The House in Sherwood (2020) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
The House in Sure Won't.
tmccull5210 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
If you're looking for a movie with preening, rampant, scenery-chewing narcissism, then this is the film for you. Neither of the lead characters are remotely likeable, and the movie cuts back and forth between them preening and mugging maniacally for the camera.

We have Angela, a psychic medium seeking to affirm herself on Facebook and YouTube, and we have Karen, who feels that Angela has ruined her life by giving her false psychic advice. Karen learns that Angela is going to spend a few days in a haunted flat in an attempt to verify any paranormal activity going on in the place, and she sets out to torment Angela, and expose her as a fraud on social media.

During Angela's investigation, Karen pranks her with phony phone calls and poison pen letters. She even breaks into the flat and stages false signs to activity to fool Angela. This works, but there is also actual activity going on that Angela manages to record and document. Angela actually ends up making verbal contact with the entity in the flat, and the entity shows her proof of Karen's attempts to prank her.

Karen stages another prank phone call to Angela, but this backfires on her, as Angela says that she knows that the caller is Karen, that she can prove it, and is going to the authorities to stop Karen from harassing her once and for all. That night, Karen steals into the flat again to remove any potential evidence that might implicate her, and establish her guilt. In the meantime, Angela has further communication with the entity, which presents itself as evil and demonic. Karen ends up locked in the cellar of the flat, and discovers that Angela isn't quite the fraud that Karen tried to expose her as. The entity possesses Karen in what may well be one of the worst performances of a possession that I have ever seen in any horror movie.

There is a huge, gaping, Grand Canyonesque plot hole here. Karen is filming all of these hijinks so that she can expose Angela as a fraud. Her plan is to post the footage on social media for all of the world to see... but she breaks back into the house to recover evidence that she'd used and left behind that can prove that she's the one behind the hijinks. What the Hell kind of sense does that make? She's planning on posting a video detailing each and every little thing that she's doing to Angela. She's confessing to the world... including the police... everything that she's done, but she's worried that the police will find physical evidence linking her to her nefarious activities?

This is a sort of follow-up, or sequel to the movie, "Investigation in Sherwood", which depicts a private investigator who finds himself unexpectedly drawn into genuine paranormal activity in the same flat shown in this film.

Of the two movies, the first was by far the better.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Annoying Actress!!
alexzandrea_clark11 January 2021
Great idea and I love found footage but one of the actresses is beyond annoying I couldn't even make it half way through. I get she is supposed to be an annoying character but holy moly I'd rather have Katie Hopkins. Shame!! I'll swerve anything else she does. The lady who plays Angela is great though!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Rather slow and awkward
jmbovan-47-1601739 January 2021
This is a low production found footage film of a woman, psychic, investigating the haunting of a home. She is broadcasting live to rebuild her reputation. as a psychic and medium. At the same time and often in split screen, a woman is playing mean spirited pranks on the psychic as she feels robbed by the psychic for a bad suggestion. The focus on screen is often a small view, and this makes it seem very amateur. The acting of the psychic is okay but nothing special. The acting by the other woman is borderline camp and often off putting to her scenes. There is very little scares or thrills to this film. The presentation of the ghost has a eeriness to it, but little is done to extend or enhance this. Interesting concept that is poorly managed and presented.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worse acting by the two lead actresses
discerninguser15 January 2021
The acting of the two lead actors was so hammy and over the top, that this so-called horror movie came across as a spoof comedy.

Found footage movies are where the characters show us what they are seeing. But for the major part of this film, we had to endure close ups of the two characters' faces, including their ugly teeth and skin pores.

The actress who plays the antagonist is particularly irritating.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Decent idea, executed slowly and poorly
haskel-7295122 December 2020
If you haven't seen any of British Director Richard Mansfield's films, they are very low budget, found footage, and glacially slow. Usually with very simple plots. This one is certainly low budget and almost painfully slow but actually the plot is an improvement over his other work, especially over "A Haunting In Sherwood", which this is a sequel to. This is far from a good film, I can't even say it is a particularly entertaining film, but it isn't the worst way to spend 70 minutes. Once it finally gets going there are a few actually inspired chills, bit not enough to make up for the dullness of the first two acts. Keep trying Richard, you're getting closer to making a decent film.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This film had potential.
kjjames8110 January 2021
The good points: The acting, the story, some really good scary scenes. The bad points: Okay some the scary scenes didn't work, most did. Then there's the running time, I Felt if it was on for longer it may have been scarier. Now for the supposed budget and done in covid Times this film had a lot going for it and I have just watched the new wonder woman film which cost hundreds of millions to make and it was awful. This movie made for a normal person's week's pay is a far better film in all areas. Kudos to the film director and all involved I.e. the actors and actresses ( the main people in the film) did an amazing job all round. Do yourself a favour, watch this and remember it cost a person's week's pay to make and put this against a Hollywood film that cost hundreds of millions to make. I know o I would give an award to for their film making. Does it have endpoints, of course it does but what it has accomplished is for the viewer to see. Well done.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
All in all pretty poor
viralappzgroup5 April 2021
The bad bits of this movie: The actress that plays Karen over acts to the point she reminded me of Jim Carrey.

The writer not only plasters his name 'Mansfield' all over everything he even names a character on the phone after himself... Not good!

There are no real if, what's or why's in the movie. For an hour it's paranormal/poltergeist activity then suddenly turns to a Demon in the last 5 mins.

The 'suspense' is massively underplayed. The clown at the stairs could have been so much better with a little sound effect.

The better bits: The lead actress who plays Angela does a relatively decent job for a low budget movie.

There are a few suspenseful build-up's to enjoy but sadly they amount to very little.

All in all, give it a watch if there's nothing else on but I would turn off a Sheffield United match to watch this.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Abysmal "acting"
HeyHay3720 March 2021
From the moment the first words were spoken, I knew I was in trouble. Where did they find these "actors"???? Probably related to the film makers-the acting (if you called it that) is SO ATROCIOUS, that I was wondering if I was watching a mockumentary!! I hope they have day jobs, because they need to keep them! Good for a laugh, but not much else!!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst film ever
laurence-2695218 January 2021
Worst so called horror film ever not scary wooden acting
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Investigate The Investigator!!!
wandernn1-81-68327423 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Okay this was pretty bad. The material was bad. The acting was bad. Basically it's like a vlogger sabotaging a paranormal investigator and they both end up dead at the end from demon possession. Horribly lame. But I did make it to the end. 2/10
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Genuine skincrawler
scornatme2 January 2021
Again another ff killer from this director and just shows his films are going from strength to strength. I found this as gripping as the last film. on the front of getting under your skin and adding more technology into the film via the use of Facebook live was a great decision and brings it right up to the 2020 mark. I will be waiting with clasped palms to see what comes next. All in all ff has a lot in store with this director.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Spooky film
dmt-6763429 January 2021
I enjoyed this film! It started kind of slow, but I liked that this wasn't a jump scare kind of horror film. It was a spooky one. I will watch it again. I am curious to see some of these other films from the UK.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not great. Has some creepy moments.
frankblack-7996110 March 2021
The cute redhead british actress is ok. The actress that plays Karen is just atrocious. A lot of people will probably not get past her acting and turn it off. For a super low budget film it wasnt horrible. Not great either. Ive seen far worse.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fun
mrsrachelfoster20 January 2021
I watched this in lockdown 3 - I think well done to this lot who made a film during covid - all Ive done is work from home and eat like a pig!

I do love a low budget found footage creepy film so this was right up my street
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Highly reasonable
jackstupidjack29 December 2020
Richard Mansfield is slowly carving a nice little niche for himself, in the UK Found Footage, horror market. This is an enjoyable, well produced, low budget affair. Nice original presentation, interesting concept, well scripted, well acted by the minimal cast, Amazon Prime seem to recognise some potential, shame he can't get a more mainstream, more financially rewarding outlet for his films, for if he can make films of this consistent quality on a tiny budget, what he could do with a few more quid to splash out, is an interesting though. an applaudable effort, deserving of a bigger audience, a larger budget.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sloppy but neat film
phenomynouss25 January 2021
Right away this film seems like one likely to antagonize some viewers, as it seems to be entirely in second person view, watching the two actors as they film themselves like a Periscope video, complete with random floating emojis and comments popping up from fake twitter accounts and the like.

Very little is explained as to what is happening and why, but thankfully it starts to get clearer as it goes along. Basically, Angela (the redhead) is an alleged psychic, and Karen (the non-redhead) feels she was screwed over by some bad financial advice given by Angela. Now she is cyberstalking Angela, who is filming herself in a haunted flat, and decides to take her revenge by sabotaging Angela, sending her threatening letters and phone calls, and trying to expose her as a fraud.

This is basically the entirety of the movie, with the two actors basically chomping scenery with all the obnoxious energy of exactly what they basically are; youtubers. Along the way, we see some rather unusual stuff that might suggest Karen is possibly butting in on something else entirely.

Overall this is definitely the type of film which if a friend told me they couldn't watch because it was too annoying, I would be like "okay" and accept that.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
For fans of found footage
jmariehamilton18 January 2021
It started off so bad I switched off after 5 minutes. Next day I went back as nothing else to watch. Worth it, despite how naff it seems at first and the ott of the 2 leads. If you like found footage horror, keep watching and watch the background in Karens footage closely. I adore found footage and this is worth a watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not scary but still entertaining
eirwen-4254827 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I liked the concept of this film and showing the two different POVs at the same time. Seeing the emojis and online comments made me laugh.

Unfortunately there was so much going on with the stalker plot, that they fail to achieve a spooky atmosphere. The actual paranormal activity gets lost in the shuffle, and what you do see isn't very scary.

Definitely not a film for everyone, but I was entertained.

Stars are given based on my personal enjoyment of the film and plot.

6 - Interesting concept, but low budget, mediocre acting and/or poor production brought down the over all score. I might might watch it again at some point.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed