"Chapter 14" was terrible. Probably the worst episode yet. And I've just learned that people ate it up, because it seems they love when writers waste their time, have their characters commit to nonsensical actions, and then rub the audience's noses in it afterwards. A common defence of the show I see from people is something along the lines of, "People hate this show because it's cynical". Maybe that's why certain people hate it, but that's not my reason. If anything, that's one of the show's assets.
No, I'm starting to hate the show because they think that being cynical is good enough on its own to carry a show. It's not. When Game of Thrones punishes the audience, it feels earned. When Breaking Bad punishes the audience, it feels earned. Even something lighter in tone like Orange is the New Black accomplishes this fairly well in its first few series. But when this show punishes the audience, it feels like it's because the writers believe this tool in itself has value, when in reality the true goal of punishing the audience is to make them feel emotionally torn for investing in characters and to make them hate the villains enough to stay tuned. I don't feel foolish for investing in these characters so much as for investing in the writers. And my hate is not directed at Frank; instead, it's directed at them.
The finale directly tells the audience "F. U." for being upset at what just happened, but the actual issue with this is that nothing I just watched made any sense and logically it would have just made everything worse for Frank. It has a built-in defence of, "If you hate this episode, you're playing into our hands". That's cheap, and it's lazy. In one fell swoop, it discarded 4 previous episodes of plot, and did it in such a way that felt completely unearned, and only there to incense the audience. It's as if they think being alienating is the same thing as being provocative - that they think people will be talking about this moment, and it will make people want to watch the show. Maybe that worked back when the episode first aired, but it's bad writing through and through, and premised on the idea that the writers toying with the audience is charming because Frank lampshades it with one of his patented monologues.
No, I didn't believe for a second that you forgot about us, Frank, because these writers are predictable, superficial, and fall back on the same formulae again and again. But thanks for checking in, you moustache-twirling cliche.
6 out of 67 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink