Eat Locals (2017) Poster

(2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
42 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A good Vampire popcorn movie - not one to overthink
azanti00294 July 2017
Once every few years, a secret coven of modern-day vampires meets to discuss the quotas and divisions of feeding territories in the United Kingdom. Gathering at a remote farm, this time they're joined by a potential new recruit/light snack in the form of Seb (Billy Cook, a new talent to look out for) Unknown to them they have been tracked by the team of Larousse (Mackenzie Crook) and Bingham (Robert Portal) but trapping Vampires is not easy, even with an army and soon its a battle of wits to see who is still standing by sun- up.

Eat Local had a cracking script from the beginning but sadly director Jason Flemyng, probably the hardest working actor in the UK, had to get the money from Johnathon Sothcott to shoot it - So the budget was clearly nowhere what it should have been. With such restrictions, the film struggles to hit its notes at times and occasionally the plot becomes lost. That aside Flemyng has assembled an impressive cast from Charlie Cox, Vincent Reagen, Freema Agyeman, Tony Curran, Annette Crosbie and Eve Myles who all perform terrifically on the side of the Vampires, while cameos from Nick Moran, Nicolas Rowe, Dexter Fletcher, Elly Fairman and Johnny Palmerio fill out the rest of the cast, often with very funny one-liners. A less respected person in the industry would not have been able to assemble anywhere near as much talent on screen. In the hands of anyone else such an ambitious project probably would have fallen foul of really poor casting and direction by Flemyng brings the elements together as well as can be expected and raises the bar considerably above anything else with Sothcott's name in the credits. The action in the film is well handled within the restrictive budget and comedy turns by Dexter Fletcher add much fun to the mix with his deadpan dialogue. Jason gives a nod to 12 Angry Men in his framing of the opening scene as the members of the Coven arrive and there are various other shots giving a wink to numerous other movies including The Great Escape. The score for the film is found a little wanting at times.

Despite all this not everything works in the film as well it should have but films are rarely if ever, made with the budget or generous shooting schedule that one would like to have. This film, however, is nowhere near as bad as some other reviewers have suggested. The cast give it their all and are clearly having a good time. It won't be everyone's cup of tea, but if you liked the movie Tremors and other similar B-Movie Comedy Horror then this should be right up your street.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Could have been better but still fun
S_Soma29 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
At the time of writing this (5/29/2017) there were only two other user reviews on IMDb, both of which were relentlessly critical of EAT LOCAL, giving the movie but a single star each. While EAT LOCAL is not a cinematic masterpiece, neither does it deserve such a sound thrashing.

EAT LOCAL might perhaps be a little confusing to the utterly ignorant who have no experience with black humor or "gallows humor". Both of the extant reviews suggest a bit of confusion on this point.

"Gallows humour is humour about very unpleasant, serious, or painful circumstances. Any humor that treats serious matters, such as death, war, disease, and crime, in a light, silly or satirical fashion is considered gallows humor. Gallows humor has been described as a witticism in response to a hopeless situation. It arises from stressful, traumatic, or life-threatening situations, often in circumstances such that death is perceived as impending and unavoidable." Black or gallows humor is known to date back at least a couple of thousand years; it is not a new invention. However, such a story style may be confusing to those who are only familiar with the current trend in the vampire genre of treating the subject matter exclusively as horror or some sort of questionable kind of romance.

The above having been said, the careful timing and subtlety required for successful black comedy can be difficult to achieve, and EAT LOCAL does not hit its mark every time. Probably best to view this movie as "quirky" and give it the benefit of the doubt for trying something a little different.

The plot of EAT LOCAL is quite simple. A small collection of relatively ancient and well-positioned vampires apparently have the tradition of conducting a sort of business meeting every 50 years in some quiet, out-of-the-way location. Unfortunately, at this particular meeting, the humans have caught wind of the vampire's existence and of this meeting and a small military contingent has been sent round to investigate and possibly interfere. The entire movie takes place in the context of this confrontation. The situation gives rise to horror and hilarity, or at least that is the intent.

EAT LOCAL is, at the very least, worth a watch. While it does not carry off its intent without flaw, it's at least something different from the usual low-grade horror snore-a-thons or pseudo-romantic drivel that infest the vampire genre nowadays. Many of the actors here are A-list and help carry the picture a little higher than it might otherwise have gone.

One element sadly missing from the movie is a convincing and interesting portrayal of some of the vampires who are SUPPOSED to be thousands of years old. What would such a creature actually be like, possessing as they do possibly thousands of years of world experience? In the case of Tony Curran who plays the character Peter Boniface, his 2000-year-old character is simply portrayed as the same sort of arrogant wonk you might meet driving a Chelsea tractor today. Annette Crosbie does a much better job with her character Alice, passing herself off as a sweet old lady with only a hint of the ancient monster that lies beneath. And then, sadly and what should be out of character, Alice does a Rambo impression to no good purpose, and then walks straight into her death deliberately. One would think an ancient mythical creature, who has successfully lived long enough to BECOME an ancient mythical creature, accent on ancient, would be a bit smarter than that by now.

Good old Mackenzie Crook is wasted as a stereotypical religious nut case (because anyone who does anything with a religious motivation MUST be the worst creep in every picture nowadays… yawn).

In the end, most of the humans are wiped out and about half of the vampires, and what's left of the humans and vampires break their clinch and go their separate ways, although one particular human and the 3 remaining vampires have a newfound friendship. You'll have to watch the movie to see what that's all about.

So, all in all, it's not that bad a movie though it's definitely not a great one. The original idea is actually pretty interesting and with a bit more effort it could have risen much higher.
20 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
So bad, it's good
W011y4m55 September 2017
Terrible script. Awfully written dialogue & the actors do their best with what they've been given but it's obvious throughout that the cast had marvellous fun making the film & because it shows on screen, it's also still very enjoyable to watch, regardless. Not a classic & nor is it great, but it's a light-hearted, cheesy movie that doesn't take itself too seriously so I'd still recommend people see it, just for the few laughs it provides.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lacks bite
Prismark1020 March 2018
Jason Flemyng's directorial debut aspires to be one of those Edgar Wright/Simon Pegg/Nick Frost comedy horror thrillers.

However it falls short of the mark by not being funny or too horrific. It also has its share of some not very funny cockneys.

Young wide boy Sebastian has been requested to join the council of vampires as their is a vacancy. However some military units have been sent to kill them but a few of the soldiers want to take the vampires alive so their blood can be used for research purposes and they will get plenty of money in exchange.

The film is the army against vampires on an all night siege in an isolated farmhouse while Sebastian tries to escape.

The film has spirit and a sense of fun. It is hampered by its low budget and a ropey script.
10 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Little Hidden Gem
gregsrants18 October 2017
A gathering of a vampire council at a hidden hideaway turns into a bloodbath when the British Army ambushes them in an attempt to put an end to their local reign of terror in the new horror comedy, Eat Locals.

Charlie Cox (Marvel's Daredevil) headlines a group of eight vampires who at their semi-centennial meeting discuss matters such as territory and new members. Their meeting also introduces the fanged ones to the human at the table. Billy Cook plays Sebastian, a warm blooded human who tags along with date Vanessa (Eve Myles) unaware his date is a vampire and she is accompanying him to a flock of bloodsuckers. Sebastian quickly realizes that he is not in friendly quarters but any notion of escape is thwarted when the army erupts in gunfire. Soon, the houseguests are accepting that they are surrounded by a heavily armed force lead by a commander committed to ending the vampire race.

Vampire films have been done to nausea over the past two decades, but thanks to a tongue-in-cheek deviously funny script by Danny King (Wild Bill, 2011), Eat Locals felt like fresh fun covering familiar territory. There may not be laugh out loud moments, but the script is nuanced and seasoned with fresh characters, fun challenges and a satisfying ended that make the viewing worth recommending.

It's hard not to root for the sharp-tooth characters as they struggle to find continued cause in their existence while fighting for their very survival. Added to the comedic mix are two additional human characters (Dexter Fletcher and Ruth Jones) that have a peculiar role in context of the vampires meeting above them in the house. Not all your favorite characters will survive but everyone seems to meet their maker after a spotlight moment which will leave audiences satisfied.

We would categorize Eat Locals as more of a comedy than a horror. So too must have the director Jason Flemying who makes his directorial debut here after over 125 acting credits on IMDb.com. The director's end credits reel reintroduces each character with each actor looking like they are having a ruckus of a good time during the shoot.

But don't think for a second that there isn't a good body count to go with all the yuks. Whether it's elderly vampire Alice (Annette Crosbie who has some of the better comedic moments) standing in the open firing off hundreds of rounds with an automatic weapon likely larger than her own physical frame or a concerned military man who gets rewarded for his kindness with two sharp objects impaling either side of his neck, Eat Locals brings body bags.

By the time the lights again illuminated the theatre at the screening as part of the Toronto After Dark Film Festival, I was thankful for the experience. What a great treat right before the Halloween season.
25 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Oh dear..
rocknrelics4 January 2020
If you're going to tackle the difficult horror/comedy genre, it helps if you put some laughs in there. I sat stony faced throughout, just wasn't funny at all. Oh and Mackenzie Crook was unusally dreadful. One to avoid I'm afraid.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
We're not saving the whales.
nogodnomasters4 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Sebastian (Billy Cook) has been personally selected by Vanessa (Eve Myles) to become the eighth member of their vampire group due to a recent opening. Things do not go as planned and to complicate things Vatican military forces (not the guys in the Swiss costumes) show up with the intent of eradicating the vampires. However, their actions give rise to sympathy for the blood suckers.

The film was a comedy-horror, without much horror. I liked the details such as the personalized license plate "BRAM 1." The script had funny dialogue, yet I felt this was an area that could have used improvement. Worth a watch.

Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Facepalm
harryplinkett1427 May 2017
This film has no idea what it is or what it wants. None of it makes sense, whether it's the plot, character development, or tone. Is it a comedy or a horror? Why is it neither funny nor scary? Why is there no plot in sight, even at the 40 minute mark? What little there is in terms of plot is compromised through poor direction and editing. It's just awful. It gives nothing to the viewer except frustration. It is literally unwatchable. Absolute rubbish. Avoid at all cost.
17 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No dessert
kosmasp7 August 2017
Which is kind of a shame, but that doesn't mean you can't enjoy the other parts of the meal you are getting served. There seems to be a lot of potential and if you only judge this by the missed opportunities and wasted chances it probably has, than the movie will not be a lot of fun to watch, quite the opposite.

We have some colorful characters and a set up that promises to be fun. Which it is, just not as much as it could. The actors still have fun with their respected role and morality is thrown overboard. No matter who you root for, there does not seem to be someone you could call a good person in this. If you don't mind and just want to have some meaningless fun, this will do the trick
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very bloodless and lacks bite
TheLittleSongbird7 September 2017
Despite being received negatively, 'Eat Locals' did have a good cast on paper and the premise was interesting. And there is certainly no bias for or against vampire films, there are both good and bad ones out there.

Actually did want to have a little enjoyment from 'Eat Locals', considering the cast and premise. Have gone against the grain before, having found panned films not that bad (some are still not great though) and acclaimed films not that good (while still seeing the appeal), and was prepared to do so here. Do tend to agree with critics with that being said admittedly, absolutely refuse to do the common thing online and resort to critic bashing which is getting really ridiculous and annoying now and needs to stop. 'Eat Locals' however just didn't work, with the right execution it could have been guilty pleasure fun but ended up a bloodless film with little to no bite.

'Eat Locals' does have good things. The cast make a very game effort, despite having to work with thinly sketched characters and a mostly dire script. Annette Crosbie and Dexter Fletcher give the best performances. There are some funny one-liners sprinkled here and there.

However, as said, most of the script is dire. It is very clunky and awkward, as well as often forgetting to be funny, a big problem for a film with comedic elements. Most of the gags are laboured and laughter free, saw a review that called them long-in-the-fang, sums them up pretty aptly.

The horror elements also fail, forgetting completely to be scary or shocking. It's all incredibly predictable and plodding and the cheap production values and gratuitous gross-out gore do not help. 'Eat Locals' even includes moments of action, which are poorly choreographed, edited and filmed (very haphazard) and lack any kind of excitement. That's one of the film's biggest problems, that tonally it's muddled and like it doesn't know what it wants to be, parts including the army, the mafia and religion add nothing and add to the kitchen-sink weirdness.

Story-wise, it's an incredibly feeble, thin and deadeningly dull (the first act especially drags) one, where one actually questions whether there is actually one at all.

Jason Flemying is a very capable actor but is very ill at ease in his directing debut. The music rarely gels with the rest of the film and sounds cheap and discordant on its own. 'Eat Locals' looks cheap and the characters are basically sketchy stereotypes with next to no effort in trying to make the vampires interesting.

In summation, had potential but poorly done. 3/10 Bethany Cox
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good, Easy Fun
amanda-72115 September 2017
We thoroughly enjoyed this film. Perfect viewing when you've had a busy day at the office and you need something easy to take your mind off things & just relax. We were really impressed with the actor who plays the unsuspecting male lead who is drawn into the vampires' lair. Other highlights were the ever-brilliant Dexter Fletcher and Annette Crosby (Mrs Meldrew!!) as an OAP-vampire- vigilante!! We took a punt and watched it with no preconceptions about what we were about to see, glass of wine in hand, ready to be entertained, which we were. So refreshing to see something that a) doesn't feature superheroes and b) doesn't involve an American male single-handedly saving the world. Again.
26 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Eat locals tongue in cheek fun
jjmfe27 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
First of all I enjoy decent horror flicks as much as the next. But having seen enough of them it's great when something that is self confident enough to poke fun at the genre comes out

spoiler alert: Lots of surprises over the course of the film and our initially rejected potential novice to the clan becomes "the Renfield."

There are all kinds of bad guys and girls in this flick coming from the most surprising places. There's enough understated droll English wit to engage the casual Anglophile.

I do hope the promised sequel "eat global" makes its appearance sooner rather than later.

Again This is not a serious flick this was intended to be a bit "camp," and just for fun low-budget horror comedy. It accomplishes that quite well. Think of it as a few of your college friends getting together to make a clever film for a class, and purposely using lots of gimmicks, for the sake the class requirements, and putting in practice the tools they've been taught.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Trashy Vampires
blumdeluxe2 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"Eat Locals" tells the story of an annual meeting of vampires that turns bizarre when problems with the chosen victim and the host couple, which turns out to be a couple of mass-murderers, arise.

The film takes the typical element of vampires and transfers it into a modern environment and rather grotesque scenario. You can see that it is not a blockbuster and that some choices had to be made according to the budget. There are infact some nice elements, like the couple of mass murderers, that makes for a nice contrast but all in all it feels a bit like a funny idea that doesn't fully work out over the playtime.

All in all this is surely a film easy to watch and you can't do much wrong with it but you shouldn't expect anything great to happen and just see it as entertainment for an evening.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A comedy that is not funny. Nothing special
ersbel27 July 2017
This is a comedy that is not funny. It is designed to be some sort of sitcom, a mini series maybe. And it is hit and, in my case, miss. The old woman with a machine gun? It is so badly worked it is not even amusing. And that is one of the many scenes thrown in for fluff. They do not help the story. They are not funny. And they were far better on the editing room floor.

The acting is not bad. But it is not good either. And the uninspired mix of mafia, army and catholicism made me think how inspired I was to get my ebook reader with me.

Contact me with Questions, Comments or Suggestions ryitfork @ bitmail.ch
7 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Vampires meet, one gets killed, military tries to kill vampires. Then come a little Silence of the lambs. Some drive off in a van while I got lost in my Instagram newsfeed.
michaelschwark1 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
i did not get it. Is it meant to be a mixture of a mafia flick (vampires gather to administrate turf rights)? I really tried to get into it but in the end my Instagram news feed was more interesting than the movie. Putting a granny with an automatic weapon also does not make a good joke automatically. I could have given 1 star but I did not mean to offend.
7 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So a take where you are cheering for the Vampires
JoeB13123 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The Eight vampires of England are having a meeting at a farmhouse, when they are beset upon by mercenaries working for the Church. The film includes Doctor Who alums Agnya Freeman and Evie Myles, but that's not really enough to recommend it. There are a bunch of fun plot twists as vampires and humans double cross each other. I think the title is a play on some Brexit anti-EU thing where the punchline is that local farmers you think are hostages turn out to be cannibals. Still, a welcome change from the tedious sparkly vampires.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Should have been so much better!
mike_nightingale1 June 2017
NB, I'm awarding this movie 4 for the inclusion of so many really good actors, actors who as an ensemble cast should have had better parts written for them. My - complete supposition - is that as the director, Jason Fleming, is a well known actor, there was some measure of doing a pal a favour in getting this cast together. Try as it might to get going, this movie, has an identity problem. Is it a comedy? Is it horror? Is it a pastiche of "Famous" movie scenes stuck together?

It may have been trying for all three (And perhaps I missed a few other tropes.)

Sadly the result misses out on everything. The premise is basically sound - British vampires meet up to discuss new "Membership" - but from there on, story, characterisation, and humour often falls flat. Dexter Fletcher, mostly shines with his comedic efforts, but that just shines a spotlight on the paucity of the writing for the rest of the cast.

Probably best observed with friends, playing a drinking game - take a shot every time you say "Oh dear!" to yourself - on the other hand, perhaps not, I wouldn't want to encourage irresponsible drinking!
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun and funny
tpotwinnow26 June 2021
This flick won't win any awards for cinematography, but it's a laugh-out-loud fun film to watch. What it lacks in character development and story arc, it makes up for with witty dialog, spot on comedic timing, and performances by actors who are obviously having a blast. And it's so screamingly British, it has bad teeth. Loved this film. It has strong "What We Do in the Shadows" energy.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not very good
garyphillimore5 April 2018
Eat locals contains a poor storyline trying to be a new British Shaun of the dead comedy vampire/horror movie and failed dramatically, it is a shame the talented Eve Myles put her name to this amongst other talented actors/actressses, I watched it till the end hoping it would improve but it never did. Don't waste your time with this movie.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Surprisingly fun
russ-s8 February 2021
Did not expect much from Eat Locals but it all just about holds together. Good cast, moved at a reasonable pace and had a few twists. Not the deepest story ever but entertaining. If you fancy an action vampire film you could do a lot worse.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wasted potential
Good plot, with a little originality. Some good casting. Not overly funny, but not desperately- trying-for-laughs-and-failing like anything with Simon pegg in

Unfortunately the acting is only average and starts to seem bad from the point where two losers unnaturally force a long uninformed sermon on immigration into a scene. After that awkwardness, the low education standard of the writing really shows and it's hard not to see all the flaws
6 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Surprisingly Good
mikeperkins-978404 November 2019
I really didn't expect much but was surprised. Just a fun movie that didn't require a ton of analysis. If you want to have enjoy a few laughs with a lighthearted take on bloodsuckers, you can't go wrong here.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Dark comedy
drgntrs-1659322 July 2019
An enjoyable quick witted comedic dance with the macabre. For the first few minutes I wasn't quite sure where the plot was headed, but as I followed I found myself chuckling along. This is not a horror film although it certainly follows a vampiric theme. Enough blood splashed to accentuate but not enough to qualify as gore. Worth the watch.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Weak-Arsed Vampires & Loads Of Missed Opportunities...
P3n-E-W1s33 April 2018
Oh, dear, I had some big hopes for this flick. For starters, it's written by Danny King, who was responsible for the witty Wild Bill (worth a watch) and directed by Jason Flemyng, who I've admired as an actor since his chilling lead role in George Romero's Bruiser. I thought that if somebody could add a new take on the vampyre mythos then these could be the two to do it... I have to admit they did try... but failed miserably.

So what's so bad? It's full of great actors? It's the entire concept which bothered me. Vampire Overlords gathering together at a local farmhouse to discuss territory and quotas... so much for all-powerful beings who need to be feared. These are the most boring undead I've ever witnessed. It wouldn't have been too bad but both King and Flemyng spend too much time on this opening scene and idea. Even when things could have raised the action up a notch, like finding out one of them was taking more than their share, it's handled in a dull and tiresome way.

Then when the army arrives, under the command of the church, I began to get my hopes up. Though Flemyng does a wonderful job of filming, adding interesting camera shots and angles - he's even pretty good with the action and fight scenes, he's not too good at creating atmosphere and this only adds to the sense of tedium. When the action finally heats up we are given a new vision of vampires. Not as all-powerful but as quite weak and powerless individuals. If you're wanting gore then there's very little in the film. In fact, the most blood in this film is in the farmer's fridge... along with loads of body parts... Sounds interesting, doesn't it(?) However, the farmer is just another wasted opportunity.

Another thing that's wasted is the opportunities for comedy. The scene where Alice (Crosbie) wobbles out on a zimmer frame to take on the soldiers offers a lot of possibilities for both verbal and sight gags. However, what we get is a week killing and a cut away to another scene, only to later return to find Alice has been slain.

And this is another letdown of the film. There are too many cut-aways. I don't mind when a director uses this as a way to cut down on gore. When handled correctly this style of filmmaking forces the audience to use their imagination, which usually is better than the filmmaker can provide. However, Flemyng doesn't just cut at gore and this gives the film a disjointed feel. The above scene, I mentioned, left me feeling unsatisfied.

It's the actors that add the power and interest to the film. Even though their characters are lacking in appeal and are two-dimensional in structure they do breath a spark into them. It's just a shame that we don't get more of the Farmer, Mr Thatcher as I think Fletcher does a brilliant job with him. Eve Myles tries to Vamp it up as Vanessa but doesn't quite come across sexy enough - close though. Then you have the likes of Tony Curran as Boniface, Mackenzie Cook as Larousse, and Annette Crosbie as Alice... all of which are underused.

So what we have is a nicely directed and well acted mostly dull and boring story. The entire thing would do well with a complete overhaul. The idea is strong and sound it just needed handling better, especially with the horror and comedic elements.

I wouldn't recommend this to anyone who likes vampires or horror movies to rush out and grab a copy. Wait for it to come onto telly... and then, only if there's nothing else worth watching.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Rather boring...
paul_haakonsen23 August 2022
I have to admit that the synopsis for the 2017 horror comedy from writer Danny King and director Jason Flemyng definitely sounded interesting, and it made me want to sit down and watch the movie. And I did so here in 2022, as I stumbled upon the movie by random luck, and without ever having heard about the movie.

I didn't know what to expect here, aside from what I read on the synopsis, so writer Danny King and director Jason Flemyng had every opportunity to impress me.

The storyline in "Eat Locals" turned out to be a rather flaccid one actually. The storyline deviated quite a lot from what the synopsis would otherwise lead you to believe, so that was somewhat disappointing.

And to make matters worse, then the storyline utterly failed to entertain or impress me. Sure, I managed to sit through just about 1 hour of the ordeal, but then I ended up tossing the towel in the ring and giving up on the movie. It was obvious that the movie was not going to change pace or tone and become something actually worthwhile watching.

I was surprised to see the likes of Charlie Cox, Mackenzie Crook and Dexter Fletcher on the cast list here. Other than those, then I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble. And that is usually something I enjoy when watching movies, as I am not associating the performers with previously portrayed characters. But since the actors and actresses had nothing worthwhile to work with in "Eat Locals", then an unknown cast ensemble didn't really shine that much anyway.

I wasn't entertained by this movie, and it is not a movie that I would recommend fans of the horror comedy genre to rush out and get to watch.

My rating of "Eat Locals" lands on a three out of ten stars.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed