6 Minutes of Death (2013) Poster

(II) (2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
36 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
"The Book can take you to places! See Death from a whole 'nother perspective!"
doug_park20012 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
As you've probably surmised, 6 MINUTES of DEATH is a low budget indie set in Philadelphia, 1862, with props and costume design that are occasionally convincing but more often ludicrously otherwise.

The first 30 minutes are VERY tiresome, with the local kids coming down with a mysterious pox-plague, a bunch of parents and teachers screaming and moaning, and so on. As horrible as the following may sound, things start to pick up after all the kids die and transmigrate to a clearing in the nearby woods called "the Library," where some mundanely dressed angel fellows--all with heavy East Coast accents--explain that a mysterious "Book" from somewhere, sometime in the Dark Ages allows them to resume their prematurely interrupted lives in a place and person of their choice. An interesting concept, and it might have made for a nice afterlife fantasy if the film had continued in that direction. However, a maverick girl-and-boy duo walk off with the "Book" before the "angels" can assign their proper destinations, and they wind up in a dark Dante-esque forest bordering Hell (?), which actually looks more like rural Long Island. One of the guardian angel guys with pattern baldness goes after them, but, as the Book decrees, he has only six minutes before he'll be trapped forever in the underworld himself. . .

For the very most part, 6MD is SO amateurishly done that it's laughable, and many will find it to be a waste of their time and money as well as downright insulting to their intelligence. In scenes such as the angel dude kung-fu fighting with "demons" (lol!) dressed in black hoodies and white masks, it would appear that the actors and directors weren't even halfway trying for anything that should be taken seriously (even in a funny way). Moreover, the huge cast for such a short film is confusing, and probably because the directors and writers of the film didn't have a really clear idea themselves, it's hard to place who's supposed to be who in both Philadelphia and the Afterworld.

I do not exaggerate when I say that in terms of overall production, 6MD is one of, perhaps THE worst film that I've ever seen--It definitely makes the bottom 3. Still, it's so weird, with such an imaginative (though seriously underdeveloped) premise that I have to give it a little something above the minimum rating. In certain places, it succeeds at being spooky if not exactly frightening--The haunting instrumental soundtrack helps in that regard. The child actors did a nice job despite the lame script they were given, and the whole film would have been far better if there were more focus on the kids and less on the various adult bozos. There is also some briefly breathtaking scenery. Finally, it gets really, really interesting at the very end. . .and then it stops.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Even 'A rather weird experience' is an understatement.
turtlilp9 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was not exactly a disaster to me - but it still was horrible.

First of all the children dying and the parents screaming take away WAY too much of the film. The more "interesting" part starts after more than half an hour. This is very boring to watch. Also, everything in this movie looked terribly unrealistic. I mean, I know that this is a low-budget movie, but... how the children die... the part at the beginning where he looks through the book is poorly animated like everything else in the rest of the movie (for example the bugs or flies flying out the girl's mouth).

The story seemed good at the beginning but started to develop to an unclear state where it was really difficult to tell what was happening. And many parts of the story don't even make sense. If he can kill everyone with "light magic" or whatever, why did he fight with his fists in the first place? And he even magically lets the girl appear in front of him! Why didn't he do that earlier?

Oh, and if we are talking about the fights... another unrealistic part of the movie. I don't know why they had to be in there. They are so unnecessary. The man didn't hit anyone really! I know that this doesn't happen in different movies either, but here you can CLEARLY see it.

Another problem of the movie (I watched it in German since it's my native language) was the lip-syncing. I don't know how it is in the English version of the movie but in the German one it was a pain to watch.

Lastly, the last negative thing I want to bring up here is... in one of the scenes near the end (in the forest) you can see a car in the background! Such a big mistake is unforgivable for ANY movie that isn't satirical! This movie is supposed to take place in the 19th century.

All in all, it was a terrible movie, you can literally see how small the budget for this movie was. Even if I had some good laughs with my family - that was obviously only because it was so bad. Don't ever watch it. I don't recommend it anyone who doesn't love bad movies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Community theatre attempts to make it BIG
BigBobFoonman12 April 2014
Quite possibly the worst community theater "actors" on the planet got together with a seriously deluded writer/director and made this piece of flotsam.....ghastly....hilariously bad acting......incomprehensible plot and script.......uncomfortably inferior writing and delivery of badly written dialogue......apparently, anybody that contributed money to this project was cast in a speaking role....so many characters that it was impossible for continuity......the only good work was the actual camera operation and special effects.....all wasted by community theatre-quality direction......somebody in that cast had big money, because Red Box got paid to put it in their machines....I turned it off after 15 minutes of gawping in wonder....
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad.
mizzez_lonely12 April 2014
I thought oh man it's a new horror movie on red box and it looks creepy. Well goes to show that looks are deceiving. Extremely horrible movie. The actors are downright awful as well as the story line. Which I never found out what it even was. Everyone who played part in the movie has got to be deeply ashamed. I maybe watched 15 minutes and honestly thought it was a joke. I wish I would of looked on here first and have saw the obvious awful rating. Folding laundry and brushing my teeth was more entertaining than this barf. Worst movie I have saw in years. So please don't waste your dollar at red box because it's not even worth a dollar. I wouldn't even accept if it was given to me.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't even bother...
paul_haakonsen25 December 2016
"The Library" or "6 Minutes of Death" actually indicates in the title itself just about how long you will be able to endure this ordeal of a horror movie. I managed to survive 10 minutes into the movie before I just gave up entirely.

The acting in the movie was just anything but impressive, and it was the main reason for why I gave up and threw the towel into the ring. This was amateurish on every account, and it didn't really work out well on the screen.

With the 10 minutes I watched, I have no idea what this movie is really about, aside from the synopsis that I read here on IMDb. And I can't claim to have any interest in finding out more about the storyline or the characters portrayed in the movie.

As for the special effects, well again I have no idea. All I managed to see in the 10 minutes was a change of person in a mirror, as some girl was apparently getting messages from a little girl through the mirror. And that effect was very simple and required no special effects. Again, I can't claim to have any interest in finding out more about if there are special effects in the movie. But hands on heart, then I highly doubt it because the entire 10 minutes that I watched just oozed low budget and low practical effects.

I have no intention of returning to finish this movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Holy god, this is beyond bad
dafjunkholder19 April 2015
FIrst off, all the positive reviews on here are clearly written by the director or someone involved in the film - they share the same weird overuse of commas and odd grammatical structure. But more importantly, no sentient being could sit through ten minutes of this without recognizing the utter and complete lack of even the tiniest shred of filmmaking going on here. This is literally one of the most pathetic excuses for a "film" I've ever seen. It is no exaggeration to say that I've seen high school film projects done in two weeks that had more intelligence and artistic talent than this gigantic turd. The "director" should be ashamed, and if it's him leaving these bogus 9-star reviews, I can guarantee him that it's not going to help - no one will watch this and walk away unscarred by its sheer, undiluted crapitude. Please, do yourself a favor, bang your head against a wall for an hour - it's much more entertaining than "6 Minutes of Death."
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very Poor Acting and not period clothes
jillermeister16 July 2014
Wow, what can I say? The acting was not only terrible, but the actors kept forgetting their lines, or stumbling through them making corrections as they went along. I was dumb struck with the lack of period costumes/clothes. It was set in 1860's but you had all kinds of dresses, except the actual hoop skirt dresses of the time. (I seen only one) I seen hair styles, short sleek, modern cuts, other than a few kids with braids or an adult with waist long hair, none of them had the braid, ringlets, and buns worn in the 1800,s. They wore hats from the 1700's, as well as modern style hats. Not the style of bonnets or hair attire worn in the 1800's. I especially loved the sleeping caps worn in church and during the day in public with their short hair sticking out of it. When I seen a guy walking with knicker style pants like worn in the 1600's I burst out laughing. You may be working on a short budget, but come on. Actors need to remember their lines and not say ummmm so much. I just could not get past the mixed period clothes everyone wore. I guess you just needed a long dress to play a part. If it was a modern straight maxi dress from the local clothing store it was OK. I can get past a little period inconsistencies, but this was a constant. I hung on for the first 1/2 hour hoping for any type of improvement in the movie before finally turning it off in disgust.

Waste of money and my time.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is a horror movie?!?!?!
Destinyfuentes497 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is very disappointing. I didn't get the storyline at all and the acting is very poor. I don't understand why red box would release this. What a horror movie disappointment I feel bad for all of these innocent victims, if only I had seen these reviews before. of course I feel bad for everyone getting hurt by this, yet this movie needs serious help. I was hoping for a good chiller but instead I got a confusing comedy. Had my attention for about 20 min, then it got so very weird. The only scary part was the acting, such a bummer. If you want my opinion don't waste your dollar on this. Yet the effects were alright. This movie just doesn't make any sense. I think my whole family could make a better movie, I hope red box doesn't do this again. 😁👎.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
...Seriously...?
ravenhair7022 April 2014
Okay...me and my wife can really only agree on horror films...and this was the ONLY new movie in the red box. we looked at each other and shrugged..."How bad could it be?" she asked. Dear god! Why? WHY did we even try to watch this? I looked it up online after the...VERY slow 20 minutes...which is all we could stand. The acting...what little there was...not to mention the DAZZLING (Sarcasm) special effects. The budget was $50 grand and it's just a shame it had to go into...that. I know I didn't watch the whole thing...but I have this ability to know if a movie does not capture your interest at the beginning...really get you curious and hooked...there's no point watching after a certain point...sorry.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
DO YOU LOVE HER MORE THAN MOMMY?
nogodnomasters8 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is another film that involves the forces of light vs. darkness without Frankenstein. It seems they were at battle for 500 years (something else my history book omitted) and then had a truce which involved a book, a book with special powers of which we really don't see too much . Evil has come up with a plan to get the book and tilt the power, although the whole story was poorly developed, executed, and acted.

The film takes place in the anachronistic setting of rural Philadelphia, Pa. A bunch of odd stuff happens in the first eight minutes before the film, becoming a story of bad facial sore make-up. This is an era where they wear plastic buttons on their shirt, have artificial shoe soles, plucked eye brows, fake eyelashes and modern make-up, not to mention the elastic hair bands.

The acting was noticeably MST bad. The child actors were the biggest "horror" of the film, worse than the new Little Rascals. Not worth watching for free, let alone the Redbox rental price.

Parental Guide: No f-bombs, sex, or nudity.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I give it a 9 since the shining!
kimdurly1 July 2014
So far, this movie is a stylish introduction of how film makers can be creative on a low budget. The looks of this movie give reason to bet it will throw a lot more in this new film era, and to hope for some other film makers to protest heavy ticket cost at theaters. When something tries to shock me consistently , I'm pretty much never shocked by anything, or scared by anything but this movie gave me the creeps. I'm usually just exhausted at the usual scenery in most horror films, stealing focus every time with the same shocks and been there done that, and I don't mean that as a negative. Put low budget creative and this is what gets you close to the terror.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent Indie Film
hectorperezz11316 May 2014
I review horror films for a living. This film was unique, low budget but unique. I give it 7 out of 10 stars for being original and thinking outside the box. Original Story Good Outline Actor was medium Currently on Red Box. Not really that good but better than the other eight previous movies. Ignore the poor reviews. The story's a cracker, the action is deftly executed and it's largely, a fun ride. original and ritualistic, with nice supernatural flourishes and an outcome that will surprise those unfamiliar with the original story. A wickedly entertaining, sometimes thrilling adventure. A terrific middle chapter with plenty of action, excitement and fun. The score on this movie could have been improved Hector
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
1 Life, don't waste 1 min on this movie
ArielLooper26 April 2014
Filming my dog sunning itself in the yard with a Fisher-Price camera for 90 min would be more entertain and FAR better acting. My child will not let me turn this off, but she's sick with a fever, so she has an excuse. I am literally still here SUFFERING 53 minutes in, which I suppose makes me the winner of these reviews by about 40 minutes. IMDb should have a 0.25 star rating, but it'd only be out of sympathy or delirium. I even thought about leaving no stars, but that wouldn't help the cause. The acting is poor, comparable to elementary school plays. The audio is REALLY bad...like 9mm 80's home movies kind of bad. The "special effects" were worse than YouTube, and that's not meant to insult YouTube. Obviously someone "KNOWS" somebody at RedBox, must be relative that owes them a favor. I want my dollar back.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
hardest laugh in a long time
mpmclinden4 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is so bad it is great mystery science theater quality fodder. The hilariously stilted acting is so bad I challenge you to watch it without laughing so hard you lose control of one body system.

In 2014 I am absolutely shocked, and pleased, someone would be so consumed by their own world view as to actually release this!!!! What a treasure!

From the absolute lack of any attention to era appropriate (protagonist with highlighted hair and Brooklyn accent in 1860 Philadelphia). Most of the time bad movies are just annoying, but once in a while they are so bad they transcend!!!
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Chicago Horror Daily loves it!
bobherret1 July 2014
These reviews are concise and well reasoned. Why bash it just because you disagree with it? All these comments that deride it are doing the same things that accuse this review of doing. I review films for a living. I can clearly tell you that this is one of the most creative horror films I have ever seen on a $5,000 budget. If the cost is precise …this director is a genius. More and more the effects f movies are killing the industry creative level. Cleary not the case in 6 minutes of death………..For all the right reasons this film doest spare an expense it getting the job done.Horror is back, wrapped in a Gothic cloak woven with camp with fire roasted marshmallow
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sometimes you just have to bite your tongue & say "SEE IT"!
nospam-25-37497721 September 2016
The list of things wrong with this film is enormous & u should DEFINITELY SEE IT!!! I'm usually merciless on defective films but not this one. Despite amateurish production, hokey parts, frequent poor acting & comic-book editing, u can still see the (almost obscured by 3- Stoogery) creative, unique & interesting plot.

Ciminera's take on the mechanics of the afterlife, demons (who look like ninjas), angels (who look like orderlies) and library books that check u out, all come together in a unique view of what's waiting for us. Even the hokey time limits in the non-living realm hint at the uniqueness of what otherwise could really be a far better film.

Personally, I don't believe they really spent $5k making this movie (more like $250), but I don't really care (u won't either). Somebody MUST give Mr. Ciminera proper funding & professional personnel for the remake of this & his next couple of films. This guy has lots of heart, lots of uniqueness & lots of potential. He's a 1-of-a-kind, impoverished, culturally low rent mix of Rod Serling, the Pope & a Philly Cheese Steak....BUT WITH LOTS OF POTENTIAL!!! Watch him!!!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Good
paulopablo22317 May 2014
Leaving slashers behind for the murky uncertainties of the supernatural, The lead has found a way to expand his talents while driving yet another modern genre shift. A strong cast at times and an atmosphere of real dread mean that despite a catalog of immediately recognizable ghost devices this movie is cleaver. The animation work could have been improved. The director delivers his finest work to date. Instead of relying on the graphic, slasher-style techniques that made many horrors a hit, He turns to old-fashioned suspense, and the payoff is big time, a mix of similar horror sub-genres which works well as far as story goes but it's nothing we haven't seen before. Horror films are remembered for the chill scenes, the real talent comes in making the most of the scenes in-between. 6 minutes of death goes so far in doing this successfully. What is nice to see for a change is some of the old-time same stuff peace Paulo
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Surprisingly good
jrutzer113 July 2014
6 minutes of death shouldn't be this good. But it is. How can the director turn a movie that cost 5k into a feature with a wide release? He has and did before. In fact, I found it rather great. 6 minutes of death a lot of descriptions were bandied about. Many said it was very so so, I'd say the film is a Hitchcockian execution with a story that feels started from the brain of a deep horror fan director. But I don't want all of that to say 6 minutes of death is the best horror film I have ever seen. It is very much its own thing and credit for the film rests heavily on on the no script style of director Joe Ciminera who normally gets your palms wet and cold. Combine that with a dedicated performance by a few known B actors and you've got a masterful display of suspense that in my opinion is a worth watch, Enjoy the film
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
New type of horror film on a shoestring budget
lettymaynard17 May 2014
It's nice to see a well made traditional horror movie these days and that is exactly what 6 minutes is without massive gore and blood. It's nothing revelatory, but it is an effectively creepy spooky warping film with not the best acting and a story that doesn't insult the intelligence of its audience like most horror films do instead its a refreshing look at horror. The characters act decent and it may please the viewer if they can get past the first 10 minutes. Not a whole lot of Hollywood special effects here. That doesn't usually happen in horror films anymore. It's entertaining and keeps your attention the whole time, even if it takes a little while to get going stay tuned after the 10. One of the better horror movies of the past couple years especially on Red Box
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"You know they are not suppose to enter the Library"
adamyellp17 May 2014
The above is one of the quotes from "6 minutes of death". My reasoning for giving the film such a high rating is not because it was well put together but because the outline of the story was original in the genre of Horror.In a time when Hollywood is more interested in remakes and sequels than in original movies, 6MD tells a new story. And is really good at it. 6 MD started off with a very good premise. The film was scary, and disturbing, and kept you on the edge of your seat until the twist ending. 6MD could have been something terrific, but instead it ends up being decent because it lacked acting, good acting. The film would have been fine just the way it, if it wasn't for cast that kept it down. What its worth, the first hour was very entertaining, but like I said, it could have been put together with better acting. i will give the director credit for the storyline or whoever wrote this.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
6 minutes succeeds in a good picture
sallywagemen24 May 2014
There's still blood and spite all over the floor, mind you but not as much as a slasher film... But there's also a lightness of touch and tone, more important, a clearly delineated narrative. Both director as the cast have taken a serious approach to the macabre theme that adds up to lotsa tension and suspense in its own genre. A film that deserves recognition as one of this country's finest horror indie movies, a horror nightmare featuring standout performances from a few good actors. Fans have varied reasons why this is a better film to those that came before and those that have come after but I to me it is obvious. There are two reasons why it is superior, original and low budget. I also like the way that the film skips over the bit everyone knows and concentrates on the good bits but there are scenes that lag and boring. It's also got the horror element right with a bit of impressive gore to finish off. For a film produced for 5k its remarkable
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I think we're safe now...
billybobbill2218 May 2014
This director is known for making low budget films that look good. His first splash was purification then Acedia, and now 6 minutes of death. Acedia was my favorite but could be beat by his newest film being released in the fall of 2014 called, "Venial". This movie immerses you in a disturbingly cryptic vision of the underworld unlike any you've seen before. First glimpse of this film may have you believe It's weird and non-traditional, but its also effective and scary and clearly the work of someone who knows their way around a spooky visual nightmare with less effects then needed to make you cringe. Acting is medico except for the rolls of the guardians which seem to lead.Roller coasters up and down make this a worth see
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Story which is original
gerardfitspell22 June 2014
The acting isn't always as spot on as the camera-work and the sound can use proper mastering and the story feels a tad over-extended, but with his mix of creative ideas seems to blind the other faults has come up with an impressive and effective thriller called "6 minutes of death". Imaginatively, it places all the known elements of the story in different contexts, completely recasting whats known as horror and molding it into a sci-fi thriller. The movie is dubbed as horror but has more of a thriller feel. All throughout the films scenes are original and thats why I like this movie. There are no copycat scenes like every other movie being released today
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent creative work
freddydoompa1 June 2014
^ minutes of death is still a very tense ride. Third time feature director Joe Ciminera ( relation to the chef on TV) clearly knows how to bring the horror. He's able to make this horror film into a strong ensemble piece, working with a talented cast at times, and yet he doesn't flinch from faithfully reproducing his take on a no script mania. This remains my best film of the year so far.The result is a film that is often chilling, but not over the top. The other performances tend to be uneven and underwritten as well. The premise of the movie is totally original and cleverly thought by Mr. Ciminera.

Is it an excellent evocation of what the show was at its heart. Better yet, its clear and sharp focus means it stands alone just fine as a work unto itself, easily accessible as a more-than- competent thriller for anyone not familiar with Mr. Ciminera work. A director who seems to keep creating lots of good content quickly. Horror fans could lead contented live following his career. Got to show film makers how creative you can be on a 5,000 dollar budget
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A hidden good one
davidmunitzx21 May 2014
6 MINUTES is a film that transcends its genre, leaves itself open to interpretation and deep analysis from both film historians and the viewing public who love syfy thrillers, and is a cinematic winner; "6 minutes of death" is the seminal best. Based upon the visions of a director who doest use scripts..It has its share of horror movie flaws, including fade cuts and extra cheesy acting, but 6 minutes is a lot of fun, atmospheric and suspenseful., and the director uses simple horror scenes and nothing over the top to scare . Just be prepared for a major let- down ending. Some may not like that the movie deviates but 6 minutes stands on its own as a definitive good horror film . Joe Ciminera gives his signature cinematic vision with mind- blowing cinematography and a dream-like atmosphere. All on a 5k budget-go figure Hollywood…..
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed