Frankenstein's Army (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
100 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Another 90 min of shaky camera
troymcgarrigle29 July 2013
The only difference between this found footage film and footage that may have actually been taken by a real Russian soldier is that the real Russian soldier probably would have been able to hold the camera without shaking it and would have kept it in focus.

Enough of this found footage technique. If it brings nothing to the storyline, then it's not worth the pain of watching it. To me the filming technique was overbearing and outweighed anything the movie might have been. It is just annoying to watch. And again there is zero character depth or development, partly due to the filming technique.

Alright, the monsters are great, good enough to rate all the five stars. If you want to see good monsters, then watch it. The acting is dodgy, the plot minimal, and you just won't care who gets gored because again there is no depth to the characters. If you're plain tired of found footage, give this one a pass.
68 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Deliriously insane
Leofwine_draca19 August 2014
One in a wave of Nazi zombie films to come out in the past decade, FRANKENSTEIN'S ARMY is a deliriously insane slice of B-movie film-making. The plot is as simple as anything, but what this Czech film lacks in intricacy and subtlety it more than makes up for with its sheer visual inventiveness.

This is another 'found footage' movie which follows a squad of Russian soldiers trekking through east Germany in the dying days of WW2. They soon come across a seemingly abandoned complex which turns out to house a mad scientist and some decidedly odd creations. The zombies in this film are some of the most creative ever put on film, and the camera-work and music make them into fearsome creations.

The acting is nothing to write home about, aside from another solid turn from stock bad guy Karel Roden (HELLBOY), but the technical values are very good. The creations are the best part of it, of course, but this is also an extremely gory film in which the blood and body parts flow freely. It sure as hell isn't high art, but it is viciously entertaining and thoroughly engrossing for what it is.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
For Fans of Trash and Gore
claudio_carvalho23 May 2014
During the World War II, a Russian troop in Germany receives a distress call in the radio from a group of Russian soldiers under siege by the Germans with the respective coordinates. The leader Sergeant Novikov (Robert Gwilym) decides to seek out the soldiers through the countryside of Germany. The soldier Dimitri (Alexander Mercury) is filming the troop to make a documentary and while they walk, they find weird bodies, slaughtered nuns in a convent burnt to the ground and open graves in a cemetery. They arrive at a deserted church where they meet a lethal army of undead with implanted weapons and tools. Soon they learn that the deranged but brilliant grandson of Dr. Viktor Frankenstein with the same name (Karel Roden) has a secret laboratory in the church and is responsible for those monstrosities. Further, they discover that their troop has been secretly assigned by the government to find and kill or bring the mad scientist to Moscow.

"Frankenstein's Army" is a campy horror movie with a silly storyline for fans of trash and gore. The creatures are original and funny and there are entertaining and bloody situations. Unfortunately the option for the hand camera as if it were footage upsets me despite the good explanation for its use. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "O Exército das Trevas" ("The Army of the Darkness")
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Blair Nazibot Project
JoeB13129 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Oh, my God, it was another Found footage movie. Now, I hate FF movies in general because I find it unlikely that anyone would keep operating their video cams or cell-phones during some horrific event. This is even MORE unlikely, as the improbable 1940's Color Film Camera that also has synchronized sound and can perform at the quality of 21st century equipment.

So our protagonists are a bunch of Russian recon soldiers who are ALSO filming a propaganda film WHILE the cameraman is on a secret mission to find this mad scientist on behalf of Stalin. (Spoiler) .

By "Russian Soldiers", I mean Western Actors doing bad Russian accents, with dialog written by people who were only paying marginal attention during WWII history class. You have military action being filmed by people who've clearly never been in the military, like dropping a grenade in a room you are in.

So let's get to the Monsters. Yes, the grandson of the original Dr. Frankenstein is making human/machine hybrids that are ridiculous looking, with big old swastikas on them so we remember they are Nazi Zombie Robots. All suspense is dissolved when you see these things, they look just silly.

The ending has the Secret Agent left to the mercy of the Nazibots by his own soldiers (who apparently have forgotten Stalin will kill their loved ones) and then having a nice discussion with the mad scientist about how he plans to end war by turning everyone into Zombie Robots.

Made worse is that you really don't cheer for anyone here. They had about two minutes of trying to make some of the Soviet soldiers likable, like the guy from Krakow who wants to rescue his wife. But then they go about simply looting and murdering civilians before they encounter the monsters. Not even sure who the protagonist is supposed to be here.

So characters you don't care about being killed by silly monsters.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Really great creature design makes this one memorable
Red-Barracuda28 June 2013
This was a movie that could have gone either way. The idea of it could have easily been executed a little tediously with a CGI created zombie army going around causing perturbation and despair. However, the good news is that Frankenstein's Army has been made by a team with a great deal of imagination. And this one should attain considerable cult value I reckon.

The basic set-up for the story is typical enough in that this is a found footage movie. It has a group of Soviet soldiers entering Nazi Germany during the final days of the Second World War. They wind up at a dilapidated factory where they discover bizarre creatures that appear to be half human half machine. It's these monsters that are the real angle for this film. Named as zombots in the credits, these creations are extremely original in design. They have a definite steampunk styling and pleasingly each creature has a completely different look. Knives for hands, propeller-heads, head-crushing heads, stilts legs, face-drills…you name it, these monsters are nothing if not original in design. What makes it even better is that this is a movie with a lot of proper physical effects and costumes – it's not rammed to the gunnels with CGI effects. This ensures that the look is more convincing. The factory location has a suitably grungy feel too, which works well alongside the creatures.

Things eventually move into the lair of the mad scientist Frankenstein. It's at this point we get to see some of his insane experiments, including combining half a Communist brain with half a Nazi one! Yeah, there is a lot of crazed imagination in this one. Surely there must be a sequel...Dracula's Army anyone?
83 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nice monster design, awful movie
MiniCactus29 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I went to see this movie with minimum expectation: to be entertained by nice monsters, ass- kicking fights and a minimum of story. I did get nice monsters, but that is all. The plot is pretty much inexistent, which would be OK if the action was entertaining but it's just... not.

First, the "found footage" thing... I know, this is not real life, but Russian soldier in WWII didn't have color camera with integrated microphone. it just makes the action harder to see because you only have one point of view at a time. It can be interesting, but not here

The people are just... there. there is nothing really to make you care about them, so you don't. The movie is really slow so there was time for more, but instead you just watch them walking in a forest, walking in a village, walking with monsters walking around. Cause yeah. you'd think they would fight those monsters, but they don't. sometime the monsters attack then disappear, sometime they don't even bother and are just there.

And then, you meet the "doctor" responsible for those creature and hear his motivation and you think "well why wasn't that the beginning of the movie" and then everything blow up and you feel like you just lost too many minutes of your life for a shitty movie.
30 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fantastic creature design makes this worth watching!
foreversmom22 September 2013
First and foremost, I rated this a 7/10 for creature design alone! They are truly unique and remarkable, even if the movie itself falls short. The acting is sub-par and there is no real character development at all. Some of the characters were so disgustingly horrible that I was begging for them to be taken out by the zombots immediately and all but cheered the moment they were.

If you want to see some fantastic creature design, give this movie a try. My husband and I paused the movie several times just to take in the whole creature design aspect. It is entertaining enough from start to finish to warrant a viewing. It's not really thought provoking, but if you are looking for some mindless fun then give this flick a go!
29 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Clever ideas wasted by bad execution and found footage style.
suite9227 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Set in late World War II, on the front between Germany and Russia. There is a lot of 'found footage' style shaky camera, shot by a young soldier on the Russian side.

They come upon a village where the population is mostly missing, but there are plenty of corpses. In a nearby factory, they find a stitched together something that is connected by cables to the main electrical lines. When the squad's flunky starts the generator, the thing animates and kills the squad's commanding officer.

They find some rabbits, which looked good for food, but they also found more constructed monsters. These have more impressive armament, and the squad loses a couple of more men. They find some German civilians who try to be helpful, but the whole situation is close to irredeemable. More armed monsters show up and do more killing.

Dmitri's underlings (Dmitri is a captain, and has always outranked everyone in the squad) find out about his treason that kept them in the factory to die. He led them indirectly to the place, and jammed their radio once they were there. Dmitri claims it's orders, and had a document to back him up. Anyway, they are expected to figure out what the Nazi scientists have been up to. Dmitri's squad mates are upset with him, and they shove him down a chute so he can find out better. He does find out quite a bit more, but it is not clear how he will get out. Then he meets Victor, whose last name comes from the title.

Does anyone get out of this alive? Are all the constructed Nazi warriors put down?

-----Scores------

Cinematography: 0/10 Hand held cameras. Bad everything.

Sound: 5/10 So-so. What would one expect from hand helds?

Acting: 1/10 There was acting? Well, Karel Roden did a bit.

Screenplay: 5/10 The steam-punk Frankenstein monsters were often cleverly constructed. The ideas were fairly well realised visually, but the story did not make all that much sense.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Deliciously Campy
innerboyka30 July 2013
I expected a low-rate B movie with maybe a few good scenes. I was very surprised with how well the film was put together. The story is simple: the Russian army is battling Germany during WW 2. They respond to a distress call put out by another Russian troop. When they get to the location they only find a hand full of Germans. I won't give away much of the plot except to say they that their expeditions lead them into a Nazi factory for making monsters run by none other than the monster-making maestro himself, Dr. Frankenstein. The monsters are good: kinda like more mechanized versions of those in Hellraiser, and the factory is like a weird mixture of Ed Gein meets Willy Wonka. The acting and dialog were also above average. I would overall characterize the movie as fun, not just the same rehashed Nazi experiment movie, and definitely worth a try
37 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A film in dire need of a plot and a tripod.
BA_Harrison21 October 2016
World War II: a squad of Russian soldiers stumble upon a Nazi laboratory run by Viktor Frankenstein (Karel Roden), who has been continuing his family's legacy, creating freakish super soldiers by combining cadavers and machinery.

There really isn't much of a plot to Frankenstein's Army—the soldiers encounter the monsters and die—leaving the film's success resting almost entirely on the effectiveness of its bizarre steam-punk creations. Sadly, the shaky, hand-held, first-person documentary style in which the movie is shot doesn't allow for a very good look at these monstrosities, and leaves the viewer wishing that the film-makers had taken a more traditional approach. Glimpses of the film's creatures look impressive, but I wanted to see them in much more detail to fully appreciate their design.

Some decent effects during the scenes in which Frankenstein performs messy brain surgery will appeal to the gore-hounds, but on the whole this feels like a missed opportunity to make something really special.

4.5/10, rounded up to 5 for IMDb.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The zombots of Frankenstein
slashingthrough29 January 2013
It took quite a while for Richard Raaphorst to have his first feature length film canned but now we can all enjoy "Frankenstein's Army", which debuted at the International Film Festival Rotterdam. The film had its world premiere at a sold out screening of the International Rotterdam Film Festival. And at long last the audience had the chance to have a look at Raaphorst's creation(s) in full splendour. I think a lot of horror fans have been looking forward to the debut of "Frankenstein's Army"; we've been teased by some excellent trailers of his "Worst Case Scenario" and when that project got stuck in development hell, artwork and teasers for his new film surfaced.

In "Frankenstein's Army" everything's filmed from a first person perspective, that person being the soldier Sergei, who's part of a Russian squad that is slowly moving further in Germany. He has the task to document the march of Mother Russia into Germany. So yes, you've read it right: this is a found footage film. When the squadron goes further into the countryside some weird skeletons and soldiers are found. When they pick up a radio signal from some comrades the trail leads them to a church / factory and then shits starts to hit the propeller.

The first half builds up slowly towards the second. Starting off with quite some shots of running and some occasional shooting, it gets more interesting when they come up a village where things don't seem right. The part where they start to encounter the first zombots (as Richard has named his creations) almost reminded me of a mix of the video game "Return to Castle Wolfenstein" and more steampunkish elements. Zombots suddenly appear and create havoc amongst the Russians. The second half steps down a bit and offers a better look at Raaphorst's monsters. The encounter of Viktor -the creator of the monstrous nazi soldiers- provides the director to go all out with special effects in the 'laboratory'. This is a place where a gorehound's heart starts beating faster: there are some geeky references, all the monsters and gory effects are real (so almost no computer effects) and that choice pays off. The effects feel real, the zombots are brought to life in a weirdly, wicked way, most of them wearing working mechanical features that gives each of them a unique look.

Raaphorst reaps I was a bit thrown off because of this film being another one in the 'found footage' style. Even though it doesn't bring nothing new to this way of drawing the audience into the film, it is well done: you know you don't get these lame something-was-there-and-now-there-isn't kind of things but you will be treated with some in-your-face gore and great zombots. Also it was hard to get over the accents used by the actors throughout the film, that is always a hard choice to make. Raaphorst his strength is his vision, visuals and details. I expected the film to be a bit more sinister and dark because of the teasers but in the feature itself there is more focus on gore than tension. Luckily he knows his gore and all the effects are really well done. It's great to see his sketches come alive on the big screen and they work well in all their bizarre glory.

I really hope this film will give Richard Raaphorst a chance to create another feature film in which he can explore more of his directional skills outside the found footage genre and is able to provide us another look in his bizarre, creative mind.
56 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An A For Design, A C For Execution
gavin694226 August 2013
Toward the end of World War II, Russian soldiers pushing into eastern Germany stumble across a secret Nazi lab, one that has unearthed and begun experimenting with the journal of one Dr. Victor Frankenstein.

This film comes from a very great starting point -- the idea that Nazis would use mad scientists to do terrible experiments on cadavers. That much is more or less true. Then, to make it horror and not just history, you add in the journal of Dr. Frankenstein. That is a purely genius decision. Even more bonus points for putting the story from the Russian point of view (the group that actually reached Germany) rather than the American, as would be more common.

The creature design deserves top marks. If this was eligible for a costume Oscar, I think it would be a shoo-in. The creatures are some of the most incredible I have ever seen. Sort of like a steampunk Castle Wolfenstein (which seems to have clearly been an inspiration, with this coming across much like a first-person shooter). The overall set design is pretty great, too.

In fact, my whole positive rating revolves around the design aspect, because I would be much more comfortable panning it based on the aspects I greatly disliked. All of these things revolve around the camera -- why was it shot hand-held when it would look better shot normally? How plausible is it that a Russian army team would be filming? Did cameras at that time film that well and not need changing every five minutes? How does the camera -- and its operator -- take such a beating?

So basically, if they had replaced the point-of-view camera with a traditional camera, and scrapped the Blair Witch-meets-Wolfenstein video game thing they had going on, this could have been one of the better horror films out there today. Coming from Dark Sky, a company I love, I am disappointed it did not pass muster.

And, despite the positive rating, I cannot truly recommend it. You really have to see the design, but I would rather not say you have to see the film. Better Nazi horror films exist (from "Shock Waves" to "Dead Snow"). I do look forward to whatever these creature designers do next, though.
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Funny gore creature feature nearly ruined by "found footage" gimmick
m-a-elsewhere17 October 2013
"Found footage" has long become a misbegotten gimmick, so abused and ill-considered as to virtually guarantee that it will vitiate and bleed dry any project that relies on the technique...

Particularly when, as here, its main purpose is to pad meager scripts with numbingly endless variations of "Is this thing on? Is it filming? Are you filming me? Can you see me? Am I on film? Are you sure it's on? How do you know it's on? Is it still on? What about now? Is it still filming? Okay, turn it off. Did you turn it off? Is it off? You're not filming now, are you?", followed by the camera breaking, going dark, and magically fixing itself for a few more minutes of "Is this thing working again? Is it on? Are you sure it's on? Okay, turn it off. Is it off?"

FRANKENSTEIN'S ARMY is sadly true to form, and nearly sunk by the cheap trickery.

A pity since, given tighter editing and writing, the movie could have become an over-the-top cult classic. As it is, brilliantly executed steampunk monsters, a wealth of fantasy gore details, and a loopy performance by Karel Roden's mad scientist enliven the premise of an utterly undisciplined WWII Soviet recon unit lured into a bunker brimming with cyborg Nazistein monsters, and make the film's final half- hour obsessive and funny enough to rescue it from being a complete debacle.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
All brawns and no brains... Look, but don't touch...
paul_haakonsen29 July 2013
Well, what "Frankenstein's Army" lacks in a proper storyline, it more than makes up for in creature design and effects. But the problem is that albeit the creatures were a visual treat to look at, then the movie suffered from having a generic storyline that just bordered on being pointless.

The story is about a group of Russian soldiers who stumble upon a secret Nazi operation, where men are turned into vile killing machines - literally. And overseeing this heinous act of inhumanity is Frankenstein himself.

Right, well nothing new or overly inventive here. And the storyline is really, really weak. I mean, Frankenstein is conducting experiments during World War II. Sure, why not, I suppose?

One thing that was a thorn in the side, was the fact that the Russian soldiers were speaking English, just with a thick, adopted stereotypical Russian movie accent. Does it work in this day and age? No, not really, it sort of seems like something left over from the 1980's. At least have the people speak in their proper native languages, it just gives the movie that much more authenticity.

The people hired for the various roles did good enough with their given roles and characters. However, don't expect to be dazzled or blown away by any award-winning performances.

"Frankenstein's Army" is entertaining for what it is - a mindless gallery of bizarre golem-like creatures set against a World War II backdrop. There isn't much story, so just strap yourself in for some interesting creatures that seem to combine elements from Clive Barker's "Hellraiser" universe and of course from Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein".

I am rating "Frankenstein's Army" a 5 out of 10 rating, simply because of the creature design, because there was very little else to keep the movie afloat.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Russian reconnaissance squad runs afoul of the mechanically enhanced re-animated dead.
Someguysomwhere31 August 2013
Another Nazi weird science and hand-held camera movie. So fasten your seat-belts! There's gonna to be a whole lotta shaking going on. This one follows an undisciplined and sometimes comical Russian reconnaissance team as they march, hike, and yeah, stagger and stumble thru German territory trying to get the goods on the Germans for mother Russia. As they progress, they encounter evidence that later becomes horrifying fact that the Nazis are trying to advance there cause with some seriously f!!cked-up science: the re-animation and mechanical weaponization of the dead.

This, Reader, you gotta see. Every kind of scrap, junk or part is imaginatively used in the reconstruction and re-animation of the dead. Now while horrifying, there is also no escaping the comical effect of this. This movie is only scary in the sense that "bizarre killer robots" are after you. It is not scary in traditional creepy and supernatural sense of the dead coming back to life. 2 reasons: The merging of people with metal and mechanical parts "dehumanizes" them you tend to think of them more as "machines". As well, this movie leans towards being an over-the-top dark horror comedy; especially at the end.

Normally I don't like hand-held camera movies or "jerky-cams" as I think of them. However there are exceptions and this is one of them. There is a "real-life or documentary voyeur effect" to these types of movies which is chiefly what distinguishes them (along with the jitters, of course). As well, since the camera person is a character in the movie, it always amuses me that when all hell breaks loose and everyone is scattering and running for dear life, they have to hold there ground and act like the bravest or most reckless person in the world and continue filming or else there's no movie. Sometimes the makers of this type of movie get creative and have the person drop the camera in the excitement of the moment; but note that the camera never stops working and always lands in a position where it can continue filming the action. You gotta love it. Boloxxxi.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The trailer was cool, the movie ... not so much.
p-jonsson12 October 2015
Me and my son watched the trailer of this movie when watching the third season of The Walking Dead. The trailer looked quite cool so I decided to get it. Maybe I should hesitated a bit when I saw that it was really cheap on Amazon but I thought, what the heck, it is cheap and horror movies do not seem to have that big an audience these days. Well, unfortunately, the cheap price was well merited.

I guess one good thing one can say about this movie is that the producer had tried to make it a bit original. Unfortunately it did not work for me. I have never really liked these handy-cam movies where all the scenes are jumping around. This one tried to be a bit original in that it was simulating being made by an old-fashioned world war II film camera instead of a handy-cam. I am afraid that it did not really make it any better as far as I am concerned. It just added a few scrapes and the occasional end of the film reel effect every so often. Usually when something gory was about to happen.

Speaking of gory. The movie was not really that gory unless you count a lot of body parts being strewn around the scenes. Plenty of the, supposedly, gory parts was just silly, possibly supposed to be comical, but mostly just really silly. The part where the mad "genious" was grafting to brain parts, one Nazi and one communist, together was just ludicrous and sad.

The blurb claims this was supposed to be Hitler's last ghastly attempt to win the war but in the movie it seemed little more than some crazy guys drug induced dream. The main adversary failed completely in projecting any form of "genius" image and there certainly did not seem to be any support from the Nazi regime.

To make matters worse there was really not a single likable person in the movie. All the characters where either just filler characters, crazy people, real assholes or some mixture of said traits.

I am afraid that I had to force myself to watch this movie to the end.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Zombots!!
HorrorInsideUsAll5 August 2013
Okay...

The only reason I watched this movie was because of the recent cover of Fangoria and the article intrigued me. I gave this movie a 7/10 because the POV / found footage concept was far from having the realistic feel to it and the acting was only so-so. BUT! The zombots were pretty frickin' awesome, minus the walking Nazi yoga ball, the female zombot who reminded me of the Oola from Return of the Jedi and the Robo Cop looking one. The gore aspect was very well done, but I'm up in the air on if I will be adding this to my DVD collection down the road. I'll have to watch it again to see how I feel about it the 2nd time around. But that's just me personally.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
some really boring moments
trashgang3 September 2013
I know Richard Raaphorst, the director, now for almost 20 years have seen his first short Zombi 1 (1995) which I liked a lot, a pure Fulci ode. I was surprised that he was making a full horror feature and face it, it even made the front cover of Fangoria.

Sadly it wasn't my thing. I even found it rather boring although it did remind me of Marilyn Manson videoclips with those creatures walking around. In fact, The Beautiful People of the band was made by Richard. For me nothing really worked out in this flick. It's a so-called, sigh, found footage flick but even that doesn't work. The only good thing are the creatures were some do have some nice devices to slash people. But the final was just a lot of boring blah blah and the part with the brains was so slow that I even thought to push the stop button. I'm rather surprised by the high ratings this flick gets but for me no can do.

Gore 0,5/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Flawed, but Underrated Gem
GirishGowda11 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Towards the end of World War II, a group of Soviet Union soldiers pushing into eastern Germany get a distress signal from one of their own. They pursue it and stumble across a secret Nazi lab, one that has unearthed and begun experimenting with the journal of one Dr. Victor Frankenstein. The scientists have used the legendary Frankenstein's work to assemble an army of super-soldiers stitched together from the dead body parts of their fallen comrades and with enhanced mechanical parts to make them the perfect killing machines - a desperate Hitler's last ghastly ploy to escape defeat.

If you're a purist, then there are a lot of things that you'll hate in this movie. This is fundamentally a found footage horror/sci-fi hybrid that is set in the 1940's. No black and white footage, everybody speaking in English, a camera that wasn't invented until a couple of decades later and the regular widescreen footage that are all supposed to be from the 40's might annoy the hell out of you. The found footage genre in itself is very contrived, especially during the second half of most movies. But, once you get past all that, there's a beautifully realized movie underneath. The creature designs - OH, MY GOD - the creatures were so fantastically terrifying. Terrifying is not the word though. They're just so captivating. It has just the perfect mix of necessary cgi and practical effects which brings these gruesomely gorgeous beasts alive.

The war tropes are all there though and a couple of the actors seem amateurish. Aside from that, the Frankenstein lore was very deftly integrated into the proceedings. The doctor was gleefully insane who made me uneasy with his gross Russian and Nazi brain experiment. The atmosphere is appropriately dreary throughout. In the end, the movie is worth it for the creatures alone. This is what clever and innovative filmmakers with a low budget can bring to the table. This movie slaps those obscenely big budgeted blockbusters across their faces. It is a flawed, but underrated gem among B-movies.

7/10
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Genius costumes!
felixmartinsson5 August 2013
This movie contained lots of blood and a few very unpleasant scenes! I personally felt sick to my stomach(and I usually don't)!

Well what can I say, I really liked the movie, even though the script sucked balls, and because it was to dark shoot sometimes. The Costume design was genius! The name Frankenstein's Army is a really good name for this movie, because that's what it is! All the creatures/characters was so incredible well made and I just couldn't stop thinking, how cool this would be if it was a game for Xbox or something. The acting bit in the movie, was OK, not genius like the costume design but alright. I felt the flaws of the script was enhanced by the really cool cutting, sound effects and costume design. (Because the script was really bad). This movie is not for anyone, I would recommend you to see it because of the costume design (that I've been nagging about), but you need to know there are some very unpleasant and strong scenes. Overall a good B- Movie!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Creature design alone makes it worth watching
johnnytheboy-979-64876030 December 2016
Clearly filmed on a budget of about what my car is worth, a large portion of that budget was evidently spent very effectively on designing and realising the monsters encountered in the latter part of the film.

They are imaginative, and well executed, and for that reason alone I highly recommend it. As some have commented in the message boards, anyone that has played many first person shooter games will recognise the influences clearly, without naming names...

The film other than that is fairly what you would expect. It doesn't do anything exceptionally wrong, though the characterisation is scanty at best. There are some wonderful black comedy moments scattered in there. Look out for the moment when an attempt to remove the helmet from a soldier with a head injury, for example.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not too shabby, if you know what you expect.
connor-lang-784-8330376 September 2013
This film is like the love child of 'Machete' and 'Planet Terror' met the love child of 'Bioshock' and 'Dead Snow' then had a romp in a hotel with less than half the budget. Though shot in possibly 3 locations, and a cast you can list on your hands it succeeds in being a fun dark dark comedic gore-fest which satirizes the rumors of Nazi experiments with mecha- zombies armed with screwdriver gas masks, steel claws, sickle hands, the list goes on. Though shot in a "found footage" style it manages to keep the camera steady enough when its needed, though takes full advantage of shake when its useful. the acting, script and directing are nothing special, but the gore effects are good and can add to the laughs if that, like mine, is your sense of humor. all in all its not too bad, worth a rental or a buy at less than £10.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Another Case Of The Shakes
bushtony4 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is nasty.

In more ways than one.

The premise sees a small squad of Russian commandos on an insurgency "mission" into Eastern Germany in WW2. Two cameramen are taggng along to record their glorious exploits for Uncle Joe and the folks back home. But someone in the squad has an agenda and the "mission" isn't quite what the grunts have been led to believe. More about that later.

This film taught me some things about history and the history of film technology I wasn't previously aware of. Having seen actual grainy, jumpy and blurry colour archive footage from WW2 I didn't know lens and chip technology was actually so advanced at the time that digital colour filtering and other effects were readily available back then. Or that picture clarity was incredibly refined and sharp and that Dolby Digital sound was easily achievable. This being a found-footage flick, the footage shown us certainly looks and sounds much better and much more advanced in quality and up to date than most of the other modern equivalents I've seen, like PARANORMAL ACTIVITY, CLOVERFIELD, ZOMBIE DIARIES, REC, THE LAST EXORCISM, etc. Guess cam technology retrogressively devolves as time and science advances.

Well, no, it doesn't and it hasn't. If you want to make a found footage flick set in a certain historical period in the past it's a good idea to at least have the sound and visuals reflect that period a bit. Like, say, APOLLO 18. Otherwise, don't make it a found footage flick. Film it straight. Because to my mind, jerking the cam around a lot isn't enough to convince on any level. And FRANKENSTEIN'S ARMY has enough arresting visual flair, striking art direction and special effects going on to make it more than worthy of a straight shoot. The "found footage" gimmick is redundant here and mostly ruins the film.

So the real mission of the squad - who, by the way, have no real individual personalities and are largely aggressive, mentally challenged loud-mouths - is to find one Dr Frankenstein and bring him back to Mother Russia to assist with the Commie war effort.

Frankie is a bit of a fly in the ointment, though. Having gone completely off his skull he is obsessively churning out an army made of dead organic flesh fused with robotics and scrap WW2 war machinery. This is the crowning glory of the movie - the bastard creations of the good doctor. Imagine the Nazi zombies of DEAD SNOW married with radical steam-punk mechanics that consist of propellers, caterpillar tracks, binoculars, machine guns, blades, cogs, hydraulics, wheels and the like whilst being completely, blindly homicidally insane. The resulting creatures are imaginative and jaw-dropping to behold - especially when combined with some excellent Dolby rendered sound effects (clanking, hissing, groaning, clattering, roaring and exploding).

I said it was nasty in more ways than one. The shaky cam is nasty enough. And so is the continuous unrelenting violence, blood, gore, torture, graphic surgery, guts, viscera and physical atrocity that dominantly pervade the second half. It is a drawn out hymn to butchery and sadism that feels like it goes on forever. And then some. So excessive and sustained that it quickly becomes anaesthetising and loses all impact and meaning. Arguably it's aiming for a comic book aesthetic, but with a complete lack of character development for anyone it just becomes a mindless exercise in slaughter without consequence or point.

Gorehounds may well love it for the last half, but I found it hard to maintain interest. Frankie's monsters are really spectacular to behold and I think most viewers would be impressed. The narrative is flaky and has more holes than a mountain of Swiss cheese. All the actors are loud and shouty. And the "found footage" hook trashes the remotest chance of suspension of disbelief and tries the patience to extremes.

Good, creative ideas, some compelling visual creativity, but the poor scripting, histrionic direction and mind-numbing execution significantly slap it down to being just another case of the shakes.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"I Need You To Be Strong!"...
azathothpwiggins26 February 2019
Toward the end of World War II, a small, advance group of Russian soldiers are on a mission to clear the way for their comrades in arms. After stumbling across some ominous signs of what may lie ahead, the team holes up in a crumbling church building, where things take a turn for the macabre and terrifying. Once they investigate the basement, the real fun begins!

FRANKENSTEIN'S ARMY is one of the better "found footage" films, due to its highly inventive / ghoulish premise. The need for a hand-held camera is a contrivance, as in all such films, but it works fairly well here. The title pretty much tells the tale as the soldiers find themselves up against a nightmarish horde of human / machine hybrids. While some of the creations are preposterous, others are quite disturbing, and all are novel and innovative!

For lovers of utterly bonkers horror stories accentuated by outrageous gore...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This one is not for children or those susceptible to intense graphic violence
mecheart30 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
** A note ahead of the review proper: this film contains sequences and depictions of extremely over-the-top gore and violence. **

'Frankenstein's Army' is a new entry in the Military/Sci-Fi/Horror genre set from the historical perspective of a small Soviet Army reconnaissance unit and presented as a found footage affair based on the dark deeds of a fictional character from classical literature. Few films in present memory have combined so many genres and sub-genres into one block of cinematic story telling. But has doing the aforementioned benefited or detracted from the overall effort? I suppose that is the question to be answered by the viewer.

The filming method itself is of the shaky cam variety, which some viewers will find issue with off the bat. The movie opens with a brief self introduction from one of the characters who provides explanation for why he will be filming the battlefield exploits of his comrades. The premise is functional enough, but when a writer must blatantly reveal through a character the reasoning for said character's actions I feel that something is missing from the plot. Show us my good man, do not tell us.

Act one follows the combat exploits of a squad of Soviet soldiers during the final push into Germany, as they reconnoiter far ahead of the main Red Army. If you've ever seen a war movie, or a military horror, you know the drill. Here we have the standard sniper, machine gunners, greenhorn, radio man, grizzled sergeant, etc. From the actions of the said recon squad we glean that these handful of men of war have been fighting for far too long as even their leader seems perched on the ragged edge of sanity. One scene finds the men chasing chickens, rousting peasants and donning ladies' dress. Sort of an amalgamation of 'Kelly's Heroes' and 'The Outpost'.

Of course, as in all found footage films of late, the troops do not appreciate the constant filming of their exploits, and so in turn constantly berate and threaten the cameraman. Again, we've seen this before, and so it came off for me as a bit tiring.

The actions sequences are good enough for the budget. The weapons, uniforms, equipment and tactics are all historically accurate enough to make us believe, but the actors who played the soldiers fell over so many times throughout their running from foxhole to foxhole that it was obvious they were not used to the weight of the packs on their backs nor the weapons in their hands.

Act two finds our brave recon squad entering a small villa dominated by an ancient church on a mission to rescue another Soviet unit. It is here that the film veers into both the Sci-Fi and supernatural realms, and I must hand it to the film's creators that 'the reveal' is well done.

The creatures are incredibly well envisioned, well realized on camera and quite horrific. Throughout act two the suspense and action builds to the point where it seems no one will survive for a final act. I must point out that act one really never introduces us personally to any of the main characters, which is a shame because more than one of them seem interesting enough to want to get to know and to root for.

Act three rolls around to find some members of the squad K.I.A. and the overall situation much more dire, and then after a final action sequence, we are left with the perspective of but one of the characters. By the time we see again the rest of them, we will have had to guess what they were up to in the interim.

Act three is also where this film devolves into some serious depravity and needless splatter punk gore. All that we had needed to know about the monsters had been showed us in the previous acts, and we darn sure could have imagined the rest of the horror show ourselves without the film showing us every gruesome bit as it does.

I live for horror/Sci-fi/Military films, but I must admit that I found the level of gore needless and a bit stomach turning. Too much visualized desecration of the human form is never a good thing for a film or novel, and here we get it fed to us over and over from scene to scene until it becomes cartoonish and finally sickening.

Overall 'Frankenstein's Army' is a good entry into my favorite genre, and I could have scored it an eight or nine out of ten for awesome creature design alone. However, the buffet of needless gore soured my stomach - something that does not happen often. Thus I must subtract three or four points from my review score.

I can recommend this film only to very mature audiences, as a child or teen ought to never partake in this kind of cinematic gore and graphic depravity.

5/10 stars ...
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed