Lucky Bastard (2009) User Reviews

Clueless Bastard

[Suradit · 5/10 · 27 July 2014]

After watching about half the film I kept thinking that an educated, intelligent, successful person would never so easily hook up with some guy he had a chance encounter with at a liquor store, let alone almost immediately claim that he "really loved" the guy. And, if that wasn't sufficiently incredible, he certainly wouldn't stick around once the guy started hitting on him for money for drugs, followed by making a scene at a bar proclaiming that "you don't own me" and "I'll do whatever I want."

I even checked in this forum at that point to see what others thought about the plausibility of all this … and initially agreed 100% with a reviewer who wrote several lines beginning with "There is absolutely no way any sensible person would …" and who concluded "The implausibilities in the story are the film's major weakness." That's exactly what I felt too.

But I gave it some further thought and watched the rest of the movie … with a bit of fast-forwarding. There are a lot of people, intelligent or not, educated or not, sophisticated or not, who sometimes do totally irrational things when driven by infatuation or, more bluntly, by lust. It may imply a degree of vulnerability but people who seem to have their act together can still be vulnerable as well.

I doubt at this point in life I'd be so easily drawn into doing something so stupid, but then opportunities to be irrational with someone as sexy as the character Denny don't come my way … for reasons other than my sensible, world-weary personality.

Real people do incredibly stupid things when it comes to sex. If they're lucky, they're not too badly hurt by the experiences and they do return to making sensible choices … as was the case with Rusty.

Quite often people in movies do things that we would never do and act in a way that seems irrational to us, but most of us know real people who do such things. The news often reports on famous, supposedly well-respected, sensible people who do incredibly reckless things because of sex. We may even look back on our own lives and recall some amazingly implausible things we did … because of sex.

Nonetheless, even after accepting Rusty's illogical behavior as realistic for some emotionally fragile people and also noting that the two main characters in the movie are definitely easy on the eyes, it is still by no means a great movie. There was never any sense of Rusty being driven by his infatuation for Denny, we were just told that he really loved him and had to believe that was what was making him act foolishly. Neither the story nor the acting helped to make us understand why Rusty did what he did.

Unlikeable storyline with unlikeable characters

[vitaminbee · 2/10 · 16 July 2009]

This flick screened at Outfest in Los Angeles two nights ago to a completely sold out audience. Many standing in line were even turned away. They were the lucky ones.

The storyline, in a nutshell: When his boyfriend leaves town, architect and restorer Rusty quickly hooks up with a sexy drifter named Denny. Rusty's already unsettled life is set on its ear when he discovers that Denny is a crystal meth-addicted hustler.

Beginning about 20-30 minutes into the film, audience members started walking out in droves. I'm not sure of their reasons, but I would have left had I not been stuck in the middle of a crowded row of people involved with the film. I would have just felt bad disturbing their experience.

Why would I have left? I found both the storyline and the characters unbelievable and unlikeable. Rusty is described as a success, but I couldn't figure out why anyone would use that word to describe him. Unable to make a decision or take a stand, he lets himself get pushed around professionally and emotionally throughout the film. Had there been some kind of hook or insight in either the writing of the character or the actor's performance, I might have wanted to root for the guy, but he just kept going back for more and never earned my respect as an audience member.

The two lead actors are gorgeous, so that was what largely what made the film semi-bearable for me. And Dale Dymkowski, who plays the hustler Denny, did the best he could with what he was given, so he's pretty much what earned the two stars in my rating.

Technically the film is kind of creaky as well. The color was terrible in the print I saw, and the sound was extremely tinny.

Recommended for home viewing only, where you have the fast forward option and the ability to give up on it easily if you're so inclined.

Horribly amateur

[dovajorth · 2/10 · 2 August 2010]

I've seen a lot of gay films, and many of them have been just okay. This one, however, was just plain bad.

There is absolutely no way any sensible person would give a meth addict $200. There is no way any sensible person would claim to have fallen in love with someone he picked up in a convenience store (especially someone in a supposed committed relationship). There is no way any sensible person would then allow that meth addict to say, "I'm yours, but you don't own me. I can fool around with whoever I want."

The implausibilities in the story are the film's major weakness. The bad acting would run a close second. The guy who plays Denny is all smirk and swagger, looking like the love child of Sting and Neil Patrick Harris. He is a complete douchebag with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. What does Rusty know about him that causes him to fall in love? That he's HIV+. And that's about it. Some argued in their review that Denny is somehow damaged and Rusty feels the need to "fix" him in the same way he restores old houses. I don't buy that at all; if that was the intent of the writer/director, it should have been set up a hell of a lot better in the early part of the film.

The actor playing Rusty is wooden and bland. At no time do we see the torture he is supposed to be suffering that leads him into this destructive relationship with Denny (which is really an extended one- night stand).

I could go on and on, but it would be as pointless as this piece of crap film.

The score, by William V. Malpede, alternates between haunting and intense. It's fantastic, and by far the only redeeming aspect of this film.

Could Have Been Done Better, but Solid Story

[hisprofessor · 17 July 2011]

I have to say that I am a little puzzled that some of the reviewers can't see the depth of the story here. While it is true that the script needed a bit of work, and that the actors were at times confined by that script, there were some redeeming qualities about the film. First, I viewed it at home on Netflix, so the issues some have raised about the sound and lighting might not have been as noticeable in the venue I used to view it. With that being said, I do feel that there was evidence of a solid movie here.

First, the actors were somewhat well-suited for their roles. Denny, played by Dale Dymkoski, was supposed to come off as an addict that was driven to his addiction by traveling a bumpy road growing up. For the most part, people who are victims of such a life tend to come off as crass and smug. Dymkoski did this well, and he even looked the part. The director did well in picking that actor, as he is not only a good-looking young man (that had to be because who could be pulled in by an ugly hustler)but he has a tough exterior and the look of a hard-nosed jerk. I am sure he is not that way in life, but he can surely put on that face in front of the camera. Good selection there. I also believe that the script makes him out to be a realistic character. He is not a truly bad guy at heart, but his life-experience has hardened him. He is the kind of guy looking for someone to take care of him. He finds that in Rusty, but Rusty is also the kind of guy Denny might want to be with long-term. That is what made it so difficult to take advantage of him, although he did at times. Denny comes off as a recalcitrant person, yet one that needs to be taken care of, and Dymkoski pulled that off quite well.

As for Rusty, Patrick Tatten fell somewhat short, but tried. I also thought the director did quite well in having him live in the environment he did. He restores houses but lives in a motel. This makes sense, for as the story moves on, we get the impression that Rusty detaches himself from what he loves. Otherwise, he would live in an old home he had restored, as would be expected of an architect in his field. This detachment plays a role in his love life as well. While he seems to love and care for Daniel, he has detached himself from him to a certain extent. He fails to understand the need to make a home with Daniel outside of a motel. Daniel tells him he is tired of living in a motel, to which Rusty responds that this is the Tropical, the place where Janis Joplin died. Everyone wants to stay there. He even has only one chair in the motel room, although there are two people living in it. So Rusty comes off as a character that has love and deep emotions but detaches himself from them. This is also true in his dealings with Denny. He realizes that he just wants Denny for sex, but he chooses to portray a relationship built on lust as love. He even goes so far as to say he loved Denny, but it really wasn't love. Rusty has a deep attraction to Denny and loves his sex appeal, a fact not lost on Denny who plays it to the hill and uses it to manipulate Rusty. However, on occasion, Denny lets his fondness for Rusty show by asking him not to leave him or let him go. Denny wants to stay with Rusty, but in order to do it, he will have to make sure Rusty understands that he will need financial support for his habit and lifestyle. It isn't until the situation is almost out of hand that Rusty snaps back to reality and makes the move he needed to make; however, as is painfully obvious when he stops and stares at Denny in the rear-view mirror, it was a gut-ripping decision, one he almost could not go through with.

So are these characters shallow and unbelievable? Certainly not. There are millions of Dennys out there. He is a young gay man who tried to leave his hellish life behind only to be trapped in a world of drugs, pornography and fast-talking hustlers. He blended in to this lifestyle, but there was a shred of decency in him, and he truly wanted to be loved. He just could not shake the dirty habits to which he had grown accustomed. There are also millions of Rustys out there-gay men who love the aesthetics of gay life, namely the hot, young attractive guys who seem so plentiful in Los Angeles. His visual desire overshadowed his spiritual desire for Daniel. The beauty of Denny clouded his view of the wonderful life he could have with Daniel. Denny served as a wake-up call, and thankfully, the alarm clock went off before he overslept. So yes, they are believable. There are many who have insatiable desires for sex, drugs, and the night life. Even those who have it together yearn for the cut-loose moments where they can let their hair down and be wild. It was through this episode with one hot hustler that Rusty realizes that good times can be enjoyed, but life is serious. Love needs to be deep, permanent and not based on sex. In the end, he realizes he is one lucky bastard. The script makes that clear at the end. While other things could have put the film in a coma, the script revived it.

Gripping film, well done, and enlightening

[artsavant · 7/10 · 22 August 2010]

My final take on the title is that a Lucky Bastard is one never to have met and become entangled with a crack addict. The manipulation of educated, successful Rusty, which comes by every single word out of Denny the drug addict's mouth, seems to be remembered verbatim. Rusty's susceptibility comes in part from his being a decent guy who does not expect others to lie. Al Green sang about a kind-hearted woman who revives a poor half-frozen snake. When the snake bites her in return, he brushes aside her betrayal by reminding her that she knew what he was when she warmed him to her bosom.

Life's too short to watch bad movies, and this is one I found myself compelled to watch completely. The actors are all capable and believable in the many layers they must weave. The production values won't make you cringe, and the script manages to show a lot in a brief time, without wasting any. The music is unusually good, which is why I'm on line to find out more about it (found it as Amazon mp3 downloads). You don't need to suspend disbelief to enjoy this film. Instead, let this film lead you out of whatever naiveté insists we'd never misstep in the path of an addicted conman without conscience. Here's where you can glimpse how fallible such a belief makes you.

Grossly underrated

[JMC4711 · 8/10 · 11 April 2010]

Viewers and critics have a hate-on for this film that baffles me. "Lucky Bastard" is a solid, well-told story about a man who, professionally and personally, is simply stuck. Given the opportunity to escape the pressures to move forward to which his business partner and his boyfriend each subject him, Rusty leaps at it when it appears in the form of Denny, a deeply damaged hustler and meth addict. The appeal of trying to fix Denny parallels Rusty's enjoyment of restoring old houses, Denny's emotional damage being comparable to the damage that perfectionist Rusty deals with in his work.

The principal actors handle the material well, although Timothy Cole as Rusty's business partner is the weakest member of the cast. The film is far more introspective than writer/director Everett Lewis's previous work. Lewis drew upon his own experience being in a relationship with a meth addict and much of the dialog, notably Denny's monologue on how he became involved with drugs and sex work, came from life. The result is a film that feels intimate and real. My one complaint is that it feels like there is a scene missing between Denny's final angry outburst and Rusty's sending him packing. Rusty's emotional transition feels abrupt and unmotivated. That one flaw should not dissuade anyone from seeing the film.

Gay story shining light on LA drug epidemic...

[ohlabtechguy · 7/10 · 21 January 2021]

I gave this higher marks than some, because I think the story cast a light on the prevalence of meth in LA, especially when it's used for sexual enhancement in the gay community. I once visited LA in 2011, and I met a recovering meth addict, age 50, by chance. It's important to show how these drugs destroy lives, as it did Denny's, one of the leads in this film. Yes...the actor playing Rusty was a bit stiff, but he played and looked the part well enough....wholesome and cute with a lean, hot body. Yes, it didn't seem believable that he would let a meth head drifter into his head or bed. But Denny was a confident charmer with a smoking hot body. And Rusty seemed to be very vanilla and conventional, with limited sexual experience. Denny brought out his inner pig....at least for awhile. In the end, we did see a believable conclusion....as Rusty's experiment didn't last long. Denny had the more demanding role and I think he did a good job. Happy ending.....but felt bad for all the people like Denny. Worth watching once.

I liked it, but I'm not mainstream.

[Watcher187 · 6/10 · 21 March 2023]

I selected this movie due to the nudity and smoking listed in the warning. I like edgy movies, but these movies tend to not be very good and it is good to find a gem in the rough, which this one is. The main characters were well cast, even the antagonist. I've never worked in porn, but I would think this is how the characters act offscreen. The character of Mike (McManus) is what I would expect a porn director to be, friendly then mean then back to friendly, whatever it takes to get the project done. Then Ashley (Rue) is what I would think a porn actress would be, having the ability to block out what she just did, "It's just a job to pay the rent." knowing that she will deal with it later in life. Dave G./Ernest (Paulson) is an awesome creeper. Mike ignores all the red flags to get the job done. Ashely eventually acquiesces to get the job done. Paulson hides his psychosis to get the job done. The rest of the car does a good job of supporting the main characters. All this was tied together by the director keeping the energy high and the suspense ongoing. At least there were no scantily clad women backing into a dark room backwards. All this suspense was done in broad daylight in one day. I truly enjoy how the movie ended. No spoilers. Something I found interesting was that Ashely Saint was a producer. That is a unique name and the name of one of the main characters. It made me think that this may have been made from an actual event, but no. Nothing that I could find. It may have just been someone deciding to give the real Ashely some notoriety. Maybe. All-in-all, an enjoyable offbeat edgy movie.

Walk out with clarity

[purban · 9/10 · 29 October 2010]

This was an excellent film that I didn't expect to watch. I thought I'd give it a try, as I have with many other gay-themed films, and turn it off in 15 minutes. But I couldn't. It is a very remarkable character-driven story. Other reviewers here have pointed out that the characters are at times unlikable or that their actions don't make sense. To that I would respond...that's life. And this film was extremely life-like. Certainly, there's some moments of weakness, but the dialog is very well-written and delivered. Dale Dymkoski in particular is captivating. His character is quite unlikable. At different points in the film, you want him gone, and yet your heart breaks for him. That's a great performance. The character growth in this story is something that's rare to see in any film, particularly one on this budget. Story-wise, everything comes full-circle.

As an aside, it irks me to read in some reviews that people were observed to "walk out of the theater." That's a cliché here on IMDb. Every time I read that, I know the review cannot be trusted. It's not a reaction I would expect at a film festival. I'm a lover of film, and I've never seen people leave a theater en-mass, especially one like this. Reviewers should post their review without relying on on others to back up their point of view. People that walk out of a theater do not lend credibility to a review, as they can't review something they didn't bother to watch. And maybe they were just getting snacks.

This is not a film, it is life itself!

[sandover · 10/10 · 16 March 2010]

***Please read carefully, this is not a rant (because someone reported abuse)!***

It is really amazing how things sometimes cross your path (rather than the other way 'round)! I was shocked to discover how this film really resembled my life, its simple truths! A friend of mine suggested I see this film on the grounds that my Phd in architecture concerned LeCorbusier's influence on Gio Ponti. "Why," I said in amazement, "how can it be that a gay themed movie has anything to do with THEM?" "Well, watch the film," he said, "and you will find out," he added with a sly smile. I got so anxious to see the film, as you can guess, and was totally engrossed by the thought.

I soon found out that the lead, Rusty, was an architect, like me, and at some point early in the film was assigned a Gio Ponti house renovation - I was thrilled! Well, they didn't get to move on with the script toward that direction (we never get to see the house, unfortunately), but I did not care, I did not have the time to realize it because I was so totally taken by the fact that the crystal meth addicted hustler Rusty passionately falls in love with and has a meaningful relationship for two days (or, is it one? the film got me confused here because, you know, we see Rusty's boyfriend going on a business trip first thing in the film, leaving him his birthday present, and then at the end, after all that has happened it is still his birthday - can it be that it is next year? but then his boyfriend was on a business trip for that long? or, more obvious, he gets to open his present one year after, since it is the same box? this is heady) and as I was saying was so taken by the fact that the really caring hustler's name was Danny, that I didn't notice Gio Ponti was nowhere to be seen.

Because Danny is the name of my ex. He was a hustler, too. (So now you know why my friend had put on that sly smile of his!) We were so in love, but his addiction destroyed everything we had.

Watching this film was a really painful experience; it brought everything back.

He was telling me too these hot, convincing things like "I really care for you, I don't wanna lose you,gimme 200 bucks, so f*** me hard all night, oh, please don't leave me!!gimme the money I tell you!!! yeah, harder," so, when someone declares his love that passionately and repeatedly, it is hard not to leave everything behind and go to the wonderful things he promises you, since you are a rich, handsome, successful architect (but you really love small budget things, this is why you live in a cheap motel).

And those trips he had, oh...One was a regular; he had this thing with the wolf and the three piggies, so when he got really high, he started mumbling "I'll huff and I'll buff and I'll blow you!" - really weird stuff! Like when Danny starts shooting himself - with Polaroid shots, that is - and the scene is filled with creepy sophomore narcissism.

So then I told him "This doesn't work out; I'm gonna work out." When I got back from the gym he was still there. We had a little conversation. Not long after that he relapsed, so I told him "This doesn't work out; I'm gonna work out." I can't tell you how many times I said this thing allover again, having fallen for his great heart, but I can surely tell you after working out that much, I got the terrific body I now have! And all in the course of a few days, just the way it happened in the film!

Isn't life amazing sometimes?

OMG What A Couple of Hunks!

[donwc1996 · 10/10 · 4 June 2014]

The two male leads in this film, both of whom are nude most of the time, are so outrageously hot that the fact there is virtually no story really does not matter. You just do not get tired of looking at these guys. And their acting is pretty good too with what they have to work with which isn't much. In fact the storyline is so thin it never intrudes on the visual pleasure one has gazing upon these two Greek gods. It's set in LA so there are some great shots of that fabled city where I once lived and married and divorced in a typical Hollywood story. I was a writer and she was an actress/model - not a recipe for successful matrimony. Eventually she gave up the business and married a plastic surgeon, telling me she liked the idea of being young forever. As well as the posh seaside estate in Zuma. My shack over a garage hardly compared that's for sure. Oh, and as far as the film is concerned the title is never explained.

The best instructional film to help codependents recover.

[dougiesantarosa · 10/10 · 4 January 2021]

So many times while picking up a bottle of wine, you will happen upon a chance encounter with a living/breathing Adonis. For those of you who rarely allow yourself an occasional night out at an iconic gay dance club where the denizens seem to resemble models/pornstars, the possibility of hooking up with one of them is less than zero. So, being led into the storeroom by the incredibly attractive helper at the convenience store and canoodling insanely while your business partner waits outside in the Alfa is going to send your senses into a mad tailspin. That's the kind of desire which overtakes a very good-looking Patrick Tatten. Then the very appealing Dale Dymkoski follows you outside to the car and Patrick Tatten tells the friend to give him the car keys and take a taxi and Dale begins a rolercoaster ride of codependency with enabler Patrick. Luckily, both survive the week in week out of some of the most abusive behavior imaginable, but along the way, we're treated to the best infomercial any kind of southern California addiction center could offer its patients. And the soft-porn wasn't terribly uncomfortable when Patrick Tatten and Dale Dymkoski are very entertaining.