Scrooge: A Christmas Carol (2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
82 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Great vocals, average script
melissarockchica4 December 2022
Did we need another A Christmas Carol film? No, probably not.

Was this worth it? Just for Luke Evans vocals alone I'd 100% say yes. Some of the songs were spectacular.

The animation was great, with exciting new imaginations of scenes. I think it was a successful modernisation of an over saturated film and will definitely get younger kids enjoying it, but maybe not enough to stand out alone if it wasn't a musical. There wasn't enough emphasis on some of the other characters stories, so you don't build much of an emotional connection with them. Some of the accents were pretty bad, and parts of the original script and wording is lost, which is important to its essence.

Despite that, it's enjoyable, and after all it's a children's film. I will be going back to replay Luke Evan's singing solos on repeat.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A mostly successful musical rendition of the classic Dickens story
IonicBreezeMachine2 December 2022
Ebeneezer Scrooge (Luke Evans) is a cold hearted miser who makes no secret of his contempt for the holidays as he runs his moneylending services with no room for compassion or humanity. Scrooge is visited by the ghost of his deceased partner, Jacob Marley (Jonathan Pryce) who is now condemned to wander the Earth in the shackles he forged in life and tells Scrooge that a similar fate awaits him with an even longer and heavier chain. Marley offers Scrooge a chance to avoid his fate by telling him three ghosts, the Ghosts of Christmas Past (Olivia Colman), Present (Trevor Dion Nicholas), and Future who show Scrooge his long forgotten past, its effects on those in the here and now, and what may happen if he continues on his course unaltered.

Scrooge: A Christmas Carol is yet another adaptation of A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens. The film is produced by Timeless Films a UK based production company that specializes in low to mid budget animated features often produced as co-productions with China or Germany. Scrooge: A Christmas Carol marks the company's third film to debut on Netflix as an original following previous releases such as Pets United, Dragon Rider (aka Firedrake The Silver Dragon), and Extinct. The film is written and directed by Stephen Donnelly whose previous directorial effort was the direct-to-video animated film Monster High: Welcome to Monster High, but more commonly works as an art director such as the Timeless produced TV series Lost in Oz. The film takes inspiration from the 1970 musical Scrooge written by Leslie Bricusse (to whom the film is dedicated) who also wrote the 1967 Doctor Dolittle as well as assisted in the music for Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory with as well as credits across several other projects before his death in 2021. While Scrooge: A Christmas Carol indulges in a few well worn tropes of mainstream animated fare, this honestly isn't a bad revisit of Scrooge.

While the movie doesn't have the budget of larger studio produced animations being a smaller European production, the movie looks good for what it is and features some solid design work, character models, and smooth movements. Luke Evans makes for a solid take on Scrooge not playing it quite up to the level of over-the-top that Albert Finney did in the original take on the musical material in 1970, but Evans strikes a nice balance between the over the top pageantry of something like this as well as the more subtle character moments with a particularly well staged scene in Scrooge's past where his lost love sees his cruelty during a debt collection which leads to a really strong song "Life Never Came" which is one of the new songs that Bricusse wrote and contributed prior to his passing and it's a really solid sequence both in terms of animation, music, and performances by Luke Evans and Jessie Buckley. The movie also features revisits and remixes of songs that previously appeared in the 1970 film also written by Bricusse such as "I Like Life", "Thank You Very Much", "The Beautiful Day", and "I'll Begin Again". The rest of the cast is very good across the board with Johnny Flynn strong as Bob Cratchit, Olivia Colman very good as the Ghost of Christmas Past, and Trevor Dion Nicholas playing a very large personality as The Ghost of Christmas present that certainly fits with his performance, but Dion Nicholas also played the Genie in a west end production of Disney's Aladdin stage musical and it does feel like the movie is trying to capture that to a degree.

The movie remixes various elements of the Dickens story as well as the original layout of the 1970 film so even though familiar beats are struck throughout the film, there are differences in details and delivery that are quite unique. One of the elements they do is change Scrooge's relationship with his nephew by incorporating a reason why Scrooge holds him at a distance which recontextualizes an element from other versions of this story such as the George C. Scott one from 1984 and for the most part I think it's done very well. The movie also tries to extend the link between Bob Cratchit and Scrooge by creating an additional encounter in the past and I think it mostly works. In terms of aesthetics, the ghosts are all well designed with the transition between Ghost of Christmas Present to Ghost of Christmas Future a particularly memorable and unique take on the ghosts that I did like. Some elements such as the inclusion of Scrooge's pet dog Prudence or impish creatures called Cheerlings that seem like they go to the minion school of animated assets did seem a little out of place and didn't really add all that much, but I've seen those kind of elements incorporated more poorly (looking at you King and I 1999) and their inclusion here isn't all that distracting luckily.

Scrooge: A Christmas Carol is an enjoyable mid budget animated take on the classic Christmas story that features some decent revisits of the songs by the late great Leslie Bricusse and a strong cast who add effort and energy to the material. In terms of its placement among the many tellings of this story, I'm not quite sure where I'd rank this, but I'd probably be more inclined to revisit this than some larger scale versions of this story like the Robert Zemeckis "rollercoaster" 3D approach he did with Jim Carrey or the three hour Steven Knight miniseries that upped the darkness and taboo material largely suffocating the themes of redemption. If you like the fun pageantry of something like the 1970 Scrooge, you'll find a lot to appreciate here with it.
26 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
1970s better in every way
tammyc-428164 December 2022
If you're going to make a remake at least try and improve something. The 1970 musical is the favorite version of this story at our house so we're a bit biased. It started out more original by incorporating Dickens childhood for Scrooges but then started semi-copying the musical numbers (rushed tempos and horribly shortened). And a dog??!! Scrooge was much too mean and stingy to have ever entertained having a pet. Hollywood - please please try doing something original. A new score would have been much better to go along with all the other changes that were made. It was like they wanted to tell it a new way but then kept changing their minds and copying bits and pieces of the well done 1970 version. Those who are unfamiliar with the Albert Finney masterpiece will enjoy it I think. But for those of us who treasure that version, this was all a bit confusing.
30 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Confusing Humbug!
sonnesun16 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It's simply terrible. It was like it didn't know what it wanted to be. Changed and cut out way too many major parts of the story just a little too much.

The new ending was terrible. I get that they may wanted to be different to separate it from the countless similar past remakes with their changes, so why include 3 Albert Finney songs with similar scenes alongside some new original songs & scenes? Did they run out of time to compose a few more songs in time for Christmas?

They all sounded bland compared. It lost the emotional impact of the original film musical. Any humour from the 'Thank You Very Much' song just got lost and fell flat in this partial remake.

The Pixar style animation looked a little lacklustre, plus including a soppy dog as Scooge's pet also made it feel more like a children's movie rather than a family movie. That in itself isn't really a problem, for Nickolodeon. It just felt far more Disneyfied than the Disney version. It's over Disneyfied. I'm only surprised that the dog didn't talk (it knew how to read though) 😆

One for small children, but they'd probably humbug it too. Bah!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No "Thank You Very Much"
ADHDDepressionFun10 December 2022
What. The frick. Did I. Just. Watch.

This is a supposed remake of the brilliant and beautiful and loveable 1970's version of "A Christmas Carol" with Albert Finney. This completely desecrated said movie and the whole beautiful tale of "A Christmas Carol".

First of all, it is canon that Scrooge is NOT a victim of circumstance. He is an absolute miserable old miser, a crotchety old man and completely unlikeable. This Scrooge was a strange silver fox and completely TOO likeable. Scrooge is an OLD DUDE, NOT A HUNK OF BURNING LOVE. The whole point of Scrooge's character is the hope of redemption/repentance and of hard change. Not the easy "Oh wow yeah I can change" that this movie portrayed. There was no great gradual change, no resolution with Cratchit and Fred (who, for whatever reason has a totally different name??? Wth was up with that????)

Wtf is up with the dog??? There was no point. Absolutely none.

Background work? Totally lazy. Like the animators said, "oh we didn't render that so we'll just go to Doctor Strange's Astral Plane".

Also, the ghosts. Past? Annoying AF. Sweet mother of potatoes my ears are BLEEDING. Why does she repeat everything, and why does she look like a giant pile of nacho cheese? AND WHY DID SHE STEAL THE DOCTORS ICONIC PHRASE?! Uh uh, honey. Absolutely not. Why was Christmas Present so freaking WEIRD???!? And why does he directly quote the Cave of Wonders? Ghost of Future was NOT scary. He looked like a weird scarecrow, and the costume came straight from Party City.

The songs were so cringy, especially the repeated ones from the Albert Finney. Especially "Thank You Very Much" - I feel physically ill. Just use different songs, OR sing them like they were meant to in the original movie. For the love of Christmas, don't modernize it.

AND STOP TALKING DOWN TO THE AUDIENCE. WE GET THE SYMBOLISM. YOU DONT HAVE TO SHOW US EVERY FRICKIN THING AS A PARALLEL IN THE SKY.

Pros: Luke Evans has a very pleasant, beautiful voice.

Cons: everything else. I am Scrooge. Humbug.
20 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too Much Stuff/Scrooge Was Too Handsome
Hitchcoc18 December 2022
I'm a bit of a Scrooge-a-holic, always looking for new versions of the classic tale. While the animation here was quite striking, what they did with it added little to the story. A Christmas Carol is a story of redemption. This Scrooge is terrorized by the characters he encounters. After seeing his headstone, he falls into a kind of hell, ending up in his bedroom. Was this a story of redemption or an ugly assault on the senses. Because all the children looked bright eyed and healthy, even Tiny Tim, I couldn't buy into the pathos. Dickens meant the world to be a dark one because it reflected what many in Victorian England faced every day: poverty, hopelessness, and fear. Scrooge, in the original, propagated that through indifference and inaction. By the way, I found the nephew absolutely insufferable and Cratchit way too insignificant. We get little character development and some of the best parts of the story are glossed over or treated without foundation. I also found the dog silly and unnecessary.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Just another carbon copy of A Christmas Carol
aarongomez954 December 2022
The movie itself isn't that bad, it's a faithful adaptation, but that's what I don't like about it.

The story of A Christmas Carol has been retold so many times that I feel there really needs to be strong justification to make yet another adaptation. I mean, what's even the point of making a movie if you're just going to tell the exact same story that's been told ad nauseam?

There's nothing original about this one other than a few musical numbers and a dog, it's essentially the same movie we've all seen dozens of times before. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if every single line was pulled directly from another adaptation, it's so generic that they didn't even need to bother hiring writers.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Watch the Albert Finney version instead.
neiljeffery118 December 2022
When I heard there was a new version of a Leslie Bricusse's musical I was intrigued, so I watched it.

CGI, music, great songs... I was really looking forward to revisiting one of my favourite stories.

Well, I am torn. While it is admirable that another version of the story has been made (I love the story), this is a very superficial telling. The CGI is clearly well done, but still manages to feel flat, and it feels that money has been thrown at animation without using any budget to create any warmth, so basically you end up not caring less about any of the characters.

Finally, I must mention the music. If you are going to have a new film version of the musical, at least put some of the songs in it. It's bare, and feels like a musical by numbers with little effort.

Avoid.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Go in blind!!
brittanylynann5 December 2022
I am one of those people that can love movies solely on the artwork and music. This movie served several, strong music "reveal" moments. I would compare it to how you felt the first time you watched "Show Yourself" and/or "Rewrite the Stars." So many of those moments. Also, I found it to be hilarious. If you're big on the traditional Dickens style, this may not be the movie for you. Because it's loosely comparable. CAN BE SCARY FOR SOME KIDDOS. The ending is a little darker than maybe some of the other adaptations. I would say it's similar to the Moana ending. All in all, I wept through the whole thing, lol. My Spotify playlist gained nearly the whole soundtrack!
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a bad retelling of Scrooge
lisafordeay3 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Scrooge A Christmas Carol is a 2022 computer animated festive musical film featuring the voice talents of Luke Evans,Olivia Coleman and Jonathan Pryce. The film tells the story of a cold hearted man named Ebenzer Scrooge(Evans) who meets ghosts of Christmas past,present and future who shows Ebenezer the true meaning of Christmas. Will Scrooge learn the true meaning?

Overall it was a decent flick. The songs are forgettable,the animation is nice and the voice acting was good too(Luke Evans did a good job in his animated debut). If you liked Disney's A Christmas Carol or any adapation of Scrooge then you might like it.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Wholly Unnecessary
gary-426-1612725 December 2022
There have been over 100 versions of this story on film and TV in the last 100 years or so.

This one, while competently made, adds nothing to the canon.

It is technically well enough done and has some fine glitz and glitter, but the plot is truncated to the point of abandonment; the character development isn't; the songs, with some exceptions are lifeless and listless.

How can I say this: even Tiny Tim comes off as a two-minute afterthought.

It's not that the story can't abide restaging. The best may still be the 1951 Alistair Sim, but the 1992 Muppet version was fresh and winning, and eve last month's Spirited gave us some pizzaz and some energy.

Scrooge: A Christmas Carol 2022, while not bad, per se, was as unnecessary a project as I can remember.
40 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The writer of the original returns for one last hurrah...
illisia4228 December 2022
Going into this, I hadn't seen the trailer, promotional images, cast, *nothing*. All I saw was a new Christmas Carol adaptation, but animated, on my Netflix Recommended, so I clicked play!

Going-in blind, I was pleasantly surprised by the fact it was a musical, and even more surprised when I heard *familiar* songs, because it turns-out this is a remake of my all-time favourite adaptation from 1970!

The animation is beautiful, the voice acting great, and the plot additions work really well, although there are classic elements from the book that were admittedly missed. Music-wise, the new versions of the old songs were pleasant although I admit I didn't enjoy them quite as much as the original, and the new songs were lovely additions.

I love how child-friendly this is! Reminiscent of The Muppet Christmas Carol, with the darker elements lessened and lighter elements added, and of course the songs. The animation and direction is *stunning* in my opinion and I think children will love it.

I see a lot of one star reviews from fans of the original, and that saddens me. Open your minds and your hearts! This adaptation was written by the same man - Leslie Bricusse - who did the original 1970 film, and yes, that includes the new songs. Sadly, he passed-away last year (2021) during production (RIP).

All-in-all a wonderful adaptation, enjoyable by newbies, and fans of the original who can open themselves to it.

Merry Christmas!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Perhaps the worst trasposition of the story
gianmarcoronconi9 December 2022
Yet another film transposition of one of the most beautiful and iconic Christmas stories of all time and I can say by heart that this is the ugliest and least faithful of all, even if the film itself is not bad but when compared to all the others done so far this is the worst done. The main problems of the film are two, one is the dog that has absolutely nothing to do with it and is just annoying for most of the film and the other is the fact that the film is too childish, denaturing the more adult part of the original work in favor of an audience of small children, thus taking away a lot from the original teaching of history to make it more likeable.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What was the point
Dickensian14 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Being a lover of the story, I watched with excitement but was left disappointed. There are that many versions of this great tale now that anything new, needs something out of the ordinary, this didn't. They changed characters names needlessly and added characters in that didn't need to be there including a dog that served no purpose. The songs were boring and I was left thinking, what was the point in that? The animation had a makeshift Disney feel about it and the characters had nothing you felt you could connect with, Scrooge himself was almost neutral throughout so there was no great transformation as per the story. Wouldn't recommend.
33 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
beautiful hommage
Kirpianuscus28 December 2022
Homage to Roald Neame version of Scrooge, it is , for CGI more, a seductive animation inspired by the classic novel. And, sure imaginative at whole, reminding the good tastes of the fascinations specific to childhood.

I like Prudence , against the strange idea about a Scrooge as owner of a pet, I admire the scene about connection , in past, between Robert Cratchit and Ebenezer, like the inspired option for Jonathan Pryce for ghost of Jacob Marley, remembering the old beautiful work of Alec Guinness in the original version.

It is unfair to critic it . First, because it is a new demonstration of hard work with a not significant budget and about large possibilities offered by technology today. Second, because i am too old for critics. My favorit options are in the past . And this correct , imaginative, seductive Scrooge, like a noble hommage to work for 1970 Scrooge, has the beautiful virtue to remind, in fair manner,the splendid art of leslie bricusse.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very delightful and uplifting
shassan-733162 December 2022
I was quite surprised to see that this year has two films based on the classic story of a Christmas Carol, first the movie Spirited and now this lovely film. The two are also musicals as well, but the first is live action, while this one is animated. Even though the classic story has been done many times, this remake was very entertaining, the animation work is very remarkable, the musical numbers are very good and moving, and the voice actors are brilliant; Luke Evans did a marvelous job, he's of course no stranger to musicals, and the rest of the cast were very nice as well. The film has a lot of funny moments, besides the touching moments also. I loved it a lot and it's a great addition to the Christmas movie list.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not all bah humbug
thomasellery12 December 2022
Firstly I need to clarify that the muppets own this story in celluloid format, doesn't mean there can't be others, but if you can still make a film annually rewatchable, despite Michael Cain's lame performance, then that's pure magic.

Back to this film, I'm doing this from an adult perspective and let's just say I'm glad I relaxed into this one with a little 420 - there's enough colour and sparkle to keep you a little transfixed.

The animation itself at times really annoyed me, mainly due to its consistency, when everything full throttle, time cracking and neon blazing it all works really well. When it's Victorian London goes broadway not so much.

I'm not sure if it was my eyes, but the style seemed to constantly change from almost classic cartoon like to early morning kids tv show cgi and only really hitting it when it was perfectly between the two.

Personally once we'd moved onto Christmas present and future the visuals got better and so did the colourful imagination. I thought the transitions from one time to another and all the detailed quirks of each ghost's universe were all really well thought out and entertaining.

Throughout the motion, colours, framing are all on top form, again it's only the cgi that distracts you from this at times.

I'm not a fan of these types of songs, but they seemed to belt them out pretty well and it's the singing numbers that go all out on the crazy so I was happy to watch.

Overall it's not going to be a film on my go to Christmas countdown watch list, but I'd happily watch it again if I had some time to kill or needed a "in the background movie"and it popped up somewhere around the holiday season.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
another Scrooge
SnoopyStyle12 December 2022
Netflix produces a CG animated musical version of Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol". It's apparently a remake of Scrooge (1970) although I've never heard of that one. This has a bit more of Ebenezer Scrooge's story. I like his failure with Isabel Fezziwig. Their breakup produces a pretty good song. I mostly like it because it advances the story. Their relationship adds a bit of tragedy to his life. On the other hand, I really don't like the dog which softens Scrooge too much. He could have a mean guard dog, but this dog is too nice. In many ways, this whole movie softens Scrooge too much. It's trying to justify his greed and his meanness.

As for the need for another version, there is rarely actual need to redo the classics. It doesn't mean that all the new versions need to be wipe off the face of the Earth. It does mean that the new ones have to be good to earn their place on the all-time list. This one is not going on that list.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A pale imitiation to the 1800 Christmas carol brothers that came before it
tadhgtynan4 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Bah Humbug xD

Starting off with good things to say.

Visually lovely.

Kids under 10 will love it.

Some of the original songs are delightful.

Broadway musical in design

Luke Evans sings his heart out and it is lovely.

Now the bad things.

Quotes little to any of Dickens Christmas Carol lines from the book. Christmas Carol the musical.

Was a dog called prudence necessary as a sidekick?

In an already overly saturated Christmas Carol renditions that exist, this is a forgettable version.

Of the 1800 of it brothers that came before it.

One less Carol to view.

Decrease the surplus population.

Manage your humbugs wisely.

Kids will enjoy it, only because they have nothing to compare it too.
23 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good rendition, but not without a few flaws
LetsReviewThat2614 December 2022
I felt this was a good rendtion of the classic story. But having said that there are a few things that do bother me with this movie. First although shes cute the addition of prudence is a bit of a mystery. Im surprised scrooge would ever care for a dog since he dosn't even like people. But really it is more of a kid version which might be why she was included. And really it was nice to see a new character. The cratchets seem to have 7 kids out of nowhere as well. Luke evens provides the voice of scrooge and man what a great voice he truely has. Others like olivia coloman and such would all good. There were dark unchild friendly parts in this film which there always is but they were still lighthearted to an extent. I enjoyed the animation style and thought overall it was enjoyable but still not the best version that has been made.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Horrible
gretchiekc11 December 2022
Sigh. Where to begin? If there had even been a half decent attempt to remain true to the period, this might have been decent. Instead, they chose to put jazzy, Broadway-esque forgettable songs in Victorian England. If that was the score you wanted, you should have modernized it.

Then there's the casting - Luke Evans as Scrooge was a horrible choice. He over sings anyway, but as Scrooge? Here's a man who is supposed to be elderly and he's singing and riffing, belting out these songs like the young man he is. No. Just NO.

Horrible acting...horrible script....horrible music. I'll take Muppet Christmas Carol over this any day of the week.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In no way a "replacement" for the original........ but good
huangfeihong77715 December 2022
The animation and cinematography in this movie is very good. The way they frame the pictures and what they include and exclude top notch.

Is the story the same...... essentially. But it leaves a lot to be desired since the essential cues created by Charles Dickens are all but completely void. This is like reading "The Message" bible - a paraphrase - rather than the word for word text itself. A pity because Dicken's original wording is immaculate. There's a reason that his book sold so well and touched so many, because they way he wrote it only added to the story and made it moreso.

The songs? Okay. Nice.

The length? Shouldn't really be a factor when telling a good story, but... fine.

The animators made everyone look like a Ken or Barbie Doll - painting a picture that is devoid of reality. But it was made for kids. A sort of introduction to "A Christmas Carol" for children who are not yet old enough to think.

There was backstory added (which I won't divulge) that was NOT part of the original, that DID add to the story and lend a little push to the original story. This story is warmer than the original story's. A "feel-good" kiddie version.

All in all, I like it. Not sure if it will be added to collection thought. Have let my Wife, the "Boss", give her opinion first.

It was NOT an "excellent" movie, but it sure blew away the Jim Carrey version (that was pure rubbish)!!!
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This may be my all time favorite depiction of the ghosts
kevin_robbins21 December 2022
Scrooge: A Christmas Carol (2022) is a movie my daughter and I recently watched on Netflix. The storyline follows the Charles Dickens tale as Scrooge learns the errors of his way, how he got here and what he can do to change them...if he gets a chance to change them.

This picture is directed by Stephen Donnelly (Lost in the Oz) and contains the voices of Luke Evans (Dracula Untold), Olivia Colman (The Lobster), Jonathan Pryce (Tomorrow Never Dies), Johnny Flynn (The Outfit) and James Cosmo (Beaveheart).

The animation in this is outstanding and this may be my all time favorite depiction of the ghosts. The ghosts are unique and so are the way their powers work. Luke Evans voice felt a little young for Scrooge but his accent worked. The depiction of Bob Cratchet, his family, their home and lifestyle was good. The dialogue is well written and Cratchet's wife was hilarious. The ending resolve was perfect as always.

Overall, this is a worthwhile addition the the animated holiday film genre. I would score this a 7/10 and recommend seeing it once.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Utterly disappointed
valy_slash18 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen quite a few A Christmas Carol screenings in my life. This is by far the worst. It has little to almost nothing in common with the original Dickens story. A lot of defining quotes from the story are missing.

For example Bob Crachit's defining quote about his son: "Somehow he gets thoughtful, sitting by himself so much, and thinks the strangest things you ever heard. He told me, coming home, that he hoped the people saw him in the church, because he was a cripple, and it might be pleasant to them to remember upon Christmas Day, who made lame beggars walk, and blind men see." ... This one was missing.

Scrooge's: ""they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population." Ghost Of Christmas Present's quote about the men of the cloth.

.... these were also mising.

At the same time, the movie was way to colorfull. Ebenezer's scenes, especially, are colorfull. They should be grey and in contrast with the light and joy of Christmas.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More Than Simple Algorithm Generated Content
JayWolfgramm21 December 2022
Looking at the thumbnail of the video, I thought that this movie looked like an algorithm chasing, procedurally generated Christmas film. I even left the film after the first musical number. It lost me after they gave Scrooge a dog. It seemed out of character for a tightfisted Scrooge to spend any time or money on a dog. But I came back later and finished watching, and to this movie's credit, there is some genuine effort put into this adaptation.

"A Christmas Carol" is likely the most adapted piece of fiction of all time. And some people may be understandably sick of them, but I personally love the story. Each version has something unique about it that it does better than the rest. And "Scrooge" (2022) is no exception.

This one does the characters of Fanny and Belle better than any previous version I have seen. I also enjoyed the slight twist on the cemetery scene towards the end. I also get the sense that the animators would consistently ask, "what is the most visually interesting way we can do this scene?" before each section. The movie still would need another once over to be theatrical quality, but it's not bad.

On the negative side, the movie does not use its time well. At an 1hr 43, the movie spends too much time on unimportant details, like the transitions from scene to scene. The addition of a dog, and some flying demons feel like studio notes to make the film more interesting to kids. There are a number of little things that the film does wrong that loses the impact of the original. Jacob Marley's scene, the reveal of Scrooge, scenes like that are handled either too jovially or too over the top.

Oh yeah, this version is a musical as well. It's all OK, nothing too bad, nothing too memorable.

If you think there are already too many versions of "a Christmas Carol", this isn't the adaptation to change your mind. But if you like the story and can go for another version, you'll like this version fine. It may have a few sour notes, but it is still a sweet Christmas carol.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed