"Fargo" Waiting for Dutch (TV Episode 2015) Poster

(TV Series)

(2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Succeeds where True Detective season 2 failed.
TouchTheGarlicProduction13 October 2015
Fargo and True Detective are both standalone crime mini-series that ran in 2014 and were unexpectedly renewed for a second season. Both shows have decided to follow a completely new story in their second season. This did not work for True Detective season 2 very well at all. The trailers for Fargo season 2 looked like it was going to be a similar disappointment. It looked like they were overplaying the Fargo-isms. But, instead, we got an excellent premiere.

Right from the opening scene of the episode, you can tell that the writers have not lost their charm. They continued to capture the atmosphere of the movie very well while injecting it with a healthy dose of the seventies and not over doing it (like the trailer seemed to be doing).

Another parallel to True Detective season 2 is that it goes for a much larger scale than the first season. One of the major reasons True Detective season 2 fell apart was that it contained too many specifics that we weren't given much reason to care about, making the show hard to follow and not worth the effort. As they continued to add things to this episode, I worried that it would be crushed under it's own weight. But they did a good job of not worrying you too much about the raw information but rather showing you with the feel of it.

The cast is excellent, a great mix of comedy and gravitas. I can see many ways for all of them to fit into the story, although I do wonder how much Nick Offerman is going to be in it; he doesn't seem like a particularly important character. My only real question is how Bruce Campbell's Ronald Reagan is going to fit into the whole thing. They teased it with the opening scene, but I do wonder how they'll fit him in.

Overall, an excellent return for Fargo, I very much look forward to watching the rest of it unfurl.
54 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
They've Got Me Again!
Hitchcoc14 October 2015
So there's organized crime in Fargo. A latter day Ma Barker and her husband and their nitwit sons are running an extortion ring among other things. Meanwhile, we travel to the southwest corner of the state of Minnesota to Luverne (you may remember it as one of the focus cities in Ken Burns' "The War"). Horrible things begin to happen at a Waffle House. The Gerhardts are having trouble because of a judge's decision and one of them follows her to the restaurant. There he confronts her and she lays into him. He kills everyone in the place, following a waitress into a snowy field. Unfortunately, a car, passing through, hits him and carries him away on the hood. We are introduced to several entities. A sheriff and his son in law. A butcher's assistant, who aspires to take over the shop, and his ditzy wife who is working on "finding herself." We also have a cop who has a little girl and wife who is dealing with cancer. It's obvious that things are going to eventually happen in Fargo. This is masterfully introduced with great possibilities ahead.
35 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fincher Feel With Coen Brothers Flare
ThomasDrufke13 October 2015
Unlike most people I liked the Fargo first season better than the 90's film, so I was very excited to start watching the second season. With another loaded cast and intriguing plot, this season is apt for greatness. This episode was nothing short of phenomenal. Just like last season and what Game of Thrones do so well is bring together so many story lines and characters and make one fluid arc. So for me, it was really the directing that stood out here.

I was impressed by the way the show set itself up. I can't say I know exactly the meaning behind the Ronald Reagan movie beginning, but from then on I was endlessly intrigued. Each scene seemed to bring another group of characters to the show and each of them were just as interesting as the last. Each set up the potential places that they could go down the line as the season progresses, and I love the little Molly Solverson appearance.

Heck, even Kirsten Dunst didn't bother me at all, or maybe I was still so thrilled that Nick Offerman is in the show. With he exception of a few minor directional choices with split screens, I found nothing wrong with this episode. Considering how good last season was and how terrific this season looks, Fargo is one of the best shows on television.

+Sets up characters

+Molly

+Intriguing interweaving story

-Split screen moments

9.0/10
32 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fargo: S2E1 "Waiting for Dutch" Review - King Cadmium
kingcadmium8 March 2022
In a small Minnesota town, a shooting at a diner disrupts the lives of a state officer, a married couple, and a North Dakota crime syndicate.

What I Liked:

This premiere does a fantastic job of introducing its characters and themes early on, with almost every character being memorable in some way.

The cinematography is solid, and each scene perfectly implements its well-crafted and memorable music score. On top of that, each actor gives a strong performance.

What I Disliked:

I am not a fan of several editing choices, particularly the usage of split screens and flashbacks, which appear superfluous at best.

Peggy's behaviour makes absolutely no sense. While she will most likely have more depth as a character during the season, it just doesn't seem plausible for her to commit a hit and run and then act calm and collected afterwards.

Overall:

Fargo opens its sophomore season with a great episode. So far, this season looks very promising to be a highly enthralling viewing experience.

8/10

King Cadmium.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Shattering!
lhb00011 May 2017
Season 1 reminded me a lot of the great film "Fargo." Dakota humor, quirkiness, violence, a masterpiece. Fargo is "Fargo." I loved it.

Season 2 is simply shattering. If you want to compare the Coen Brothers: Season 1 was "Fargo." Season 2 is "No Country for Old Men." I love it even better.

No spoilers; absolutely watch it. Be prepared. This is some very nasty stuff.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Laid back is an understatement
stankactorman23 October 2015
FARGO (FX): After watching two episodes, this season looks like it's going to match last season beat for beat and character for character except for the most interesting character of all, the pregnant deputy sheriff, Molly, who is only six years old in this 1979 setting. The references to current events are kinda fun for those of us who were actually around when they occurred. Molly's dad (Patrick Wilson) is the deputy sheriff now and (Ted Danson) is the sheriff who are investigating a triple homicide at the local Waffle Hut. Things just turn from bad to worse when an ordinary housewife (Kirsten Dunst) accidentally hits the Waffle Hut's killer with her car and thinking him dead drives home with his body on the hood of her car. Just take a second to visualize that, because we don't actually see it. Only he's not dead until he gets into a scuffle with the hit and run driver's husband (Jesse Plemons) when he comes to in their garage. Now what do we do with that body, the smacked up car and all that blood? I'm not gonna tell you. It's amazing how such seemingly simple people can get themselves into so much trouble so quickly and to what ends they will resort, to get away with murder. There is also the organized crime element when the boys form Kansas City (Brad Garrett, Bokeem Woodbine) want to buy out the local family (Jean Smart, Jeffery Donovan) who controls the illicit drug and sex trade. To say the style is laid back is an understatement. The genius here is twofold: The exquisite writing; "Yeah, that's a shoe alright." and the laconic pace which somehow still manages to maintain tension and suspense. Added to that, we have low keyed performances with well known actors who are barely recognizable physically while playing characters very far removed from the one's we're familiar with. It's not a thrill-a-minute fun ride, but it sure is an interesting one. Score: 9.5. Yeah, ya gotta watch it.
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent start to the show
onion_bums13 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Since last season, I have been expecting a lot of Noah Hawley and this show. This season premiere more than lived up to my expectations. It was a great start and I'm really excited to know what happens in the next nine episodes.

The cast is great - I am especially loving Nick Offerman in his role. Patrick Wilson will do justice to the role of Deputy Solverson. And I just can't get enough of this accent!

The sound editing and the scenes have been shot perfectly. The murders at the diner was beautifully written and crafted.

Excellent start to the show!
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Really sets the bar high for a new season
Mr-Fusion14 March 2017
Before walking in, the only things I'd known about Fargo's second season were a) it's shifted back into the '70s and b) Bruce Campbell's playing Ronald Reagan (how about that for inspired casting?), which I'd assumed would be as seen on the campaign trail. Certainly not in onset footage of the film "Massacre at Sioux Falls" (and as of the end of the episode, ol' Ron never made it to the set to film the scene; I've got no idea how he'll factor into this, and it's exciting, to be honest).

As a season opener, 'Waiting for Dutch' has all the wit, atmosphere and odd characters this show specializes in. As expected, it's tasked with setting up the new faces and overall story, but I immediately wanted more when the end credits rolled. You cannot beat that feeling. The whole episode's invigorating.

9/10

Also, dialogue like this does not grow on trees.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
So Happy Fargo Exists!
zachkleinmusic26 October 2015
This show is awesome. I can't get into game of thrones and other shows like I do with this one. It holds up television to a new standard. That and Patrick Wilson is perfect for the show. So happy they did a 2nd season. Thanks FX!! What's weird is I didn't even see the movie yet and I don't feel like I need to. The first season was awesome. This season's premiere is awesome. Why can't all those other shitty shows meet this standard? Who is making this show different? I will find out hopefully. The music is great! The actors propel the story (like they're supposed to) rather than taking away from the story. I care about what happens next and I'm not looking for dumb errors either. The story is enough where i forget that i'm watching TV. Excited to see where this goes!! (:
16 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gets better seeing the reruns
yahaira-729-69470111 November 2023
Now with the strike I've been watching re runs and this is one of the very best series I've seen 11/23 as I anticipate season 5. A great drama at times zanny and humorous. I appreciate the Midwest accent and point of view from Norwegian/Scandanavian /German sensibilities. A town where family and traditions are enduring. FARGO, a place where everyone is connected and murderous miafias live along the kinfolk. Great script and actors are well paired to their characters. True stories yet the tell told with artistic license. Can't wait for season 5 and the variety of stories over time is are intriguing thrillers. Cheers! Bravo!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sets up another entertaining season of Fargo
TheDonaldofDoom22 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
After Season 1 sets such a high bar, it's a wise decision to set the next season earlier in time, making it a prequel of sorts. The 1979 time period allows for a change in tone and setting, without taking away the style or setting it in a different area. Plus, it's nice how it references the first season with Molly.

There are some hilariously stupid moments, namely seeing Peggy drive her car home with a guy's head poking through the windscreen. It's so absurd, yet actually understandable. When in recounting it she adds she made sure to take the back roads that just compounds the hilarity of it. How her crime directly connects to the crime seen earlier in the episode, a coke-high Rye shooting a bunch of people, makes it all even funnier. Kirsten Dunst is brilliant as Peggy, portraying someone who is trying so hard to show her husband everything is normal that he knows everything is not normal. The attention to detail, which often adds to the humour, is on point. The shoe in the tree and everything else makes it that much more memorable.

The one criticism I have is that the characters are not as memorable as the characters of the first season. No one jumps out of the screen like Lester, Lorne and Molly in Season 1. None of the mafia members make a huge impression, as we haven't seen many layers to them (yet). They're all good, well portrayed characters but inferior to what I've come to expect from Fargo.

So it looks like whereas the film and first season focussed on characters drawn to crime by personal motives, this episode is about law-abiding people covering up an accidental death because they are worried about the law not being on their side.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best series ever - Season 2 of Fargo
rahuldahiya5 December 2021
There is nothing like it in the last decade.

Very engrossing storyline and rich characters make this particular season an absolute gem.

Patrick Wilson leads the cast of characters, each one better than the other!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mixed feelings
lyb3-891-9858832 January 2016
The characters are pretty flat in their behavior is predictable. The story, though definitely interesting, fails to capture the credibility, which we seek in this genre. The acting has it's glimmers in the face of Offerman and Plemons.

Hawley has crafted an exciting, but unfortunately rather hackneyed fable and i do look forward to the participation of other writers later on.

As much as i was intrigued by the plot, i couldn't help being discouraged by the ridiculous murder scene, the ludicrous detail that came right after and the from time to time unconvincing direction. What made season 1 exceptional we might find here painfully simplified.
21 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mixed feelings (again)
jdjc00126 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
While this episode did have its moments, I found it to be a bit messy overall. In comparison to the first season, the characters and direction (as others have already mentioned) feel quite a bit flatter thus far and what appears to be this season's focal point (the murder of Rye Gerhardt) is not nearly as interesting as the descent of Lester Nygaard. The editing is the worst it's ever been, with unnecessary split screens and pointless flashbacks to events that happened in THE SAME EPISODE, but even with all that, I think my least favourite part of the episode was the diner scene, which tries to make a murder of 3 innocent people comedic with very over-the-top acting and cringeworthy dialogue. I don't get the deal with that Reagan thing at the beginning of the episode either, but maybe that's just because it's something that has yet to be fully developed.

The best parts of the episode were the subtle things, such as the differences highlighted between the behaviour of Dodd Gerhardt and Ed Blumquist at their respective dinner tables but having then having Ed become just as dastardly as Dodd by the end of the episode, and also the story about the girl in the polka-dot dress reflecting how Floyd as well as Peggy are underestimated when it comes to their immorality simply because they are women. which still gives me a glimmer of hope that this season will improve and reach the heights of the first, however judging by this first episode I'm not so sure.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Intense, exciting, and well acted
anujvish-8156615 July 2021
After watching the season 1, I was expected extremely high from the season 2 and it kicks off with nothing less. This episode, from start till the end, was filled with thrilling sequences blended with the perfect cast. The actor playing the character Ryee stood up the most. From the very 1st scene, his performance was top notch.

The cinematography and production design were more captivating and detailed than the season 1. Direction was on point. I felt the music except for the main theme could have been a bit better. Overall, episode one was almost flawless.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An absolutely insane first episode
amickmt-7455221 February 2020
This is the best season and the best friend episode. Wow. Well written. Bravo!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Phenomenal!
gedikreverdi19 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The bloodshed at the Waffle Hut and the sociopath woman that hit and brought the shooter home and prepared dinner for her husband. And her husband killed the guy and they hid him in the freezer. He's one of the three sons of Otto who had a stroke and their rivals from Kansas are going to attack. It was extremely good and I almost made sure it'll be at least on par with the first season.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A missed start for season 2
lienschellekens8 December 2015
I don't understand the good reviews this season.

Season 2 has lost everything that made season 1 exceptional.

The meaningful cinematography is almost gone: Conversations just switch between close ups of the person talking. For example, in season one, the meeting between Lester and Malvo: We go from a wide shot, that slowly goes closer as they get to know each other. At the end of the conversation it switches between close ups.

Another example: the soundtrack. In season 1 Lester, Malvo and Number & Wrench have their own soundtrack. You hear their songs in their introduction, or in key moments for the characters. The choice of music helps to explain the scene. I don't see anything like that in season 2.

Lastly. If this is a prequel for season 1, why isn't that explained better? The year is different, and the characters have the same name and profession. That is it. C'est tout. Or am I missing things?

Maybe it's me, maybe there wasn't enough time to work on these episodes. But season 2 is not in any way as good as season 1.
20 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful
ikrivi19 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
You hit a guy with your car and then you drive with him on your car, a number of miles, through a populated area and park in your garage like nothing happened?! And that should make sense. Terrible, awful writing.
17 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not really a great opener
silverton-3795910 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It looks as though the story this season could be good; a struggle between a large mob outfit (Kansas City) and a smaller one in Fargo (Gerhardt family). KC has a corporate structure and the Gerhardts are still a gang among gangs in a region of a state.

That makes for an interesting story, if the production team can be restrained. The director wants to make some kind of statement by using split screen shots where they don't work. The writers are dragging in characters who have no real place in the story past a scene or two and trying to glue them in place for whole episodes. The casting team is finding actors who don't fit at all, such as Kirsten Dunst (a terribly annoying player) as the wife of Ed (Jesse Plemmons).

Plemmons works well in his role, while Dunst simply makes a mess of hers. It doesn't help that the Peggy character is supposed to be delusional and an airhead, because Dunst can't play the character and the mental illness just makes the character too complicated. Mental illness is kind of a bridge too far for Dunst. If the casting directors intended to use Kirsten Dunst, they should have learned a little about her limitations. If they had done so, she would have been cast as the waitress in the Waffle Hut Diner.

Jeffrey Donovan, Zahn McClarnon and Bokeem Woodbine are great in their gangster roles, and Patrick Wilson, Ted Danson and Jean Smart are good choices for their roles. Keirnan Culkin was placed where he could do the least damage as the youngest Gerhardt brother who dies early in the story. Casting was a big job in a series like Fargo, so the casting team was bound to make a few bad calls. Over all, they did pretty well.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What the hell is this crap?
dryade_melancolique15 October 2015
First of all i've got to say that i really enjoyed season 1! It was a brilliant homage to the film. The characters, script and actors were really good. Besides, Billy Bob thornton was awesome.

I watched again season 1 pilot and that was really great. Without hesitation I can't watch season 2 pilot again after this. This is just too bad...

So, what do we have here?

A really, really boring pilot. Nothing Happen. People talk just for the cheap fake "talking fargo effect" but this is crap. Too much clean.. Too much empty.. Where is the enthusiasm of Molly or Marge? I only see cheap fake characters there.

Patrick is supposed to play young lou (played by keith carradine in season 1 ) Really? I hate nowadays actor like tom hardy where the acting is just "frown" add some AAAaaaaabs and it will be aaawwwwesomee like a Reaaallll MMmmmaaannn. Patrick Wilson got the charisma of an octopus and i feel bad for octopus to say that.

The worst acting is without a doubt given by Kirsten Dunst and her "Fat Matt damon" husband. Oh my god... it's like "Troll 2" best acting scene : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyophYBP_w4 OOOOoohh Myyy Godddddd what happening to people Brain nowaday?? How can you rate this pilot so high? When it's sux so much in front of season 1 . OOooohh myyyy Goddddddddd I need to wash my eyes after this.

Best Regards, Mr Dryade
22 out of 145 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Why flashbacks
mgidb1 September 2019
I don't care about many people who likes this but the first season should be considered hereas better
2 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed