September Clues (2007) User Reviews

Intelligent work

[texviller · 10/10 · 27 September 2015]

Your jaw will drop same as mine.

What you know is what you think you know.

Truth is MUCH stranger than fiction.

This is not "popcorn" watching time: This is what 9/11 REALLY was and you will be in shock about world you living in.

Turn off your Tell_Lie_Vision and turn ON your brain. This is only weapon you have now.

Spread this excellent documentary, check site and see if they already translated it to your language.

This should be in all media but that will never happen because we live in Orwellian Nightmare. Not fully yet but we running there.

Wake up

A must see

[sugoigringo · 10/10 · 2 December 2015]

Just because TV has since its inception been a massive weapon of distraction (to quote the author's own words), September Clues in an absolute must watch documentary (well, it's nothing but plain truth) for anyone willing to know what REALLY happened on 9.11 and HOW they made it. September Clues IS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH PERIOD. - No air planes hit the WTC - No one was hold inside the WTC that day - No victims - Complete prefabricated videos endlessly broad casted on your world television. What you saw on TV but nothing a rough 90 min long movie aimed at fooling the whole world.Do you CARE ? Antagonist nations is a delusional concept and it has never really existed as such.Media are controlled and work hand in hand with most military intelligences of the so-called "industrial" nations of this planet. September Clues unveils what most people still pathetically FAIL to understand. That 9/11 was nothing BUT an entire media fabrication, a pre-fabricated movie aimed at fooling us people via a manufactured hyper reality broadcasted on a world wide scale.

Everything you know about 911 is completely fallacious

[howardgilmour · 10/10 · 9 July 2017]

The greatest documentary ever made, bar none.

If you want to know what happened then this is the documentary for you. If you can hack it, if you have the mental strength to come out from your programming, if you have the courage to see the lies around you and if you have the courage to have your world view challenged then watch it.

Nothing prepares you for what you are about to watch. You are about to have your foundations rocked.

9/11 staged from beginning to end

[schijnbeweging · 9/10 · 5 December 2015]

Of all the 9/11 documentaries(and some are good), this one is the most jaw dropping. And though it makes more sense than for example "loose change"," in plane sight", etc it will be hard for many to even evaluate it, let alone accept it.

What was withholding me at first were my emotions about that day. Not that the main point of the documentary is hard to understand: it's not. But if one talks about vic-SIMS and 9/11/actors for example, it feels that one is denying the existence of real people and real suffering. And it's mean to do that right? It's a funny condition of human nature which makes it hard to "get out" of this fairy tale and understand it. (and probably many others)

Compared to some, this documentary is not produced very professionally and seems to need an update. But watch it anyhow.

Misleading editing used to promote hate.

[ranb40 · 1/10 · 1 November 2017]

The fade to black nonsense is really an artifact related to switching of the video feed. Also the moment of impact is not visible as the plane crash is obscured by the already burning tower in front of it.

As for an on-scene reporter's microphone failing to pick up the sound of the 2nd plane crash, it is not known exactly where the reporter was standing. Also the CNN anchor not noticing the crash can be attributed to watching another monitor in the newsroom.

That a person could have heard the 2nd crash from their high rise apartment less than 3 miles away is not unrealistic, but the video deletes part of the audio that describes in detail the location of the witness. There is no reason for Simon to be withholding evidence unless it is to prop up a weak claim. The video tries to degrade the reliability of a witness because they only saw the 2nd plane hit, not the 1st one. There is no good reason to do this. Super human vision is not required to see a large plane fly into the WTC from 3 miles away; no matter what Simon Shack says.

Another bogus "fade to black" claim is made while reviewing the helicopter shot of the 2nd plane crashing into the WTC.

The "nose in nose out" claim is just silly. If a person views a better quality video than the obviously lower rez version in the Clues video, they will see that the nose out shape doesn't match the nose in shape. Shack conveniently edits his version of the video to show that the plane hasn't flown into the view yet; this makes it easier for him to say there was no plane.

September Clues removes audio and manipulates the appearance of the Naudet video to trick the viewer. Watching an unmanipulated version shows what really happened, not what the producer of the video says happened.

The entire premise of the video falls apart when the misleading manipulation of the September Clues editor is revealed.

Not convincing

[msmith-54624 · 1/10 · 28 February 2020]

They don't seem to understand video compression artifacts and lighting.