New Delhi, Aug 23 (Ians) Lamenting the “massive brain drain” of young, talented, and hardworking doctors, Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Tuesday said the Central and state governments have a serious responsibility for the welfare of aspiring doctors from small towns and rural areas and to improve their working conditions.
In the inaugural National Academy of Medical Sciences (Nams) Public Oration, he said: “Since there was no explicit mention of right to health under the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court, in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha, interpreted Article 21 to include right to health. In the case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity, the Supreme Court held that failure on the part of a government hospital to provide timely medical treatment to a person in need of such treatment results in violation of his right to life guaranteed under Article 21.”
“In a sense, I would say medicine and law are similar.
In the inaugural National Academy of Medical Sciences (Nams) Public Oration, he said: “Since there was no explicit mention of right to health under the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court, in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha, interpreted Article 21 to include right to health. In the case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity, the Supreme Court held that failure on the part of a government hospital to provide timely medical treatment to a person in need of such treatment results in violation of his right to life guaranteed under Article 21.”
“In a sense, I would say medicine and law are similar.
- 8/24/2022
- by Glamsham Bureau
- GlamSham
New Delhi, Aug 23 (Ians) Lamenting the “massive brain drain” of young, talented, and hardworking doctors, Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Tuesday said the Central and state governments have a serious responsibility for the welfare of aspiring doctors from small towns and rural areas and to improve their working conditions.
In the inaugural National Academy of Medical Sciences (Nams) Public Oration, he said: “Since there was no explicit mention of right to health under the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court, in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha, interpreted Article 21 to include right to health. In the case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity, the Supreme Court held that failure on the part of a government hospital to provide timely medical treatment to a person in need of such treatment results in violation of his right to life guaranteed under Article 21.”
“In a sense, I would say medicine and law are similar.
In the inaugural National Academy of Medical Sciences (Nams) Public Oration, he said: “Since there was no explicit mention of right to health under the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court, in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha, interpreted Article 21 to include right to health. In the case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity, the Supreme Court held that failure on the part of a government hospital to provide timely medical treatment to a person in need of such treatment results in violation of his right to life guaranteed under Article 21.”
“In a sense, I would say medicine and law are similar.
- 8/24/2022
- by Glamsham Bureau
- GlamSham
IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles, Tweets, or blog posts. This content is published for the entertainment of our users only. The news articles, Tweets, and blog posts do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the source responsible for the item in question to report any concerns you may have regarding content or accuracy.