A young couple were spreading panic among public opinion in a sort of Bonnie & Clyde way. They engaged a killing spree in a club, then they robbed a store wearing a mask; soon after they tried to run away, covering their tracks. It's a real manhunt for police officers who, together with special forces, managed to track them down at a bodega: at the gunpoint, the couple had no chance to get away, so the woman shot his boyfriend in the back, killing him as a result. This troubled young girl, supported by her grandmother (Lin Blakley), tried to persuade policemen she had been coerced from the start by her abusive fiancèe. Anyway it's not easy to convince the jury after you killed innocent people; is it a sort of Stokholm syndrome or has she some motives in killing these people?
An original episode, where it's clear the real nature of the defendant, but naive members of the jury could trust her lies. She's a piece of work, nothing more.
An original episode, where it's clear the real nature of the defendant, but naive members of the jury could trust her lies. She's a piece of work, nothing more.