Legend Quest (TV Series 2011– ) Poster

(2011– )

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Laughable
Honajz19 January 2012
Common! This nothing has with archeology, it's fake by fake. How you can trust anybody, who breaks in any place, trying to find "clue", oh yes, and suddenly he sees wings of angels or cross or labyrinth or stone in bull-corner or anything like this and knows where to go then? "See, it looks like skull - definitely skull of Mayan children or priests who hidden talking cross!" - "Oh, amazing! It's too small for coffin it must be arch of covenant!" - "Superb, thus sculpture looks like little box, it is clue pointing to this door!" Really funny. And what is surprising - they found nothing! Arch of covenant is hidden beyond wooden wall, so we leave it. Mayan talking cross is definitely hidden beyond stone block under water. Etc. And what this really annoying editing? I know spectators could have lower IQ but not all are stupid.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Finally! Ancient mysteries are "solved"
6StringSamurai30 July 2011
Legend Quest is SyFy's attempt to create a modern Indiana Jones (with a bit if Dan Brown thrown in for good measure), and is about as historically accurate. Host Ashley Cowie certainly looks the part, right down to the 5 o'clock shadow and the shoulder bag (it's a satchel!) In a half an hour of television, this "archaeological explorer" (whatever that means) seeks to solve the great mysteries that have plagued historians and archaeologists for centuries. Along with him is Kinga Phillips, a buxom "field producer" who's sole purpose is to be a sounding board for Cowie's wild assumptions and theories. Some of his leaps of logic are laughable at best. "Hey, this two headed eagle has wings. The Ark of the Covenant had angels with wings. It must be a clue!".

The show's structure is much like a treasure map. "Take 20 paces to the the south west". One clue leads to another and another. If it were that easy, they would have solved these centuries ago. Rubish.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
...Wow
theta-astute27 July 2011
I honestly thought this show had promise at first, but as I watched episode after episode, I realized it wasn't going anywhere. The main dude (I honestly didn't even bother to remember his name because I found him THAT non-interesting) puts clues randomly together. Give him a stick and he'll say to go left, right, into the temple, under the water, travel to 3 different countries, and there you go. He has his "idea" of where the legendary artifact may be. But he cannot make sure because of some stupid reason. It's either protected, not enough information, too dangerous, or something else.

I have also done research on some of what he claimed was "history". Most of it is meaningless babble.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Absolute Garbage
awwhalen12 March 2017
I have no idea how this show was green-lit, or how it got away with the shoddy work that it did. The editing is disgustingly terrible. The "evidence" they use to justify recording is laughable. It's a show that has nothing to show for its expense, yet they try to convince the audience that the team is perpetually on the verge of discovering something groundbreaking. It's insulting, and a perfect example of "investigative" reality shows on the paranormal that have gone too far.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
utter garbage
i_am_mattyt12 April 2015
Apparently this show was written by children.

It's a truly pathetic attempt to make archeology more interesting by adding a legend quest theme. but it actually does more harm than good. It's as dumb and retarded as ancient aliens which also manages to take the hard work of scholars and regress it to mysticism and film flam.

I actually enjoyed it because I like to hate things and this show provided me with a non stop tirade of hatred.

It manages treat the audience like morons.

It uses editing techniques to add bad voice overs to scenes where there clearly wasn't any dialogue.

The editing in general is just awful. It's a mish-mash of extreme close ups and non-existent suspense. The episode I watched featured 3 close ups of spiders.

The Indiana Jones knock off host just pisses you off. He is arrogant and manages to lose his Scottish accent in favour of an American accent on numerous occasions seemingly in dramatic situations.

For a show that presents some adventure and history check out digging for the truth instead.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Lot Of Fun
cordayalec-327-17356916 January 2018
True, it's not perfect. And some of Ashley's historic connections and theories are tenuous at best -- but they are real. The facts are there and the evidence is undeniable, even if it could just be coincidences.

The biggest problem with the show -- and why it failed to live past one season -- is the fact that it was shown on syfy. Thus the editing push towards action packed excitement was necessary, as well as the cutting of a lot of archaeological details. 15 minutes per mystery was simply too little to delve into details and make the show come alive and real.

For example the episode dealing with the sun disk was painfully shortened. Reading blog posts and articles by the crew about the trip from where the episode emerged, it becomes clear that there was a lot more archaeological details and investigations. And the fact that Ashley nearly died on that trip wasn't even mentioned in the show.

In other words, if the show had avoided the 15 minutes per investigation and given each story more time, details and character, the show would have stuck around a lot longer.

Also, Discovery or History would have been a better channel than Syfy.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Embarrassment to archaeology
Lithophantom8 August 2011
I was so hopeful that SyFy had something with this series...but I was wrong. I am a real life archaeologist and the amount of work we have to do to even get a small idea of what we are trying to find is enormous. This crackpot makes wild guesses and gives us all a bad name. My way of explaining his research and outrages assumptions is: if there is fish on the menu of the restaurant in which he is eating...then Jesus must have been born in the basement. Not only does he make wild assumptions, and act like it is his superior intellect that leads him to these conclusions but he searches for things we are not even sure really exist. Or even better yet he whole heartedly assumes they have supernatural powers. The only redeeming thing about this show is that it takes us to really cool archaeological sites, otherwise, it isn't worth the time. It is an embarrassment to the field of archaeology. I could say more but the other reviewers are doing an excellent job letting you know this show is terrible.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Legend Quest don't waste your time ...
Lakerii16 August 2011
SyFy's new reality series Legend Quest has a premise that is almost too good to resist: Indiana Jones meets Man Vs. Wild. Legend Quest follows Scottish historian Ashley Cowie as he traverses the globe in the search for ancient artifacts thought only to exist in myth and legend. The first episode finds the permanently unshaven Ashley and his female sidekick/producer Kinga Phillips on the hunt for the Ark Of The Covenant and later the Mayan Talking Cross. Legend Quest quickly establishes what sort of show it's going to be when Ashley says "you may know the Ark of the Covenant from Raiders Of The Lost Ark" – or the Bible, right, Ashley? You do remember the Ark of the Covenant was in the Bible first?

There are two ways to look at a show like Legend Quest; you can either switch your brain off completely and enjoy the pulse-pounding Da Vinci Code style action adventure, or you can spend more than a moment thinking about what's happening and be insulted by the daftness of it all. Legend Quest is so incredibly stupid and misleading that it's almost impossible to just go along for the ride. Don't get me wrong, twelve year old me would have eaten this crap up. Ancient symbols, globe trotting adventurers and the idea that archeology was all about carrying flaming torches whilst diving into caves; I couldn't get enough of that stuff as a kid. If Legend Quest was a scripted series I could probably get behind it but by presenting all of this nonsense as "fact" it's yet another irresponsible reality offering from SyFy after their flagrantly dishonest Haunted Collector.

In the first half of the episode our heroic lead Ashley zips around with the world with his crew by his side uncovering all sorts of amazing clues that will lead him to the final resting place of the Ark of the Covenant. As intelligent human beings we know that Ashley is not going to find the Ark of the Covenant because that's the sort of discovery that would have made the news at some point. Despite this Legend Quest goes to great lengths to convince us that Ashley actually discovers the Ark without, you know, actually discovering the Ark. He first visits a village in Ethiopia where the symbols of a two headed eagle and of a Knights Templar cross lead him to Tuscany, Italy. In Italy he speaks with an actual Knights Templar which he's allowed to do because Ashley is also a Knights Templar, because why wouldn't he be. A knowing look from this wise old man sends Ashley to a church in France where he definitely one hundred percent comes across an Ark sized tomb that most probably has the Ark hidden inside it.

As part of the order of the Knights Templar Ashley chooses not to go any further because the Knights Templar obviously buried it for a reason. As Ashley crouches in front of a stone wall he intones "I may have come as close as anyone to the Ark of the Covenant." The key word being 'may'. In fact, most of what Ashley says is filled with words like that. On his Mayan adventure he says things like "This could be evidence they were here" and "It makes total sense that's where they would have taken the cross next" and "This could be the alter". Nothing is a definite, obviously, because Ashley is just making half of this crap up. There are a lot of theories and guess work on display here, and the second quest comes to a halt a stone or two away from that elusive talking cross. "The rock was too unstable to move safely" he laments.

Each week you can guarantee that Ashley will get closer than anyone ever has to these lost artifacts but something will stop him from moving that one last rock, or opening that one final door, or pushing aside that one remaining shrub. That would be fine if Legend Quest didn't take everything so damn seriously. Ashley Cowie is a hyperactive dimwit who bounces around the world making wild accusations and taking giants leaps of faith. You could pass this off as a bit of fun if the show was willing to acknowledge that 90% of what it delivers is complete bullshit. Ashley is apparently an actual historian, and you can't imagine he's taken terribly seriously by his colleagues if he really thought he came within inches of the Ark of the Covenant and didn't knock down the wall just to check. Legend Quest's ability to pass off completely fictional situations with a straight face would make even Bear Grylls blush. This is fraudulent nonsense that continues SyFy's recent run of blatantly lying to its audience in the name of 'reality' TV.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Legend Quest More Fiction Than Science
info-1031010 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
(SPOILER ALERT - Contains brief reference to recent episode) I had such high hopes for this show and have watched every episode since the premiere, but...

This production is the biggest load of bunk imaginable proving once and for all that anyone with a video camera, a pretty assistant and an accent can sell a show. I LOVE the concept and tracking down history is a passion, but this is not so much tracking down history as justifying a very large expense report.

The breathless excitement Ashley invokes as he spins tales of unseen connections would be exciting to the viewer were it not for the utter absurdity. Like the two pieces of rock in Israel that somehow lead him to conclude that not only do they represent King Solomon's ring, but point the way to its location as well, resulting in a helicopter ride over the Vatican in Italy.

You can actually get glimpses of his trusty assistant smirking or holding back laughter as he weaves his web of intrigue. They sure put this on the right channel because it is absolutely fiction, just a little short on the science.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting but ...
cerenzia14 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
... it was like watching Nicholas Cage in basically any movie he's in, pulling together random symbols into meaningful clues (or not). Possible spoilers.

This *could* be an interesting series if they didn't film it like an Indiana Jones-esqu action/adventure movie, complete with dotted lines on a map showing their travels as they "unravel" the mystery, mysterious "Orders" protecting secrets, and a sexy, do-nothing co- host who he calls over quite often, as if her only job is to be the mute sounding board for his unique and inspired ideas (because he's a Templar, dontchaknow, and understands all the imagery everywhere, even when he's wrong or the symbols don't look alike AT ALL). when he enters a basement of a church in Italy he acts like no one has been there for hundreds of years; cheese factor increased by the graffiti scratched into the rock walls behind him showing the hundreds of people there before him, and by the 'surprise' of pulling open a modern-day wire door as if Jesus himself unlocked it for him - dude, someone unlocked it for you before the cameras were rolling, or their security is lax. It doesn't mean much more than that. And we're not that stupid or easily entertained.

Surprised that they would create a "reality" show like this when there's so much more they could be spending their money on.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reality chasing after fantasy
recklessron31 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
******************* SPOILER ALERT ******************* The first three episodes are The Ark of the Covenant, Excalibur and Holy Lance (the one that pierced Jesus's side). That's 3 mythical objects that could NEVER be found in reality. Not surprisingly, none of them are actually found.

Add to that each episode covers 2 different, completely unrelated, topics - all in 30 minutes - which should give you a good idea of the depth in which these topics are handled.

IMHO I'd rate it a zero, if I could, since it has no redeeming features whatsoever.

I think you'd be much better off watching the Indiana Jones movies - as they are as 'real' as this is and FAR more interesting.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Could have been interesting
jw_116 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I watched a few episodes of this show, and as many have said above, it is obvious that Syfy is trying to do some kind of an Indiana Jones/National treasure/da Vin code type show. It fails miserably. There is no excitement of him actually finding anything. Just places where relics may have been....

Spoiler alert: (lol since there is nothing to spoil and he doesn't actually find anything)All of his local contacts who seem to reluctantly help him try to find what he is looking for also seem to be laughing at him. See Templar guy in Italy during the Ark of the Covenant search. After watching that debacle, I was glad to see him get sliced open by some giant thorn plant in the Mexican desert.

I kept the show on just to watch Kinga walk around the desert in skin tight pants.They should just get a few more models and have them walk around too. Replace Ashley the "archeologist" with another hot girl...

South Park or SNL needs to make fun of this guy, however if they tried, the joke would be lost, since a few months from now, no one will ever even know the show existed.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fun but overly dramatic with questionable assumptions
parrish4216 July 2011
The new Syfy Channel offering "Legend Quest" embarks on some excellent historically inspired adventures, but presents us with an overly dramatic portrayal of what real archaeologist do in the field, failing to show the research, planning and logistics that must be involved in such ventures. Ashley Cowie is a good solid host who brings us insightful thoughts which appear to be heartfelt. None the less, these very ideas are not ultimately backed up with discoveries that demonstrate accepted scholarly research within their hypothesis. Kinga Phillips has in this first episode been used more as "eye candy" or as a straight person requiring her to employ her acting skills rather than her accomplished journalistic credentials. Ashley Cowie's exuberant efforts to portray his historical assumptions are shown without substantive academically accepted proof lacking the appropriate historical and or biographical references.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I had to chime in with the other reviewers, the show isn't good.
phileeguy914 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Remember when Syfy was Sci-Fi and had the Saturn logo in the corner and you knew you'd be getting shows geared more towards the supernatural, fantasy, or futuristic/science fiction type? Yeah, I miss those days too.

But with the channel's re-branding and desire for a broader audience it has changed it's programming somewhat and invested in this show, which tries to straddle the lines of the supernatural and historical but hasn't a solid foothold on either side.

I originally thought this series would intrigue me with a fresh look on the lost treasure hunt type of shows that I enjoy, but it just insulted me with poor reasoning and dubious historical evidence. I can deal with the fact that the items aren't found (they never are in these types of shows, as finding them would make headlines worldwide before a filmed show reached editing), but I want to be entertained, not insulted.

(Spoiler ahead) For instance LQ's host, Ashley Cowie, is in one episode searching for King Solomon's ring, which was said to have supernatural powers. He compares it to the Green Lantern's ring as the comic book hero's jewelry too has powers, but says Solomon's ring is actually real. So wait, he's actually admitting that he believes that the ring has powers?

On his search trail for the ring he believes he must go to the ancient city of Megiddo because it was the northernmost point on an imaginary star of David over a map of Israel, wherein Jerusalem is in the center, and 6 important towns mark each point of the star. But why the northernmost point? Oh because when he was searching an old underground passageway in Jerusalem (of which there are plenty) he happens across part of the ancient passageway that had a doorway with 2 blank stone slabs above the door in the shape of a upwards pointing triangle. Yes, he surmised that was a sign, and not just a good structural shape to keep the rocks above from falling on peoples heads.

This type of faulty deduction is present in just about every episode I've seen. (End Spoiler)

The show itself goes to a good length in detailing the various places they travel to, but that positive is overshadowed by the shows many problems.

If you're into sightseeing with a little history, watch the Travel Channel. If you're enjoy history with a little sightseeing watch the History or NatGeo or various similar channels. There's plenty of one/two hour specials on those channels that take this type of show and do it better justice. Legend Quest tried to take that show concept to another level but failed.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pointless, silly, and a waste of good electrons
lbblues16 August 2011
WTH was SyFy thinking when the green-lighted this show? The greatest salesperson in the world is whoever convinced the suits that this was a good idea.

The premise itself is interesting and had potential: someone scouring the world to find long-lost items of great interest and historical significance. The problem, as other reviewers have already pointed out, is that said protagonist is hunting for things that probably NEVER existed! Excalibur? Come on; it's a legend, a fairy tale. Someone resembling Arthur may have lived (doubtful, though), but there was no Camelot, no Merlin, and definitely no Excalibur. And has he every actually found any of these legendary items he's sought? You get one guess.

I could go on, but you get the point.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A good travelogue & history lecture - that's it
lbnsyretiree3 August 2011
I have only been able to catch 2 episodes of Legend Quest. It is a well choreographed and edited show and makes a good travelogue with gorgeous scenery and a good history lecture of ancient legends. But I have a problem with the conclusions at the end.

I was really upset when the host theorized that the spearhead that pierced Christ was secreted in Area 51. Though not admitted publicly, the spearhead recovered by General Patton was stored in the Fort Knox Gold Repository. The crown of King Stephan of Hungary was stored there as well but was better publicized, especially when President Carter decided to give it back to Hungary while the country was still under communist rule (which upset my Hungarian born wife to no end as she was afraid the communists would destroy it). It is logical to assume that many historical artifacts are stored at Fort Knox other than just tons of gold bullion. But don't try to sneak in there to look for it. You won't make more than 10 yards inside the fence before becoming history yourself.

Another episode was on the Stone of Divinity (or something like that). The search and scenery were well presented but heavily edited. The scene of finding what appears to be the stone was strictly dramatics. The flooring with the trap door is less than 20 years old (no mildew or dry rot on the beams) so the caretakers of the Castle on Iona have known a black monolith of some sort has been down there a long time.

Perhaps the best looking part of the show is Kinga Phillips. Though her biography shows her as being born in Poland, the name Kinga is Hungarian. That's the same name as my wife's Hungarian sister, and one of our nieces by her brother. She is a professional actress and not an archaeologist but works well with the host as well as being eye appealing.

So, if the endings and findings were done more realistically (such as the Iona custodian telling them there's a big black rock in that small room under a trap door), I wouldn't groan so much.

And as for Groom Lake Air Force Base (science-fictionally called Area 51), give me a break. You can see every building on Google Earth and read the runway markings. At best I think it's a decoy to keep UFO hunters busy and security personnel and procedures trained and practiced for real secret bases.

Yet I still like the show but mostly for entertainment rather than historical accuracy.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed