Time to Remember (1962) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"We'll be rolling in money!""
hwg1957-102-2657049 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Centred around a house where the jewels of a safe robbery have been concealed several people vie to get hold of them but it only leads to disappointment and eventually to murder. This is a sterling example of the Edgar Wallace series from Anglo-Amalgamated with a good script from Arthur La Bern, solid acting from the cast and pacy direction from Charles Jarrott. The characters are undone by their avarice and the wintry setting of the London scenes, well filmed by Bert Mason, adds to the bleak atmosphere.

The cast are able, particularly Harry H. Corbett as the estate agent Jack Burgess whose mounting despair is very well portrayed by the actor. Perhaps the ending of the film is a bit rushed but all in all it is a well told tale. Interestingly there is talk in the film of thieves falling out but that's not quite true of the robbers and moreover the murders are not done by any of them. Greed makes the ordinary person into a killer which makes the movie a bit deeper than just a caper gone awry story
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining and nostalgic
tombancroft213 June 2011
The series of Edgar Wallace mysteries that this film belonged to were quite entertaining and were shown in the cinema before the main feature. It is interesting to see actors you remember, some of whom never progressed, some who were destined to play supporting roles for the rest of their career and some who went on to become major stars. In this film a gang of jewellery thieves rob a house which has just become empty on the death of it's rich lady owner a week earlier. Her jewels are still in the safe(!?). The robbery is not a complete success and one robber hides the jewels in the house as he's about to be captured. The house is put up for sale. Harry H. Corbett plays a struggling estate agent. A lady enquires about buying the house. This eventually leads to Corbett putting two and two together and guessing the jewels may still be there. The events unfold with a few twists and turns, making this a very watchable film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the best from this film series.
alexanderdavies-993829 September 2019
"Time to Remember" deserves to be regarded as one of the best films from the "Edgar Wallace Mysteries" series. It has a good pace, a good enough narrative, the usual stellar cast and some intrigue (not of them have). Harry H. Corbett takes the acting honours as a shady estate agent who seizes on the opportunity of recovering some stolen loot after a robbery goes wrong. Speaking of which, that particular scene could also have gone awry as one actor is clearly making his way along a real rooftop! In spite of what one reviewer wrote, the above film is certainly available on DVD. It can be purchased on various websites.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good British "B"
GManfred15 January 2012
"Time To Remember" must have been the English equivalent of our "B" programmers, with some obscure (to myself) actors and a very good story. The story is from Edgar Wallace, which accounts for the absorbing plot but the acting is unusually good for this type of movie. It has a Monogram or Republic look to it, almost a TV look to it actually, but production values are overshadowed by all-around professionalism.

It was made in 1962 and can be distinguished from a noir movie by excess lighting and by an annoying 60's go-go music track, but succeeds due to an interesting story and to the breakneck speed of plot development - the picture is only 55 minutes long on my copy and it goes by in a flash.

The reviewer above has already delineated the story and the male lead is Harry H. Corbett, who is not listed in the credits on the website. He plays an opportunistic real estate agent who stumbles on a bungled jewel robbery at an abandoned London house. I am not familiar with his other credits but he was excellent. The other players were more than competent with no noticeable weak spots. It is not available in any format so you'll have to get a copy from a DVD pirate, and it is worth your trouble.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I remember this one as the low point of the Edgar Wallace series!
JohnHowardReid23 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
NOTES: Number 18 of the 50-picture Merton Park "Edgar Wallace" series... First film directed by television director Charles Jarrott who returned to movies with Anne of the Thousand Days (1969), Mary Queen of Scots (1971), Lost Horizon (1973), The Dove (1974), The Other Side of Midnight (1977), The Littlest Horse Thieves (1977), Last Flight of Noah's Ark (1980), Condorman (1981), The Amateur (1981), then returned to TV for fifteen years, and then back in movies with The Secret Life of Algernon (1997), Turn of Faith (2001), Snow Prince (2004).

COMMENT: Another disappointing Edgar Wallace entry! But I just had to include this one as a public service to warn people off! Although it begins promisingly and boasts a reasonably intelligent cast, this Edgar Wallace entry is one of the least interesting in the entire series. The reason is not so much the totally undistinguished direction (aside from the fall off the roof at the beginning, which is quite effectively accomplished), but the fact that the script is heavily over-weighted with dialogue.

And such dialogue! Crudely disguised instant information jostles with seemingly endless verbal sparring that moves in circles and gets nowhere. As for clichés, count them! There is one scene in fact, a tete-a-tete between French Victor and his girl friend (filmed all in one dull take), that must surely hold the world's record for the number of clichés in a single camera set-up, clichés that are topped off by French Victor remarking that "every gendarme in Paris is looking for me!"

Mr. Jarrott's answer to this entry of inescapable ennui is a brief sequence of inter-cutting two different tracking shots of running feet on cobble-stoned pavements. This interlude provides a slight bump of excitement against the surrounding arid plains of relentless mediocrity. Mediocre that is, except for the plot's long-awaited climax, which turns out to be so tame, it must rank as the worst feature of all.

Other production credits are fair average quality, with the exception of a pedestrian music score of ear-numbing cacophony.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed