Storm Children: Book One (2014) User Reviews

A stoner documentary: slow, almost no dialogue but beautiful in a nostalgic way

[tomaspartl · 8/10 · 26 October 2022]

This documentary is black and white, runs for 2 hours and 20 minutes, there's about 10 minutes of dialogue in total and it has no story.

It's basically a bunch of children roaming around a wasteland that used to their village before the hurricane smashed down most of the houses with gigantic ships that it carried ashore and drowned half the population.

So, there's a couple of ships that are about the height of a 5-story building resting next to a bunch of shacks made of bamboo and tarp or just shabby tents that look like something from World War II. And there's mud all over the place. But luckily, some of the ships were left in the sea and it's a total blast to go with your friends and climb them and jump into the sea and bring some kinda raft-thing to them and just hang around and jump into the sea some more. Yeah, life sucks, everyone's dead and the village is a pool of mud but hey, we're kids and we're gonna have fun like no one else in the world. I mean, do you have a bunch of wrecked freight ships in your water park?

Not quite the documentary you will expect

[plsletitrain · 1 February 2018]

But its Lav. And he could be surprising and unpredictable to a certain extent, with his works. Which could work both ways. Will he wow you? Or will he disappoint you. In this case, it was the latter for me.

I decided to break down my positive and not-so-positive take on the film.

Positive 1) Mesmerizing would be an apt word to describe the first few minutes of the film. The way he shot the scenes, you feel like you're taken to the actual place. Staring at the sight of rain falling, or a close-up of the water flowing in the river is just very mesmerizing you'll feel lost while looking at it. Its like you're being hypnotized by the rain and the water and even if that's the only thing you stare at, you still enjoy it. 2)It felt so surreal watching the calm sea and how angry it must have looked like while the eye of the storm was passing. 3) It was a delight to see children singing Frozen's "Let it go" while knowing that hours/days before, they experienced a major catastrophe. 4)There was one scene where the camera was shaking hard, and not just the usual shaky cam we see, it was literally shaking that was probably brought by the wind blowing. It felt so real, not choreographed. This was just as real as it could get. Not so positive 1)While I know that the film is a documentary, it looked like a literal slide-show silent film. To be honest, if you were doing anything aside from watching the movie, you won't miss much because the scenes were a bit protracted. 2)I don't know where I got my expectations from, but I kinda expected it to be a documentary before, during, and right after the storm. Almost more than 3/4 of the film was devoted to showing scenes of children playing with floodwater, or children swimming on the already-calm sea. There was only a few minutes where actual dialogue and actual interview of the victims and survivors were done. 3)This is NOT for the dialogue-driven. Visual-driven, can be, but the movie will lose you because as I said, the scenes are protracted. 4)There were some scenes where a random out-of-nowhere pop love songs play. In the end part, a trance song randomly also played. E

There were only a few minutes that had actual interviews with the people of Tacloban, the hardest hit city. I wish Lav focused on these first-hand accounts more.