episode - is weirdly terrific as Rose.

Mira's father, screen icon Paul Sorvino, anchors the film as the father-like Captain Parker, who we learn from old interrogation video was involved in Whitley's original arrest and conviction several decades earlier.

Chris Backus' performance as Matt is subtle perfection. No actor could better capture the permanent effects of childhood trauma PTSD than Backus does here. To drive the point home, even the lovely Jena Sims (Sharknado, Attack of the 50-foot Cheerleader) as Alexa, can't break through Matt's shell.

Chris Masterson's George is creepy as hell and worlds away from his most famous role of Francis on Malcolm in the Middle.

Veteran actress Marla Adams (Splendor in the Grass, Days of our Lives, etc.) gives a solid performance as the well-meaning foster mother of the abducted boys.

Don Swayze as Whitley's abusive foster father is appropriately disturbing. Even the kids in this film are outstanding. Of note, young Ashlyn Jade Lopez sets an emotional tone in the first frames of the film that stays with the viewer throughout.

As noted above, the subject matter is dark and the story is a complicated journey. Outstanding performances make it well worth the ride.
59 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Aaron Farb Get a Haircut
randyunseen2 December 2019
Wow... For all the great actors in this movie. What happen? Didn't like the script or the Director? Zero chemistry and their married. Aaron Farb Long Gressy Hair was so disgusting that I stop eating my popcorn. You couldn't wash it, and slick you're hair back for the movie? Why couldn't you get Your cut. You just came back from undercover, Your not believable as a cop. Sorry... This movie is so hard to watch. I feel so bad for the producers who had to pay all this money for horrible acting...
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not very good... at all
unlocktheparadox19 June 2019
I feel like Paul Sorvino only did this one to do some work with his daughter but maybe there were other reasons. His role is merely a marketing ploy to get people to watch but his role isn't very big.

The acting is absolutely horrendous. I don't know who directed this but it almost seemed like a PA was standing behind the camera with a dry erase board for them to read their lines off of. When there is a pause between lines exchanged by characters it sounds forced, and read instead of authentic. The scenes where the characters get highly emotional are about as exciting as the acting gets but those moments again don't fit well with the rest of their acting making it seem awkward and unbelievable. The movie did have a great start but it was confusing. It's only about 3/4 of the way through the movie that we learn the back story that was told in the beginning of the movie, and who those characters were. I guess if I had to say anything nice I would say the killer was a little devious and good in his role and acting but I was still rather confused from beginning to end. Maybe I am missing something???

I think this was a good attempt to bring something low budget to life but it is a flop.
10 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Tied all together
Geenahgee048 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The young brother and sister who killed their father at the beginning were the serial killer and the receptionist lady in the hotel.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Good bones, but laughably executed
stephenlamb-494-83039829 January 2022
As an aficionado of horror of all star levels, I took a shot at this one because the story and cast sounded interesting. It had promise, but soon devolved into a mess of surprisingly phoned-in acting and eye rolling plot developments. It really could have been good.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Classified as a THRILLER but just does not quite make it all the way there
Ed-Shullivan27 January 2023
First of all Mira Sorvino is always going to add to any films credibility. This is not her first rodeo playing a crime fighter. I recall her starring as an ICE Agent in the 2005 TV Mini-Series, Human Trafficking, and she held her own in that dramatic film series.

Having said that Mira Sorvino is somewhat wasted in this low budget film by todays standards THRILLER. I don't know what the films director was thinking when Detective Erica Shotwell (Mira Sorvino) walked through some parts of the investigation wearing a mans hat on her head? It looked ridiculous. But I digress. Back to the plot. There is a psycho on the loose after a prison break and in a vaguely similar style to the 1996 film title, Sleepers, there is an abuser of young boys who have to find a way to survive their past horrors and then re-live those memories when this psycho breaks out of prison.

Mira Sorvinos cop partner is Detective Brian Larson, (Kristoffer Polaha) who has a bit of a drinking problem which is his cross to bare after being one of the four young boys who survived the psycho predator who held him and three other boys in his torture chamber.

The script had all the makings of a good story, as well as casting Mira Sorvino in a lead role, her father Paul Sorvino as the precincts Captain, and her husband Christopher Backus as another one of the four tortured boys living with their nightmares from their horrific childhood(s).

It's just too bad that the on screen film just wasn't so thrilling as maybe the script could have been. Therefore I give this film a ho hum 5 out of 10 IMDb rating.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not worth your time
pnschtqg11 March 2022
The basis of the story line is ok. It's a short movie and lacks depth in the plot and story line. The actors, despite being great in other films are definitely not great in this one. Too many loose ends leaves you feeling slighted. It was hard to get through even for a short film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unpleasant Characters, Muddied Plot
lavatch3 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"Beneath the Leaves" seeks to unite two narrative strands related to abused children. One strand focuses on two Bly kids who set their house ablaze with their alcoholic, abusive father inside. The second strand concerns four boys who were held captive in a mine shaft by a psychopath, prior to their daring escape. Years later, after another fire, the psycho escapes from prison and starts stalking the four boys who are now grown men.

First, the entire premise of the film is an unpleasant, unwholesome, and extremely depressing topic. Second, the filmmakers fail to connect the two plot strands except for one detail that links the little boy involved in the Bly home fire to the psychopath Whitley in hot pursuit of the four grown men, Josh, Brian, Matt, and Georgie. SPOILER ALERT: For those viewers interested in the minute plot detail the solves the riddle of messy narrative, here it is: apple harvest. END SPOILER ALERT.

The slow pacing only adds more misery for the film viewer, who was expecting a film that featured the outstanding performers Mira Sorvino and her father Paul. Mira's detective wears a fashionable hat while on the job, and the hat is more interesting than her character. Big Paul plays the hapless chief of police who has as much trouble controlling his wacky police office as he does in tracking down the villain. For most of the film, the chief is sitting at his desk.

This film demonstrates why any work of cinema must start with a screenplay that develops both action and characters in a coherent way. In the case of "Beneath the Leaves," the action was far-fetched and the characters uniformly unlikable.
9 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Comes full circle, weird, and Mira
radcat-1466424 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Some people said they had no idea why the beginning was in the movie. Are you serious? It is explained that, obviously, the killer is the boy, and why he's obsessed with fingernails. Duh. Anyway, loved that Paul and Mira were in the same movie. She was great as always. Strong storyline. Nice twists. Interesting statement on the foster system, PTSD, alcoholism, and other mental health disorders. All, in all, was a great thriller.
30 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Excellent for a student film - it was a student film, wasn't it?
clivescarff7 August 2019
When you see good actors give bad performances it usually boils down to script and/or directing, and such was the case here. The camera angles were as cliche as the script, and the script was very cliche. Trying too hard to be something it was not. I gave it 1 star because the shots were in focus.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
mediocre
ops-525359 February 2019
Except for a very promising start sequence, where some kids does their father, this was a mediocre,mish-mash acting and full of nick-nack talking grown ups with some inner demons that destoroy the story. its something about the acting that doesnt appeal to me, they are too rough,too designated and too perfect for the roles they fill. just watching them police doing house searches, look at how they move forward, how they handle the walkie talkie and gun. have they had any professional advisory at all ?

i guess i'm wrong, but i think that this kind of flicks are made to lure the brainblasted part of the population into the vivid world of b-movies, beacause its b or c all over. the filmography starts with a tempting glow of perfection, then when the real film starts,you are strangled by the shining bright picture of hd'ish quality, with bad focusing . how could you.....? the fights and special effects are blurry with a lot of ketchup action.

do watch if you want, im sure some will feel tensed by the action, to me though,the old grumpy man its not good enough and not recommended
17 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Does not make sense and boring
kdeshannon23 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The movie started out interesting with the young girl and boy killing their abuser but then they are not in the film at all until the very ending. I thought that the female detective was the young girl throughout the whole movie but she was not. The beginning had nothing to do with the movie.

It seems as though the characters just do random things in the movie that have no relevence at all to the plot. It's not even interesting. It's like a cluster **** of things going on that make the movie dull and confusing. I guess they needed stupid stuff to make the length of the movie appropriate.

Overall the movie was uninteresting and lacked any clear order. There is no action but a movie can be great without action, just not this one.
16 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Great potential -- Great Failure
boomerchinde13 June 2019
Let me begin by saying that both Paul and Mira Sorvino are on my list of favorite actors. They are genuine pros, yet even their efforts cannot raise this stinker above mediocrity. There is really nothing new here, and what they do present is cliched so badly as to be embarrassing, i.e., the hip, sloppily dressed detective, the female detective maligned by sexist co-workers, the escaped prisoner looking for revenge, etc. Every turn of the plot is so choreographed that any suspense has been thrown to the wind. I've heard it said that winning an Academy Award can actually cause harm to a performer's career. This film may be direct evidence of that, as it's so very sad to see Mira Sorvino attached to such an anemic film effort as this.
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mira saves it
BABSBunny2420 August 2019
Mira Sorvino's performance is the only thing that made this film tolerable for me. The plot is interesting, but the execution of it missed the mark, mostly in the lack of believable characters. It could have been great, but ended up being only so-so.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed