"NCIS" Choke Hold (TV Episode 2014) Poster

(TV Series)

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Choke Hold
nebohr6 January 2022
Choke Hold 12.4.

Too much technical babble. Have you ever seen the starter motor on your car? THAT, along with a gearbox, could deliver the amount of torque required to slice through someone's neck. So: starter motor, gearbox, battery and controls/wiring? All would weigh in the neighborhood of 80 pounds.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting Story
writeras3 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The plot of this episode is interesting and entertaining, but does have some holes. Apparently the actor who plays the Russian scientist could not do a Russian accent. We're supposed to believe that she is trying to defect, but she speaks better English than the NCIS agents. Not a believable Russian at all.

Another hole is after the scientist is supposedly shot and killed. Wouldn't the Russians want the body returned? How did Gibbs know that they wouldn't?

The writers also never satisfactorily identified the leak. Who was passing information to the assassin? Who hired the assassin? We think it might be either the Russian government or a rogue faction? The story isn't very clear which.

Still, it is an enjoyable outing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Manipulative at best
mdfurman29 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
(Don't think this has spoilers, unless plot structure and character development are considered spoilers; for some writers they are. No specifics given herein.)

The writing is usually smart and creative. This episode was atypical with usually- logical characters making compounded illogical conclusions solely for the purpose of falsely raising the ire of the audience. (One character going off the rails at a time is a plot point; all characters, except Mallard, behaving out of character is a lack of creativity in the need to create conflict.) To further depart from character, the MacGuffin, interesting in its own right, was discussed with an insensitivity that is usually reserved for sophomoric B slasher movies -- an unusual break from sensitivity exaggerates the horrific scene at a cost of damaging the character of the individual -- again, these sort of character flaws are used in B movies to herald someone's demise.) As with many poor script, a deus ex machina ending coupled with a move back to center for the characters, is used to elicit much higher-than-deserved ratings. This was noble characters performing at their worst, redeeming themselves in the end, rather than noble characters working against impossible odds and eventually triumphing. Maybe this is what they wanted; we found it more manipulative than creative.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed