Another Earth (2011) Poster

(2011)

User Reviews

Review this title
361 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Rather beautiful and sad
ix-viii-ix10 December 2011
I went to the cinema on the spur of the moment, I had a couple of hours to kill. I scanned the billboard for anything that might seem vaguely interesting - "Another Earth" sounded science fiction-y so I bought my ticket and went in.

It's important I explain this for two reasons: first because I saw this movie "tabula rasa", having not seen trailers, read reviews or having any idea what it was about. Secondly it became evident from the bad- tempered muttering in the back I wasn't the only one to have done this.

At first I struggled with the concept, but I kept an open mind and a very different movie to the one I thought I would see developed, and was actually quite well done. After about 20 minutes I was ready to get up and leave, but giving it time paid back dividends, by the last half-hour I had become too involved to consider leaving.

The story is a slow burner that grips you incrementally, and while the occasionally grainy or out of focus shots give you the strong impression this was made on a shoestring, that is no reason to hold anything against it. Having seen the high budget yawn-fest "Transformers" I can actually say that given the current state of big budget science fiction this is a refreshing, if a bit left-field approach to the genre.

Evidently my companion viewers in the cinema, a small group of guys, were not getting as much out of the deeply troubled love story that forms the basis of the plot, and they made their discontent very audible to my irritation.

In brief, not a film for everyone, but if you're in the mood for an introspective slow-burner and you've got the patience for it, this film will prove a rewarding experience
185 out of 234 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A very impressive indie film by a new filmmaker.
Top_Dawg_Critic4 August 2021
Wow. This is one of those thought-provoking films that will stay with you long after it's over.

It was impeccably co-written by Brit Marling - who's also the lead, and co-written and decently directed by Mike Cahill, in his first full length feature film. The fact a new filmmaker took this vision and gave us this beautiful independent little gem - on a 100k budget, is incredible. This is better than some films I've seen lately put together by seasoned filmmakers.

It's not your typical sci-fi, but it will spark the brain and move your soul. It's a muted story of atonement and forgiveness, in a quietly moving parable of redemption from the choices we make. The ending was perfection, as it answers that question you'll have, and leaves something extra for the imagination. The cinematography was excellent, and the score absolutely fitting and amazing. Casting and performances were spot on.

My only issue was Cahill's annoying and pointless fast zoom-ins, and the unnecessarily slow pacing, that made the normally pleasant 92 min runtime feel much longer. But nevertheless, for a new filmmaker on a limited independent budget, this was a gem to watch. It's a well deserving 8/10 from me.
38 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This Me or That Me?
ferguson-626 July 2011
Greetings again from the darkness. An award winning film at Sundance, this one seems to carry the same polarizing effect that "Tree of Life" does. The reviews and comments have been discordant and contentious. After sitting through a Q&A with Mike Cahill (co-writer, director) and Brit Marling (co-writer, star) I am guessing they are taking great pride in the love/hate responses. Their film was designed to take you deep ... make you think and self-analyze. This is not a fluffy Owen Wilson rom-com. Explaining what it is, well, that's a challenge.

The story begins with Rhoda (Brit Marling) out for a night of partying. We learn she has been accepted to M.I.T. and that she is quite the space and astronomy lover. Her very poor decision to drive home after drinking results in a horrific accident that changes her life and that of a young family. At the same time, scientists discover "another Earth" has been hiding on the other side of the sun. Flash forward four years as Rhoda is released from prison.

She is a broken spirit whose bright future has been dashed. She tracks down the man who survived the crash she caused and has every intention of apologizing. Instead, she cleans his house. She finds John (William Mapother) has dropped out of society and found numbness in the bottle.

I won't say more about the story because it is really something to watch unfold. What I will say is that I found the advertisements to be somewhat misleading. This is not a sci-fi film per se. Sure the second earth brings about numerous questions concerning the "other" us. What would we say? How would we react? Have I done better there than here? But that is actually an underlying element to this story ... always present in our thoughts and those of Rhoda. Instead, this film is a psychological drama. And a dark one at that.

You will recognize William Mapother (The Grudge, Lost), who plays John. He has a regular guy look to him and stretches well from happiness to depression to, once again, showing a spark. Brit Marling is one you don't know, but will soon enough. She is an amazing presence on screen and avoids the Hollywood acting crutches. She plays Rhoda as the damaged, confused creature she is in the story. Very well done.

A couple of other interesting notes include Kumar Pallana (The Royal Tenenbaums)as Purdeep. With minimal screen time, his character provides Rhoda with a lesson she needs. There is also a scene where John plays a saw as a musical instrument. The sound is amazing and the music is actually from Natalia Paruz, who is knows as the "saw lady". Other music in the film is outstanding and courtesy of Fall on Your Sword. Very unique, but a perfect fit for the film.
191 out of 262 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Very Beautiful Slow Movie
delightful-life30 November 2011
This is not a commercial movie, but something like a documentary shot with a commercial movie like quality.

The storyline in the IMDb main page describes the premise of this movie, but thats not what this movie is about.

The other planet thing is just like the background music, its there for effect. Other Earth is all about beauty, the attention to detail and the simple yet delicate story.

Its a lot like those many many beautiful Japanese movies (Tokyo Story comes to my mind, though I have to say its not as good as that). Its a beautiful journey, and when its done you lie back and think about its beauty.

This movie is highly recommended if you enjoy simple movies like those.

This is not a sci-fi and even the logic behind the other planet is too far fetched and they don't even hide it, they never go into any scientific details. There is also no action, nor is it a thriller.

Cheers. :-)............
111 out of 160 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Melancholic, Sad and Thought Provoking
claudio_carvalho11 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The seventeen year-old Rhoda Williams (Brit Marling) receives the acceptance letter from the MIT and she celebrates with her friends. In the same night, a planet similar and close to Earth is discovered and called Earth 2. Rhoda drives her car looking to the Earth 2 and she hits the car of the composer John Burroughs (William Mapother), killing his pregnant wife and his baby son. Rhoda goes to prison and four years later she is released and moves to her parents' house. She finds a job of high-school janitor and she tries to commit suicide. She survives and she writes an essay to a contest where the prize is a ticket to travel to Earth 2. Meanwhile the scientists discover that Earth 2 is a mirror of Earth and the synchronicity between the dwellers has interrupted when the planets were seen by each other. One Day, Rhoda decides to visit John Burroughs, who had the life destroyed after the death of his family, to tell him that she had killed his family. However she does not have the nerve to tell him the truth. So she lies and tells that he had won a free cleaning service of his home. Rhoda wins the contest, but meanwhile John and she have fallen in love with each other. Rhoda has to take a decision whether she goes or stays, but she wants to tell John the truth first. "Another Earth" is a melancholic, sad and thought provoking movie, with a dramatic story of redemption. Brit Marling delivers an awesome performance in the role of a teenager that has a car accident and kills innocent people. The essay written by Rhoda is magnificent, in a movie where the characters and situations are well developed. The conclusion is open and I liked the interpretation that Rhoda would have killed John in Earth 2 and also won the contest to visit Earth. My vote is seven. Title (Brazil): "A Outra Terra" ("The Other Earth")
20 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Small drama with big ideas underneath
rparham21 November 2012
In science fiction, the idea of a "mirror" Earth is an old troupe. From various stories and novels to no less than 2 episodes of the original Star Trek, the "what if" scenario of a Earth just like ours, but yet a little different, is well mined. Nonetheless, director Mike Cahill and his co-screenwriter, Britt Marling, have used this concept as a backdrop to their film Another Earth, which, despite it's title and science fiction underpinnings, is actually a sobering drama about mistakes made and the infinite possibilities of the universe. Heady stuff, to be sure, and while Another Earth is hardly perfect, it eschews what you would normally expect from a film of it's title to deal with very down to Earth matters.

17 year old Rhoda Williams (Marling, engaging in double duty as writer and star), who is fascinated by astronomy, has just been accepted into MIT and has been celebrating at a party with friends. On her way home, drunk and distracted by the news on the radio of a second, Earth like planet that has appeared in the sky, causes an auto accident. In the second car is music professor John Burroughs (William Mapother), his pregnant wife and young son. Both the son and wife are killed in the accident, Burroughs ends up in a coma, and Rhoda spends the next four years in prison. After being released, she asks to be placed in a job that keeps her interaction with people to a minimum, and so ends up as a janitor at a local high school. Wracked with guilt at her part in the accident, she decides to visit Burroughs, who has turned to alcohol in the intervening years since awakening from his coma, but cannot bring herself to reveal the truth to him, and ends up pretending to be from a cleaning service and thus begins helping him put his home, and to some extent, his life back together.

In the time since the evening of the accident, the new planet has drawn closer to our Earth, and it is revealed to be an almost exact duplicate of Earth, with the same continents, and, as revealed on a news broadcast where radio transmission to the planet is attempted, possibly the exact same people. Rhoda, desperate to take hold of all that was lost from her participation in the accident, writes an essay to attempt to join the crew of the first planned expedition to the second Earth, while at the same time, her relationship with Burroughs, who does not know who she is, begins to grow.

Another Earth focuses its attention on Rhoda, who, in a moment of stupidity and selfishness, caused the irrevocable destruction of John Burroughs world as he knew it, and has been consumed by the results of her actions. Another Earth approaches her in a more realistic manner than many other dramas have, showing how that unfortunate mistake has transformed her world. Another Earth delves into her situation, affected by her guilt in her participation in the terrible tragedy and potentially unable to move on with her life. Another Earth delivers much of this often without long bouts of dialogue, relying largely on Marling's performance to deliver the emotional core of this character, and she proves up to the task. Marling unveils Rhoda to us through body language and sobering looks, and we can feel how so much of her was transformed that night. Another Earth doesn't specifically make us feel sorry for her, she accepts her responsibility in the tragedy, but it also does paint a picture of a human who, do to how society treats those who commit acts like this, even if accidental, seems to have fewer options available.

Burroughs, while not ignored, lacks the same degree of development, and we largely view him through Rhoda's gaze. He has crawled inside a bottle to salve his wounds and stayed there. When Rhoda enters his house, she seems to be the first significant human contact Burroughs has had in some time, and he opens up the closed gates of his world to her, first a little, but gradually much more. We can feel his pain and understand his helplessness as he continues on after so much has been taken from him, but he doesn't quite reach the same level of depth as Rhoda, however he is hardly a cipher.

If Another Earth missteps, it comes late in the film, where certain decisions are made that are arguably too manufactured, too melodramatic for this film that seems mostly interested in not working in the standard trumped up events of similar material, and while it certainly doesn't ruin Another Earth, it does seem a bit overdone, where a subtler, more realistic choice might have been better.

Against the story of these two characters, the revelation of the second Earth plays as a backdrop, but at key moments this plot thread delivers interesting material that allows Another Earth to move beyond the standard for a drama of this type. The idea of how this second Earth is similar, but also different, from our own is touched upon, but then becomes a greater piece of the narrative, allowing it to move in somewhat unique directions. Another Earth uses the science fiction conceit of the second Earth as a catalyst for story and character development, not as thin excuse to throw a bunch of special effects on the screen.

Another Earth is a small, somewhat slow piece that deals less in the fantastical nature of it's title and subplot, but more in the isolated world of two people who were changed by one terrible event. With Marling's strong performance and the film's focus on the characters and their coping with a horrible event, Another Earth proves to have it's aim set on a more precise and personal target than you might think.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The big thing a lot of viewers didn't figure out...
TheInvisibleCar17 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler Alert!!!

This comment is for those who have already seen the movie, as my comments mainly pertain to the last scene.

It would seem that most viewers didn't get something I just automatically figured out during the course of the movie...and this thing has to do with the broken synchronicity. Earth 1 and Earth 2 didn't just automatically start to become different, something had to break synchronicity, and those differences would only occur with the two planets interaction and then have to domino or butterfly effect from there. When she was driving in her car, looking up to see the blue dot in the sky, her double was doing the same thing. But, the other planet was not a mirror image, it was a duplicate, so unlike in a mirror, where when you raise your right hand you see your reflection raising its left hand, what she saw was more like looking into a rorrim, which is a type of mirror where things are not reversed, so you actually see things as others would be looking at you and seeing things...the print of a book you are holding up to a rorrim isn't reversed and you can still easily read it, and so on. When the blue dot was first noticed and the disc jockey was announcing it she looked up into the sky and her body double was also looking up, but exactly where that blue dot was in the sky was different for the two of them. So, given her body double's different positioning of her head, her different angle of viewing, she noticed the other car in time to brake or swerve and miss it. Similarly, when Dr. Joan Tallis was on live TV making live radio contact, at first she thought she was getting feedback, because in reply to anything she said, she was hearing the other Joan Tallis who was broadcasting the exact same radio message to her. This was a frustration for her, until something different about the radio waves traveling through space meant that one of them would hear something differently, and respond differently, so that instead of just saying the same thing to each other at the same time, back and forth, one of them somehow responded differently, "Hello? Hello?" as they undoubtedly had heard something different, or failed to hear something because it was blocked by interference. Then their synchronicity was broken enough in that small way for the two of them to actually have a conversation, and undoubtedly, television viewers on Earth 2 might have experienced a small break in synchronicity, as their Joan Tallis was answering the question about what she bought at the space store in Cape Canaveral, so the viewers on Earth 2 didn't have their Joan Tallis holding up the words "space strawberries," on her yellow pad to possibly provoke the obvious reaction that Rhonda's brother on Earth 1 was having. (And obviously, Rhonda 2's brother didn't have a sister who went to prison, so very likely in that family's life, along with Rhonda 2's friends at MIT, quite a bit of synchronicity had been broken by then.) So, the Rhonda 2 didn't crash, did go to MIT, did study astronomy or astrophysics, which was her area of interest, and won the contest for other reasons, probably just for being a motivated MIT graduate student specializing in space and astronomy. She had nobody to consider giving up her space flight to, since she didn't kill anybody's family. John Burroughs undoubtedly joined his family, now having two fathers, only one being slightly banged up and with minor head injury issues. This was already a question in my mind and in other viewers' minds, whether by looking up at the sky at different angles the two Rhondas had broken synchronicity enough to where one of them had swerved and missed hitting the other car. The final scene didn't raise any questions at all, rather, it quickly and refreshingly answered the really biggest question that viewers who got it were already asking themselves and wondering about. For me, that final scene was a magical and beautiful moment, but not wonderful at all, as it replied to all the wonder by answering every question and tying-up all the loose ends of the story very well, at least as far as the story line was dealing with. (Of course to follow the story one had to at least suspend belief enough to not stray from the story, wondering about things like whether the two planets would be experiencing tsunami tides because of their gravitational pulls and such, etc.)

There was no moral difference between the two Rhondas, it's not that one of them decided to go the party and drink while the other didn't, they were the same person, they were the same drunk, just one was a drunk trying to look at a blue dot in the sky over here, while the other was a drunk trying to look at a blue dot in the sky over there. Face to face, they should realize that were the same person until then, only one, like most drunk drivers, just didn't end up in an accident by mere chance, just dumb luck and nothing else.

I just thought it was a wonderful movie and the final scene answered that wonderful with a terrific happy ending. The two Rhonda's certainly have a lot of catching up to do, and undoubtedly, John and Rhonda are the only people who ended up on the same planet as their other selves, and the other shuttle passengers certainly arrived to notice little or no difference with the planet they left, probably feeling more like returning astronauts than true space explorers. The Rhonda 1 and John 1 switch proved to be an additional but major break in synchronicity for the two Earths.
166 out of 216 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not exactly what it says on the label
benjlinacre10 March 2022
This film pulled me in on its promise to deliver an interesting enough sci-fi plot. The cover suggested it as a major focus.

Unfortunately, this whole concept just sort of meanders around in the back ground.. literally, shots of 'another earth' in the sky, becoming more of a by-product.

This film, essentially a dramatic piece focusing on the aftermath of a tragedy, is actually good. Sadly, it just isn't what I came for and I felt slightly cheated at the lack of any actual sci-fi alien planet doppelgänger earth action. I'm aware of the concept, and it works as a metaphor - but it felt like the film was pulling in two different directions, marketing as one thing but delivering another.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Hidden Blue Gem in the Indie Sky...
winstonsmith_8414 June 2021
A sad, tragic, yet beautiful story that takes its time and leaves you thinking, crying, wondering...

Firstly, the directing, the acting, it's all solid as could be. The main actress, Brit, is a severely underrated actress who I feel has so much in her expressions that I'm seriously in astonishment I haven't seen her rise to Oscar level performances in some of the best movies being made these days. What happened to her and why isn't she being cast in like every movie? Anyways, her expression, her ability to act, was just what really carried the movie for me.

Aside from her excellent acting, the story was hard hitting. Every move she made, every decision she made, I could totally see her doing. Yes it's too hard to apologize, so you make up a little lie. Yes you want to make someone's life better. Yes you dream of what could be on the other Earth. It all made so much sense. The time she finally revealed to him who she was... wow... it was such a moment I'll never forget.

And of course, I can't not comment on the amazing science fiction concept. The idea of another Earth popping into existence, and then everything after that being different... going on a different trajectory.. it's kind of a mind blowing idea. What if that happened, how would we react? I think the movie portrayed it somewhat realistically and I could see an Elon Musk type finding people to go on the journey to the planet who might fit into the other Earth like a missing puzzle piece.

The film never goes too far or says anything too loudly. It's all done in this way that keeps you imagining, wondering, what might be...

Anyways, I could totally give this a ten out of ten. Not many films make me tear up but this one did multiple times... that plus the low budget sci-fi and great acting and thought provoking... it all just adds up for me.... But I feel it's more of a nine out of ten. Not quite sure what the slightly missing element is... maybe the two earths would have contacted eachother sooner than four years... maybe that's what bugged me slightly... but alas, it's a small nit pick.

I've seen this movie twice now, and it was more enjoyable on the second watch.

Do I recommend this to everyone? Not really. I just think it's a movie I personally love. That I'd proudly add to my Blu Ray collection. It's not for everyone... the pace is slow, there are few characters, and maybe it's a bit Indie... but I liked all of that personally. The character study and brilliant performance of the worlds most underrated actress who I really wish would have kept going and going into more movies. Anyways, maybe see it if you like Sci-fi thinkers that are slow paced and fine tuned...

Beautiful beautiful story. 9/10.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Could have been more
Fbh911 March 2012
When I heard the concept of this movie, another earth that suddenly appears, I was inmediatly interested. The concept seemed good and could give place to a great story without the need of great special effects or anything, just a great script. Sadly, the movie tells a story that has been done many times before. It's predictable and the whole concept of "earth 2" is wasted in transforming this movie from "something you have seen many times before" to "something you have seen many times before... with a twist". Not to say that it is a bad movie, but I just felt that the whole Earth 2 concept was wasted on it, it felt more like and add-on than an important central plot for the story.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not for me.
Dechilo19 August 2012
Keeping this short and simple:

The storyline never feels to go anywhere, the science is lame and the real story summed up in 15 words: It is a story about a car accident and a girl trying to redeem herself.

Personally I was disappointed by it as I was expecting more. If you are a science fiction fan this is probably not the film for you. If you on the other hand like to see people trying to better themselves and turn their life around (inspirational stuff, this is probably more your cup of tea!).

Finally: everyone has a right to their own opinion, I can understand why some people might love this film however it was certainly not for me.

Thanks for reading.
106 out of 167 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Suspend disbelief, and love this movie
jesus-100-9845217 July 2011
I am a psychiatrist and psychotherapist who can tell a hawk from a handsaw, and there is a wonderful handsaw in this movie. So, I feel qualified to tell you it is safe to see this movie as it is, without worrying about details like gravity. Do not allow unimaginative naysayers to keep you from enjoying this gem. I mean, we all can enjoy vampire and zombie movies, right? Is any movie any better than "Let the Right One In"? I saw this movie last night in Brookline Mass at a Q&A preview, with director, writers, and an actor -- all combined in two lovely people. No one in our sophisticated audience that included a CETI scientist cared enough about the "laws of physics" problems to mention them in the question period. All we cared about were the endearing characters, the music both acoustic and visual, the plot developments, the shocking climaxes, the compelling emotional plausibility.

The movie is not about anything as terrestrial as gravity. In the world of this movie, something has happened to upset some kind of cosmic symmetry, and the other earth has appeared from a parallel universe. I do wish some character or other had dispelled the physics with "I don't know why our orbits are not affected". But, the metaphor works as a way to discuss looking at oneself. It really does not matter. The acting is perfect, the camera-work perfectly beautiful, the plot deeply affecting with wonderful surprises.
381 out of 555 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Two almost-made movies
bastanchury23 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a science fiction movie. There was no science to explain the phenomenon. It is preposterous that another Earth would all of a sudden appear from nowhere. If it somehow could happen, there should have been tidal and orbital effects but none were even mentioned. It is also not an action movie. It is a very slow-paced drama. Not that there's anything wrong with slow-paced drama, but it was not what I was expecting.

The pluses: the visual beauty of some sequences and Brit Marling in the lead.

The minuses: There are two story elements that each could have had its own separate movie. As it is, neither got the development it deserved.

The ending did not do much to resolve anything.

In my opinion the filmmakers could have done better by making two separate movies with this material: a drama, and a science fiction.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is NOT a Science Fiction Movie.
michaelt28170208526 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Please don't read any further if you don't want to know about details in this film.

I was left very disappointed after watching this film.

Another Earth is the discovery of another planet the complete double of earth, with exactly the same people on it.

A short time into this film, we see and hear a woman talking to her exact same self via a radio transmitter. And this for me was the most interesting piece in the film.

The majority of this film has people walking around, asking themselves philosophical questions about what would they do ? and say ? if they met themselves on this other earth.

I like down to earth science fiction. I like Twilight Zone, and Outer Limits.

There is a movie with Roy Thinnes of The Invaders fame. The movie is called "Journey to the far side of the Sun", and is also about a planet the double of Earth, on the completely other side of the Sun.

I was wondering how the two films would relate ? Another Earth was for me a complete waste of time. The writers could have expanded the story from 90 minutes, and added much more.

At the end of the film, a supposed shock ending, the leading lady played by Brit Marling, ( I had never heard of her ), suddenly finds herself confronted by her "other" "Earth" self, who suddenly appears behind her, And then the screen goes black, and the credits role.

This film had plenty of interesting hype, but delivered nothing substantial, and I'm truly surprised at how many people liked it, judging by their reviews.

I thought it was rubbish, from start to finish.
86 out of 145 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not flashy or overly impressive but still undeniably entertaining
socrates9927 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
There are two irreplaceable stars to this fairly low budget movie, one the beautiful vision of the second earth itself, and two, Brit Marling, the beautiful protagonist who is in almost every frame. This is not a sci-fi movie in any real sense. The second earth is just a convenient device to explore the real subject of this film, the anguished journey of a young woman who has committed a horrific crime lacking any real intent.

It's easy enough to get the details of that crime before seeing the movie but suffice it to say that there was a similar incident with a young woman in my town in the near past so it had an extra level of relevance for us.

In the local case the girl got away scot-free. This movie's protagonist not only doesn't get away unscathed, she struggles in an utterly humane way to overcome her guilt. For that Brit Marling is an exquisite choice of actress who held my attention and sympathy throughout. All the more impressive because she shared writing credits with the director, Cahill.

This is an artful if bare bones film that you will forgive for having to resort to fantasy to make its points. It definitely makes me wonder what this Mike Cahill might come up with next.
57 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
worth watching. Invest the hour and a half.
joker-scar31 July 2012
First off, I will keep this short and simple, like the story, which I liked. I thought the acting was very good, especially the lead actress, she has a long career ahead of her if she is smart. The story was thoughtful and well handled. Although I knew where the story was going half an hour into it, it was fine. The only negative thing I can say is the photography. I felt like I was watching a film shot by someone who learned cinematography with a handy- cam. I like hand-held photography as long as it doesn't draw attention to itself, which this does, too much so. Every time the cameraman zoomed in closer within the shot it took me out of the moment. And it did it several times. Obviously this was done on purpose, the reason I think is to make it feel more real, and it does. I feel it's real-ly distracting.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Way to Survive What You've Done
ThomasDrufke29 January 2019
How do you get an audience to sympathize with a felon? Well, you cast a great actress and write a great script. 'Another Earth' is a fascinatingly strange sci-fi thriller about a girl who, on the night of a duplicate earth discovery, manages to forever change the life of herself and a composer during a tragic accident. This film asks many things of its audience, which include buying into an obscure and uncomfortable romance, and for the most part it succeeds very well. While it doesn't hit the emotional highs of something like Arrival or Interstellar, on a much smaller level, it challenges the audience's brain, and sometimes that's all you can ask for out of a science fiction film. And given just how creative and unique 'Another Earth' is, I give this film all the credit it deserves.

7.7/10
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A quietly powerful work of art
howard.schumann14 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
""O wad some Power the gift tae gie us, to see oursels as ithers see us!" – Robert Burns

Beginning as a blue speck in the far distant horizon, in four years a new planet resembling Earth has moved into our solar system, creating a hovering phantom-like globe in the sky that puzzles scientists and laymen alike, but brings a feeling of wonder to the night sky. Winner of the Alfred P. Sloan Feature Film and the Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival, Mike Cahill's low-budget film, Another Earth, is a quietly beautiful meditation on guilt, redemption, and second chances. Though it has some implausible elements, it is so skillfully written and performed that these elements seem irrelevant. Cahill demonstrates that science fiction movies do not have to have blaring music, unending frenzy, CGI effects, or ugly and violent monsters to successfully capture our imagination.

The premise of the film is that the new planet is an exact mirror of the Earth, containing a duplicate version of ourselves who mirror our earthly circumstances. Cahill's main focus, however, is not the new planet but the attachment between two damaged individuals who begin to bring each other back to life after a devastating incident that forever scarred their lives. As the film opens, Rhoda Williams (Brit Marling), a bright 17-year old, unsteady after a night of celebrating her acceptance into MIT, drives her car through a red light, putting composer John Burroughs (William Mapother) in a coma and killing his pregnant wife and their young son.

The film then jumps ahead four years when the still guilt-ridden and morose Rhoda is released from prison and tries to set her life in order, moving back with her parents Kim (Jordan Baker) and Robert (Flint Beverage), and her brother Jeff (Robin Taylor). Though she had planned on studying Astrophysics, the only job she can now get is working as a high school janitor, a job where she keeps to herself without much interaction with others. When she sees John placing a toy robot at the site of the accident, on a whim she goes to his house pretending to be a maid offering a free trial for a cleaning service oddly called "Maid in Heaven."

In the back of her mind, however, is finding a way to release her inner torment. Fascinated with this sullen but obviously highly intelligent woman, John takes her up on her offer and asks her to come back each week to clean his house. At first uncommunicative both verbally and emotionally, the two alienated people slowly begin opening up to each other a little bit more each week. Though Rhoda eventually plans to tell John that she was responsible for the accident that killed his family, their visits seem to bring them to a new awakening of what is possible in their life, and she repeatedly postpones her confession.

After listening to TV broadcasts talking constantly about the possibility that your identical twin on Earth 2 might be a happier and more satisfied version of you, Rhoda enters a contest to become the first voyager to visit the other Earth. Astonishingly, she wins first prize after a heart rendering essay describing the reasons she wants to go. At first, pleading with her not to go through with it, John's attitude is changed drastically after she reveals her complicity in the fatal accident, a scene that leads to a startling and unpredictable conclusion.

Supported by the ethereal sounds of the group "Fall on Your Sword," Another Earth engenders powerful performances that deserve recognition at awards time. Marling, who also co-wrote the film, gives an intense and moving performance that brings her character fully to life. Though the film misses an important teachable moment near the end, it is a quietly powerful work of art that suggests that truth lays more in inner than in outer space, and that the biggest world to conquer is the one that is right before our eyes. As author Marcel Proust put it, "The real voyage of discovery lies in not seeing new landscapes but in having new eyes."
142 out of 212 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not really a sci-fi, but ok story
kayumk6 October 2021
Marketed as a sci-fi which piqued my interest and I've put off watching it for years. Really it's just a story about the search for redemption and trying to make amends. It's an ok watch as an indie movie, but it's about 1% anything to do with sci-fi.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Can a movie suck massively, and yet be frighteningly Awesome? Why is this my first review?
DJ_Capital23 January 2012
Hammer your expectations down through the rocks. Here, let me help you. There's 1000's of fellow IMDb'ers who thought the movie sucked horribly. A lot of suckage. It's not that great. It's not sci-fi. If you're thinking of another movie to compare this to, no matter what you pick, this one'll fall terribly short.

To the facts, Brit co-wrote the movie, she's gorgeous. I probably would've given up half-way if it wasn't for the mysteriousness she portrays. That face, gawd! Made on a shoestring budget. Heck, Brit had to do her co-star's make-up in between shots. This is a movie made with passion, and a lot of faith that they'd done good stuff.

Well, let me sorta paint my experience watching 'Another Earth'. Glued to my seat, for an hour and a half, almost as if this was a thriller? I'm serious. Captivated by the gorgeous shots of 'earth 2'. Waiting for the little streams of info being released ever so stringently -- the announcement on the radio as they discover earth 2, and a whole bunch more. I've already mentioned how captivating Brit is.

What? No Sci-fi? There's definitely food for the sci-fi enthusiast. The premise comes from a mixture of new-age string theory of the multiverse kind. The ending'll have you wondering about Einsteinian space-time implications.

The core of the movie is largely philosophical. Forgiveness. Rebirth. etc. Kept me struggling throughout with my emotions about the main character. Past the acting. How much forgiveness can the viewer unleash? And is it justified?

Chill out, leave your expectations at the door. You may not like it. It's slow. It demands your attention, so keep away from the caffeine. You might not feel the same way about Brit though. She's gorgeous. She really is. It's just a well-made passion-filled indie-flick. It's got some gorgeous imagery. The atmosphere, constantly thick, with color and emotion. This review's gone on way too long. Indie flick of the year? Gets my vote. Who cares?

Oh BTW, its possible your friends'll hate you for recommending this. Especially if they're the kind that finds it hard to appreciate photography, artsy stuff maybe, and don't have much patience, you know, generally. So there ya go, one final reason for you to dig this flick. The fact that you like it -- yeah it'll be one of those things you look back on and say 'Hey, I really am different. I appreciate interesting deep stuff. I'm like an artist, philosopher, or something. neat!'. Holy hell. What? Is that really why I...
66 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
More Here Than Meets The Eye
e_estrella_jr8 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
A fair share of people, at Sundance and beyond, have had a chance to see "Another Earth." It seems people are polarized by it - either loving it as I did or hating it as some did. Rather than give away too many secrets let me help you understand what side of the fence you'll probably be on: The "science" of the movie is merely a backdrop for a much more telling tale - one of the heart. William Mapother and Brit Marling are the ultimate "star crossed" people. They survive the tragedies of life while looking in a mirror of universal proportions. They FEEL, which isn't common in science fiction fare. Then again, this is NOT a "science fiction" film. In fact, it's LESS of a science fiction film than the revamped Battlestar Galactica was a science fiction show. Both BSG and Another Earth use the science (and significant "license") to help the story along.

The filters of the lens capture the depth and circumstance of both Mapother and Marling. Marling in particular warrants more screen time beyond this movie; she's not only stunning but soulful with an expressiveness that belies her age. Mapother is as always, very much the "soul of the moment" in so many moments within this film. Though as some have commented, some choices the characters make are "questionable," but the viewer has to remember that they're already suspending belief with the science shown.

If you're looking for a.) extreme technical accuracy vs. plausibility and "license" or b.) an action thriller or science fiction "tour de force," then this film is not for you. However, of you're looking for a refreshing change from the standard fare coming out of Hollywood, you will certainly enjoy "Another Earth."
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A lifeless series of stills that drift from one scene to the next.
adams13714 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I have listed this as a spoiler just in case, although I provide no details regarding the outcome of the film. I merely hint at things.

I went into Another Earth with hopes of finding something unique. After all, the trailer, log line, and tasteful stills all pointed to the idea that Mike Cahill's pet project was something different than what I was used to.

I was mistaken. Badly so.

Disappointment cannot even begin to convey my feelings towards this film. The most heartbreaking aspect of Another Earth is that it fails to deliver an emotional payoff despite consistently setting up emotional-anchored scenarios. Rhoda (Brit Marling) hits and kills the child and wife of John Burroughs (William Mapother). She sees the bodies and CUT! we jump to four years later to find her back with the family (whom, I might add, seem bizarrely awkward around their daughter. She was in jail, not Siberia, for the last four years. Did no one ever think to put visitor hours to good use?). We don't see the real emotional impact of her mistake because she comes home a living zombie: empty, quiet, deadpan, and flat out boring.

Which leads me to another problem: depressed people don't have Lego-brick personalities. And if they do, they don't star as lead characters in films (unless we're talking Twilight). Cahill seems to believe the only way to convey guilt is to make Rhoda an unkempt rag doll with an expressionless face. To him, having her stare off into space for thirty seconds shows just how "emotionally deep" her problems run. For us in the audience, it means it's time to check our watches.

The silence in the film (and there's a LOT of it) doesn't tell us anything about Rhoda. Instead, it acts as a precursor to a lot of overly artsy shots that make you think about how much color correction they did in post. In fact, this entire film could run as a series of photographic stills— after all, it seems to care more about how pretty Earth 2 looks into the sky than the emotional struggles of the girl standing beneath it.

Dialogue is contrived, painfully so. If you've watched even one Hollywood film, you can probably guess each and every line before it's said. Things fall in a predictable fashion and characters flip flop personalities depending on what the plot calls for. There are numerous points over which characters throw massive fits, only to dismiss the same problem a scene later.

And then, of course, there's the blatant unrealism of it all. No, I'm not talking about Earth 2. I can suspend my disbelief for that. What I'm talking about is the set up between Rhoda and John. Despite what John's been through, he's not an idiot; it shouldn't take him an hour and ten minutes to figure out Rhoda's not who she says she is.

Another Earth expects you to ignore basic logic in order to swallow even the most simple of moments. It interprets "suspension of disbelief" as meaning "you can't judge this film because it's artsy." This film lacks the depth it so desperately attempts to flaunt. It comes off cheesy, pretentious, shallow, and self-obsessed. Characters pinball through events and come out as empty as they started. The ones that do change do so without any real good reason. There's no pleasure to be had in watching this film unless you absolutely love staring at empty, motiveless images (and characters) for long periods of time. But if that's the case, I recommend watching a Discovery Channel doc. At least you'll be learning something.

To conclude, Another Earth is a complete waste for anyone looking to enjoy themselves. It delivers nothing in exchange for your time and money and expects you to come out praising it for its "unique delivery." Do your eyes, wallet, and gas tank a favor and avoid.
161 out of 287 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Deep Introspection Joins with Otherwordly Exploration
chaz-2814 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Another Earth contains both an outward looking expansionist grand vision and an inward focused deep introspection. First, the external and gargantuan stimulus is that another planet appears in the sky. At first, it's just a speck like any other planet or distant star. Then it keeps coming closer is soon apparently our same planet dubbed Earth II. The internal and emotionally scarred center of the film, however, is Rhoda (Brit Marling) who is just released from prison four years later after being convicted of vehicular manslaughter. As a 17 year old girl who just got accepted to MIT, she drove drunk, hit a car with a family in it, and killed the pregnant wife and five year old boy. The husband, William Mapother, went into a short coma.

To avoid human contact and most forms of communication, Rhoda opts for janitorial work upon release. Her family wants her to resume her life where she left off but her psyche will not allow that. So begins a deeply philosophical exploration on regret, guilt, forms of forgiveness, and compassion all while a new, mirror-imaged planet is coming closer and closer. Did Rhoda commit the same mistake on Earth II? Is that family torn apart or still together on that new planet? These and a host of other theories and possibilities are tossed around for the audience concerning not only a mirror planet, but about past events and moving forward.

In real life, Brit Marling graduated from Georgetown with and economics degree and instead of pursuing a banking career with Goldman Sachs (an offer she turned down) took off for Hollywood. She was only offered smaller roles in cheap horror flicks. So instead of demeaning herself in garbage like that, she sat down with the eventual director, Mike Cahill, and wrote her own script. Brilliant move. It was a much harder road to travel to write her own script and then get it picked up by Fox Searchlight who bought the distribution rights at Sundance, but she pulled it off. It really is a breath of fresh air to see a film like this, learn its back story, and become immersed in it as opposed to whatever the most recent superhero movie is.
98 out of 144 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting!!
omarkh-3836219 January 2019
When I first saw the trailer I was thrilled to watch the movie. I liked it but the end was not satisfying for me.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
More Holes then Swiss Cheese
yukoncornelius5528 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Saw this movie at Sundance and feel compelled to write this review because of all of the bogus hype surrounding it. This movie has so many holes that I wish the writers would have received some notes because nothing in this film makes sense. Problem one: The "other" Earth has been hidden behind the sun that's why we couldn't see it all these years we have been exploring the cosmos? Makes no sense. Planting this other planet in our solar system was a huge mistake. Problem two: It takes four years to contact and travel to the other Earth when it is ten times bigger in the sky then our own moon? Makes no sense. It does not take four years to travel to the moon and we have been doing it since 1969. Problem three: Brit Marling's character's name was not revealed to William Mapother's because she was a minor? She was a senior in high school and off to MIT so I don't think she would be a minor, and even if she was I'm sure the victim of the accident would be in the trial and see her face. You can ask the audience to take one leap of faith, but not multiple ones. If this movie had just been a film about star crossed lovers it would've been much better off. The sci-fi element is completely unnecessary and treats the audience like morons; and William Mapother is no leading man. He is super creepy. The secondary actors were sub par. Mr Littlejeans from Royal Tenenbaums makes an appearance that is just laughable. There is random voice-over from a character that is not relevant to the film. You don't even find out who it is until late in the third act. I'm sure there are people that are going to disagree with my review and that is fine but for anyone who is a sci-fi fan looking for a sci-fi movie this is not for you. The best sci-fi film I have seen at Sundance was Primer and I highly recommend that over this film.
159 out of 299 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed