Schindler definitely shot Curtis in the leg - his fingerprint was on the gun, which he admitted carrying, and the .22 bullet was pulled out of the seat back which was soaked in Curtis's blood.
How could he have not been charged with that? You could say that he was in fear of his life having been taken out into the desert at night by armed men, but that is an argument for a defence lawyer to make, not the CSIs.
In a procedural series like this one, the details matter, and a serious offence for which no charge is made is hardly a minor detail.
I have to agree with the other comment too, that though Fishburne has charisma the show shouldn't be all about him. I guess the reason for relying on him so much could be that after all these years the original actors want time for other projects, but if that is so then I think they need to bring in at least one other charismatic new character.
How could he have not been charged with that? You could say that he was in fear of his life having been taken out into the desert at night by armed men, but that is an argument for a defence lawyer to make, not the CSIs.
In a procedural series like this one, the details matter, and a serious offence for which no charge is made is hardly a minor detail.
I have to agree with the other comment too, that though Fishburne has charisma the show shouldn't be all about him. I guess the reason for relying on him so much could be that after all these years the original actors want time for other projects, but if that is so then I think they need to bring in at least one other charismatic new character.