Softcore porn with no discernable plot. Nudity and sex scenes aplenty that fails to tell a story. In reading the IMDB summary this movie sounded interesting. The description had to come from the film makers themselves. The movie did not convey many of the things described.
A story told in non-linear fashion keeps your attention. The inter-relatedness of the scenes is usually explained / tied together by the movie's ending. such as Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction." This movie was just random scenes: New York in winter, girl/girl sex scenes, boy/girl sex scene, Lunch scene. Of this collection the lunch scene was the most helpful in figuring out this movie.
Technical flaws or items that bothered me: The movie was in black and white save for a few scenes shown in color for no apparent reason. The model / Dee's scenes with "The Other" or the married man bordered on being ridiculous. They have sex, actively humping, while both are still wearing their underwear. This contrasts with Dee and Elenore's scenes that show full frontal nudity and come close to showing penetration. Cut to the bathroom scene, Dee is in the tub and the man walks in wearing a loin cloth. I though the director was against male nudity but, I was wrong. As we watch in full view as the man lifts his loin cloth and washes his penis in the sink. Illogical that he would put on a loin cloth to join his sex partner in the bathroom. Although it adds to his unlikability by having him wash in the sink. During this Dee is in the tub and the bath mat was left hanging on the side of the tub. People that use towels as bath mats typically put them on the floor when bathing to avoid getting the towel soaking wet and to actually use them as bath mats. My best guess is that the tub wasn't filled for this scene.
The color and lighting were a miss and only added to the lack of purpose in this movie. Black and white to color and back again, repeatedly. The last scene with Dee and Elenore was shot in the dark. It could have been done with shadow puppets. I gave you a three star rating, because your movie will serve teenagers well as a masturbatory aid. Next time a little more story a little less nudity.
A story told in non-linear fashion keeps your attention. The inter-relatedness of the scenes is usually explained / tied together by the movie's ending. such as Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction." This movie was just random scenes: New York in winter, girl/girl sex scenes, boy/girl sex scene, Lunch scene. Of this collection the lunch scene was the most helpful in figuring out this movie.
Technical flaws or items that bothered me: The movie was in black and white save for a few scenes shown in color for no apparent reason. The model / Dee's scenes with "The Other" or the married man bordered on being ridiculous. They have sex, actively humping, while both are still wearing their underwear. This contrasts with Dee and Elenore's scenes that show full frontal nudity and come close to showing penetration. Cut to the bathroom scene, Dee is in the tub and the man walks in wearing a loin cloth. I though the director was against male nudity but, I was wrong. As we watch in full view as the man lifts his loin cloth and washes his penis in the sink. Illogical that he would put on a loin cloth to join his sex partner in the bathroom. Although it adds to his unlikability by having him wash in the sink. During this Dee is in the tub and the bath mat was left hanging on the side of the tub. People that use towels as bath mats typically put them on the floor when bathing to avoid getting the towel soaking wet and to actually use them as bath mats. My best guess is that the tub wasn't filled for this scene.
The color and lighting were a miss and only added to the lack of purpose in this movie. Black and white to color and back again, repeatedly. The last scene with Dee and Elenore was shot in the dark. It could have been done with shadow puppets. I gave you a three star rating, because your movie will serve teenagers well as a masturbatory aid. Next time a little more story a little less nudity.
