"Blue Bloods" Higher Education (TV Episode 2012) Poster

(TV Series)

(2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Educating the Wrong Way: Higher Education ****
edwagreen1 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Bridget Moynahan asks for Frank's help in not allowing her daughter to go to a college party. Frank takes the daughter's side, but wait until you see what he had done when the girl returns from the party.

The major story of this episode deals with drugs on campus and the fact that students are becoming sellers with one winding up dead. When the obvious suspect proves to be innocent, wait to be jolted to see who the real culprit is. While I shall not divulge the person's name, we can say that crime in education is high up.

Jamie reconnects with a former flame who he meets while she is doing charity work. Of course, she soon becomes the victim of a crime.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The cost of higher education
bkoganbing11 May 2017
It's domestic stuff in this Blue Bloods episode as Sami Gayle is having conflict with Bridget Moynahan about dating a college age boy. Both keep trying to drag Tom Selleck into the quarrel.

Will Estes meets up with a former Harvard classmate Laura Breckinridge doing some community service away from her six figure Wall Street job. Later she gets involved in a mugging and questions how Jamie could leave a legal career to be a cop, Reagan genes and all.

As usual however it's Donnie Wahlberg and his partner Megan Ketch who catch an interesting homicide of a college kid who according to narcotics detective Dash Mihok is one of a lot of drug dealers on his campus. Possibly this was Law And Order's mythical Hudson University. In any event he finds a most unusual killer at the end of their search.

The episode says a lot about the cost of higher education and what we put a generation through to obtain same.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mexican geography
eyeman1-11 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Undercover detective clears former informant by stating the the source of his drugs was Durango, Mexico and the drugs supplied by the alleged killer were tracked to a supplier in Guadalajara, Mexico. Subsequently, a shipment stated to be from Durango is identified and tracked to the suspected killer. Which one was it? Or is this just bad proof reading of the screenplay? The implication in the plot is clear: Drugs from Guadalajara were being sold on campus, and not from Durango. The former informant, Harlem drug kingpin and framed suspect, was supplied exclusively by a Durango drug lab. The actors writers and director are filming sequences without checking to ensure that they make any sense.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed