Office (2015) Poster

(2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A clear example of style over substance, Johnnie To's musical-drama is visually impressive but narratively empty
moviexclusive9 September 2015
At a ripe old age of 60, Hong Kong's gangster noir master Johnnie To seems to have mellowed. In place of hard-boiled male-driven films like 'The Mission', 'Election' and 'Exiled', To has preached about the corruptibility of money in 'Life Without Principle', broken his cardinal rule against sequels in favour of a sappy slapstick rom-com in 'Don't Go Breaking My Heart 2', and is now doing a full-fledged musical about corporate politics. 'Office', adapted by Sylvia Chang from her own hit play 'Design for Living', is probably the most uncharacteristic Johnnie To film we have seen to date, though it is also hardly one of his best, be it from a critical or commercial standpoint.

As with her play, Chang stars as the high-powered CEO named Winnie of the lucrative company Jones & Sunn that is about to launch its IPO. Established early in the narrative is that Winnie used to be the Chairman's secretary, and that their relationship goes beyond that of a mentor and a mentee. Indeed, it is an open secret among the company's rank and file employees that Winnie is Chairman Ho Chung-ping's (Chow Yun Fat) lover, and it is also hinted later on that his comatose wife (Mimi Kung) whom he visits regularly in hospital with a bouquet of flowers has never quite gotten over his affair. On the other hand, his bright Harvard-graduate daughter Kat (Long Yueting) has just joined the company as an ordinary employee, in order to give her an opportunity to prove her worth to her fellow colleagues.

Though Winnie was a pivotal lead character in the stage version, Chang's screenplay instead cedes more time to three other characters – her vice CEO David Wang (Eason Chan), a bold but impetuous go- getter who has been using the company's money to dabble in stocks; the company's financial controller Sophie (Tang Wei), who has just been dumped by her fiancé back in China because she keeps putting off their marriage in fear that it would affect her career progression; and last but not least, Li Xiang (Wang Liyi), an eager bright-eyed new employee whom Winnie favours to David's resentment and who has a thing for the Chairman's daughter Kat. Their collective fates unfold against the backdrop of the looming Lehman crisis in 2008, with profound ramifications on both the company and its employees.

Commendable though it may be for Chang to reduce her role in order to give voice to the other characters occupying different strata of the company hierarchy, the absence of a lead character unfortunately makes for several under-developed subplots that don't quite flow or blend into each other. David comes off as the most fully formed character of the lot, but his tryst with Winnie and subsequent manipulation of Sophie in the midst of her emotional meltdown lacks credibility. Ditto for Li Xiang's attraction towards Kat, which isn't given a raison d'être beyond love at first sight. But most lamentable is the relationship between Chung-ping and Winnie, which has been condensed into a handful of scenes with both exchanging knowing looks at each other during some corporate event or with Winnie staring wistfully at pictures of Chung-ping on her desktop.

Without enough time to properly develop these intricate workplace relationships, To struggles to find the right tone for his blend of office drama and satire. On one hand, the musical numbers strike a comic note on the grind of the everyday work life; on the other, the rest of the film want to portray in all seriousness the different corporate archetypes, whether the over-achieving newcomer, the brash yet insecure senior management executive, or the shrewd but Machiavellian head honcho. That uneasy balance falls apart in the third act as To tries to build towards a finale that is meant to bring both reckoning and closure for the characters, what dramatic resonance in the proceedings sadly undercut by the frivolity of some musical numbers that seem awkwardly inserted to lighten the mood.

These flaws however do not diminish the film's technical accomplishments, of which there are many. For one, the US$6.3 million set designed by William Chang on which the whole film was filmed is impressive to say the very least, especially the open- concept office space comprising one floor of orderly rows of tables and chairs and two converging staircases leading to the upper floor where the CEO's office is. Much thought has also been put into the visual design, which aims for a clean-cut minimalist look that either does away with opaque walls altogether or makes them transparent. In that respect, the staging (pardon the pun) feels almost as if we were watching actors on a stage, performing in a series of interconnected cells defined by thin metal bars and brightly lit florescent tubes.

As unique as 'Office' may be amidst To's oeuvre, it will likely not be remembered among one of his best. That has largely to do with Chang's script, which tries to balance too many characters at the same time and ends up being unwieldy in the process. It also lacks the clarity of purpose and voice as his best films, unable to decide if it wants its message to take away a serious moral message like 'Life Without Principle' or simply be entertained like 'Don't Go Breaking My Heart 2'. It ends up doing neither well, and instead coming off better as a technically accomplished exercise full of style but somewhat lacking in substance. Oh yes, it is pretty to look at, but it is ultimately also pretty empty inside.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
There are many helpless plots in the workplace. I really feel the same.
yoggwork19 February 2019
There are many helpless plots in the workplace. I really feel the same. The junior clerk at the bottom can't see the day to come. The exaggerated scenery is a failure, although it is to match the performance situation of singing and dancing. Perhaps the story will be more plain, more direct and more touching.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Brilliant and boring
Johnnie To may be an ace in directing and exploiting the settings, usually the streets of cities, and Hong Kong in particular, but here it is the offices of a financial company in Hong Kong, and here the film is visually impressive and Johnnie To fully grasps this universe and this set of sets, stairs, glass walls. But this ensemble leaves us unmoved, without any empathy for the characters, in whom we are unable to take an interest. Is it because it is a musical, a real one? Maybe, because we fully admit to be insensitive to this style.

We can see that Johnnie To is making fun of the financial world and of these characters who all wear the same uniform and whose preoccupations are purely financial and who spend their time lying to each other.

Nevertheless, the film is brilliant on the form. And it is always surprising to see Chow Yun-Fat without a gun in his hand!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
OFFICE reflects more stamps from Sylvia Chang's pathos-laden felicity than Johnnie To's rough-and-ready stock-in-trade
lasttimeisaw7 March 2020
"Scripted by Sylvia Chang (one might wonder how come she didn't direct the film herself, one answer probably is that To is more bankable to secure its none-too-meager budget), she plays Winnie, the CEO of a high-flying corporation called Jones & Sunn, whose chairman Mr. Ho (Chow) is also her lover for more than two decades, as the company is going public, she is promised to be a major share holder. Meantime, Mr. Ho sends her own daughter Kat (Lang) to work anonymously as an intern (with only Winnie knows the lowdown), and Kat meets another tenderfoot, the ambitious but doe-eyed Lee Seung (Wang), romantic tingle eventually materializes as the film follows through their wide-eyed experience of how a corporation operates under the savvy supervision of Winnie, but also cracks start to show when the IPO process is undermined from within, especially by David Wong (Chan), the mid-level executive who commits some hanky-panky both financially (mad keen on earning "double" in the stock market) and sexually (also a casual lover of Winnie), and when his gamble falls through, he has to wheedle Sophie (Tang), the accountant hailed from mainland to appropriate the company's money to save his skin, on the false promise of his amorous fondness."

read my full review on my blog: cinema omnivore
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Out w/ the Jean-Pierre Melville, in w/ the Frank Tashlin! Long live cinema!
mehobulls5 September 2020
Experimental, fun & disconcerting. The office metallic structure is open & vertical, it's governed by a giant clock; people are moving inside it like coucou figures; one particular scene in all glass translucent restaurant where the employees have gathered for a drink seems borrowed from a hive of swarming bees. Actors are in motion frenzy; this is not a time to probe feelings; what you see is all what there is
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Flashy and fun!
christa-pelc25 January 2021
Wow, the costumes are lavish, the music superb and the story is engaging. This is the story of an office romance, a divided family, a deception and many power struggles. What more could you want?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed