9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (2012) User Reviews

An Excellent Documentary About the Cover-up of the Destruction of the Three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11

[webdevtim · 10/10 · 2 March 2013]

More than any other documentary ever produced concerning that infamous day of September 11, 2001, this documentary covers the Architectural, Engineering and Scientific analysis of the physical impossibilities of the US Government's explanation for the collapse of tallest three high-rises of the World Trade Center complex commonly known as the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7.

The completeness of the evidence presented in this documentary is astounding; there are times during the film where I was moved to tears when I realized the far reaching implications of this information that our news services should have been providing us for the last 11 and one half years.

I would say that if you could only watch one film this year and this film was one of the films available for you to watch, If I were you, I would watch 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, because knowledge is power and this film will empower you like no other.

More Important Than Any Hollywood Film!

[js-mil · 10/10 · 27 January 2013]

9/11 has changed the world, especially America and the countries we have invaded. The the major problem with 9/11 is that we've been lied to about what happened. What really happened has been covered up by corporate media and government agencies with propaganda and even outright lies.

Before you spend any time watching another fictional Hollywood film, watch this Experts Speak Out documentary about the scientific evidence behind an event which is changing the way of life in America, from the TSA scanning and patting down our bodies at airports to our basic rights like Habeus Corpus and privacy.

This film will help open your eyes to a terrible lie.

A great documentary that should be seen and shared

[NonFictionReform · 10/10 · 2 March 2013]

This documentary provides a good explanation about what happened to the World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11. It is well put together and flows nicely from a narrative perspective. The concluding sections with the psychologists and therapists talking about how difficult a story it is for many Americans to hear. This discussion is "right-on" because most people say that they would have heard about it by now if it were true (they are hearing about it now and many won't listen).

The video segments of the Twin Towers being destroyed show ejected material falling outside the building (i.e. nothing holding it up) is convincing. This material is falling at the same rate as the floor-by-floor destruction of the building. This can't be a gravity collapse because the material on the outside would be falling much faster.

An excellent documentary!

One of the most important documentaries of our time

[corafisher · 10/10 · 1 March 2013]

I have heard challenges to the official 9/11 story for several years, but never had I seen the WTC evidence compiled and detailed so professionally until I watched Experts Speak Out. Although it's a low-budget, independent film, the cinematic quality is at par with Hollywood documentaries... But most importantly, the testimony from the dozens of experts, combined with the video and photographic evidence, is impossible to ignore. Anyone who thinks that asking questions about 9/11 is "unpatriotic" or "loony" will be transformed after seeing this film.

Not only does the film go in depth into the many scientific flaws surrounding the official 9/11 account -- especially regarding the collapse of WTC building 7 -- it also features top psychologists and therapists who explain why this chilling information is so difficult for some people to accept. That gives this documentary immense value to those who are becoming aware of the issue for the first time, as well as those who desire to educate others on this subject.

9/11 Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out: "Experts"

[Platypuschow · 1/10 · 25 September 2023]

Plot

Persuasive viewpoints of over 1,700 architects and engineers who believe the unsettling theory that scientific forensic evidence points to explosive controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001.

Cast

Made by Richard Gage a man who has made multiple 9/11 documentaries, as if one wasn't enough.

Verdict

Let me be absolutely clear on something, this is NOT a documentary this is one of many conspiracy faux documentaries that has been appearing for the last couple of decades.

It claims it provides experts, but Google them and you'll find maybe they're not exactly reliable. This is one of many documentaries about 9/11 than comes from a different angle, a twisted angle, a paranoid angle seeing things that just aren't there and filling in the narrative themselves.

Watch a real documentary, this simply isn't.

Rants

Something that I genuinely believe is tearing this world apart is this conspiracy thing, it's absolutely rife. People don't believe anything they see or hear if it doesn't fit their own personal agenda. They don't need evidence, they shun facts, they dismiss science they demonize healthcare experts and they instead believe irrational ravings of Youtubers or not entirely right in the head "Influencers" and "Commentators".

Think its harmless? My ex went down that rabbit hole, flat earth, anti-vax, chemtrails, deep state/illuminati, weirdly all happened around the same time she went from a decent person to a uniform bigot hating anyone different from her. There's a reason conspiracy theorists always tend to be on the same political side.

Breakdown

Speculation not facts Paranoia not documentary Broken minds not expertise.

This is an excellent documentary for beginners and professionals interested in "What Happened on 9/11"

[Wayne1954 · 10/10 · 12 February 2013]

This is an excellent documentary for all levels of viewers from beginners to professionals who are interested in what happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11. The documentary includes interviews and explanations by many building professionals and others using simple language to explain how the buildings were constructed, and more importantly, how they were destroyed. The speakers apply simple concepts from physics to clearly show that the official story of aircraft impact, followed by fire, followed by a gravity-only destruction of the entire structure of both twin towers, down into their basements, could not be true.

The producers are to be commended on putting together such a tapestry of facts and explanations that can serve as a backdrop to understanding the events of that day. I have the original boxed set and the bonus DVD material which includes additional interviews is worth viewing for more in-depth descriptions of the events and the experts' stories about why they are speaking up. You can watch the documentary here ... then you can ask your local public library for a copy so that you can see the additional Bonus materials.

They don't explain How it could be done.

[williamgeiss · 2/10 · 30 August 2018]

They claim explosive brought down the twin towers and building 7, but give no evidence on how a massive undertaking could have been done. It would have taken months to do this in 3 buildings, No one saw them. M No one saw them spraying thermite.

these charges/thrmite were not set off by the plane crashes. how were the charges set off. the government. All they can say is we need more investigation.

Essential Viewing

[lionel-610-667922 · 10/10 · 16 February 2013]

Essential viewing for everyone, especially those in the U.S. and UK.

A&E fort 9/11 Truth bring forth what actually happened, with plenty of solid, irrefutable evidence that the attacks of 9/11 were completely outside of the scope and capabilities of the alleged, nineteen Saudi's in question.

Actually, go to youtube and watch WTC7 collapse, straight down, at near free fall speed, appearing to literally melt into it's base, as though held in place by a form or mold, around the massive skyscraper! We've been told that this incredible sight was accomplished by, "burning debris" on one side of the building. Suuuure, it was!;) Not.

Also, anyone who doesn't already know about William Rodriquez, watch his testimony on youtube. He knew those buildings inside and out and against orders of firemen, repeatedly ran into one of the buildings, pulling people out, over and over again, at great peril to himself. Anybody think Cheney or the rest of the Bush gang would have done that, in the same situation?

Me, neither.

He persisted in pressuring the completely reluctant Bush Administration to hold the 9/11 Commission, which was limited in scope, politically compromised and poorly funded. The one who's chairs state publicly that they were lied to repeatedly, by the Cheney/Bush Administration, the Pentagon, the FBI and the CIA. Lied to, repeatedly about 9/11. He also was in one of the buildings, in an elevator with others and confirms what firemen and others there have stated. There were explosions taking place in the basement of that building, moments before planes hit.

Everyone who cares about their country should see this. At least, people who value their freedom and value the ideal of honest government.

There is an article from the New York Times entitled something like, "Forgotten Voices of 9/11". It reports that the firemen were radioing to the ground, as they climbed the stairs and reached the crash site in one of the buildings, found survivors at the crash site in the building and were calling down for support to help bring the survivors at the crash site in the building where we have been told, over and over again, that there was a giant, superheated inferno, capable of weakening massive steel beams. Survivors would not be found in such an environment and they wouldn't have been able to get to the crash site, if there was. They reported NO raging inferno, obviously. Moments later, the tower disintegrated around them.

We owe it to them, the multitudes that have perished in the wars based on lies and deception in it's name, to look into the unbelievable events that happened that day. Then, investigate and bring the people who did carry it out to justice.

Just watch it, already!

How the Towers Fell

[Michael_Elliott · 28 June 2015]

9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (2012)

*** (out of 4)

This documentary originally aired on PBS and apparently became a hit among certain groups, which led to it growing a rather strong cult following. The documentary basically takes a bunch of experts to discuss how it was impossible for the Twin Towers to fall on their attack on 9/11. We're given the "evidence" that the government said caused the two towers (and Building 7) to collapse and then we here from countless high-rise architects and other experts. We learn the scientific reason as to why it was impossible for the buildings to fall in the way that they did and we see their evidence as to why they believe there were explosives inside the building.

Some people look at conspiracy theories as loony nuts who are constantly not believing what they're told and coming up with wild stories. Others see conspiracy theories as people willing to look further to what we're told and discover things that just don't make sense. There are so many awful 9/11 documentaries out there that it's hard to go through a dozen of them and find one good one. Theories are all over the place but I must say that this one here is actually one of the better made ones. I say that because they offer up some pretty good questions as to the official report and show some nice evidence as to why things just don't make sense. As someone who watched the events live that day, I think the most striking stuff is the actual news footage from that day where people discuss hearing explosions.

The documentary is certainly one-sided and there's no doubt that it was produced to push this side. Personally speaking, I would have preferred some "experts" from the "other side" to offer up their reasonings for thinking that the towers could have fallen the way they did. I think if both sides would have had a voice here then it would have been much better. As is, we pretty much get the conspiracy side here and now we have to search out another video from the other side to hear their explanations. Either way, this is still worth viewing for those who enjoy documentaries on the subject.

Unbalanced and Therefore Not Believable

[EddiesFathersSon · 1/10 · 1 April 2014]

As someone who does believe we are sometimes misled by powerful people I was interested to see this film. I have worked as an architect, though never on high rises. I studied the WTC towers in college for both their design and (at the time) innovative structure. I had extensively read trade publications about 9/11 and the 3 building collapses and thought another perspective was a good thing.

Unfortunately this movie did not use much good evidence in its analysis. It seems to have started from conclusions and worked backwards. Most all the arguments made for how we were misled about the cause of collapse did not ring true to me as a building professional.

Ultimately, I was so disappointed in the quality of the analysis that I researched the experts in the film. I could find no credentials that make anyone quoted in the film particularly credible. My view is that this film is actually MORE inaccurate than anything the main stream media has said about the WTC collapse.

I am doubtful about those doubtful people

[Lebl-stephen · 1/10 · 4 January 2020]

Very weak theory, the documentary starts with people saying that the evidence have been destroyed to hide the truth. That's groundwork for conspiracy, you can not prove the truth, therefore you can not prove our truth is wrong ... One of the experts is known to be part of the AIDS denialism movement. I am surprised Alex Jones wasn't part of the experts ...

So They Have All This Evidence

[tomasajdari · 1/10 · 12 June 2019]

... like the supposed nanothermite in the dust that looks and behaves exactly like paint chips with rusty steel on it and yet nothing happens, no chemist in China or Iran mentions it, even though they are far beyond the immediate reach of CIA/FBI. The same goes for the structural engineering arguments.

Again. Nothing happens. Nothing.

Oh, does it? All they can do is to ask for more donations to prolong the money laundering scheme of mr. Gage

These People Are INSANE...

[wrightiswright · 2/10 · 25 June 2019]

Just a load of guff spouted about a tragedy caused by TERRORISTS (not the US government as this bonkers documentary would have you believe). These crazy conspiracy theorists and so-called 'experts' need to take off their foil hats and emerge from their dank basements to actually enjoy life, not spout nonsense which is insulting both to the survivors of 9/11 and our intelligence.

Oh, I forgot to mention... it's ruddy boring too. AVOID AVOID AVOID. 2/10

Stop Profiting from the Grief and Gullibility of Others

[wbrabbit-57019 · 1/10 · 29 April 2021]

I wonder how many terrorists contribute to these movies, perpetuate their lies, and continue to draw attention away from the real monsters of 9/11.

While the government response was obviously incompetent, it's preposterous to claim there was "no raging inferno." You're taking bits and pieces and half-truths and spinning it to make money from the gullible. It should be illegal, but unfortunately it's never going to be illegal to scam people with lies.

If you want evidence of a raging inferno: Please see any of the thousands of personal accounts on 9/11. Please see the fires raging for months after the collapse. Please SEE THE TAPES OF THE TOWERS COLLAPSING AND THE FIERY EXPLOSIONS AT THE TOP OF THE BUILDING, RIGHT AT THE POINT OF THE RAGING INFERNO.

Or maybe listen to the 9/11 calls of dying office workers describing, "black, arid" conditions and "lack of oxygen from smoke and fire."