Fun movie. Escapist. If you're looking for gritty crime drama, move on. But if you're looking for charming characters, good performances, and a feel good movie where the real bad guys get what's coming to them, then you will enjoy this little gem.
26 Reviews
gentle entertainment
jimseth-982-86566628 January 2017
This was a film of gentle entertainment for people who like a cheery story and a pleasant viewing experience with a few laughs along the way.
If you like gritty crime drams, horror movies or deep and meaningful drama this will not be the film for you. If you would enjoy seeing the best of our stalwart British Actors still adding value in their latter years with a gentle story with an uplifting ending you might fare better.
A great soundtrack for baby- boomers. Look out for classic performances from the likes of Phil Davies who never fails to please.
If you like gritty crime drams, horror movies or deep and meaningful drama this will not be the film for you. If you would enjoy seeing the best of our stalwart British Actors still adding value in their latter years with a gentle story with an uplifting ending you might fare better.
A great soundtrack for baby- boomers. Look out for classic performances from the likes of Phil Davies who never fails to please.
Easy watching lovely OAP Yarn
praestandum30 August 2021
A lighthearted comedy
Gordon-1124 January 2017
This film tells the story of an elderly man who accidentally stumble upon a case of cash from the security van outside a bank. He discovers that robbing a bank is easy, and goes robbing banks in order to save his social club from being sold to developers.
"Golden Years" is a lighthearted comedy, there is no question about that. It is hard to imagine two retired people robbing banks as easily as counting one two three! The heist scenes are more funny than exciting, and the police conclusions are simply funny. The authorities seem to be incompetent despite all the plan evidence, which is entertaining. There is suggestion of it possibly having a sequel, and I hope it will be as entertaining as this.
"Golden Years" is a lighthearted comedy, there is no question about that. It is hard to imagine two retired people robbing banks as easily as counting one two three! The heist scenes are more funny than exciting, and the police conclusions are simply funny. The authorities seem to be incompetent despite all the plan evidence, which is entertaining. There is suggestion of it possibly having a sequel, and I hope it will be as entertaining as this.
A golden British comedy.
SpoilerAlertReviews5 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I went to see this at a senior screening (afternoon showing which includes tea and biscuits for our beloved old age pensioners) and some might think this is the target audience. Even though I could hear plenty of laughter from the ranks above, there's plenty of current affairs a lot of them could relate to, which wouldn't offend, but bring home some realities.
The film includes pension pinching, poor care home staff and a failing health trust. The bowling club is under threat as is the bingo nights. And Bernard Hill, King of Rohan has had enough of the daylight robbery and turns to a life of crime himself; storming the West Country in his caravan, robbing building societies in Point Break fashion whilst sightseeing the stately homes.
Good cast of British greats including Simon Callow and Mark Williams; it's Brad Moore's full-of- himself Stringer that adds some office like humour donning cowboy boots and a fake tan. It's got plenty of comedy and some laugh out loud moments but there's not enough to be considered a roaring comedy. It has a decent soundtrack suiting the theme giving the film an upbeat attitude.
However that's about it, nothing more to say about the film but it is as the title suggests, it golden, good ol' British humour. Light hearted entertainment that's actually fun for all ages, especially if you like cucumber sandwiches and mobility scooters.
Probably best for when it's released on TV or make the most of the tea and biscuits and grab a senior screening like myself for cheap seats.
Running Time: 8 The Cast: 7 Performance: 7 Direction: 5 Story: 6 Script: 5 Creativity: 6 Soundtrack: 7 Job Description: 5 The Extra Bonus Point: 0
56% 6/10
The film includes pension pinching, poor care home staff and a failing health trust. The bowling club is under threat as is the bingo nights. And Bernard Hill, King of Rohan has had enough of the daylight robbery and turns to a life of crime himself; storming the West Country in his caravan, robbing building societies in Point Break fashion whilst sightseeing the stately homes.
Good cast of British greats including Simon Callow and Mark Williams; it's Brad Moore's full-of- himself Stringer that adds some office like humour donning cowboy boots and a fake tan. It's got plenty of comedy and some laugh out loud moments but there's not enough to be considered a roaring comedy. It has a decent soundtrack suiting the theme giving the film an upbeat attitude.
However that's about it, nothing more to say about the film but it is as the title suggests, it golden, good ol' British humour. Light hearted entertainment that's actually fun for all ages, especially if you like cucumber sandwiches and mobility scooters.
Probably best for when it's released on TV or make the most of the tea and biscuits and grab a senior screening like myself for cheap seats.
Running Time: 8 The Cast: 7 Performance: 7 Direction: 5 Story: 6 Script: 5 Creativity: 6 Soundtrack: 7 Job Description: 5 The Extra Bonus Point: 0
56% 6/10
Silver Star.
GiraffeDoor16 October 2021
Surprisingly engaging, fast paced and taut story of the eldery fighting back again a society that has abandoned them which starts a but "get of my yard!" but soon develops a superb tone of proletarian rage.
Funny, poignant and intriguing, the police procedure aspect for once isn't dull and our heroes never stop being sympathetic.
The vibrant, sunny cinematography is appealing and I can't say I've seen much like it in a long while.
I am not convinced that it is feasible but the message that sometimes those who are breaking the rules are the good guys and those enforcing the law are not just makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside. The solidarity among the elderly people is nice too.
Superb movie to watch with your parents (though do mention a little sex too though) and not half bad for the kids either.
Funny, poignant and intriguing, the police procedure aspect for once isn't dull and our heroes never stop being sympathetic.
The vibrant, sunny cinematography is appealing and I can't say I've seen much like it in a long while.
I am not convinced that it is feasible but the message that sometimes those who are breaking the rules are the good guys and those enforcing the law are not just makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside. The solidarity among the elderly people is nice too.
Superb movie to watch with your parents (though do mention a little sex too though) and not half bad for the kids either.
Solidly enjoyable, with a fine cast
I_Ailurophile17 July 2022
Distinctly recalling the American film 'Going in style' that was released a few weeks prior in 2017, this bears strong similarities in its plot and themes. If anything, 'Golden years' is even more dour in broaching the horrid abuse and neglect of the elderly specifically, and the absurd, cruel inhumanity of society under the first of capitalism and arbitrary financial "markets" generally. Add on top reflection on the necessity of community, and the ceaseless, torrid, thankless demands required of workers. This film treads the same waters of comedy-drama, to be sure, though it's worth noting that the comedy is a tad more understated and sparse, while the stark, somber drama is played up more heavily. At the same time that it's a great delight to watch senior citizens putting pep in their step and spitting in the faces of genuinely villainous institutions, the sad and infuriating realities underlying the scenario somewhat restrain the entertainment to be had. Let's be honest, though - all this is just part and parcel of the story, and makes the movie all the more engaging.
In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that the greater contrast between the competing elements of the picture only serve to heighten each. Where 'Golden years' aims for humor, it's an especial joy to watch Bernard Hill, Virginia McKenna, Simon Callow, and their aged co-stars lean into the playful frivolity - a far cry from the more serious roles we've seen them in, and all the better on account of their advanced years. Factor in the pleasure of seeing Alun Armstrong in so prominent a part as Sid, at 70, and the bluster that Brad Moore happily adopts as smarmy, thoroughly unlikable detective Stringer, and the cast become the heart and soul of the feature. In the more sober moments, meanwhile, the players get a fair chance to exhibit the able skills we all know they possess. Though of course, a strong ensemble counts for little if the film otherwise can't stand on its legs otherwise - yet even for the disparity between the comedy and drama, this is very well balanced and rather capably written. The characters and dialogue are real and believable, and the scene writing that builds the title bit by bit is wonderfully varied as it propels the narrative.
With that said, if there's any slight deficiency to be found in 'Golden years,' it's perhaps in the story being told. Don't get me wrong, overall it's solid, and enjoyable. The swings in tone are sometimes a bit much, however, and while the fundamental weave of the tale is suitable, neither the comedy nor the drama are ever so robustly grabbing as to firmly command our attention. More substantively, though there's plentiful wit and intelligence sprinkled throughout, including at the climax - the climax itself is at once a smidgen inelegant in how it's executed, and like the denouement, too neat and clean in hurriedly wrapping up the story. One derives a certain smug satisfaction in how the plot plays out, but that doesn't entirely mean the storytelling is unimpeachable. By no means is this to say that it's bad at any point, but there's just nothing here to mark 'Golden years' as a "must-see" recommendation.
Whatever perceived shortcomings may present, however, ultimately the movie is just what it wants to be. It's steadily entertaining, with just enough sincere drama as counterbalance, and the all too real, dire themes at the core are ripe for cinema. When all is said and done the cast may be the most noteworthy facet, so fans of Hill, McKenna, or the others are likely to get the most out of the viewing experience. Even for the casual general audience, though, 'Golden years' is sufficient fun that it's worth checking out if you happen upon it.
In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that the greater contrast between the competing elements of the picture only serve to heighten each. Where 'Golden years' aims for humor, it's an especial joy to watch Bernard Hill, Virginia McKenna, Simon Callow, and their aged co-stars lean into the playful frivolity - a far cry from the more serious roles we've seen them in, and all the better on account of their advanced years. Factor in the pleasure of seeing Alun Armstrong in so prominent a part as Sid, at 70, and the bluster that Brad Moore happily adopts as smarmy, thoroughly unlikable detective Stringer, and the cast become the heart and soul of the feature. In the more sober moments, meanwhile, the players get a fair chance to exhibit the able skills we all know they possess. Though of course, a strong ensemble counts for little if the film otherwise can't stand on its legs otherwise - yet even for the disparity between the comedy and drama, this is very well balanced and rather capably written. The characters and dialogue are real and believable, and the scene writing that builds the title bit by bit is wonderfully varied as it propels the narrative.
With that said, if there's any slight deficiency to be found in 'Golden years,' it's perhaps in the story being told. Don't get me wrong, overall it's solid, and enjoyable. The swings in tone are sometimes a bit much, however, and while the fundamental weave of the tale is suitable, neither the comedy nor the drama are ever so robustly grabbing as to firmly command our attention. More substantively, though there's plentiful wit and intelligence sprinkled throughout, including at the climax - the climax itself is at once a smidgen inelegant in how it's executed, and like the denouement, too neat and clean in hurriedly wrapping up the story. One derives a certain smug satisfaction in how the plot plays out, but that doesn't entirely mean the storytelling is unimpeachable. By no means is this to say that it's bad at any point, but there's just nothing here to mark 'Golden years' as a "must-see" recommendation.
Whatever perceived shortcomings may present, however, ultimately the movie is just what it wants to be. It's steadily entertaining, with just enough sincere drama as counterbalance, and the all too real, dire themes at the core are ripe for cinema. When all is said and done the cast may be the most noteworthy facet, so fans of Hill, McKenna, or the others are likely to get the most out of the viewing experience. Even for the casual general audience, though, 'Golden years' is sufficient fun that it's worth checking out if you happen upon it.
Not as good as I thought it would be
euroGary6 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Nick Knowles is best known to me as a presenter of BBC television programmes that require him to stand around in a hard hat of the kind beloved by George Osborne. It turns out he's also a writer, and co-wrote the screenplay of this latest British entry into the comedy genre 'old people behaving badly'.
Arthur and Martha (no, really) are facing financial trouble: no sooner does the price of Martha's medicine dramatically increase than they discover Arthur's former employers have gone bust, meaning he will no longer receive his occupational pension. Arthur, enraged (he's played by Bernard Hill, so working-class anger is really the only option) decides to go on the rob. Before long Martha has joined him and they embark on a spree of bank hold-ups (combining same with a touring holiday of National Trust stately homes). But when their local bowls club is threatened, it's going to take more money than just the two of them can steal to save it: time to call in their friends.
This was not as laugh-out-loud funny as I thought it would be: there are some chuckly moments, but in the main it is the kind of comedy that raises a smile rather than a guffaw. Unfortunately, the script at times gets so preachy the viewer feels like he's being clubbed about the head: there is much talk of money-grabbing bankers and National Health Service 'postcode lotteries'. Careless writing (or editing) also causes some obvious errors: Alun Armstrong's police detective simply disappears toward the end of the film with no explanation; and unless I missed a vital bit of exposition the timings of the final heist do not work once the funeral has been taken into account.
So the real joy of this is - as so often with British films - seeing on the big screen actors you are more used to watching on television. As well as the afore-mentioned Hill and Armstrong, there are also Una Stubbs, Simon Callow (trying a West Country accent he should be thoroughly ashamed of), Phil Davis, Sue Johnston, Ellen Thomas (currently in 'EastEnders') - and, in a rare appearance, Virginia McKenna. It also makes a nice change for a British film not to be set in London (this is set in Bristol). But as for the script? Don't hang up the hard hat yet, Knowlesy...
Arthur and Martha (no, really) are facing financial trouble: no sooner does the price of Martha's medicine dramatically increase than they discover Arthur's former employers have gone bust, meaning he will no longer receive his occupational pension. Arthur, enraged (he's played by Bernard Hill, so working-class anger is really the only option) decides to go on the rob. Before long Martha has joined him and they embark on a spree of bank hold-ups (combining same with a touring holiday of National Trust stately homes). But when their local bowls club is threatened, it's going to take more money than just the two of them can steal to save it: time to call in their friends.
This was not as laugh-out-loud funny as I thought it would be: there are some chuckly moments, but in the main it is the kind of comedy that raises a smile rather than a guffaw. Unfortunately, the script at times gets so preachy the viewer feels like he's being clubbed about the head: there is much talk of money-grabbing bankers and National Health Service 'postcode lotteries'. Careless writing (or editing) also causes some obvious errors: Alun Armstrong's police detective simply disappears toward the end of the film with no explanation; and unless I missed a vital bit of exposition the timings of the final heist do not work once the funeral has been taken into account.
So the real joy of this is - as so often with British films - seeing on the big screen actors you are more used to watching on television. As well as the afore-mentioned Hill and Armstrong, there are also Una Stubbs, Simon Callow (trying a West Country accent he should be thoroughly ashamed of), Phil Davis, Sue Johnston, Ellen Thomas (currently in 'EastEnders') - and, in a rare appearance, Virginia McKenna. It also makes a nice change for a British film not to be set in London (this is set in Bristol). But as for the script? Don't hang up the hard hat yet, Knowlesy...
Barely average.
churchofsunshine12 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Nick Knowles is best known in the UK as the presenter on the various National Lottery quiz shows and as a staple ingredient of the BBC's daytime TV schedule fronting various lifestyle shows. Apparently he also fancies himself as a writer, and somehow or other, one of his scripts has managed to get the green-light and released as 'Golden Years' with the extra tag-line 'Grand Theft OAP'. It came and went from UK cinema screens without any fanfare, and isn't likely to get any larger exposure now it is available on home video.
Bernard Hill is hardly a headline actor (I recognised him only as Captain Smith of the Titanic in James Cameron's 1997 film of the same name) - his most famous work was probably 'Boys From the Blackstuff'. Una Stubbs starred with Cliff Richard in the film 'Summer Holiday' and was Aunt Sally in 'Worzel Gummidge'. Simon Callow was in 'Four Weddings & A Funeral'. In 1966 Virginia McKenna starred in 'Born Free', and like most of the cast, her career has seen better days. I guess there aren't many good acting roles for pensioners these days. 'Golden Years' tries to be a comedy but never really succeeds.
Sloppy editing - or writing - I'm not sure which, means there are plot holes you could drive a tank through. What happens to Alun Armstrong's character at the end of the movie I have no idea as he just seems to disappear, and the timing of the funeral before the big heist makes no sense at all. Unless I missed something, a character dies and is buried within two days, and that just isn't realistic. We're led to believe the characters get away Scot-free with their heist, but how can that be so when Brad Moore's character clearly had them bang-to-rights just before the final climax? Suddenly nothing seemed to make sense and it is full of unanswered questions. Besides anything else, are we to believe he went out to a caravan dealer with several wads of sealed £50 notes and paid for a top-of-the-range model in hard cash? Wouldn't something like that arouse suspicion? Wouldn't the brand-new notes be traceable by their security numbers? The police would be knocking at his door in a heartbeat. I think Nick Knowles should stick to presenting, as he clearly isn't much good at writing.
My advice is to wait for this one to hit Freeview and air on Film4. You're not missing anything by buying it on DVD. I can't believe they even got 'Bargain Hunt's real-life auctioneer Philip Serell to basically play himself in a cameo. Nothing about this film was even remotely credible. Even the 'Care Home from Hell' at the beginning was laughable, and not in a good way, and that's before I get to talking about the idea of an 'NHS Postcode Lottery'. It's the sort of right-wing nonsense you read in the 'Daily Mail' that is inevitably not true. I really didn't rate this film much at all. 5/10 is being kind.
Bernard Hill is hardly a headline actor (I recognised him only as Captain Smith of the Titanic in James Cameron's 1997 film of the same name) - his most famous work was probably 'Boys From the Blackstuff'. Una Stubbs starred with Cliff Richard in the film 'Summer Holiday' and was Aunt Sally in 'Worzel Gummidge'. Simon Callow was in 'Four Weddings & A Funeral'. In 1966 Virginia McKenna starred in 'Born Free', and like most of the cast, her career has seen better days. I guess there aren't many good acting roles for pensioners these days. 'Golden Years' tries to be a comedy but never really succeeds.
Sloppy editing - or writing - I'm not sure which, means there are plot holes you could drive a tank through. What happens to Alun Armstrong's character at the end of the movie I have no idea as he just seems to disappear, and the timing of the funeral before the big heist makes no sense at all. Unless I missed something, a character dies and is buried within two days, and that just isn't realistic. We're led to believe the characters get away Scot-free with their heist, but how can that be so when Brad Moore's character clearly had them bang-to-rights just before the final climax? Suddenly nothing seemed to make sense and it is full of unanswered questions. Besides anything else, are we to believe he went out to a caravan dealer with several wads of sealed £50 notes and paid for a top-of-the-range model in hard cash? Wouldn't something like that arouse suspicion? Wouldn't the brand-new notes be traceable by their security numbers? The police would be knocking at his door in a heartbeat. I think Nick Knowles should stick to presenting, as he clearly isn't much good at writing.
My advice is to wait for this one to hit Freeview and air on Film4. You're not missing anything by buying it on DVD. I can't believe they even got 'Bargain Hunt's real-life auctioneer Philip Serell to basically play himself in a cameo. Nothing about this film was even remotely credible. Even the 'Care Home from Hell' at the beginning was laughable, and not in a good way, and that's before I get to talking about the idea of an 'NHS Postcode Lottery'. It's the sort of right-wing nonsense you read in the 'Daily Mail' that is inevitably not true. I really didn't rate this film much at all. 5/10 is being kind.
Sometimes, 'fightback' is the only option.
Reno-Rangan14 June 2017
This film quite reminded me the Korean film I saw a few years ago called 'Grandma Gangsters'. That film was about a vacation, though money involves and here it was about the pension. That's a serious thing, could have been another 'I, Daniel Blake', but that's not how it goes. A very interesting and comical take on the pension crisis. What could the old people can do about it? Well, that's the point, they use an opportunity that comes their way to tackle the issue.
I love films involving aged people. Not for amusement, but to see them struggle, emotionally I break down. Only those on the realistic portrayals. This title looked okay, but when I read the synopsis, I desperately wanted to see it. I knew it was a comedy, so I did not expect greater, except some good laughs. It did delivered, but I felt a few scenes were very unrealistic, even for a cinematic. Like the ending was not convincing enough. Though the rest of the film was fine.
The story centres on the character Arthur played by Bernard Hill, which I first time noticed his character, particularly being in the lead since as Theodon, the King of Rohan from 'The Lord of the Rings'. So, like any film, it all begins with a simple introduction of his life and people around him. Unlike his friends, he is much able to do the stuffs at his age. Some way or the other, they are all depending on him, including his wife. Then one day he comes to know that he's not eligible anymore for his pension benefits. After thinking a lot, the heartbroken Arthur decides to take an extreme step. So begins his new adventure, and the following, his gang joins him.
❝They may take our pensions, but they will never take our lives.❞
Does it not sound cool! Brilliant performances by all. For a theme like this, the characters have to be fit which is a stereotype that this film breaks. But there were some sacrifices like the screenplay was altered to balance between the physically weak characters and the contents that's usually fast and furious and sometimes rough handling requires. It all worked though.
A crime film, yet there's no violence or the action sequences. Involves some nervous scenes and like I said earlier, the end twist should have been better. Considering how everything was developed, that was not a bad ending at all, especially keeping in mind audience point of view of what they would be expecting. It was not entirely about the old guys. The cops have a small part, including one of them was old who leads the robbery case.
At some point, it looked like 'Bonnie and Clyde', which was mentioned in the storyline as well. Like a cat-and-mouse game, the events in the tale stretches as much as it can possible, providing entertainment for us. The narration could have ended in very early, though the cops were not all Sherlocks. Everything in the interest of the film to develop in the right way with little silly and more funny.
Not an average film or a classic. Made with a decent budget and the fine casting, I think the film is good to try once, but I suggest not to anticipate like any outstanding heist films you have seen in your life. Learn about the film, like its storyline and its characters. If you do that you will understand its limitations, except less fun while watching the film.
7/10
I love films involving aged people. Not for amusement, but to see them struggle, emotionally I break down. Only those on the realistic portrayals. This title looked okay, but when I read the synopsis, I desperately wanted to see it. I knew it was a comedy, so I did not expect greater, except some good laughs. It did delivered, but I felt a few scenes were very unrealistic, even for a cinematic. Like the ending was not convincing enough. Though the rest of the film was fine.
The story centres on the character Arthur played by Bernard Hill, which I first time noticed his character, particularly being in the lead since as Theodon, the King of Rohan from 'The Lord of the Rings'. So, like any film, it all begins with a simple introduction of his life and people around him. Unlike his friends, he is much able to do the stuffs at his age. Some way or the other, they are all depending on him, including his wife. Then one day he comes to know that he's not eligible anymore for his pension benefits. After thinking a lot, the heartbroken Arthur decides to take an extreme step. So begins his new adventure, and the following, his gang joins him.
❝They may take our pensions, but they will never take our lives.❞
Does it not sound cool! Brilliant performances by all. For a theme like this, the characters have to be fit which is a stereotype that this film breaks. But there were some sacrifices like the screenplay was altered to balance between the physically weak characters and the contents that's usually fast and furious and sometimes rough handling requires. It all worked though.
A crime film, yet there's no violence or the action sequences. Involves some nervous scenes and like I said earlier, the end twist should have been better. Considering how everything was developed, that was not a bad ending at all, especially keeping in mind audience point of view of what they would be expecting. It was not entirely about the old guys. The cops have a small part, including one of them was old who leads the robbery case.
At some point, it looked like 'Bonnie and Clyde', which was mentioned in the storyline as well. Like a cat-and-mouse game, the events in the tale stretches as much as it can possible, providing entertainment for us. The narration could have ended in very early, though the cops were not all Sherlocks. Everything in the interest of the film to develop in the right way with little silly and more funny.
Not an average film or a classic. Made with a decent budget and the fine casting, I think the film is good to try once, but I suggest not to anticipate like any outstanding heist films you have seen in your life. Learn about the film, like its storyline and its characters. If you do that you will understand its limitations, except less fun while watching the film.
7/10
Such a shame
jb-949004 March 2018
It seems inevitable that the careers of well known, well respected actors finish with them having to accept "end of the pier" scripts such as this. Another reviewer has already pointed out many of the huge plot holes in this movie. The actors just about kept me watching but really it was no better than the awfully scripted comic spots in TV shows such as Rogue Traders and Martin Lewis' Money show etc., which I can no longer bear to watch. These actors deserve much better written scripts worthy of their proven acting abilities.
A gold star film.
Sleepin_Dragon11 April 2021
A mature couple take a stand against the banks after a pensions collapse.
I absolutely loved every single second of this movie, it's funny, moving, very different, and features some of Britain's finest mature actors. Funny, plenty of unexpected moments, and lots of great lines. As always with this type of film, there are plenty of moving scenes.
It's always great to see a mature cast in a film, everyone here a quality actor, what a cast list.
Some wonderful visuals, they picked some terrific locations to film at.
I can't make my mind up who steals this, Bernard Hillnot Brad Moore, Hill had me absolutely captivated, in acting terms he really stands out, such a wonderful actor, Moore on the other hand is hilarious, and drop dead gorgeous.
Loved it, 9/10.
I absolutely loved every single second of this movie, it's funny, moving, very different, and features some of Britain's finest mature actors. Funny, plenty of unexpected moments, and lots of great lines. As always with this type of film, there are plenty of moving scenes.
It's always great to see a mature cast in a film, everyone here a quality actor, what a cast list.
Some wonderful visuals, they picked some terrific locations to film at.
I can't make my mind up who steals this, Bernard Hillnot Brad Moore, Hill had me absolutely captivated, in acting terms he really stands out, such a wonderful actor, Moore on the other hand is hilarious, and drop dead gorgeous.
Loved it, 9/10.
Enjoyable if far-fetched fun film
szweda-1855529 July 2021
We watched this on Prime Video and stayed awake for most of it. A while ago we watched Dad's Army and these two are similar, light-hearted romps with unlikely plots but loaded with acting talent of mainly the British variety and not to be examined too critically. Oh, and Blow Dry too...
Yes, it was a cute, feeling-good knockabout tale of Hobbit-stature folk in the southern counties... all very polite and "if only" but compared to British horror films these films are, we thought, well worth your time.
No sex, no profanity, no violence as such... pour a glass and press play... PS Why no subtitles for this modern film for us older folk?
No sex, no profanity, no violence as such... pour a glass and press play... PS Why no subtitles for this modern film for us older folk?
Cringe worthy
carollake-896228 August 2021
Some fine actors (Hill, Stubbs, Callow) working to a dreadful script and plot..
Trying hard to be funny and failing. The story of the wannabe tough cop is so unfunny and obvious, plius the actor having zero talent means it's more cringing than humorous. McKenna and Johnston should have been retired long ago.
Is this the best our film industry can come up with?
Trying hard to be funny and failing. The story of the wannabe tough cop is so unfunny and obvious, plius the actor having zero talent means it's more cringing than humorous. McKenna and Johnston should have been retired long ago.
Is this the best our film industry can come up with?
Don't take it seriously
r96sk10 July 2020
'Golden Years' is hit-and-miss in a few areas, but overall it's all a good laugh with an entertaining premise.
Logically a lot of it is flawed and/or undercooked, most of the characters act strangely and the plot is kinda choppy in parts; especially across the final act. They try to force things together, whilst seemingly believing they're being much more clever and funny than they actually are.
However, taking out all of that, it does produce entertainment I can't lie. The cast are very good, with Bernard Hill (Athur) and Simon Callow (Royston) standing out. Brad Moore's Stringer is a terrible character though, he adds nothing despite being a key part to the plot.
It's silly and averagely written, particularly the dialogue. I can't, though, deny I did enjoy myself watching this. If you don't take it seriously, which is admittedly difficult as it sometimes comes across as if they are trying to be smart, then you'll have a good time viewing.
Logically a lot of it is flawed and/or undercooked, most of the characters act strangely and the plot is kinda choppy in parts; especially across the final act. They try to force things together, whilst seemingly believing they're being much more clever and funny than they actually are.
However, taking out all of that, it does produce entertainment I can't lie. The cast are very good, with Bernard Hill (Athur) and Simon Callow (Royston) standing out. Brad Moore's Stringer is a terrible character though, he adds nothing despite being a key part to the plot.
It's silly and averagely written, particularly the dialogue. I can't, though, deny I did enjoy myself watching this. If you don't take it seriously, which is admittedly difficult as it sometimes comes across as if they are trying to be smart, then you'll have a good time viewing.
We watched this so you don't have to, please, don't .... just don't.
t-c-redman10 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Based on the trailer, we watched this with my 93 year old mother on a Sunday afternoon. I say this to emphasise that we didn't build this up as prime time viewing. But in spite of the promised wit of the plot and charm of the recognisable cast, we saw what is certainly one of the worst and most amateur films ever made. Of course it is a fantasy, but that is no excuse for shoddy plot construction, terrible dialogue, dreadful direction and unwatchable cinematography - unworthy of a crime reconstruction film, the locations were nice, and that was it. The unevenness was excruciating e.g. Crass sex references throughout; the dubious social commentary e.g. Stopping of NHS funding for life saving drugs; the untimely death of one of the leading characters (reprising his early death in a previous, seminal, British comedy). The cast have huge talent, with one exception, but my god, they didn't stand a chance with the script (the exception being the spray tanned policeman, who was one of the worst actors I have ever seen). An oddity was all the extras being listed in the closing credits, does this mean they either worked for no fee ( but a credit instead) or perhaps the film was crowd funded? I can only imagine the biggest cost of the film was for the rights to the music, but sullying David Bowie's classic title song can surely not justify the fee paid? Can I respectfully request that the producers and writers go back to their day jobs, and despite their best intentions, satisfy themselves with the knowledge that just because you can make a film, it doesn't mean you should make a film.
Golden Years
Prismark1022 September 2021
Another in the recent line of heist movies featuring pensioners who have been swindled by their pension fund.
Golden Years wants to be Ealingesque with a touch of social conscience for the plight of the elderly.
Arthur (Bernard Hill) and Martha (Virginia McKenna) are a retired couple. She needs medical treatment and Arthur discovers that he might not be able to afford it as his pension fund has tanked.
In desperation he thinks about robbing a bank. Only for good fortune to come his way, he accidentally manages to get away with 50k from a security van that has come to the bank.
Emboldened, Arthur plans another bank robbery and this time Martha joins him. Later his friends join in for further robberies as they are also struggling financially.
The police led by veteran Sid (Alun Armstrong) believe that a violent gang is behind the robberies, not a bunch of pensioners.
Golden Years is co-written by television presenter Nick Knowles. An improbable plot is amiably done with lots of charm. Unfortunately it is too silly and at times plays like a farce.
Virginia McKenna looks too old to be Bernard Hill's wife. Alun Armstrong is too old to still be plod. Simon Callow is just too fruity.
Golden Years wants to be Ealingesque with a touch of social conscience for the plight of the elderly.
Arthur (Bernard Hill) and Martha (Virginia McKenna) are a retired couple. She needs medical treatment and Arthur discovers that he might not be able to afford it as his pension fund has tanked.
In desperation he thinks about robbing a bank. Only for good fortune to come his way, he accidentally manages to get away with 50k from a security van that has come to the bank.
Emboldened, Arthur plans another bank robbery and this time Martha joins him. Later his friends join in for further robberies as they are also struggling financially.
The police led by veteran Sid (Alun Armstrong) believe that a violent gang is behind the robberies, not a bunch of pensioners.
Golden Years is co-written by television presenter Nick Knowles. An improbable plot is amiably done with lots of charm. Unfortunately it is too silly and at times plays like a farce.
Virginia McKenna looks too old to be Bernard Hill's wife. Alun Armstrong is too old to still be plod. Simon Callow is just too fruity.
A Cracking Little Film.
billyslad18 March 2018
I'd never heard of or knew about this film. I came across it on Netflix as I was looking for British films to watch.
If you like gentle British comedies/dramas similar to the Margery and Gladys film with June Brown and Penelope Keith, you'll love this. I'm not going to pull the film to pieces on improbabilities like some critics do, just watch it for the fun it is. There are many older British stalwarts of film and television in this and it's great to see them together here. I loved this film, though it will probably appeal to an older audience more than a younger one.
If you like gentle British comedies/dramas similar to the Margery and Gladys film with June Brown and Penelope Keith, you'll love this. I'm not going to pull the film to pieces on improbabilities like some critics do, just watch it for the fun it is. There are many older British stalwarts of film and television in this and it's great to see them together here. I loved this film, though it will probably appeal to an older audience more than a younger one.
As the British so Eloquently say - What a Pile of RUBBISH...
tbugera28 March 2023
Some fine actors (Hill, Stubbs, Callow) working to a dreadful script and plot..
I didn't even manage 5 minutes of this drivel - & half of that was on Fast Forward.
Trying hard to be funny and failing. The story of the wannabe tough cop is so unfunny and obvious, plius the actor having zero talent means it's more cringing than humorous. McKenna and Johnston should have been retired long ago.
Is this the best our film industry can come up with?
Some fine actors (Hill, Stubbs, Callow) working to a dreadful script and plot..
Trying hard to be funny and failing. The story of the wannabe tough cop is so unfunny and obvious, plius the actor having zero talent means it's more cringing than humorous. McKenna and Johnston should have been retired long ago.
Is this the best our film industry can come up with?
I didn't even manage 5 minutes of this drivel - & half of that was on Fast Forward.
Trying hard to be funny and failing. The story of the wannabe tough cop is so unfunny and obvious, plius the actor having zero talent means it's more cringing than humorous. McKenna and Johnston should have been retired long ago.
Is this the best our film industry can come up with?
Some fine actors (Hill, Stubbs, Callow) working to a dreadful script and plot..
Trying hard to be funny and failing. The story of the wannabe tough cop is so unfunny and obvious, plius the actor having zero talent means it's more cringing than humorous. McKenna and Johnston should have been retired long ago.
Is this the best our film industry can come up with?
Superb entertainment with social commentary
stevenduhig30 September 2019
Just loved this movie. So entertaining with .great humour and superb experienced cast. The social commentary is perhaps less percepible with US audience but it is great. Very well written, directed, filmed and edited. Shame Tom Jones did not appear in person..
A grand story
colinjames85026 March 2021
Great fun!
french-800892 May 2020
Beautiful and funny crime caper
adamtheactor-976774 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Golden Years is a well crafted treat that will more than likely strike a chord with the older generation. It's certainly not a laugh a minute film ,but has a careful mix of drama and old fashioned fun. A film that has a great cast from the past and present. It's one of those little gems that comes along in British film once in a while. Credit to the writing team for producing something fresh that is built on great story telling, rather than non-stop special effects and action.
Brad Moore is an absolute joy to watch. His character (DC Stringer) thinks of himself as a media sensation, determined to upstage the older detective investigating the bank robberies at every given chance. Bernard Hill is fantastic as always and plays his character for real.
John Miller who has very little to show in regards to previous film credits, directs with a natural tone and energy. He certainly knows how to stage the tender moments, and the outright slapstick in a near perfect fashion.
The result is a very enjoyable film indeed.
The result is a very enjoyable film indeed.
Light hearted fun
adamabraham-5436425 March 2021
Cracking Lighthearted Laugh
berniek-1058819 June 2021
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
