Demonic Toys: Personal Demons (Video 2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
It's not bad...it's not good...
notewoodth496 February 2010
I'm a big Full Moon fan! I loved just about everything Band put out in the 90's ..especially Demonic Toys. Don't get me wrong I hold a very special place in my heart for the Puppet Master series, but I've always felt that Demonic Toys just had that edgy, risky, guilty pleasure feel to it. This particular installment to the series, which I could not wait to see, simply enough falls short of its predecessor in a number of ways...I mean I could pick at a movie's flaws all day, but being a hard core fan of the original I'll try to be brief...

There are some people out there that say the story line was a little weak, but I'm not going to judge a low budget horror film sequel too hard...I mean it's called "Demonic Toys 2" ..I can only hope that you rent this movie knowing that it's not going to be up for any awards. A bigger problem I had with the movie was that it didn't really try to be unique away from the original...they only play the theme song from the original about every second of the movie and it just gets ruined and annoying. The acting in the movie is OK...the characters themselves leave a little more to be desired. There is a lot of computer generated blood which really detracts from the movie.....the first movie had blood, guts, and eye balls out the yin yang....just get some corn syrup and goop it up 90's style. My biggest complaint about this movie is the puppets. The baby doll and jack attack are all well and good, but what about Mr. Static and Grizzly??? Fans would have gone even more crazy about this movie if they were included. No...instead we're given some new old toy called Divoletto...and in my opinion he really does nothing in this movie.

I did find it to be entertaining, but that might be me being bias because I love the demonic toys. This could have been a great addition to the franchise, but it just tried to sell off of the success and popularity of the original. What a shame...all it needed was a few more puppets ...a couple gallons of blood ...and a little more care.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The kill scenes are just okay and the entertainment value is ehh. This is worth seeing if you're a fan of the series
kevin_robbins15 May 2021
Demonic Toys 2 (2010) is available for free on Tubi. The storyline focuses on some world explorers investigating an Italian castle that unleashed a spirit who brings the demonic toys back to life. This movie is directed by William Butler (Gingerbread Man 3, Furnace and Power Rangers) and stars Alli Kinzel (Criminal Minds), Lane Compton (NCIS) and Selene Luna (My Bloody Valentine). The storyline was okay and kind of had a throwback feel to it (like Ghoulies) but the script wasn't as good as most Demonic Toys movie. Usually there's some solid comedic content but this falls short of the previous three pictures. The kill scenes are just okay and the entertainment value is ehh. This is worth seeing if you're a fan of the series but a below average addition to the genre. I'd give it a 3.5/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not really worth the effort
paul_haakonsen23 March 2010
Having seen movies like the "Puppet Master" series and "Doll Graveyard", I had little expectations to this movie, but I must say that I was disappointed.

"Demonic Toys 2" does not really manage to get up to the level of the previous work that Charles Band have made. There is just something about this movie that makes it impossible to really get into the groove of the movie.

Perhaps it is the thin storyline or the effects. Or it could be the lack of new thinking to this movie.

Now, the good parts of "Demonic Toys 2" were the characters in the movie. There was a variety of interesting characters, that sadly were not given enough time (or chance) to fully shine through on the screen. The actors and actresses portraying them did a fairly good job.

The dolls were cool to look at, if you can overcome the fake way of their movements and the way they kill people. There is something very grimy and gritty to the dolls, and it works well. It gives them a dark and sinister appearance. Well, I have always liked the dolls in Band's movies.

The effects were below average, and most often hilarious to look at.

If Band went for the early 90's feel to this movie intentionally, then hats off to him, then he really managed to pull it off. This whole movie reeks of early 90's horror movies. From the way it was shot, to the storyline (or lack thereof), to the dialogue and to the location in which it was shot (you just got to love the purple sky).

The movie just didn't really appeal that much to me. There was something important lacking from it, and I think this movie might actually have been scary (or somewhat scary) had it been released in the late 80's or early 90's.

If you are a fan of the "Puppet Master" series and such similar movies, you should sit down to watch this one, but do not go into this experience with high expectations
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I just don't like movies like this.......
blurnieghey23 October 2021
I really do want to respect Charles Band. Back in the day he put his name on a number of decent B-movies and was one of the early innovators in the home video market, producing the type of movies I enjoyed watching during that period. It was certainly a long time ago and he has managed to put out a lot of real trash in the years that followed that I simply can't stand, the whole output using the "small stuff can be scary" genre being at the top of the list. I get nothing from these types of films except a sinking feeling in my stomach as I imagine what is going on n the heads of people who find this junk entertaining. The "toys" aren't scary and the gore and kill scenes are lame. No real nudity to pick things up and the plot, of course, is completely stupid. What really gets under my skin are the silly comments and attempts at humor the "toys" make that are not only inappropriate for a horror flick but inappropriate for a toy that was made in the 1400's or whatever. Why do filmmakers feel they need to do this? Do people like it? I guess, because they keep making "horror" movies with that sort of dumb dialogue in them, but I think it sucks. It was sort of funny when Freddy Kruger first did it and it quickly got old for me and that was decades ago. This is boring, lack-luster cinema at its worst, but it won't even put you to sleep--it just raises your blood pressure.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Doesn't live up to the original
nathan-mcgee629 December 2015
Okay, I'm a fan of Charles Band and his company Full Moon, my favorite is Puppet Master and Demonic Toys so I was more than happy to check this one out. So me and my younger brothers which are also fans of the original decided to check this out last night, but sadly we were disappointed.

This movie was awful but not in a good way. The original Demonic toys was a low budget cheesy movie but it delivered a good amount of fun and really kept you entertained despite the bad acting n lack of plot. This movie on the other hand it didn't quite deliver the fun, all this movie seem to deliver to me, is a good amount of boredom. I literally found myself doing something else than watching the movie. But i really think that's the fault of the pacing of the movie because it's really slow, we really seem to spend more time with the Human characters of the movie, that's never really a bad thing but they don't add anything to the movie except wonder around a castle for what seems like forever. So when finally get to the demonic toys they aren't anything special because compared to the original they really cheap and the voice of Baby Oopsite Daisy gets annoying after a while. So as a Demonic toys fan like I stated above it was a big disappointment I'm actually really ashamed of myself for buying the DVD
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Massively lacklustre
Leofwine_draca26 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
DEMONIC TOYS 2 is a massively lacklustre B-movie sequel from Full Moon Pictures. It was shot in Italy as a belated sequel to the original movie, but it makes even the Full Moon flicks of the 1990s look good by comparison. The story is hackneyed and long-winded, involving a bunch of random and boring bad actors assembling in an old castle, where once again they're stalked and slashed by a bunch of rather uninteresting living dolls. The production values are rock bottom here and the calibre of the effects is reminiscent of the 1980s, except not as good. Give it a miss.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
0/10. H👏I👏D👏E👏O👏U👏S. One of the worst movie I HAVE EVER seen. Bad actors, plot etc
orestesnikolaou26 July 2019
If there was a zero this film would get it. Spin-off of Chuky, Annabelle etc
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Don't mess with the toys
kosmasp13 August 2020
Although if you don't, we won't have a movie now ... right? Also there is whole bunch of these. And I don't just mean killer toys, but as in Demonic Toys. It spawned a lot of "sequels" - or is it prequels? Spinoffs? Haven't seen them so no idea.

So while there may be an story overall that connects them, I don't know about it. I made the effort and watched all Puppet Master movies - I think that's enough of one of that series! There's no need at least at the moment to go through with this one too. Especially because there are so many other movies I have to get to ... What this is about you ask? Well what do you think? A bunch of people in a "castle" being hunted by toys ... it sounds ridiculous you say? Sure, but it can be also fun if you are into the joke. Decently made overall
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Decent Follow-up to a Nostalgic Favorite
Reviews_of_the_Dead14 May 2019
This was a film that I first heard about when I was working at Family Video. If you don't know my story, I was the resident horror film expert. Any time horror films would come in, they were some of the first I processed so I could take home early. This one caught my eye as I have a lot of nostalgia for the original film and its sequel. I didn't care for it the first time I saw it, but I decided to revisit it with a more critical eye. The synopsis is a group of people on a world wide search for oddities find themselves trapped in a nine hundred year old Italian castle when they accidently unleash the Demonic Toys.

We start this off with someone repairing two of the demonic toys. I'm not really sure if they are ignoring Puppet Master vs. Demonic Toys or not, but it does look like this is more of a sequel to Dollman vs. Demonic Toys from the looks of the damage to them. The two who are reconstructed are Baby Whoopsie (voiced by Jane Wiedlin) and Jack-in-the-Box. They are then put into a crate.

The film then shifts to the outside of the castle from the synopsis. We have a young historian, Caitlin (Alli Kinzel), who is quite accomplished for her age and is fresh out of college. With her is Butterfield (Leslie Jordan). He is one of the best toy historians in the world. They are met by a vehicle of people led by Dr. Lorca (Michael Citriniti). He is a collector and has a scarred face. He states it is from his rivals who were after the same items as him. With him is his young wife, Lauraline (Elizabeth Bell), his stepson David (Lane Compton), a dwarf psychic Lillith (Selene Luna) and Eric (William Marquart), his assistant.

They are there to see a rare doll named Divoletto. When Butterfield looks at it, he states that it seems to be made back in the 14th century. It actually can move on its own when the side of the box is tapped with a tomahawk looking wand. When Lillith touches it, she feels a great evil. She also felt a similar evil when entering. Caitlin reveals that this place was owned in the past by a witch of sorts, Fiora. There is an ominous painting of her.

Things take a turn when the cars are stolen. It is decided that they will have to stay the night in the castle. It is revealed though that this isn't really the case. Lauraline and Eric are actually lovers. They have a plan to steal Divoletto, replace it with a fake and flee. The problem is they don't realize Divoletto is still alive. It has a demon living within it. It then revives the other two demonic toys that Eric brought into the castle. To complicate matters even more, Lillith attempts a séance and becomes possessed by Fiore herself. The group is picked off one by one as they try to survive the night.

After my second viewing I've come to two conclusions, I think this film has some really good aspects, but it also has some really bad ones. I want to start off with the elements of the story I enjoyed. I like the idea of this old toy being found. We learn in this film that exorcisms were performed on Fiore and that the 'demons' removed were put into this odd objects. This is something that I found to be quite interesting. Caitlin being a rational person believes that there was more mental illness, but these people believe it helped which makes a ton of sense.

Going from there, the tagline Personal Demons of the film also makes a lot of sense. Everyone that dies commits a sin of sort. I won't go too much into those that live or die, as I don't really like to spoil anything. There are the sins of adultery and theft though to give you a bit of an idea. There is a creature at the end of the film that is credited as Personal Demon which I believe is supposed to be the embodiment of Fiore. I could have done without that, but the evils taken from her she considered to be her 'personal demons' as well.

If you've read any of my other Full Moon film reviews, you know one thing that frustrates me is the lack of continuity in their films. I do have to give his one credit, it doesn't tell us anything from the previous demonic toy films, so it really doesn't violate there. I think it ignores Puppet Master vs. Demonic Toys, as that is technically not a Full Moon film. I am fine with the toys being brought back by a different demon as well. That was something that I was at first upset about, as it completely ignores the history of them, but this makes sense.

As to the pacing and editing of the film, I would say that is fine. I never really found myself bored, it just falls into the same issue that a lot of Full Moon films do. They don't want to pay more for the effects and they decide to go a little story or dialogue heavy. The problem with most of these films is that the story is pretty basic and the characters aren't interesting enough. This film kind of falls into that a bit. It really wants to establish the mythology, but there are things that Caitlin acts shocked to find, but she and David don't uncover anything. I thought the ending was fine for how the film played out. I just personally wanted more toy mayhem.

Surprisingly, the acting for this film was not too bad. I thought Kinzel was solid in her role. It felt believable that someone of her age could be in the spot she was in. I do think they went a little bit overboard on all of her accomplishments, but that's not her fault. I also found her cute which doesn't hurt. Compton I thought was fine in his role. I do think his family dynamic is a little bit too out there. Luna was interesting as the psychic. I know that Full Moon loves uses little people as well as having psychics so it makes sense to kill two birds with one stone. Citriniti is fine, Bell was annoying, but that's what she is going for and Marquart was just kind of there. It was fun to see Jordan in this film as I'm a fan of him. I also wasn't the biggest fan of the change of Baby Whoopsie's voice. It is funnier to see a baby doll with a man's voice.

Something that I had a real problem with would be the effects of the film. There are some that were done practical and looked good. The blood is an aspect of that in here and some of the wounds. The real problem I had with this film though was the CGI. It looks horrible. There is green screen that didn't make a lot of sense. The movement of the toys was mostly CGI and it was bad. There were wounds on people as well that falls into this category. I'm fine with computer enhancements, but to rely on it like this one did, I hated it.

The final thing to talk about is actually a positive. I thought the score was pretty solid. It is hard to give this film credit as it uses the theme from the original Demonic Toys and it uses it quite a bit. I really like that theme though, so I do give some. I did think the rest of the soundtrack did fit the film for what was needed from it.

Now with that said, this film did do some things right. It changes what brings these toys to life, but it does it in a way that makes sense. It doesn't really violate continuity as it really did go ambiguous. The one thing I'd like to know is why Dr. Lorca was after the demonic toys and if he knew the history of them or not. The acting was fine. There was a bit of a pacing issue, but I thought the ending was fitting. The soundtrack was something else that was solid. The effects in this film really hurt it though. Overall I'd say that this film is below average and I would only recommend it if you are fan of the series.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
18 Years... For THIS?
P3n-E-W1s311 August 2019
I don't understand why Full Moon Entertainment and Charles Brand waited so long to bring out the sequels. I also cannot comprehend that there have been eighteen years between the first story and this one and still the film is atrocious. Eighteen years to write a script, raise a budget, develop a cast, and hire a director. Though the finished project looks like it was cobbled together in a couple of weeks.

The story concept is a worthy effort and would have made a great story had it been handled better. Though the writer, William Butler, interjects plenty of characters, no matter how stereotypical, he fails to give them personalities the audience can relate to. Since he even directs this travesty he had ample chance to make the individuals and their persona's visually interesting at least... and fails.

But, it's not just with the human cast he fails. In the original flick, there was more than a spattering of dark humour. This was nicely carried by the Baby Oopsie Daisy - who is now called Baby Whoopsie. There's about as much dark humour in this film as there are atmosphere and characterisations... oh, that's right, there's none of them either.

There was one bright light in this darkness and that was the great Leslie Jordan as Butterfield. Granted he usually plays the same character in most of his appearances and does here. However, if this is a great character and adds to the film and story then I can live with it. In this case, I thank him for lifting this film out of the muck and mire it was wallowing in, even if it was for his scenes only.

So if you're a Leslie Jordan fan then... STAY AWAY from this film. Even his presence doesn't make this worth watching. Not even once. Go check out my Absolute Horror list and pick a better film to watch, there are plenty.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This a great horror movie.
jacobjohntaylor12 June 2017
This is one of the scariest movies I have seen. 3.9 is underrating it. It is a 10. Demonic Toys is a little scarier. But still this is a very scary movie. I do not know why people do like it. I do not care that people do not like it. They do not have to like it. But I do not agree. If you like really scary movies you should see this movie. It is a very scary movie. If it does not scary you no movie will. This is very scary. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has good special effects. I have to say I do not see anything wrong with this movie. Other then it is not really better then Demonic toys. But I do not think it is possible to top Demonic toys. This is a great movie see it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good horror B-Movie
The evil toys totally make this movie, there is something about them I really really like. If you don't like horror movies, b-movies and all that, then why you watching this movie? Of course you wont like it. However, this was a decently made low-budget movie.

Other makers of low budget horror should really take note, this is how its done. A small cast, with actual characters, gore, one setting (the Italian castle).

The acting wasn't that great, but what do you expect? This was a fun movie, and the plot with Devotello or whatever it was called, was cool. That and I just loved that killer baby!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining Grade B low-budget horror quickie
Woodyanders11 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A motley assortment of folks gather together to inspect an ancient evil puppet at a rundown castle. Naturally, said puppet and two other equally wicked toys come to murderous life. Writer/director William Butler relates the fun story at a swift pace, makes the most out of the sprawling old castle location, and delivers a generous sprinkling of graphic gore. The freaky dolls are genuinely grotesque and amusing, with the foul-mouthed Baby Whoopsie (voiced with cheerfully profane aplomb by Jane Wiedlan of the Go-Gos fame!) a total nasty and vulgar hoot throughout. A spooky séance set piece provides a definite highlight while the special effects are funky and colorful. The cast have a ball with the blithely trashy material: the fetching Alli Kinzel gives a charming and spirited turn the sweet and chipper Caitlin, Michael Citriniti slimes it up nicely as sleazy creep Dr. Lorca, the gorgeous Elizabeth Bell bitches it up delightfully as the sexy, but snippy Lauraline, and Leslie Jordan is a whiny riot as the effeminate Professor Butterfield. Terrance Reicher's slick cinematography gives the picture a pleasing glossy look. The shivery score by Richard Band and Kenny Meriedeth hits the spine-tingling spot. An enjoyable little item.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Flawed if still rather fun
kannibalcorpsegrinder30 October 2016
Arriving at an ancient Italian castle, a professor and his staff attempting to document the findings with a group of antiquities experts finds they have released a series of dolls possessed by an evil, demonic energy and must race to find a way out alive.

This here was a decent enough if slightly flawed effort. One of the main elements going for this one is the fact that there's quite a large amount of Gothic atmosphere found here in the main location as this one really lets the castle location come through quite nicely. This features all the usual grand set-pieces and designs that come about here through the location taking place here, from the scenes of them wandering about the castle going for the various rooms and settings featured here while taking full advantage of material that can be attempted here with the elaborate, ornate decorations, candelabra- lit rooms, secret passageways and much more that makes this one quite a bit more fun than it really should be putting the Gothic set-pieces into the hunting grounds for the toys. With the discovery of the different rooms featured within here, especially the torture chamber and the exorcism vault that are found here, they make for a great place here which gives the dolls a spectacular place to hunt, generating the great stalking scenes in the basement where they take out the cheating couple or in the big bedroom against the one unaware loner who gets tormented beforehand with all the various sights and sounds of them appearing before the final kill which is quite impressive and enjoyable. Once they finally reveal themselves here which comes at the end of the big seance sequence which itself is a fantastic highlight offering with the flashing lights, demonic voices and the overall resolution of the main plot line being revealed to them, this one readily picks up the action and becomes a thrilling, suspenseful series of chasing through the bowels of the castle trying to fight them off in order to get away which makes for a fine finish here. These here make this one quite fun and enjoyable, though it does have a few quite detrimental issues. The main one here is the fact that the film's rather long periods of time here without the dolls being a part of the film, letting the exploration of the castle and their eccentricities take over the large portion of time here in the first half so they don't get really unleashed to knock people off until the later half. That it all for the better here, with the doll effects being quite substandard and really silly looking, barely featuring enough here to look like they're committing the crimes and just making it very obvious they're dolls. It's the biggest thing that holds this one back, alongside the bland pacing.

Rated R: Graphic Language and Graphic Violence.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Good Sequel To Demonic Toys
ladymidath10 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I find I like Demonic Toys 2 a tad more than the first one, which is pretty good. Full Moon Pictures can be very hit and miss. The movies can be great like subspecies, Puppet Master, or they can be awful like the the later Evil Bong films. The special effects and music are good and the acting is not too bad, although a couple of the actors were way over the top. Selene Luna as Lilith is the stand out as is the excellent Leslie Jordan as Butterfield who sadly passed last year. The story, now set in an old castle is very atmospheric and really adds to the story. All the toy make an appearance, plus a new one called Divoletto, a creepy looking automation. This is one of the best in the Demonic Toys franchise.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Decent sequel
christianplacencia18 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Since I first watched demonic toys, I've really wanted to see a sequel for a very long time, that freaking killer jack in the box is just too damn awesome to not get a reappearance.

Honestly it's about time, even though the plot needed some work and yeah they could've had more killer toys.

But hey, it's a low-budget film, so you really shouldn't expect that much if you want to enjoy it. It's stupid, the acting is mediocre, and not scary, but hey it's pretty damn cool to just sit down and watch a killer baby doll slash someone's head off. Would recommend if you have one of those days where you can't decide what to watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed