The Remains (2016) Poster

(I) (2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
88 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Don't expect much, and you may half enjoy.
Sleepin_Dragon23 September 2019
The first thing you notice is the film looks cheap, the special effects are shoddy, some of the costumes look like people dressed up for Halloween, and it's a story that's been done to death. Despite the negatives it's watchable enough.

Todd Lowe is rather good as the central character, the tormented father, not unlike a young Kenneth Brannagh.

Some decent scares, although just as the film starts to get into its groove, it comes to an end.

I wouldn't watch it again, but it was a decent watch.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Wasn't bad but wont be watching second time
Mista_K16 August 2016
After seeing the rating before the movie I was a little hesitant on even starting it. A lot of negative ratings on here but I gotta say the movie wasn't that bad, it started off strong and caught my interest. Some down falls would be some cheesy acting and predictable scenes. The little daughter made an impression on me I feel like she was the best actress of the movie and was convincing in a lot of her scenes, I would say she has a promising career ahead of her especially in horror films.

All in all if your a horror fan the movie is worth a watch, although if you find it to be that bad. Don't regret turning it off you wont miss anything special..
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The acting was okay but the storyline was a huge disappointment.
aprilbrowne6 August 2016
There was some over-acting from the medium at the start. Other than that, I was mainly glad to see that the children could act, and did a pretty good job of it. Child-actors who are not just skilled enough to create the suspension of disbelief, but also are interesting to watch must be either difficult to find, or too expensive for most film-makers' budgets.

Apart from that the movie built up, built up, and then... poof. It was over, without a creative surprise or unusual twist- anywhere. Summary: some creepy things happened, it got more tense with the creepy things building up, we are waiting for the big blowout which was more of a predictable letdown, and then it was over (except for me sitting there swearing about what a crappy movie I'd just watched).

I recommend the viewers out there skip this one. Read a book, wash your dog, rearrange the sweaters in your closet by colour. I wish someone had told me the same.
20 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Made 0 sense ... dont bother
ashleyryan-3689627 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
So, big spoilers here because I'll explain the movie.

1890, a seance is done because a couples daughter is missing. Daughter is dead, bc the medium connects with her. Then the medium is suddenly taken over and kills everyone in the room.

FFW to now, a typical story of mom dying and idiot dad wants to start over with bratty kids in an old home whilst doing no research ahead of time about the home. No one has lived in this house for 120 yrs and it's super cheap and super nice. Sure why not!

So then, the kids start getting possessed bc theres a random chest of old valuables in the house.

Then the dead daughter from the 1890s appears, warns dad that "she" is coming. Medium pops up, makes the kids kill the dad, oldest daughter burns the chest, medium spirit kills the 3 kids.

Then a new family moves in. That's it. No scares. No storyline whatsoever. No back story. No clue as to who the dead girl is or why shes even there. No clue as to what took over the medium and why shes even evil. Then theres this neighbor with a dad who had a stroke in the house, so no development with that either.

None of it made any sense whatsoever and as someone who LOVES bad movies, I just hated this bad movie. Only watched it bc I was a huge True Blood fan.

The end.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't waste your time on this trash.
stacyhall-5224915 September 2016
This movie was so bad I felt the need to create a profile to review it.

The acting all around is terrible. The premise of the movie seems legit, but the actual script and delivery is way off.

It's hard to feel for this family when every one in it is an asshole. I hated the little girl just minutes into the movie and slowly grew to dislike the whole family. The older daughter is the typical angsty bitch, the son is obnoxious, and the younger daughter has resting bitch face and an attitude to match. The father is a stoic blob in each scene. If you can't like the characters, how can you like the movie? There is literally nothing in this movie that compels me to watch. I kind of felt like the subsequent haunting of this family is karma.

I couldn't finish this disaster. I normally love under rated B movies, but I couldn't find one redeeming thing about this one. Do yourself a favor, skip this one.
41 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible Everything
IfIRateYouKnowItsBad5 August 2016
God this movie was AWFUL!!!!

I created an account just to warn people not to spend money or time on this pile of crap!

Not a good movie at all.... TERRIBLE ACTING and overacting 🙄

If you like spoiled, bratty kids that curse, slutty teenage daughter, oblivious mourning father who's an idiot who's never heard of Google who purchases a house no questions asked then this is the movie for you...

I've always wondered during the process of shooting a movie if anyone ever says "wow this movie is really crappy, this acting is really crappy, what's the point of this movie"
57 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Needed better acting - really
NicholasMCG10 July 2017
So listen, the set design and style works and the basic premise is nothing special but it could work. The problem is there are many scenes that literally feel like the first take, as if actors are holding their script in their hands reading their lines out loud for the first time. It's rather painful at times and either they were short on time and could only do a couple takes, or the director needed a lot more experience directing actors. Some of the actors are in other projects and have performed much better so this really does fall onto director's responsibility. I don't recommend this movie.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of money and time
lrdxx5 August 2016
I can't believe I spent time watching this. Horrendous, very badly executed. It looks promising at first, but then it gets repetitive with clichés. Seriously, what on earth do the other characters do??? They do absolutely nothing but to lengthen the film. Worst part? The ending. The whole film could have ended in 15 minutes instead of 85 minutes. Very disappointed. Some very irrelevant scenes around the protagonists. No in-depth look about their characteristic or the events in the film that helps us grasp the plot. Not sure if the film was cut short during the process or something but I don't get any of it. Will gladly get a refund if possible.
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
There must be better things to spend money on...
jmoroney-6774720 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I wish I could give this a lower score.

Completely lacking in originality. I feel like the creators of this movie opened The Big Book of Horror Movie Clichés, blindly pointed at a dozen or so pages and put them all together.

The actors switched between overacting and looking so uninterested they were ready to walk off the set. The characters had absolutely no depth. The plot was typical - recent widower moves to a new neighborhood with his kids, the angsty rebellious teenage daughter and the two token younger kids. The house is beautiful and old and suspiciously cheap. Creepy things start happening, dad rationalizes. Generic evil entity takes control of the kids, kids beat dad to death in the spooky attic.

Honestly, it was a relief when they all died in the end.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not As Bad As You'd Think
michaelant5552 November 2016
The 3.8 rating put me off, but after reading some of the reviews that said people were being too unkind about this movie I decided to give it a try. It starts in 1891 and instantly comes across as one of those old Italian horror movies that you would rather poke your eyes with a short stick than watch any more of, but after the first ten minutes the film comes back to the modern day and stays there.

The acting is okay. The story isn't particularly original, in fact it reminds me of the first season of American Horror Story just not so good, though it's still watchable (depending on your individual standards of course). It has all the usual goings on you'd expect from a horror film, and I guess it's on a similar quality level to The Visit, but I preferred this one; maybe because I was really looking forward to The Visit and got seriously let down, whilst I had serious doubts about this one and it turned out to be not so bad as I feared.

If you watch this with the 3.8 rating in mind then you might just get pleasantly surprised. It's by no means perfect, but it kept me watching until the end and that says something as I've rolled my eyes at plenty of films in the past and have switched them off, but I made it through this one with only a few heavy sighs and a stern look or two at God for letting the makers put some things into this movie's story-line. I've given this 5/10, but it may be around a (watchable) 4.5, really.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Give this one a chance
greenmemo8 August 2016
This movie is not half as bad as the early user ratings may suggest. It is also by no means perfect, and my rating is only a way to help the flick get at least into the safety zone of 4 plus stars, because to be honest I rarely give a anything under 4 a chance. This movie is all about the location, a Victorian house that "welcomes" its new occupants, a widower and his three kids, a very dysfunctional foursome, specially the teenage and the pre-teen daughters. The acting is decent, the camera work is very proficient and there are a couple of jump scare moments that make the film qualify as horror, as maestro Mario Bava used to say. Detractors may claim that the director ripped off the Amittyville Horror and The Shining in equal parts, I would say he lovingly paid homage to those horror staples. Plot holes aside, I enjoyed this old fashioned ghost story to a considerable extent.
16 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A real haunted house
ada4630 October 2017
We don't agree with the harsh reviews of this movie. This is a haunted house flick, and having lived in a big old haunted Victorian, we thought they did a very realistic job of giving you the feeling of what that is like. It's not constant terror or horror, but lots of creepy, weird things happening that you are always trying to explain away (seeing figures, crashes in the attic, noises and voices). The seance was a good idea, as that was very popular during the Victorian times and they did good job of making it seem like it could be a hoax. Our frustration was with the thin story line about the haunting (what was going on with the original family, what happened to the girl, etc). You can make an educated guess, but revealing that story through the haunted chest in the attic would have been much more interesting and scary and would have led to a better ending which seemed rushed and hokey. We thought the characters were well rendered and believable, seemed like a real family, not saccharine where you root for them to get offed. This is one where it would be worth someone with better writing skills taking a shot at fleshing it out. Has the potential to be a really good scary movie. Seemed like the unscrupulous Realtor idea came from American Horror Story's first season. Now that was scary!
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Enough with the cursing, dammit!
begob21 August 2016
A family moves house after the death of the mother, only to find themselves trapped by the history of their new home as an evil spirit takes over ...

Standard haunted house tale, so it needs a bit of spice and cleverness to impress. The outstanding feature is the photography, with plenty of angles and movement and depth and detail. But they might regret the decision to light almost the entire movie brightly - shadows often obscure a horror tale, but this one needed more.

The acting was OK, especially the little girl, although even she struggled with some lifeless dialogue. And I think that's where the problem is - the writing and direction. The origin story didn't play through, and we weren't led to the source of the evil. Some crucial scenes were handled badly and turned out underwhelming. Plus there were some spots where dialogue was repeated to no extra effect, and one of the female characters could have been folded into another without harming the story.

The music was pretty good, but laid on too thick.

So it's a first time feature for the director/writer. A bit sloppy, and lacking conviction. But it definitely doesn't deserve one star ratings.

ps. The cinematographer has a similar movie in production, so that could be interesting.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Most crap I've seen in a while
trinipurplestar6 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was sh*#, I suggest you go watch paint dry instead. The beginning showed potential but as the movie progressed, the pace never changed, it never got interesting and it definitely was not scary. The whole plot was crappy. There really isn't much to comment on with this movie, I waited for over an hour for something..anything...to happen. The most action was within the first 5 minutes and the last 5 minutes which really wasn't any action at all. I'm guessing the budget was really low because I don't know what really was going on in the movie. I don't really have anything else to say so I'll just end with a popular quote: "Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever." ― Mahatma Gandhi.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
could have been better.
inspacecontact44 March 2020
Pretty good movie started out with a lot of potential. Yet it dragged too much especially at the end.Make it scarier and i would have reeally loved this movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Where did the scares go?...
paul_haakonsen23 September 2016
The synopsis for "The Remains" is what lured me in, well, and also because I have always enjoyed horror movies. But I wasn't familiar with this movie prior to stumbling upon it by sheer random luck.

And now having seen it, I can check it off the list, and say that I have seen it. It wasn't a particularly impressive movie, to be bluntly honest. The movie had a huge potential, but director Thomas Della Bella didn't utilize the potential. And the few scare moments there were to be found throughout the movie ended up as being nothing impressive, mere moments that you shrugged off with a casual shake of the head.

I will say that the atmosphere in the movie was good, and Thomas Della Bella was good at building up the suspense, but he just lacked the conviction to bring it to a fulfilling climax. As such, then the movie suffered terribly, and ended up being less than mediocre.

For a horror movie, then the only really frightening thing about the movie was the lack of scary moments and things that actually made you want to turn on the light. It was a dull, slow experience if you are looking for a good scare.

The acting in "The Remains" was adequate, and it was Todd Lowe who was carrying the movie with his performance.

Usually a good horror movie also has fairly good special effects. "The Remains" hardly used any special effects. So don't expect this to be a glorious Hollywood special effects galore.

The best thing about the movie was actually the ending. That took me by surprise, and I hadn't seen that coming. So that was an upside to an otherwise flaccid and monotone movie.

"The Remains" is the type of horror movie that you watch once, then you bag and tag it, put it on the shelf, most likely never to see the light of day again.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not a complete waste of time...but don't watch it twice.
ravenhair7028 August 2016
The movie starts out interesting and it does pull you in. But as far as jumps and hair-raising...eh. It's the usual family finds a house way cheaper than it should be...(Haunted house red flag...) and moves in. Strange things begin to happen and they try to explain it away when anyone else...me included...would be sent screaming into the streets, clothed or not. The acting is not terrible and the jumps in the film keeps you hanging on hoping for that happy ending you know will never happen. This IS a horror movie, people. It's very rare. All in all not a complete waste of time and me and my wife were actually surprised by the 3.7 rating it received on IMDb. Didn't think it was quite that bad, but the people have spoken. Until the next bad movie.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Watchable, but lacked payoff at the end.
audra197612 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This movie had some good elements going for it. Haunted house had a creepy aura, tense music, big old dollhouse, haunted doll, couple of creepy little kids that did a decent acting job. Like the single dad, the backstory of the house being used for seances over a hundred years ago and eventually a demon coming through and possessing the house.

"Watchable," in that I watched the whole thing, but I was very disappointed in the end. There was little development or tying together of some of the threads started through the story. The ending was just rushed and I was left like, "huh....okay. That's the end."
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Death changes people
nogodnomasters24 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The film opens up in 1891 Azusa, California with a seance gone bad. We never really got to find out what the real issues were or if the girl they were looking for was killed by her father, or what demon or ghost has entered the picture. We move to modern times and a new family moves into the house and find a chest in the attic...well you know the rest.

On the plus side the characters were slightly better developed than a lot of the recent offerings. Victoria (Lisa Brenner) had that creepy Wednesday Addams high forehead look going for her, which worked quite well. However the story line wasn't developed. The connection of the ghost/possession was made simply through the items in the chest used at the failed seance...and? They could have made a better connection to the neighbor and Realtor. And what was with the moody teen daughter? Was she forbidden from dating? Why the sneaking around? Special effects include eye make-up and doors closing by themselves.

Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity...just tease.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nope
Vorhees199626 May 2019
This was just not very good. The acting, for me, was tough to get around. Also the oldest daughter who is a teenager but played by a 30 year old woman was distracting. Like I thought she was the mom from the trailer but no.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hits all the right notes with a surprisingly low budget
gmace-6355921 April 2024
Having been a horror fan the better of my 40 years on this earth, I've seen it all before. So when looking for something new to watch, I was recommended a film on Prime Video called The Remains. I looked at the director and realized I hadn't heard of his work before. Turns out this was his first film and further research showed that the movie was shot in about two weeks with a budget smaller than the food cost on a daytime soap opera. Going into the film knowing this information set my expectations extra low. I had to double check that I hadn't researched the wrong film, because it was filmed incredibly well. It actually punches well above its weight class in several areas. Yes, some of the acting is a bit cringe, but that's honestly to be expected in most horror, especially my favorite 80's horror. I was invested in the story and anxious to see where it all would end. The budget does show a bit, as the payoff at the end of the film feels a bit rushed, but this is expected and a minor nitpick. The makeup on certain scary characters is very well done as is the audio presentation, adding that creepy atmosphere. Overall, I really enjoyed the movie and want to see what director Thomas Della Bella can do with a bigger budget.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good movie
joeboccuto21 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I am one of those guys who signed up on here JUST to write a review for this movie. The one thing the film may have going for it is it is probably the record-holder for driving user-account-creation with said users joining for the sole purpose of bashing this movie. If The review page for this movie contained ads or links leading to information about honest-to-God important social issues, the world would quickly become a better place simply because the movie is so boring that people would click away and learn about important problems the world is facing with also what I suspect would be record-setting numbers.

I am actually somehow STILL watching this movie as I write the review, and in stark contrast to the previously mentioned anticipated wonderfully positive effects on world-peace-inducing ads, I have never wanted to kill myself more, and I come from the generation amongst whom the B.U.M Equipment clothing line were once incredibly popular, so that is really saying something. Anyway, I guess if you've read this far, you "deserve" to hear a bit about the film.

First of all, the acting is not only atrocious with a capital "Eff You" to us, the audience, but I cannot determine whether or not this was intentional. The young kids are the worst offenders here, and I won't give them a pass for their age because they and their parents deserve to be punished for participating in this film/allowing their children to participate in it. The mother of the kid from Problem Child probably would have made better career choices for these kids. In some scenes, they over-act terribly. In others, they stare at the camera so stoically I have to imagine the director was dangling puppies above a fire and told them he would burn them alive if the children dared to emote while the crew was rolling.

The older daughter is mildly attractive in a very boring and stereotypical way. The sub-plot revolving around her acting like she wants to get pregnant to anger her father is the best part of the whole film and I will tell you why. If you play her (again horribly over-dramatically acted) PG-13 make out-scenes with the subtitles on, you can get a genuinely hilarious taste of the lyrics from the director's nephew's awesomely cheesy metalcore band. I got more of a kick out of rewinding and replaying the frames where said-lyrics popped up over and over than I can recall anything else since the golden days of rewinding VHS tapes after a Phoebe Cates nip-slip.

The guy who "plays" the father makes some of the goofiest faces directly at the camera since my parents told me that my face would get stuck that way if I kept doing it. My parents are both long-dead, so it has been a long time since I have seen faces that goofy, is what I am trying to say.

The opening scene of the movie takes place in a generic yet fashionably-inaccurate era that apparently blew the budget for the rest of the film. Aside from the previously-mentioned awesome metalcore make out scene, this part is honestly the best part of the movie, as it does a rather remarkable job of disarming the audience and getting us !---! <----this close to thinking the rest of the movie won't be a dumpster fire that I would not urinate on to extinguish. But like I said, this scene blows the budget so hard that later in the movie the crew needed to use the same piece of dental floss to make some (not even spooky, just naked) Barbie dolls turn their heads as they did to make a door appear to open itself not even 30 seconds later. I commend the high school sophomores of 1998 and their masterful use of Avid Premier for these mind-blowing special effects. The scene is a star-wipe transition short of an Oscar nomination. Only Crash over Brokeback Mountain was a greater snub.

The story is there, I think. It consists of a bunch of typical tropes if interpreted by a deaf guy reading Braille with the tip of his uncircumcised penis and dictating it to a pride of lions fighting over a typewriter out of Tom Hanks' collection. I think the part where the dad beats the kid with a baseball bat is actually the actor beating the story-writer to death and this movie was a clever way to put a real-life snuff film available On-Demand. Truly some GENIUS misdirection there, because screw that guy, he deserved/deserves a death much, much worse. The story is the regrettable tribal tramp-stamp on the lower-back of a 40-something writing career that is only visible at dive bar shows where the director's nephew's metalcore band is playing while wearing the t-shirts of their own band on stage. On that note, I am pretty sure the director's nephew is wearing his own band's shirt in the scenes where he is playing the sex-object of the teenage daughter who, by the way, spends the entire freaking movie hating her father (while, again, attempting to get PG-13 pregnant as a big "Screw You, Dad!"), only to spend entirely too much screen time hysterically crying over her father's dead body and telling his corpse how much she loves him. She is probably upset because he won't be alive to subsidize paying for raising her child. To be fair, though, this is the same father who found a ghost-girl in the attic telling him to burn a bunch of stuff and then, instead of following directions, he looks at that bunch of stuff on his bed, then asks his kids to play board games the next morning while they each take turns telling him to go eff himself. The same father who finds his daughter essentially dead on the ground out back and breaks basically every rule ever regarding safely moving someone who could have just suffered a very serious traumatic injury, all while just ignoring his son standing next to her in the yard looking like he just got caught peeing himself (which, SURPRISE SPOILER ALERT, he did!!!! SCARY!!!). The same father who leaves his kids alone and apparently never taught his kids not to take candy from strangers, because when they get punished for (god forbid) allowing their next-door-neighbor into their home, and then justifying it by saying, "She had cake!!!" Honestly, THE BEST parenting this goofball displays is beating his screenwriter son to death with a baseball bat. I think that part was a dream but I was busy tying a noose around my own neck by the time the movie got to this scene to pay much attention.

All in all, this movie was pretty good and I would recommend watcbing it with your kids as a way to punish them when they get bad grades or are starting to feel like disappointments by the time they are in their early teens. Telling them that they have to watch this movie every time they make a terrible life decision is a parenting technique that I wish had been available to the parents of my generation. But much like adults making six-figure salaries by making videos about opening kid's toys that most kids cant even afford, the world is a pretty stupid place where we allow movies like this to exist, and financially compensate those responsible for making them instead of making them sign up on some sort of national registry for life and go door-to-door letting us know that they have recently moved into our neighborhood.

Guessing which words I had to substitute because of profanity rules can be more fun than watching this movie!!!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This should have remained a bad dream.
avalonjoyous6 March 2017
Let me get the positive out of the way the seance beginning was not bad and the acting regarding the the medium was pretty good I was pretty impressed to be honest.

When she spoke her voice was very pleasant to the ear and sounded sophisticated and worldly.

Now with the good out of the way this movie sucked so badly it's just indescribable .

Suffice it to say the kid actors are dull as dishwater and can't act for crap seriously.

The movie was also boring and barely anything happened up until near the end of the movie.

Suffice it to say even near the ending it was unbelievably bad and the oldest daughter was by far one of the worst actresses EVER.

Just watch her give the worst performance ever near the end of the movie it is truly hilarious.

The father was so so his acting was alright but he also overacted horribly in this movie .

The ending I won't spoil but I'll just say this it's beyond hilarious and the SCARES in this movie are nonexistent,cheap,bad,and cliché.

Highly NOT recommended .
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Standard family moves into haunted house story but...
gil-191-41472816 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There was really no backstory to the haunting. At the beginning of the movie we see a seance gone wrong, but it flimsily just makes it that the medium dies and is now the evil spirit killing everyone in the seance.

No backstory on the spirit itself, just a quick how do you do and off to the sad family with bratty kids and clueless father.

Then we get a mediocre build up that just kind of stumbles along and an ending that seemed like it was done with the motivation that 'well, the movie has to end so let's do this.'
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watchable
el731 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know what else I can say about it besides that it's watchable. The acting is pretty decent, with a cast full of 'hey it's that guy' people, and the cinematography and set design have some flair to them, although some of the shots are so derivative of Insidious that you can recall exactly what scene is being used as a reference point on sight. There are also references to Sinister and A Haunting in Connecticut scattered throughout, and they are not improved upon, but at least they're more or less competently copied. The movie starts exactly as you hope a movie like this will start: with a gloriously cheesy deep focus shot of an old Victorian mansion with a big ol' sign letting you know what you're in for. There's a set up that gives you some history on the house, and then the modern day family moving in. I get the sense that the teenage daughter was supposed to be more of a red herring to throw the viewer off of what was really going to happen, but it wasn't very effective. The story is fine but derivative, and the movie is fun to look at. The sound design is where the low budget really shows. Do you get scared by the sounds of scuffling shoes and chairs scooting across the floor? Me either, but if you do, brace yourself because you're going to be hearing a lot of that in this movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed