Envy (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Uncompromising Depiction of Imprisonment Both Physical and Emotional
l_rawjalaurence2 October 2015
Based on a novel by Nahid Sırrı Örik, KISKANMAK (ENVY) is a powerful depiction of the ways in which people's lives are hemmed in by class, gender and emotional preoccupations.

I cannot comment on the adaptation's relationship to the source- text, but as it stands Zeki Demirkubuz's film, although set in the early Thirties, offers a powerful comment on inequalities within contemporary Turkey.

The action opens at a celebration in the Black Sea town of Zonguldak. Couples dance idly round the floor until the band-leader calls them to order and invites everyone to sing the National Anthem in praise of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. The action takes place only seven years after the Republic was established in 1923; and we are reminded once more of the principles upon which it was founded - equality, fairness, and opportunity.

Unfortunately what follows completely subverts that impression. Mine-owner's wife Mükerrem (Berrak Tüzünataç) leads an aimless existence dominated by tea-parties and social occasions. Sharing her house with her husband Halit (Serhat Tutumluer), and her sister- in- law Seniha (Nergis Öztürk), she orders her servants to wait upon her hand and foot. Eventually Mükerrem falls in love with Nüshet (Bora Cengiz), the youthful son of a local society family; together they spend clandestine evenings together, while Halit apparently remains oblivious.

Mükerrem's actions enrage Seniha, who hitherto has enjoyed a close relationship with Halit's wife. Seniha ends up taking a decision that ultimately leads to the destruction of all three protagonists.

Shot in washed-out colors, with the lighting focused deliberately on the characters' faces, Demirkubuz's film creates a self-enclosed world in which outward show matters: preserving one's honor counts above everything else. Within this world women are kept as virtual prisoners: the film is full of repeated shots of them either looking out of the window from inside, or photographed inside their houses from the outside. The sense of imprisonment is enhanced by repeated close-ups of lattices, grilles and covered lights.

The idea of female confinement is nothing new; it is characteristic of any patriarchal society in which men like Halit come home from work expecting their dinner, and prepare for business trips by having their suitcases packed for them. As portrayed by Tutumluer, Halit is a very passive person, despite his apparent power: everyone, it seems, is prepared to do all his work for him.

What gives Demirkubuz's film added bite is the way he shows the characters experiencing emotional as well as physical imprisonment. Neither Mükerrem nor Seniha can see beyond their limited field of self-interest; and hence destroy themselves as well as those closest to them. In a highly socially stratified society, they have been brought up to observe certain mores; and when these mores have been traduced, they have no means of coping. Their reactions are almost childlike, but entirely coherent in a society whose inhabitants are almost entirely prevented from thinking for themselves.

KISKANMAK is a domestic tale but carries substantial political undertones. In any world that curtails self-determination, few people can survive for very long. The film ends with Seniha photographed alone on a cruise-ship, biting into a sandwich and admitting her faults in voice-over. While understanding that she has acquired self- knowledge, we hardly feel sympathetic towards her, in light of what has previously taken place.

The mood of melancholy is cleverly underlined by the use of a musical leitmotif from Albinioni. KISKANMAK is a mournful yet memorable piece of work.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A review for those who have read the book
elsinefilo11 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Nahid Sırrı Örik's "Kıskanmak" is bound to be a difficult work of art to put on the silver screen because "Jealousy" could be one of those novels that have no decent main characters with whom you can associate yourself. In Örik's novels, the women are mostly narcissist people driven by their carnal desires while attractive men who bear feminine physical features do not necessarily have virile qualities that a patriarchal society would approve of. In that sense a movie adaptation from a novel by Örik should be interesting but is it indeed?

Zekir Demirkubuz's movie is more or less loyal to the book. The movie is set in early 1930's Zonguldak , a port on the Black Sea, which is the center of the major coal-producing region of Turkey. Mükerrem, beautiful young lady of 25 (Berrak Tüzünataç) is married to Halit (Serhat Tutumluer) an engineer of 40 at the local coal mine. Seniha (Nergis Öztürk) is, in her own words, the "dried-up,ugly spinster" sister of Halit who has been living with his brother since their parents passed away. Since there is a major age difference between the couple and their marriage does not have the first honeymoon passion Seniha knows that her sister in law will someday cheat on her husband and she will use that for her own interests when the right time comes.

Someone who has not read the novel would probably not understand why Mükerrem should cheat on her husband with whom she is –ostensibly-happily married. Besides why should an unmarried sister be jealous of her brother's happiness? The movie does not really give clear-cut answers to what is already there on the book. Demirkubuz says "I racked my brains about the concept of ugliness. I wondered how beauty was seen from the eyes of the 'ugly'." Let me just put it that way. Nahid Sırrı wants us to think that Seniha is an ugly, unmarried woman.In fact,he does not openly tell us that she is ugly. Ugliness is more like "a self-concept" on behalf of Seniha. In the novel, it is duly noted that Seniha has charming eyes and it's told that Nüzhet ( with whom Mükerrem cheats on her husband) hits on Seniha once. Moreover it is clear that if his brother tried hard enough he could definitely find a husband for her sister.

Seniha is a "femme-fatale" not because she is alluring or seductive but because of the 'self-perception' she has and the way her family treats her. In the movie, you can clearly notice the lack of communication between the siblings but it does not really tell you why Seniha just hates his brother. Though her parents send her brother abroad for a substantial engineering education, they never consider the feelings of Seniha when it comes to her education. When she falls in love with a suitor, her family does not ever think of marrying their daughter just because any expense (any dowry) means less money to be sent to the brother. Later on, they try to marry her off to a widower who has three kids already. Without knowing that, in the movie it sounds like Seniha has always been the 'bitch' in the family. Seniha never talks about profound details of her life to anyone. In the movie, she tells Mükerrem how she lost her virginity for instance (which is a changed detail by the way.) What makes Seniha mysterious is the way we know about her through the omniscient point of view but we know that this view is more or less Seniha's point of view so the movie could have used voice-over either through Mükerrem or Seniha.

There is no catchy acting in the movie except Nergis Öztürk's performance. She plays the ugly femme fatale as well as she can. However, there is no music to support the mystery of the character. Demirkubuz thinks music and cinema are in an abusive marriage in today's cinema and he refrains from using scores even for such a movie in which the psychology of the leading character is important.

To make the long story short, Zeki DemirKubuz's movie is just a damp squib for those who have enjoyed the book. Though the plot is more or less loyal, the acting and the cinematography are not good enough to catch the psychological ambiance of the book. The soundtrack is barely existent. The only thing that the movie does better than the book is the 'bed'.Though Örik wrote a story of 'sex and psychotic jealousy' he never talks about the 'bed' openly.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
one of the darkest movies in modern Turkish cinema!!!
fazdemir6 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The director continues to tell the story of losers. Because the film is an adaptation of a novel, it can be regarded as different from the other films of the director. However, the main character of the film is a loser and a very dark person like the main characters in other movies. The story is about Seniha, a very ugly and unmarried women. She lives with his older brother and his wife. She is jealous of his brother and his wife and wishes them to be unhappy like her. She encourages young and unexperienced wife to have an affair with a young boy. She plans to take the revenge from her brother. When she informed her brother that his wife has an affair, he murders the young lover and goes to prison.But this is not enough for Seniha.The feeling of jealousy is such an enormous that the feeling can be over if her brother would be dead.

We have seen so many films telling the story of couples cheating each other. There is also love triangle in this movie. But the character deciding the events is not one of them. There is a fourth character who manages the affairs to take her revenge from her brother maybe from all over the world.Seniha is an unique character in Turkish cinema so it is worth to see it.
16 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed