"Siskel & Ebert" The Worst Films of 1989 (TV Episode 1990) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
So many bad films, so little time...
AlsExGal19 February 2022
.. so film critics Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel decide to talk about general categories of bad films using the many examples from 1989. Among the categories are stars who cannot direct (Eddie Murphy in Harlem Nights, William Shatner in Star Trek 5), movies that play like TV shows ( Troop Beverly Hills with Shelley Long, Her Alibi with Tom Selleck), big stars who cash in on substandard products (Hulk Hogan in "No Holds Barred" and Fred Savage in Little Monsters), and bad sequels ("Star Trek 5" and "Ghostbusters 2"). Other than the sequel films mentioned you may have never heard of their other examples they gave because the films were really that bad.

Gene makes an oddly prescient remark about Woody Allen, and both Roger and Gene bemoan all of the teen movies that began to glut the market in the 80s in general. They'd be happy to know that tide turns in the 90s. They would be unhappy to know that a third Ghostbusters film appears in 2016 that is worse than Ghostbusters Two could ever have imagined to be. At least the second Ghostbusters was true to the characters and the general history of the original.

Not mentioned in this show, Gene Siskel wrote in his column in the Chicago Tribune that "UHF" (the "Weird Al" picture that became a long-lasting cult classic on video after numbering itself among the films that helped to fuel bankruptcy for Orion Pictures) was also a worst picture of the year. Well, nobody ever said he was Carnac The Magnificent.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Season 4, Episode 17
Michael_Elliott15 January 2018
Siskel & Ebert (1990)

Season 4, Episode 17

YOUNG EINSTEIN, KINJITE: FORBIDDEN SUBJECTS, HER ALIBI, SHE'S OUT OF CONTROL, NO HOLDS BARRED, TROOP BEVERLY HILLS, PINK CADILLAC, STAR TREK V, GHOSTBUSTERS II, HARLEM NIGHTS, THE WIZARD, NEXT OF KIN and OLD GRINGO are the films that get this episode to themselves as Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert take a look at the very worst movies of 1989. Fans of the series will know that these here are some of the most entertaining episodes because the critics really get to dig into the films and sometimes the actors appearing in them. This includes them going after Burt Reynolds and Charles Bronson for delivering the same old thing again whereas someone like Clint Eastwood constantly challenges himself (although, not with PINK CADILLAC apparently). Overall this is certainly a lot of fun with several great jokes thrown in along the way.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed