The Thirteenth Tale (TV Movie 2013) Poster

(2013 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Great
animupsycho19 August 2017
This is really one of my favorites I've seen throughout the year of 2013.

Cinematography 8/10: The cinematography is beautiful. Most of the shots and standpoints in this film were well done.

Characters 7/10: Throughout this film, the characters were well- developed, but not every character was interesting and had no real background.

Plot 9/10: This movie had a very good plot, there wasn't any plot holes from my perspective and it was an intriguing ride.

Cast 8/10: The cast was well-chosen and all had a very good performance. I've always been a fan of Vanessa Redgrave and this performance of hers as Vida Winter was incredibly well done.

Conclusion: This movie is great and I give it an 8.25/10.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One out of three is bad
Lejink3 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This BBC psychological thriller drew on most of the established "givens" in what appeared to be a classic ghost story, with a big creepy house, a troubled governess, mysterious deaths, brooding Yorkshire moors, emotionally disturbed children and of course sightings of a ghostly lady in white. In fact, the twist is that it manages to subvert all these clichés and still produce a gripping story which holds the viewer until the end.

Perhaps the story had a little too much going on, what with Olivia Colman's character's own big childhood secret ("everyone's got one", as Vanessa Redgrave's dying narrator repeatedly tells her), the romance between the married doctor and the fretful governess and the Agatha Christie-like succession of unexplained and apparently uninvestigated deaths, but with atmospheric direction and fine acting by the two leads in particular, both of whom resist the temptation to ham it up, they successfully draw the viewer into these improbable events.

Yes, the twist about the mysterious twin sisters is fairly transparent from early on and it fails to deliver even one "jump out your chair" moment, but the story carefully explains away all the loose ends it throws up by the fiery conclusion. As I said the story's not exactly original, as becomes obvious when Colman twice on her own visits the old haunted house in time-honoured Tippi Hedren fashion, but my eyes were pretty much glued to it throughout, if not quite through my fingers I must say.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Tale of family woe
Prismark103 January 2014
The film was pushed as a spooky, supernatural story when it is more of a thriller.

Vanessa Redgrave is the dying writer. Olivia Coleman is the biographer called in to write a story of her youth in a large house with a dysfunctional family.

A mother who went mad. A father on the verge of madness plus uncontrollable sisters who are a burden to the housekeepers.

The film takes a while to get going but the book has been adapted for the screen by Oscar winner Christopher Hampton.

As the film develops, secrets are revealed about the twin sisters and their effect of the people around them.

The film is well acted and the story gradually draws you in and surprises you as it does not go the way you think it will.

Of course I have never read the book so no comparison is made with the novel. It's a drama that stands in its own merits.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
wise work
Vincentiu26 January 2014
the presence of Vanessa Redgrave could be a guarantee about this film. but it is more. because it is not only a beautiful film but a wise one. not victim of many easy solutions - useful for many Gothic stories - but delicate and precise, gentle and care to each obstacle. a movie who remembers many old stories. but it has courage to not be only one of them. the key is the intelligent performance of lead actresses. and the spirit of old world - tower of secrets, deaths and the best servants. but the secret remains the clash between feelings, past and future, the limits and shadows of characters as a puzzle. that seems be all. a movie who has not ambition to be remarkable. but it is really good.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Deadlier than the male
aethomson15 May 2021
Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DeVito were twins. One inherited all the noble qualities, and the other... didn't. The twins in "The Thirteenth Tale" are rather less amusing. Madeleine Power is brilliant as the nine-year-old girls Emmeline and Adeline (Ella-Rose Wood skilfully doubles). One of these twins (under that cascade of gorgeous red hair) has the makings of a sociopath. You wouldn't want to be governess to this difficult duo, but Hester Barrow (Alexandra Roach) comes from the school of no-nonsense firmness. Also from a school of too clever by half rationality, leading to this "scientific" procedure - which you just know will not end well.

It's English Gothic. There's a whiff, nay, a stench of corruption within the tainted aristocratic blood, yea, in the befouled DNA. So mental instability is always going to be on the menu. The stolid servants (Janet Amsden as The Missus and Robert Pugh as John The Dig) ought to be secure enough - unless they get drawn into the cesspool.

If you want to enjoy this film, you'll need to accept the conventions. Some elements of the story are super-credible, other elements look cliched or artificially engineered. Is dying author Vida Winter (Vanessa Redgrave) trying to absolve some collective guilt by "confessing" to her chosen biographer Margaret Lea (Olivia Colman)? Lea doesn't come across as tough enough to be a professional biographer. But maybe it's Lea's vulnerability that keeps Winter talking, spilling the beans and spilling them in the right order for her fantastical narrative to keep us watching. A movie like this draws you in with its well made beginning; but whether you'll say at the end, "This was time well spent" is not specified on the manufacturer's warranty card.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Adequate rendition of a great book
imdb-887-4559662 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A film version of this wonderful book would be difficult to do properly. I found it adequate, but certainly not impressive. The dialog while touching on aspects of key elements from the book fell short of conveying to the viewer important points of the story. I'm not sure I would have enjoyed this film had I not read and enjoyed the book. Many compromises are necessary to transform a novel, but both the screenplay and direction were lacking.

At the outset, it is offered as a ghost story and this emphasis is unnecessary. It is a mystery to unravel without ethereal suggestion. The relevance of the book lacking it's final story is brushed aside where it could have easily been developed. The strangeness of Charlie and his sister was introduced belatedly and incompletely. Margaret's wardrobe was not suitable - did she stop by on her way to the gymnasium? An actress who cared about her role might have provided better input on attire. The romantic element between Margaret and the Doctor was implied by weak smiles between them and a parting comment although not particularly important to the plot.

Much of this might have been saved with an introductory voice over or even flashback dialog with Margaret's father at the bookshop to set these facts in place. For example: "The reclusive and mysterious Vida Winter's most famous work is one nobody has ever read in a book of thirteen tales containing only twelve." Likewise, a summary, perhaps as dialog between Margaret and the Doctor where she relates the missing tale as Vida's Cinderellian story of the orphan half-sister would have brought more conclusion to the viewers.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Soaks into the bones of you
lisletbear6 February 2014
I love Gothic. I have been steadily reading my way through the back-catalogue of greats from Le Fanu through Poe, M R James to Will Self. I like not just to read and enjoy, but to carry a story with me forever. For that to happen the story has to get inside of me; it has to creep in slowly under my skin, and then shake me up from the inside. The Thirteenth tale does just that. From the off, the makers employ all the best Gothic themes in order to summon feeling; the grand but degenerate house,wildly baroque gardens,sense-memory flashbacks, costume, unheimlich twins. It adds to the tension with filmic techniques- the pared down narrative,filters, uncanny usage of colour,slow close-ups and misty long-shots. The result is pure feeling. For me, the feeling begins as mystery and a slow sense of disorientation and unreality, but develops through anxiety, into something unnameable strange and completely absorbing. This film is pure Gothic. I feel alarmed, I feel shaky. This film will live with me for a while yet.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Run-of-the-Mill BBC Drama
l_rawjalaurence1 January 2014
Based on a best-selling Gothic novel, THE THIRTEENTH TALE contains all the virtues characteristic of contemporary BBC drama; lavish locations with plenty of exterior shots, ornately decorated interior shots, 'mood' lighting designed to create a spooky atmosphere, and a cast of well- known actors given full opportunity to show off their creative talents. In this particular piece, aging novelist Viola Winter (Vanessa Redgrave) enlists the services of little-known writer Margaret Lea (Olivia Colman) to recount her autobiography, including her Viola's mysterious childhood when her family home (Anglefield House) burned to the ground. However Viola is herself a writer of fiction, so we never quite know whether what she recounts is 'the truth' or not (if the truth exists, of course). Christopher Hampton's screenplay allows for plenty of exchanges between the protagonists, as well as creating a 'hall-of- mirrors' like effect in which nothing is what it seems to be. However the narrative of THE THIRTEENTH TALE does tend to sag; like many BBC dramas, the director James Kent seems too much concerned to create atmosphere through music and location shooting (both interior and exterior), both of which tend to impede the progress of the plot. The denouement, when it comes, is both predictable and un-scary. One is left with the feeling that the story could have been far more effectively recounted in a sixty-minute slot.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very Difficult To Fathom Out But Definitely Worth The Effort
plutus19475 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It seems lately that every time I turn on my TV I see either David Tennant or Olivia Colman. I am certainly not complaining though.

If you watch The Thirteenth Tale you will certainly need your wits about you to follow this wonderfully written plot with all it's many twists and turns.

I doubt you will be able to fully fathom it out until virtually the final scenes.

Olivia Colman who played Margaret Lea was her usual impeccable self and Vanessa Redgrave (Vida Winter) never puts in anything less than a perfect performance.

I feel a special mention must be made about Madeleine Power who played both parts as young Adeline and young Emmeline, Her performances were immaculate and I am sure we will see a lot more of her.

SPOILER BEGINS

I am not going to give too much away about this TV Movie because you will have to work it out for yourself, but the story begins with Margaret, a professional biographer being engaged by Vida to write her autobiography. Vida is dying of pancreatic cancer.

SPOILER ENDS

I have given this production a 10 rating because I feel it rates alongside the tremendous whodunit Broadchurch', which incidentally also starred Olivia Colman.

If you have the patience to sit down and watch The Thirteenth Tale uninterrupted I am sure you will not regret it.

I would be interested to know how long it takes you to work it out. In my case I solved it just before the full facts were revealed.

Just a little piece of useless information. Both Vanessa Redgrave and Olivia Colman were born on the same date, 30th January, but of course in different years.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad
jinglemaking7 May 2020
Good story good acting but when it's transferred to a movie somehow predictable for many spots.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Far-fetched and ultimately pointless
candyapplegrey27 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Beware - this isn't scary or creepy. The plot is totally implausible, the characters not fully delineated. Evil sister. Good sister. Spare sister. Hackneyed tropes abound, e.g. the ethereal children's voices singing, guess what? - Ring Around the Rosies, that staple of spooky children movies. The scenery and locations are stunning and beautifully filmed. It looks like an expensive production but it's all very much style over substance.

Olivia Colman has nothing much to do and so does nothing much. I've never considered Vanessa Redgrave a great actress but I have to give her credit for saying this line with a straight face: 'If you don't tell your stories, they die and come back to haunt you.' I'm tempted to say 'So what?' It's complete nonsense. Just like this drama. Should have stopped at 12.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent drama.
michael-penn77731 December 2013
AN adaptation of the bestselling Gothic novel The Thirteenth Tale which was filmed in North Yorkshire is being screened tonight.

Scenes for the production, adapted for the small screen by Oscar-winning screenwriter Christopher Hampton and starring Vanessa Redgrave and Olivia Colman, were filmed at Duncombe Park in the summer.

The story follows ageing novelist Vida Winter (Redgrave), who enlists a young writer to finally tell the story of her life including her mysterious childhood spent in Angelfield House, which burned to the ground when she was a teenager.

Superb location. I wish there were more films like this.

Highly recommended viewing.

10 out of 10
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The 3-D look is quite effective.
mark.waltz17 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The best thing about this gothic thriller is the photography, so vivid in its colors that the film literally pops out at you, and that makes it quite stunning to look at, especially in the spooky scenes. Vanessa Redgrave is an author dying of pancreatic cancer, and has allowed a biographer (Olivia Colman) to come to her house to write her story. What Colman finds is a mystery, not only about Redgrave's life, but unrevealed details about situations in her books which are based on Redgrave's childhood. As Redgrave reveals her story, the questions arise that have some very shocking answers.

Every color the camera picks up on is presented with vivid detail that is stunning to see, especially the greenery of the land Redgrave's character grew up on. It really pops out as if the viewer had on 3-D glasses. The sudden blurred background pop into focus as either the camera moves in or the figure walking towards the camera gets closer. The effect is brilliant and really adds to the mood. Redgrave plays most of her part lying on a couch and Colman basically sits there and takes notes, so there isn't much for them to do acting wise. They're supporting to the background story. I'm reminded of Bronte novels, "The Turn of the Screw" and "The Woman in White" while watching this. Intriguing, but missing that real bang until later that makes the viewer say "Wow!"
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unengaging and unconvincing
paul2001sw-12 January 2014
'The Thirteenth Tale', a new BBC drama, tells the story of madness in an upper class family. There's a twist in the tale, but finding a way to convey it critically maims the dramatic structure: the story is told, entirely in hindsight, in a way that kills engagement, promoting the mundane story of the telling into the foreground over the potentially more interesting story that's actually being told. One can also note that this is the sort of tale where, however neglected or crazy its young protagonists are supposed to be, they never fail to look anything but ravishing. I found it psychologically unconvincing and essentially dull.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well crafted tale but lacking in real suspense or chills
bob the moo3 June 2014
This film got positive reviews when it was screened around the Christmas period last year, however I sat on it for ages since I was conscious that being a good drama around that time of year doesn't always translate into it being a good drama in and of itself. The ghostly tale of death and mystery is told by an older woman approaching her own death to a younger woman commissioned to write her story – it is a standard setup and from here the story is told across many years in a patient and reasonably engaging manner. Indeed, the telling of the tale is where the film's strengths lie because it is undeniably a well crafted affair. The casting, the locations, the production values and the general maturity of the whole film are all such that it feels much better than it actually is. Suffice to say I can understand why it went down quite well at the end of the festive period, because it does stand out as a classy and adult affair, in contrast to the lighter entertainment fare that would have dominated the previous week or so.

I did find it pretty good thanks to this, with a steady approach and decent tone, but yet I never really got drawn into it in the way I would have liked for a serious drama and well-told story. There are a few moments of suspense and chills here, but generally it doesn't build into anything bigger or more dramatic – the same steady approach that helps to found it, also undoes it in this regard. It has its merits and there is a certain satisfaction to it but it never really gets beyond the quality of its build to become something where you don't see the craftsmanship because of how strong the actual story is.

The cast is part of that quality build and I did enjoy both Colman and Redgrave; the rest of the cast also has good quality turns – although Game of Thrones fans may find some of the casting a bit distracting! Direction and design of the film is of a high quality as I say – it looks good and feels weighty throughout. Shame that the delivery of the material didn't build better and didn't provide more in the way of chills and emotions. Perhaps it was too much going on in the small space available (with a couple of stories here) but it does feel lacking as a whole, even if the quality of the build is enjoyable to see.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Enjoyable Dark Murder Mystery, Which Should've Been Better.
P3n-E-W1s313 December 2022
Greetings, salutations, and welcome to my considerations and recommendation of The Thirteenth Tale.

Story: 1.25/2 - Direction and Pace: 2.50/4 - Performances: 1.50/2 - Enjoyment: 1.25/2

TOTAL: 6.50/10

This movie deserved to be so much better than it turned out. It possesses a good story concept, fine cinematography, and a robust cast. Sadly, the writers cannot make the most of the concept, or the director unsuccessfully transposed it to film.

A famed reclusive writer is dying, and before she passes, she's chosen a biographer to write her story. She claims her tale is the missing story from her collection of shorts entitled The Thirteenth Tale, in which there are only twelve stories. But it's not. It's a real-life tale of lovelessness, mental illness, mayhem, and murder. But who is the killer in this unfolding mystery? Is it the authoress or her twin sister?

The writers give the audience a narrative filled with interesting characters and dark deeds, all hidden away from the outside world by the slowly decaying walls of the great house. However, there is a fault with these characters. The principal players are okay, but some fleshing out is required, especially for the aggressive twin Emmeline. Why was she so combative? A smidgen of more light on her mental state would've been beneficial and added more power to the tale. Also, more on their mother and uncle would've empowered the picture more. And there're plenty of quiet places that the director fills with slow and beautiful compositions. Though these are nice to look at, being a character-driven story, using this time to build more involved characters and their backgrounds would've been ideal.

Another thing that struck me as a tad poor was the performances. You have Olivia Coleman and Vanessa Redgrave, yet they feel underused. They meander through the film with no power in their performances. For two strong actresses, I expected more. I suspect this is down to the director rather than the cast. For example, the most robust actress was Madeleine Power, who portrayed both twins, and is excellent. She adds a nice, quiet subtleness to Adeline and an erupting volcano of violence and hate to Emmeline. Sadly, the actresses who follow in her older incarnations cannot provide the previous intensity, which is a pity, as they're only required to portray one character. So the director failed to show why Emmeline had quietened down or failed to push the actresses to be fierier. Then you have Tom Goodman-Hill as Dr Mawsley. Now, Goodman-Hill is a fine actor, but he tends to have one acting style - solid and powerful; even his stance oozes strength. And that's how he comes across here. So I reckon the director allowed the cast a lot of leeway in their portrayals. It's not a terrible thing with this cast, however, because all of them are highly talented.

So in the end, I enjoyed the movie but wanted more. I'm happy to recommend The Thirteenth Tale for one viewing, but I don't think I'll be returning for a second helping.

Check out my Killer Thriller Chillers and Dramatisation Of Life lists to see where I ranked the movie.

Take Care, Stay Well, And Merry Christmas.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
lovely film
watcher201929 April 2020
An old fashioned ghost story and a great cast. You will not be disappointed.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Watched after reading the book. Worst idea ever
ovidiuleo-816-71040211 March 2018
So... It's really difficult to find a director and a script writer with fewer imagination and lack of drama perception. SCRIPT WRITER: I was actually shocked to discover that Christopher Hampton, the script writer, is Oscar winning. I admit I never saw Dangerous Liaisons but I did see Atonement and I liked it dearly. Yet this script lacks everything expected from a script writer of this amplitude. The way he lost momentum of what in the book are most carefully threaded subplots, some of the dialog not only simply obliterated, but, worse, amputated, characters unreasonable modified or even excluded altogether in a most uninspired way... all tat is absolutely disconcerting. I never expected a movie to follow every letter of the book it's based upon, but there is a limit to which you are bound if you want your movie to hoover around the same level of quality the book does. Christopher Hampton though, thought different. I'm under the impression that he wrote this script in the most unprofessional way he could ever write a script, in the manner one would do if one forgot about the deadline and remembered it the day it should have been delivered. Script wise, the movie is a complete shame on Christopher Hampton's panoply. DIRECTOR: If I was Diane Setterfield I would be very unsatisfied by how this movie turned out. But I think more than being disappointed by the script writer, I would be so by the director. James Kent directed more than one movie based on a book. One of them - I loved the book but I HATED the movie - is 11.22.63. Not gonna comment it here though. The distracted way in which The Thirteenth Tale was directed is disconcerting. Unbelievable how actors like Vanessa Redgrave's or Olivia Colman's acting was reduced to utter amatorism by this director. The same sensation I experienced watching 11.22.63 which I already mentioned. James Franco looked like an impotent amator, not like the great actor he actually is. The only actress that resisted this mutilation of talent and turned out completely untainted was Sophie Turner. Thumbs up for her - and not the first time, either. The location of the filming is superb - I've been in the area (not seen the actual park, only Helmsley) and just like probably most of the countryside England, it is breathtaking - yet this doesn't transpire from the movie. The scenes concentrate on debilitated characters instead of the majesty of the land. A house that is the actual centre in the book for most of the plot is barely filmed here and there and that's only an example. So, considering the two main things that can make a movie an Oscar winning one or a simple celluloid pulp - just, as, unfortunately, The Thirteenth Tale is - scripting and directing, were impossibly idiotic this time. Hence my recommendation: don't watch the movie if you read the book, unless you are a script writer or a director and you want to learn what not to do when doing your job. Or, better yet, just read the book and forget the movie. You'll have more to win like that.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Long and boring
pilot100913 July 2022
Just a long predictable actors wet dream. Grossly over acted by Vanessa Redgrave (does she ever do anything else I wonder) although the other cast do a workman like job. The story is just too short for the films length so it drags on and on until frankly you just don't care what happens and in any case you have already worked out what is going to. Give it a miss IMHO.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A real flashback down memory lane!
jillian-horberry31 December 2013
...not generally a fan of 'ghostly' stories but was curious to see the fine cast of The 13th Tale. It was gripping from the beginning, superb acting, stunningly pretty and horrid little girls, sensational sets and music which really helped keep the concentration - a marvellous production and of course original story. Having been drawn in, I was soon to be flabbergasted when I realised some of it was shot at Duncombe Park where I was at prep. school in the 60's - a first shot of the entrance gates, the drive and steps to the front door I knew at once! - a much loved place by most of us who were lucky enough then to have assembly and put on the Nativity Play in the main Saloon,walk through the doors onto the terrace, build dens around the Yew Walk and around the Temples, play on the same swing and around Father Time, admire the mahogany staircase only for the staff to use, peer down into the Main Hall with its chequerboard floor waiting for parents to arrive, have story time each evening with the Head whilst sitting round her on the floor of her Study, the Library... I was transfixed and quite horrified to see the house as burnt out shell!! How did you do that? overall a magnificent and moving production, just a perfect setting for the story... thank you to Heyman Productions and the BBC
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Gothic Noire
crumpytv25 March 2022
A tale of a psychologically disturbed family told in flashback by one who survived.

The actual story is quite implausible and beyond belief.

Such goings on could not have remained unnoticed.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Great landscapes, poor script in the movie compared to the book
esti-cab16 September 2021
I don't get why so many people rate that movie with 10 an so, perhaps they didn't read the book before.

Movie's script is poorly absolutely reinvented and runs very fast into the main secret facts of the story that in the book you have to find out for yourself, where wich ones are told in a very explicit manner in the movie, breaking out the mistery atmosphere around the whole story... Even changing things that doesn't exist or are told on a different manner on the book and jumps put to another important plot on the story (Aurelius). I understand that in a movie based on a book you cannot told all the details but probably they couldn't use a script better written.

Very disappointed with that movie. I just read the book, fall in love with the story and find out there exist a movie so I wanted to continue immerse in that beautiful story told in the book written by Diane Setterfield.

Anyway, best thing of the movie are landscapes, great, beautiful and stunned England landscapes and some scenes and house are exactly as I could imagine reading the book.

One point to keep in mind, in the book sisters are red-haired with sharp GREEN eyes, not blue, and there exist quite physical differences between them, despite being twins that are not shown in the movie and it is not told until the very end there are not only a pair girls, neither the sociopath personality, that's something you have to conclude for yourself as well as another things.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wonderful, intense and mysterious BBC drama
robert-temple-131 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This moody and mysterious drama based upon a novel by Diane Setterfield (who looks very like Olivia Colman), brilliantly adapted by Christopher Hampton, was shown on December 30, 2013, and was a real success. The direction, acting, cinematography, art direction, and every aspect of the production were splendid. As always happens when Vanessa Redgrave is involved in something, we are all mesmerised by her every look, especially those when she stares into the void and remembers things. In this film, she spends her entire time lying down because she is dying of pancreatic cancer. Despite that, she dominates the action and it is impossible not to fall under her spell. And when did anybody not fall under her spell? The intensity, the dreaminess, the abstract gazes into the beyond (as if she could see something which we cannot see, which is of course always really the case) are all there. And the person who has to counterbalance all this is Olivia Colman, also superb as usual, this time as an introverted and somewhat sulky woman with her own unresolved issues. Redgrave plays a famous popular novelist, and author of a best-selling book called THIRTEEN TALES, which notoriously only contained 12 tales. So everybody has always wanted to know what was the 13th tale which she suppressed and never told. As death approaches, she feels compelled to tell that tale at last, which is the true story of her early life. Redgrave lives in a huge ornate country house full of rare books and beautiful objects. She summons Olivia Colman, a younger and little-known writer, to stay with her and for a very handsome fee to become her biographer. Colman is doubtful and on the verge of being hostile and resentful. She always dresses like someone going camping in the woods and clearly carries the burden of some deep wound. Will she too reveal her own 13th tale? Thus the two women progress with their mutual revelations, all of which are desperately disturbing and infinitely sad. Not for a moment are we bored, as the story unfolds in such a dramatic manner, with many flashbacks. The director James Kent has done a magnificent job of making all of this work. Colman asks Redgrave, suspiciously, why she chose her to write her biography, and Redgrave mysteriously says it is not because of Colman's biography of the Brontes, which she 'would not dream of reading', but because of an article she once wrote about twins. This unsettles Colman, who drops the subject. Colman tells Redgrave that she, Redgrave, has always lied about herself and has told numerous versions of her life, all of which appear to be untrue. Having written under the name of Vilda Winter, a pseudonym, no one has ever known her real name, so Colman demands to be told it. Redgrave says her real name is Adeline March and that she grew up in a large country house 'about five miles from here" on the Yorkshire moors, called Angelfield. She said it burnt down when she was 17. It is what happened between her birth and the age of 17 that is then shockingly revealed, layer upon layer upon layer. It is all so very gripping and strange that we are on the edges of our seats as we watch the tale unfold in all its Gothic complexity. It involves incest, madness, impersonation, and murder. Even in 'telling the truth', Redgrave is not really doing so, because a further layer of the real truth emerges towards the end of the film. But the first version of the truth is that Redgrave was a twin, with an identical twin sister named Emmeline, who died long ago. In the flashbacks, we see the red-haired twins as children, both apparently played by the same child actress, Madeleine Power, who is extremely talented and acts very passionately. They loll around the huge house entirely unsupervised and uneducated, their parents being the brother and sister who live incestuously in the house but rarely come out of their bedroom except to look increasingly demented and exhausted from constant sex (well played by Emily Beecham and Michael Jibson). A mysterious murder takes place in the house, which is blamed on the mother, who is then taken away permanently to an insane asylum. The true murderer is revealed later. Then we move forward in time and the twins are 17. These both appear to be played by the actress Sophie Turner, though the IMDb cast list says she only plays Adeline. I confess myself at a loss to figure out the casting here. Whether Power plays one, two, or three girls (yes, we eventually learn that there are three rather than two), I cannot say, but whatever is the answer, she is extremely good at it and has the correct eerie but beautiful look, especially when she, like Redgrave, gazes into space. Then we discover that Emmeline is really still alive but is also dying, and Colman sees her digging frantically in the earth with her bare hands saying: 'Dead go underground.' Her face is heavily scarred from the fire at the old house. Meanwhile Colman explores the ruined house nearby, half destroyed by the old fire (an amazing true location, wonder where it was), and meets a strange man who sleeps in the ruin sometimes. Later she discovers who he is and why he is there. Things get 'mysteriouser and mysteriouser' as the saying goes. As the real truth comes out about the twins, Colman becomes emotional and bursts into tears and tells her own story, how she feels guilty for having indirectly caused the accidental death of her own twin. Redgrave drolly tells her: 'Feeling guilty doesn't do anybody any good,' but holds her as she sobs. I don't wish to ruin things by telling more of the bizarre tale, but it is surprising, hair-raising and highly melodramatic. This is a really gripping and excellent film.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed