To Be King (2012) Poster

(2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A double standard in efficiency
lossowitz27 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
In a relatively small country like The Netherlands it is difficult to produce movies that take place in a different time and place than present day Holland. The amount of money needed to recreate the past or suggest a foreign landscape is impossible to recoup with even a highly successful Dutch movie. A solution often found is to take the filming to Eastern Europe, where ancient locations are easily found and labor is cheap.

For this movie the production took to Italy, to give the imaginary country of Katoren a late medieval and Mediterranean feel. For the most part this works: the villages and buildings have a certain charm, and sometimes an almost alien atmosphere. Combined with the creation of a bureaucratic dictatorship and outskirts of the country which resemble Austria, a Dutch high tower suburb and an American desert, it is familiar and strange at the same time, exactly the way this parable of a hero who wants to become king of his country by solving five tasks needs to be. The writer of the book on which the film is based wanted to show children the serious problems of society (environmental pollution, religious division) and their possible solutions by abstracting them as well as making them tangible. Together with the acting these are the assets of this movie.

However, Italy is also a weak point. The Italian extras, needed to fill the cities and town squares as habitants of Katoren, often don't seem to know in what kind of movie they're in, what they're supposed to do and some, perhaps in a leap of ambition to European stardom, act like they're doing Sophocles. The building posing as the regal palace is covered in green mold. The ministerial chamber is a derelict room with dust on the floor. To keep believing in the script one needs to close one's eyes to these shortcomings, because the reality of filming is seeping through relentlessly.

The script is another foible. A Dutch broadcaster co-produced, and sometimes you wonder if you're watching a marathon of television episodes: each task is introduced with a journey, an acquaintance and the slow unfolding of the assignment in the same careful pacing. The solution sometimes is painstakingly easy (the Pantaar suddenly deciding to sacrifice himself), and Stach seems to thrive more on luck than wisdom or even drive to make Katoren a better place. When the apprentice journalist asks him why he wants to be king, he answers: 'To be cheered by the crowds.' An honest answer but not one to expect from a hero.

The ending is being stretched to its limits, and when Stach finally becomes the King, by landing in a pile of pillows and a muddle of confused Italian extras, the movie is suddenly over. Two hours feel like almost three, and a greater efficiency in storytelling would have benefited the rhythm of the movie as well as the use of locations and props that now seem to be expensively prepared for unnecessary scenes.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Loved the book, what is left over of it in the movie?
virindra7 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I read the book 20 years ago. I loved it. I had my doubts to watch the movie. Dutch movies aren't that great in general. This weekend i rented the movie and watched it. It wasn't what I expected it to be.

Acting wasn't that great, very immature. This older German woman in Pantaar was the only one who gave a great performance. But her role in the movie was very little. The assignment's in the movie were different than in the book. That was very disappointing. The movie was boring. The end of the movie was great, like it is the strongest aspect of the book.

My advice; watch it when it comes on the television.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too serious, too realistic... too bad
Joejoesan14 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A few years back Ben Sombogaart directed the film version of my favourite kids book Kruistocht in Spijkerbroek (Crusade in Jeans). He did an excellent job by not only following the events in the book but also adding elements that would make the story stronger and more realistic. My hopes for the movie adoption of my second best kids book, Koning van Katoren (King of Katoren) were therefore very high. Too bad the film disappoints on most levels.

The story is about 17 year old Stach. He wants to be the new king of Katoren and has to complete five missions in order to do so. Along the way he's followed by a beautiful young journalist, Kim, who turns out of having a hidden agenda. Jan Terlouw's original book is a fantasy story with some of little nods to the political climate of the seventies. Director Ben Sombogaart updated the story with the use of smartphones, Wikipedia, big televisions and that is all fine. His use of landscapes and locations is thrilling: Koning van Katoren looks like it costed 40 million euros. The casting of Mingus Dagelet (Stach) and Abbey Hoes as Kim is well done.

It all goes wrong with the storytelling. To break with the (boring?) chronological way of telling the story in the book, director Sombogaart uses short confusing flash forwards and flash backs. The thread of a looming war is illustrated by documentary- like images of war planes, tanks and big war ships that pretty seem out of place in the overall atmosphere of the movie. To make the movie more realistic in some parts of Kartoren other languages are spoken (Italian and German). A European may respect that, but for kids and people who haven't read the book it slows down the action.

Ben Sombogaart is one of the most respected filmmakers of the Netherlands. His desire to also tackle kids literature can be applauded, but in this case it works out the wrong way. Perhaps a more fun and less serious tone would have been a better choice.

5/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adults: wait for the television release
maleichan3 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Koning van Katoren is made after the award-winning children's book by Dutch author Jan Terlouw. He wrote the book in 1971. The movie tells the story of 17-year-old Stach, who was born the very day the last king of Katoren died. As the king left no heir, after his death the king's cabinet ministers took over the reigns and turned the kingdom into a country that was always waging war on its neighbours and in which singing and fireworks were forbidden. At seventeen, Stach - young, reckless and lacking all respect for authority - goes to the palace and asks what he has to do in order to become king. The ministers decide to set him five impossible tasks. If Stach succeeds, he will become king.

Let me start by saying I am not this movie's target audience. Koning van Katoren is a children's movie, not a picture for nostalgic adults who have read the book (repeatedly) in their childhoods. And let me add, secondly, that I understand that screen adaptations most often require changes and cuts in the original story. Having said that, some of these adaptations bother me. First of all, the story is dragged into the 21st century by adding laptop computers, mobile telephones, etc. In some cases, this effort is successful; controlling the wandering churches of Uikumene (one of the five tasks) with navigation software is a good find. In other cases, the effort is too obvious, annoying (when text messages are dancing in balloons across the screen) and just plain incongruous with other aspects of the story - dress, sets - that have a much older feel. It is also too bad that the makers made no effort to blend the 'real' images of modern fighter jets more seamlessly into the picture. Secondly, I really don't understand why girlfriend Kim is turned into a reporter in the movie. I don't see what that adds to the story. Thirdly, using distinct Italian, German, and Almere settings for the various tasks feels disharmonious, as if you are watching different movies. Finally, the dragon of Smook was a disappointment, in that the makers turned it into some kind of futuristic transformers beast.

To end with a positive note: the acting is up to scratch, and (four of) the five tasks are a pleasure to watch. I'm sure children will spend an entertaining afternoon in the theatre watching this picture.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Dutch movie for children
myriamlenys29 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
With "King of Katoren" Jan Terlouw wrote one of the most famous children's books of the Low Countries. I read the book as a child - Dutch is my mother language - and I recommend it wholeheartedly : it is a successful mix of suspense, wit, horror and whimsy. Behind its fairytale trappings it is also a satire on various evils both old and new, such as sectarian intolerance, pollution, bureaucracy and the greed of powerful elites hoarding knowledge which should be common.

The movie is based on the book ; it's a fairly free adaptation, although it treats a number of the same themes. The plot is brought resolutely into the 21st century, what with various characters using modern social media. It's not a bad adaptation, but it struggles to find the specific Terlouw tone, perhaps because it's too superficial and busy and flashy. For instance, the dark storyline about the beggar/magician who comes calling for alms (and who takes along people's most prized possessions, including things such as pet dogs or babies) doesn't feel all that grim - or all that deep.

The hero's quest also begins in a clumsy manner. Our protagonist gets born under an unfortunate star : shortly after his appearance on this earth, his mother dies of childbirth complications and his father dies in an accident. He gets raised by his uncle, a royal servant. Forward to the scene where our protagonist, now seventeen years old, declares his intention to become king, because parrrrty ! Some bureaucrat remarks that any attempt along these lines is going to need approval from his parents. The reply, with a great big sunny grin : "They're both dead". A young man of deep emotions ! The viewer thinks : "Well, at least he's nice to the uncle who raised him" - but the next scene shows him being not-nice to the uncle who raised him.

The first impression, in other words, is not good - and I'm pretty sure that a lot of viewers are going to watch the rest of young Stach's adventures in hopes that someone will remove that arrogant smirk from his face, preferably with the aid of a halberd...

In fairness I need to add that I'm too old to belong to the target audience ; so a rating of six stars may be unkind.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Deviates to much from the book
patrick-566-6218402 September 2020
This movie is based on a very popular Children's book which is not very complicated. The movie deviates to much from the book in my opinion. Very strong story lines in the book are replaces with generic events in order to make the movie shallow.

I do need to say that the movie does create the feeling of taking place in a existing country, having being filmed all over Europe.

If the movie had followed the story in the book it would have been better.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Like the book, but then again not like the book
mvgennip25 December 2012
I loved the book and I love the movie. It's fun, it's modern, it takes the best parts from the story and it's refreshingly non-Hollywood. It's nice to see what the makers did with the book, they had to leave some of the challenges out but that does not feel like a miss. The country of Katoren has areas that are like Italy, like Austria and even like Arizona (with a Bijlmer like city in it!). The modern touch was fun and fitted well into the story. After all: Katoren is a fantasy country... they could have made it 100 pct animation, but instead it is our world, and then again not. Having read the book, the movie is easy to follow. Maybe this is less when you don't know the book. For me it was interesting to see how the challenges were worked out. The actors were also refreshing, like the mayor of Uikemene and his family. Recommended for everybody who has read the book!
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great movie
wicher-bos23 February 2020
I would like to see an international remake of this movie... It touches on all the important issues of our times... Stach symbolizes human leadership...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed