"Outlander" Both Sides Now (TV Episode 2014) Poster

(TV Series)

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Both Sides Now
VickiHopkins28 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Let's get the bad news out of the way. The remaining episodes of season one won't be back until April 4, 2015. That means you have 190 days from today to wait before the return of Outlander. Take a deep breath. You can do this! No doubt reruns will feed your addiction. I'm sure Starz doesn't want its fans to moan and groan from highlander withdrawals. Now that we have that out of the way, let's talk about Episode 8 -- the mid-season finale.

Yes, all things come to an end. Even books in a series...eventually. And so it is with the first eight episodes of the much anticipated and highly coveted Outlander on Starz. In a diversion from the book, this episode is heavily focused upon Frank and his desperate search for his beloved wife, who has somehow vanished into thin air. Much of the focus of the story has been on Claire's experience being sucked back in time, but I think this diversion adds richness to the series by exploring what Frank is dealing with as well.

Rightly so this episode is named Both Sides Now, but I'd like to add a third that it had a rather dark side. The greatest criticism of this series has come from women who do not see this as a romantic novel, when there are instances of attempted rape, actual rape, and beating one's wife with a belt. I am staying neutral and not commenting. It doesn't mean I don't have an opinion. Of course, there are the groups of readers who have loved this story of Jamie and Claire regardless of the not-so-pleasant scenes of brutality tucked between the pages.

The police, after six weeks of searching, tell Frank they've done all they can do. Their theory is that she ran off with another man. Reverend Wakefield throws out the possibility that the river swept her downstream when she wandered off and got lost. His druid wife tells Frank the tall tale of Craigh na Dun and the stones that suck people back in time. As Frank screams to the copper, "My wife is not with another man," we are taken back to Jamie and Claire reminding us that's exactly where she is while wearing two wedding rings.

After a scene where Frank is set up in a dark alley by some woman in order to steal the reward he's offering, we see the dark ancestral side of the modern Mr. Randall. The men in the alley are no match for angry Frank, who nearly beats to death his attackers and almost strangles the woman for her complicity in leading him into a trap. Yes, the man is hurt, frustrated, and these poor people crossed Frank at the wrong time in his life. His actions get him a preaching session from the reverend about turning from the dark side and back into the light.

Claire is given lessons by Angus on how to defend herself with a dagger. She finds the opportunity to do so when Redcoats turn up unexpected, interrupting Jamie and Claire doing the deed on the grassy ground. Once again, we are faced with a potential rape, but Claire stabs her attacker in the back and Jamie brings down the other two men holding him from intervening.

The entourage of Dougal, Angus, Murtagh, Willie, Rupert, Jamie, and Claire (did I forget anyone?) continue on their journey to meet a man who might be able to clear Jamie's name. However, to be safe, Jamie leaves Claire alone with Willie in the woods. She promises Jamie to stay put, but when she realizes that they are near Craigh na Dun, she slips away and runs toward the mound.

This scene is the most powerful in the episode. Frank decides to visit the area before he gives up and leaves for Oxford. He stands by the stone crying (poor guy) and then begins to yell Claire's name. Claire hears him through time, and she yells his name in return. Frank hears her voice, but then it is suddenly silenced. Just as she reaches the stone to touch it and return, those pesky Redcoats capture and drag her away to Frank's disgusting ancestor, Black Jack Randall.

The dichotomy of the two characters has returned, as Randall and Claire play their cat and mouse game of let's tell the truth. Fed up, he binds her, pushes her face down on the table, and lifts her skirt. Another scene of attempted rape ensues. (Poor woman how much of this must she endure? I do see the point here.) When we think all is lost, Jamie bursts open the window, points a gun at Randall, and tells him to take his hands off his wife.

End of mid-season one, and the cliffhanger has been played. Of course, those who have read the book know the outcome. When it returns, it may be the most controversial if Ron Moore, the executive producer, goes down that road showing the consequences of Claire's disobedience and Jamie's belt meeting her often exposed bottom in this series. For some reason, I don't think that's going to go over well with some women in the audience not familiar with the written text.

Nevertheless, the episodes have ended. Get your calendars out, markers, and start checking off the next 190 days you must live before more episodes arrive. I just hope for your sake the world doesn't end before then.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Frank's untold story is a wonderful addition to the Outlander story
beyondwords14 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
As an avid reader since 1994, I've probably read and re-read "Outlander" at least 15-20 times. I was always intrigued by the very slightly different British version, "Cross Stitch", because the British editors felt there needed to be a little more Frank in it to round out Claire' conflict between Frank and Jamie.

This is what I like about this series, and especially about this episode. Frank is more than a briefly-met character that gets disposed of fairly quickly. We experience Frank's anguish and anger at Claire's disappearance. (I LOVED the poster with the "mysterious Scotsman" and a rough sketch, including a 1,000 pound reward!) Mrs. Graham, the housekeeper, has a chance to explain what she believes to be the stone's powers, to his disbelief -- and yet, in a heart- tugging scene, we see that he is at least willing, in his desperation, to entertain the idea that falling through the stones might be possible.

Knowing how this book ends, and seeing how well it is progressing towards that end, I'm thoroughly enjoying the little side trips that simply round out the story and add to the depth of the characters. I was also pleased to see Hugh Munro included (although, really, that piece of garish amber was as big as a brick -- I had pictured something much smaller, that could be tucked away.)

The attempted rape scene was shocking and disturbing, just as it was in the book. I'm still waiting for Jamie to come into his own, and to be honest, while he was an intriguing character in the first half of the book, it wasn't really until the second half, after Claire's choice becomes clear, that Jamie's story begins to take on a stronger shape. So we have that to look forward to. :-) Leaving Jamie on the windowsill with a snarl on his face and Claire at the mercy of Black Jack Randall was a superb teaser for the second half of the series!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Needs to Refocus Back to Jamie and Claire's Story
mcampbelljh129 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The final episode of this ½ season was interesting. The acting was very well done by all involved. I like the TV series; The series is trying to bring the books to life and I get it that that is a challenging thing to do with so many fans of the show avid book fans. These fans know Diana Gabaldon's books; know what is important to them. As a producer and director of the show I would be trying to keep those fans happy. Will there be differences from the books, yes we all expect that, some changes deletions are required to make the show TV friendly. As a fan of the books the thing I have a problem with is when changes/additions are made that jeopardizes some of the things I love best about the books. To me those producing/directing the show's episodes should know the entire Outlander book series, as well as Diana Gabaldon; know what pieces are important to the fans and what might not be.

This is a great adventure story but the focus of the adventure is the lives of Jamie and Claire. My list is of what is important in order of their importance is: 1) Jamie and Claire's romance both the explicit sexual element and the eternally endearing romance 2) The adventures they take in Scotland, France, the Caribbean and America. 3) The characters that support their stories. There are many characters that will come and go as the adventure continues from book to book (Dougal & Colum, Murtagh, Frank/Jack Randall, Geillis Duncan, Jamie and Claire's daughter: Brianna, her husband Rodger, Jamie's sister Jenny and her husband Ian, their son Ian and his wives, Jamie's son adopted son Fergus, Fergus' family and Jamie's illegitimate son William, Lord John, his Aunt Jocasta, the residents of Fraser's ridge, the famous people they meet along the way like Bonnie Prince Charlie and the King of France, etc.). These character give the story it richness. However the only thing constant in all these books is "Jamie and Claire" and their love which is the driving force for every adventure in the series.

I'm saying this because I and other fans were quite upset that the producers/writers and directors all seem to be pushing other things at us and minimizing the romantic aspect of the Jamie and Claire love story that we care about most.

I think they cut too much of the book out to accommodate the Frank/Jack scenes in this episode just so they could end the half- season finale with the attempted rape of Claire by Black Jack. Black Jack's attempted rape is a story that should have come long down the road not in this episode but obviously it was put here so we could have that cliché cliff hanger ending. This rush to crush may be indicative with having only 8 episodes before a break rather than the 16 one would expect in a full season so now we have to have a cliff hanger ending when the series is on its 6 month hiatus, verses when the season is actually over.

I would have liked more of Claire and Jamie's relationship and less of Frank and Claire relationship. I really don't care what Frank was doing when Claire was gone from 1947 yet we spend half of this episode with Frank and or Jack. It's not that the scene wasn't well done; it's just something I do not care about. To include this extra we miss the whole part of Claire getting accustomed to Jamie and falling in love with him. So that when she is finally taken back to the stones "by Jamie by the way" there is a real reason why she wants to stay with the man she has come to love, her protector and lover Jamie. Rather than that we get a whirl wind wedding night romance (a one night stand) followed by Claire finding herself magically at the stones where Frank and Claire's voice has traveled thru the centuries like Frank was her soul mate. He isn't, she leaves him because he's self- centered, boring and not a very good lover. So can we finally refocus this series to the wonderful adventures that were in the book surrounding Jamie and Claire please! They are much better than the ones we are seeing on screen and let's not cut out significant sexual encounters between Jamie and Claire just to give Frank some new additions that have no basis in original story. We don't care about Frank, we care about Jamie!

What else do I miss? I miss the shyness of Jamie as he woo's Claire to win her affections and her increasing responsiveness to him; the honeymoon days when they are alone for 3 days, the part about Claire learning to live outdoors. The lovely scene of them making love in the ferns and the fishing scene. The whole month they are married and on the road with Dougal and the gang was compressed into a day. We don't see Claire's reluctance to make love to Jamie sleeping next to the men and realizing she lost 20 years of taught propriety. The fight with the Grants was so compressed you lost most of the action. We don't get to see the whole water horse segment down by the Loch when one of the men assumes she's a witch because she's not afraid of the monster; something that has significance when it comes to the witch's trial. Then we miss the after rape sex Jamie and Claire had to overcome the shock they were both in and make them feel one again. Nor do we see Jamie leaving her alone in the glen and the important conversation Jamie had with Claire when he tells her what he will do to her if she leaves the glen before he returns. All compressed so we can end the ½ season with the rape.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Fitting End to the First Half of Season 1
jmansmannstjohnslrev26 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Wow, after a mixed bag start to season 1, the last three episodes were certainly emblematic of the quality of production that makes the Outlander series so compelling and so engaging to watch. While Both Sides Now did not, in my opinion, hit the same heights as the prior two installments, it was a fitting end to the first half of the season.

Frank's portion of the story is the most straightforward, the tale of a man devastated, confused, and angered by the loss of his wife, unaware that her disappearance can be caused by forces he doesn't understand. It's tragic because he refused to believe that she left him for another man, and in true Outlander fashion, this is both true and false, more complicated than a straightforward yes or no answer. She didn't leave him to be with another man; she had no awareness that the stones would transport her back in time, and didn't anticipate the circumstances that would cause her relationship with Jamie. It's hard not to feel sympathy for Frank when he did nothing wrong, and unlike his ancestor, is able to beat back the darkness in his heart.

I believe the most compelling of the three major storylines is Jaime and Claire's relations, and the difference between passion and intimacy, and love. I think it's the best and most compelling because it harkens back to some of the same issues that were present in Frank and Claire's relationship in Episode 1. Jamie and Claire are physically attached in almost every scene they are in together during the episode, but strangely absent is the intimacy of the connection that you saw in the earlier episodes. Physically, they look like a husband and wife, but something is off; the spark is missing. When introducing Claire to Monroe, there is a hesitation to introduce her as his wife. When Claire and Jamie embrace, Claire can't help but gaze upon her ring to Frank. At this point, Claire's marriage is affording her something that she hasn't had much in her time in the past, a connection. You can see that as Jamie's wife, she's beginning to be viewed more and more as a MacKenzie, and a Scot, instead of a Sassenach. They teach her to defend herself, and there is playful banter between them, something that you really haven't seen up to this point.

But you see the lack of stability in this relationship after Claire kills the deserter assaulting her. It is a pivotal moment for her, because in all of the death she witnessed during the war, its the first time she's killed someone, the first time she's taken a life. More importantly, it is a catalyst in emphasizing the disparity in how Jamie and Claire view the marriage. Jamie is fully committed, in love with Claire. Claire does not feel the shame. Jamie is heartbroken that he could not protect her, Claire is angry, not at Jamie but at herself, for being caught up in her fling with Jamie and forgetting about her mission, returning to Frank. Indeed, Outlander really hits you over the head with it in case you weren't paying attention. Claire promises to wait for Jamie and the others to return, but runs to the stones to get back to Frank. In contrast, as Claire is about to be violated by Randall, Jamie alone bursts through the window prepared to defend his wife.

But, while I think that exploration of the complexities of love, compared to passion is the most interesting part, the best portion of the episode is the showdown between Claire and Randall. Tobias Menzies and Caitriona Balfe are just absolutely magnificent in this scene, and almost carry the episode on this scene alone. You really get to see both Claire and Randall at the high and low points of their power in this scene. At its start, you can already tell that something special is brewing because it completely subverts expectations. Claire lounges in Randall's office sipping her wine, with complete confidence on her face. She knows what to expect from Randall, and has buried all of her fear. You truly get the sense that she is a worthy adversary, a worthy equal to Randall, even though she is at his mercy. Randall too is supremely confident, more assured than ever that he is in complete control of the situation.

Then you see Claire use her knowledge from the future to expose Randall's dependency on the Duke of Sandringham, and the tables turn. For the first time in the series, you see Randall in a way you haven't before, rattled, unnerved, and uneasy. You also see a Claire reach a new level of confidence and control; she is literally teasing Black Jack Randall in his own quarters.

Yet Black Jack quickly turns the tables and have I mentioned to this point that Tobias Menzies and Caitriona Balfe are amazing because almost immediately their personalities believably flip into a complete 180 of themselves. Randall immediately regains his steely confidence and reasserts control over the interrogation, both psychologically and physically. In the same breath you see a version of Claire that you haven't seen before. She has been threatened with abuse in the past, but for the most part she has been fiery and feisty, defiant in the face of more physically imposing adversaries (she literally killed one twenty minutes earlier in the episode). For the first time, she appears weak, vulnerable, and helpless. Her shrieks of help are so unnerving because she's never asked for help before, never been so resigned to the possibility that she alone could not find a way to overcome the obstacle before her.

While the episode leaves the viewer on a cliffhanger, it is emblematic of what made the second half of first eight episodes of Season 1 so compelling, the richness of the characters, the depths of their emotions and relations to each other, and the complexities of the challenges posed by the world around them.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
1x08 review
jackDee-5656514 October 2020
The mid season finale went all out and was a fantastic episode, that cliffhanger was great
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Jamie ????
codamax130 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
OK I read a review a spoiler earlier so I have a very important question .. If Jamie and Claire are so in love how does he end up with an illegitimate son??? He was a virgin ?? So that means that later in the story he has sex with another woman other than Claire and that would just break my heart and end all shivery for there actually being true love between only 2 people ?????and Claire would never Forgive him for being unfaithful And end any thoughts that a man in love can actually be true to only one woman.... So does Jamie really have sex with someone other than Claire if so I will stop watching this show right now ! But I do agree that the producers need to get their priorities together and take care of the readers who cares about frank we don't stop spending so much time on things that don't matter and concentrate on what does.
1 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Slavery and torture in the name of Islam?
abdulkadirelmas-271-77351927 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
It is very sad that the scenarists gave a very wrong message about Islam, by letting a mute character claim that Muslims in Algeria enslaved him with other Christians and tortured them to convert to Islam. I find such message very offensive because it is not based on any fact. On the contrary, in Islam the conversion is only valid by the free will. Enslavement and torture in the name of Islamic religion is just inaccurate. This unfortunate detail in the show should not be overlooked, since the very message this show gives is to be open minded and leave prejudice about one side's historical tales and accusations.
18 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Darker than it needed to be
meyersjl-959-17933625 April 2019
Some scenes were good and it is certainly a great cliff hanger for the mid season finale but the plot was darker than it needed to be. One almost scene was enough, it doesn't need two of those scenes.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I've yet to 'see' Jamie's character come to fore as it did in the books, as it is in the series. Still, 10 for me.
banat572 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILERS* *SPOILERS* *SPOILERS* *SPOILERS* *SPOILERS*

Even after some eight or so times of watching this episode, my thoughts about it are still percolating. They managed to cram a lot of action in this one, but my first viewing left me a mess after the "stones" scene which just took my breath away and I broke down and cried. The acting by Tobias Menzies and Caitriona Balfe continues to be brilliant.

They both bring so much to their respective roles that I honestly have been gob smacked from week to week. I realize that a lot of things go into making this show, but if these two people lacked talent, nothing and no one could bring these characters out. Good for us they are loaded with talent and once they put on those costumes on, they are Frank/Black Jack and Claire. And here we are at the mid-season finale, episode 108 and aptly titled 'Both Sides Now' because for the first time we get to see 'the other' side, Frank's side and it was heartbreaking watching Frank go through his grieving process. First, this was an episode that was told simultaneously from Frank's and Claire's point of view, and it's a huge departure from the books, but it worked for both audiences, book and non-book readers. Speaking as a book reader, it helped me to understand this man much better. It humanized Frank and brought me closer to him. I said it before and let me reiterate, Ron D. Moore's a genius and no doubt about it. I'm enjoying the show and leaving books behind while the show is on. He has a vision and he's running with it and we can join and enjoy the ride or get off his train. Our choice and I must say I'm joining the crowd that's hitching a ride on that train. That's not to say that I'm on board with every choice he's made about the adaptation, and I do think there was some missed opportunity in adding more dimension to Jamie Fraser's character. I'll try to explain this a little bit further down, but now let me say that this episode was a mixed bag for me. I predominantly liked it, but wasn't enamored with it as with the previous seven. Some things just didn't work for me, while others did. I'm watching the show without comparing it to the books and it is not easy, but I've managed it so far, I noticed that my opinion/observation of this episode in particular, comes more from a perspective of a "reader" than a "viewer". I've noticed the difference only after I had a discussion with my awesome DH who's been watching the show with me who has never read the books. I was surprised with his take on this episode and it was fascinating to hear him talk about the parts he loved and actually appreciated. He thought that all that Frank stuff was necessary and very poignant. So, I guess we all bring to the table our own interpretation and none is right or wrong, but just our own. In our discussion of the issue I had, he totally shot me down! He completely disagreed with me and that's when I realized that my POV was still being influenced by the "reader" and not the "viewer". Watching Frank's timeline was exhilarating, jarring and depressing, but boy was it welcome! Wee Roger was curtness itself and I'm sure that we'll see him some more before the season ends. Claire's bonding not just with Jamie but with all the Highlanders. I was impressed by the filming of the 'near rape' from Claire's perspective, giving us a 'dream like' view and speed. And as I said earlier, the two timelines converging at the Craig Na Dun, combined with a Druid song in the background, just did me in.

The cliffhanger watching Jamie's snarl was awesome and seeing the expression on Black Jack's face was disturbing to say the least! It's rare that a book of this caliber gets an adaptation as close and vivid as this one is. Everything throughout the season has been portrayed as close to it as possible and the production is superb, from top to bottom. But knowing who's behind it, it doesn't surprise me, and as a fan of the creator of the show and books, I am in virtual seventh heaven and very grateful to them both, for creating and bringing this literary gem to me. That said, I am disappointed that the character of Jamie Fraser hadn't been fleshed out in these eight episodes as much as Frank or Black Jack has. I think, and this is in no criticism of RDM & Co, but just my own personal observation, is that Ron Moore made a conscious decision to expand one character at the expanse of another.

While I'm all for it, I think it could have been accomplished with at least a third less screen time, which could have gone to the developing and 'rounding' of Jamie's character. I was and on board with seeing Frank and his suffering; watch BJR's character tell us his POV about the flogging. Those scenes gave us better picture of those characters. My question is why couldn't we have had the same opportunity to get to know JAMMF in just the same way? So while they followed JAMMF's story almost to the letter of the book, keeping him in the background for too long in my humble opinion, as they fleshed out other characters, such as Frank and Dougal, even Angus and Rupert. That was wasted time and opportunity in developing JAMMF.

I'm not losing faith in the show, in RDM or anything of the sort but that's my impression …

As much as I love Tobias Menzies, I'll be glad when Frank/BJR are out of the picture.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Frank, Frank, Frank???
brizosdream29 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
After that lovely romantic wedding night we are back to Frank, yet again. (Really, what's up here?) We have a whole new set of scenes just written to focus on Frank. Frank seems to dominate this final episode. We have Frank back in 1947 looking for Claire; the police trying to convince him that she's off with her lover and not missing at all. Frank in the bar being approached by a stranger telling him he knows where the man he's been looking for is. Frank meeting with the men who try to rob him of the ransom money and him losing control, and beating the men and choking the woman who led him there. We have the Reverend Wakefield and his house keeper Mrs. Graham trying to help Frank come to terms with Claire disappearance. Followed by Frank leaving for Oxford, but stopping one last time to stare at the stones, only to hear Claire's voice calling his name.. "Frank Wait for me..". (Oh I guess she must of heard him…It must be love that transcends time.. Wait do we have the wrong character?.. Yes I think we do.. Isn't that supposed to be Claire's love for Jamie that transcends time, not Frank?? Ohm… Is there a "bromance" going on between Ron and Frank. I think there must be)

What is everyone else doing back in the 1800's. (Let's see if we can fit all this in the 20 minutes left in the episode after we get done with all the Frank stuff.) Well we have Jamie and Claire talking about how unusually it is what they feel for each other when they touch and make love (no love scenes however). We have Hugh Munro's visit on the hillside and some garbled speech from the beggar that Jamie understands, but no one else (that's a scene I would have cut). We have the lads sitting by the fire listening to the Water Horse story being told by Rupert but no water horse by the lake scene with Claire (I guess we couldn't afford the Loch Ness Monster). Then we have the fight with the Grants (no one wounded, so quickly over, what was that really all about?). Following the fight we have a quick lesson of the lads teaching Claire how to kill a man with a knife. Lucky they did because just following that we have the attempted rape of Claire by Redcoat deserters. She has to kill the one trying to rape her, as Jamie is unable to help because the other deserter has a gun to his head. The attempted rape by the Redcoat deserters was a powerful well filmed scene, however instead of following the book and continuing with the after rape sex scene, they decide to cut out to "Frank and Mrs. Graham??". (Not a great place for a cut out). They do come back however and we find Claire both in shock and angry at Jamie; followed by Jamie leaving Claire to go find the man who could prove his innocence. Claire visibly angry at Jamie but then decides she angry at herself for not going back to "Frank" so she leaves to run back to the stones that have "magically appeared" right next to where Jamie left her (how convenient). Almost to the stones she reaches out to touch them to go back to the man she loves (Frank??) only to have more Redcoats grab her and pull her back to the 1800. (Really, wasn't Jamie supposed to do that after the scene with the witch trial??). Then the season finale we've all been waiting for.. Claire spread over a table, ass in the air, knife at her breast waiting for Black Jack (psychotic Frank doppelgänger) to rape her yet again. Thank god our hero Jamie arrives just before he pierces her breast with that knife she had hidden in her boots. Cut to black.. Oh well folks, I guess we have to wait 6 (did you say 6) months for the actual rescue (LOL).

OK, I've been a little tongue in cheek here, but I guess I'm a bit disappointed in this ending episode. First of all by this time in the series we should be developing the "stars roles" more (i.e., Jamie and Claire). I know I had to wait through episodes 1-6 so we can finally see Jamie and Claire kiss but really do we have to go back again to the non-romantic Jamie and Claire so quickly. Next let's get Frank back where he belongs (a distant memory that may creep up in a passing voice over thought, not the whole frigging episode). There are lots of good scenes and lines in Diana Gabaldon's books; I wish they would use some of them, instead of inventing ones that do not work quite as well. Just when this season seemed to be heating up (Episode 7) we have to call it quits for another 6 months. I want more, more Jamie, more Claire, more romance, more Outlander and less break, less changes for the sake of change, and definitely less Frank!
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed