Neighbor (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
85 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Interesting premise, but horribly done with out of continuity F/X
white_fire418 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This movie has a good premise. A girl who lives in your neighborhood, going around and killing everyone around you in varying forms of gory torture, just to entertain herself. The thought of that would be very scary in real life, and if done properly, could make for a very tense, entertaining movie.

It's unfortunate this idea was turned into this horrible B 'movie'.

While it starts off very strong, and in a very interesting way, it unfortunately goes downhill, especially after the half way mark when it tries to do hallucination based alternate time lines that make no real sense and have no point being in the movie, other than to provide more gore.

A young woman, who is never named, starts off in a kitchen, eating some cereal, going through the house as if just waking up in the morning, giving the viewer a sense of calm. This quickly turns to horror, as she goes upstairs, into a room very calmly, and finds the actual husband and wife of the house, tied up to chairs, with horrible looking wounds on their bodies, the wife dead in the chair. Very chilling and nerve racking, as the Girl displays massive psychosis and a very calm nature while finishing off the occupants.

From there, we go to the main leading man, who just had a crap load of shrooms and wakes up in his chair, watching TV on his widescreen....which is inexplicably hooked up to an archaic cable TV device. It makes no sense whatsoever if you are aware of technology of both today and yesteryear. And this is just the first of many head scratching things in the movie.

We find out that the main lead guy is a 'musician', hangs out at a local eatery/pub a lot, is infatuated with a girl from the bar, but never says anything to her, was in a relationship with a rather chubby, unattractive blonde who works in a book store filled with seemingly nothing but paperback books....I haven't seen a store like that in about 10 years.

He has two male friends, one of which is getting married, which only ever comes into play in the aforementioned hallucination sequences later on, and serves really only at a feeble attempt of character development.

After spending a night at the house working on music, and then watching a movie together....3 men, watching a movie together, with no hint of beer or anything....just a bit odd. But not as odd as where they all actually live, because the 'neighborhood' is constantly shifting and changing, from posh, to suburban, to ghetto hood depending on the shot in the film. Incredibly inconsistent, even in the interior of the house, as the main leads basement looks like a rat dwelling, and yet the upstairs looks like it's taken care of by Martha Stewart? See how I went from one point to another there without finishing the first point? Expect that A LOT in this movie. It will randomly cut from one thing to another, and never really finish certain shots/stories.

Anyways, after the movie watching, the male lead is standing in his driveway, a bunch of stuff with the friends, then he's in his basement tied up in a chair by the Girl. What follows is inconsistent, blathering nonsense, punctuated with scenes of bloody gore.

Now, with the gore....while it looks decent, it too, unfortunately, is very inconsistent. For one thing, the main guy has his wrists duct taped to the chair, but in one shot when he's 'escaping', the tape is magically gone and he's free. I kid you not.

One girl is given a glasgow smile with a hacksaw....yet in scenes just a minute or two later, with her cheeks all torn apart, you can literally see the sides of her mouth, still in tact.

The main guy has his eye lids pinned up into his forehead, yet again, later on, the holes still in his forehead, his eyelids are fine, in fact back to completely normal, no holes, no nothing! At it's very core, it's essentially a girl who just tortures the hell out of everyone in a few houses for an hour and a half, with about 20 minutes of WTF is going on thrown in the middle for some reason.

This movie could have been something much better, but ultimately, it's just bad. Besides, any movie that constantly finds an excuse to throw in the beginning of the credits from some movie the director made 10 years ago, which was also a B grade movie, is just not good.
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Rather dull torture themed flick that tries to be too clever and fails.
Corpus_Vile5 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
An unnamed psycho chick (America Olivo)breaks into the homes of suburbia, subjecting the inhabitants to horrific degrees of torture. She soon has her eye on likable guy Don, (Christian Campell)who is planning on hosting a party with his friends. However, his plans are interrupted in a bad way when our anti heroine pays him a call. Will he survive what she has in store for him? Or will his tormentor be hosting a party of her own?

I caught this at the Edinburgh Fabfest, and when the producer introduces an honest to god doctor to warn patrons of a film's content, I couldn't help but suspect a cheap gimmick, and unfortunately, I wasn't wrong either.

Apart from some very impressive FX and set pieces, (and one scene in particular is guaranteed a reaction from guys and will be the talking point of the film), there's really nothing new to see here at all.

It attempts to make use of a disastrous time slip plot device which fails miserably, and will have you scratching your head as it's ultimately meaningless, and appears to be an attempt to give the film some gravitas, which it doesn't have, because ultimately, the film doesn't really go anywhere, and has no particular plot to it.

However, fans of extreme horror for the sake of it, who may have liked Grotesque for example, or who are fans of set pieces, could do a lot worse here though, as the film definitely doesn't shy away from extreme content, shows an absolute willingness to push the envelope, and again,is technically brilliant in its execution.

The film overall however, is a pretty unremarkable and ultimately disappointing affair, which is a pity, as it potentially could have been great.
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not too bad not too good, but doesn't deserve 4 pages of negative shills
Indifferent_Observer14 January 2011
This movie is obviously being targeted in classic IBMD shill fashion( making 5-6 sock puppet accounts and trashing it) If you go through all the 1 star reviews they're all made by the same user on 1 review accounts. While this movie isn't anything too great it doesn't deserve to be called the "Worst movie ever" yadda yadda yadda. Believe me its far from the worst movie ever..

My only real problem with the movie was the main psycho girl's acting, which was simply bad when she was trying to come off crazy or torturing her victims. She did fine when she was acting normal, but the crazy act was just hard to buy and came off kind of silly at times. Not in a good way either. The rest of the movie and all involved weren't too bad, the script and the film definitely needed much more, but were worth a watch nonetheless.

5 out of 10 stars is an honest review here. Pretty forgettable, but will pass the time.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An utterly random movie surfing the torture porn wave
dschmeding17 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Wow, I have to say that I haven't seen such a random movie for a while. "Neighbor" ... and here it starts, even the title of the movie makes no sense with the "plot" of it. Everybody read the synopsis so I won't get into it... there is nothing more to say about what goes on here except they spiced it up with a non-linear chaotic time-line that suggests a deeper meaning but when the credits roll you will yell at the screen about the plain stupidity of it all.

So what are the major letdowns? There is no character development whatsoever, the main villain is not explained except for some shallow sidelines that suggest she experienced something bad (duh!). The female lead overacts like hell, scenes are mashed together randomly and we never learn why the hell she is shortly portrayed as some kind of a nurse just to turn into a waitress the next moment and then become a rock chick with leather skirts and boots that she lends from a guys house. The "posh" neighborhood is portrayed inconsistently, the torture scenes are just there to reel the Hostel/SAW fans in and whats most despicable of all that the movie tries to be smart and funny with some movie quotes and lame jokes while the overall tone of the movie just doesn't fit with this element.

Why is the girl obsessed with the guy, why does she shed one tear, what about her notebook that is strongly accented in the beginning and then dropped on the sidelines, why is that ridiculous acid face burn (worst Special FX in the movie BTW) inserted with some ghost visions just to get dropped as well. The script is a mess, visuals and actors are OK.... but this is one of the most obvious signs lately that this torture movie hype needs to end.
34 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
saying this is awful is being kind
Flashlight_Redlight25 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
i cant believe how bad this is. its one of the worst movies ever made. it is shot on video with really bad actors and a director who has no clue what hes doing. whoever wrote this garbage should go to prison. i admit we couldn't watch the whole thing it was just to boring. the guy getting tortured seems to just be getting pinched or something because he doesn't act like hes in any real pain. the girl doing the torturing is a terrible terrible actress. the special fx are week. i don't know what happened at the end because i couldn't watch the rest it was so boring. how did this end up on a DVD ? can someone tell me that. those bad straight to video blair witch project parodies were actually better than this. i give this movie a one only because you cant go any lower. this is the worst movie ever made.

the day i posted this i got an email from another user who said the director flags all the bad reviews. then a few days later my post was gone. so be careful. i am contacting the IMDb about this, this must be against the rules.
25 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So this is what passes for a movie nowadays?
TomTom23324 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"Hey, we got money for some good gory effects." "But we don't have any money now for actors, a writer or director" "Ah, we don't need it. Just get some people off the street. No one will notice."

Sometimes you watch a "movie" so bad you can't believe that there was someone in the world who actually uttered the words "yes, I will see this gets funded" The lead actress is very easy on the eyes - and then she tries to act and even someone this attractive looks ugly. Everyone else is worse.

The director, if you can call him that, has his name above the title. I don't know why. When I saw that I assumed he was someone of note I must have not heard of before but after looking at his credits, he's not. And of course he possesses no actual directing skills. None. Just think if you saw some bad video on youtube and the guy who made it puts his name above the title. It's that stupid.

This "movie" makes no sense. But the worst thing of all, besides the terrible acting, writing and "directing" is the fact it still got a DVD deal. Really, it's pretty amazing what can get a DVD deal nowadays. Now my six year old is pretty handy with the camera - I wonder if this director can hook us up. I will make sure my six year old puts his name above the title on his work.
26 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
worst movie I've ever seen
troy1269531 July 2010
Matched by the terrible effects and acting of the worst movie you can see, the plot of this movie was awful and made no sense what so ever. I laughed at this movie the entire time, and it wasn't meant to be funny. This movie contained the worst acting I've ever seen, and the worst attempt at special effects that I've ever had to endure, trying not laugh the whole time. I do not recommend that anybody should watch this movie, unless you want to see an atrocious story plot filled with bad acting. I don't know why this movie got anything higher than a 1, but it doesn't deserve anything higher. Anybody who liked this movie, are people that don't know a real movie from a pathetic excuse to call a movie. This movie to me, will be the worst movie I've ever seen. But i haven't seen M. Night Shyamalan's The last Airbender yet so it probably wont be for very long.
47 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pointlessly horrendous, and horrendously pointless
martynmc724 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
All those who attended the Celluloid Screams horror festival in Sheffield tonight were 'treated' to an uncut and unrated UK premier of Neighbor in the presence of the films producer, who both introduced and attended a Q&A after the screening.

To sum up the plot (of what little there is) Neighbor is the logical conclusion to the current wave of torture-porn, consisting of little more than a woman who breaks into her neighbour's houses and tortures them for fun. Some of these neighbour's are having a party, and one by one they arrive and get tortured in increasingly nasty and violent ways.

When introducing the film the producer told the audience it was OK to laugh as this wasn't meant to be serious, however, the tone of the film is very dark and not really particularly humorous. I guess the producer thought that the killer telling some jokes here-and-there, and torturing a man by sticking a swizzle-stick down his penis until it bleeds, and then breaking the stick inside (get it...cocktail!) counts as humour. Well I'm afraid I found the film unsettling, unnecessary and nasty.

However, my main issue concerns just how pointless the whole film is. There is no reason for any of it, and in fact the producer admitted to the audience that the non-linear timing was added so people thought the film was deeper than it was (he also admitted he didn't really like movies and preferred music, and that the editor had to throw up when editing some of the scenes...which I don't blame him for.)

Ultimately, this film was made to be sick and nasty, at least in other such extreme cinema a semblance of point could be found (such as Salo, or Cannibal Holocaust), but Neighbor is having none of it. I doubt it will get a release (and the censors will hack it to pieces before it does), and if it is released I cannot really recommend it to anyone. Suffice it to say it left a very sour taste in my mouth.

I gave this film 2 stars as the acting is very good, and the SFX are astounding considering the budget (though to be honest, the realism is what makes this nasty pieces of trash even worse). See it if you must, but don't expect to enjoy it or get it out of your head for a long while to come.
33 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deeply disturbing thy name is Neighbour
BleakDestiny14 September 2011
OK good points......the lead is a stunner as she is in every film she has been in thus far.

OK thats the good points done with now lets discuss the film. The movie has no storyline and is basically just a torture movie, she toys with her prey with all manner of unpleasant tools including a very nasty scene involving a single nail......don't ask.

Alas the movie has no upsides and is deeply disturbing and made me extremely uncomfortable. I cant really recommend this to anybody beyond those who are into torture films or those looking for something very very alternative.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Maybe I am just weird but I did like this.
poolandrews5 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Neighbor starts as an attractive young woman (America Olivo) leaves the house in some leafy quite suburban area of some plain looking US city where she has just killed the entire family within. Don Carpenter (Christian Campbell) is a musician in a band called the Low Budgets along with his best friends Sam Landis (Joseph Aniska) & Mike Hodder (Pete Postiglione), one night Don is attacked & overpowered by the woman & tied to a chair in his soundproof basement recording studio. From that point on Don is horribly tortured & mutilated my the woman who seems to take sadistic pleasure in hurting him, eventually the woman turns her sadistic attention to Don's friends whom she also takes great pleasure in torturing & killing in front of Don just to add to his torment...

Written & directed by Robert A. Masciantonio who also has a small role in the film as Kip Wellington the news reporter Neighbor is at times pretty gruesome & is probably best described as a torture porn thriller that starts off fairly sedately but once it gets going is quite nasty & unpleasant to watch. Available in a heavily cut (by over four minutes) R rated version & an uncut Unrated version which is infinitely better, I mean what's the point of Neighbor without the gore & nastiness? The UK version is also different in that it is based on the Unrated US version but has been cut by the BBFC to remove some of the penis torture sequence which is really hard to watch comfortably if your male. The film wastes no time revealing that the unnamed woman is a total sadist & killer so in that sense there's no great build-up of tension but it does allow the film to get down to business early on. The first half an hour runs smoothly enough with a bit of character development although the murderous woman is never given any sort of background which I would say is the films one weak aspect in that we never get to know her, even her name. Then once she starts torturing Don it's pretty nasty stuff until the end which again is a bit unsatisfying as it just finishes rather than ends. At 90 odd minutes the pace is good, it kept me watching to see what she was going to do next & whether Don could escape but other than that there's not much going on. During the middle third of Neighbor there are several hallucination, dream & dream within dream scenes that feel like padding & come across a bit out of keeping with the rest of the film. Overall I have to say I liked Neighbor, it's the barest of films that really only exists to present gratuitous torture but I'm alright with that! It has a few quirky & amusing moments, it's well written for what it is & how much ambition it has & it certainly delivers the gory goods if that's what your after.

The film is well made with some nice shots actually, the beginning & end of the film feature fairly impressive long one take tracking shots, there's no quick cut editing or shaky hand-held camcorder crap & the none-descript unassuming everyday suburban setting adds a certain level of reality to it, there's nothing particularly flashy on show here but it's well made & looks good. If you look at the cast list you will notice almost every character surname references some horror icon like Carpenter, Cunningham, Baker, Hitchcock, Landis, Price, Hodder & Leigh. There's some nasty gore here although one has to say not all of it entirely convincing but you will get the point, people's toes are cut off, holes are drilled in legs, peoples jaws are sawn open, arms & legs are slashed open, a finger is cut off with a pair of scissors blood pours & splatters all over the place & of course there's the infamous scene in which Don gets something painful shoved up his penis with bloody results.

Filmed in Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, stars America Olivo & Christian Campbell met on this film & are now married while almost all of the music heard in the film was composed by the real Low Budgets band. The acting is alright, some of the victims might have screamed a little more but Olivo puts in a good performance that goes from threatening & sinister to playful & quirky.

Neighbor is certainly not a film that will appeal to everyone, it's fairly short on narrative but I like to say it's economical & to the point rather than shallow & empty but that's a matter of opinion I suppose. It also features a really hot looking woman torturing people in gory ways so I guess I was always going to like it.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
There are no words to describe how awful this is
On_The_Mark28 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The fact there is the word "awful" next to the one when you choose it here is about as apropos as it gets.

This was bad. It makes Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 look like Citizen Kane and that is no exaggeration, my friends. Sometimes you come across a movie so poorly executed, you sit there mouth agape wondering if it's real. The fact that someone actually wrote what was saw on the screen down, in English, boggles the mind. Even the actors had to be giggling at how bad it was, not that these people are going to get a lot of work with the level of skill displayed (although it's not like they had a lot to work with) - but the lead guy, he was just terrible and he's supposed to be the brother of Neve Campbell. Well, Martin Sheen and Patrick Swayze have a bad actor brothers too, so there you go.

The guy who directed this mess should be punished. He should be locked in a room and forced to watch it over and over and over for a week straight. He should be arrested and fined and banned from ever directing anything ever again.

And for you wannabe filmmakers, take note. This is exactly what you do not do. If you want to make a movie, make sure there's a story. Make your characters three dimensional and work on your dialog. Just having a bunch of gore with no real story does not make an entertaining film. Learn how to direct a film keeping in mind the viewpoint of the people watching (this guy sure didn't).

Luckily we didn't have to pay to see this waste of a DVD and I honestly feel sorry for anyone who was duped into thinking this was an entertaining movie and forking out whatever money you had to pay (even a dollar is a rip-off).

I like to write letters for stuff that is really good or really bad (this being the latter) and the only place I can think of complaining is Lionsgate. Yeah, Lionsgate? Have they scraped the bottom of the barrel or what?
21 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Alfred Hitchcock meets Quentin Tarantino
jdanese325 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I went to a screening of Neighbor this weekend in the suburban Philadelphia town of Lansdowne Pa. I knew going in, that the movie was going to be in the slasher genre and expected another low budget, silly, fake blood, snooze fest. I left however, feeling that I had just seen a gem. I can see this movie being a future "cult" sensation.

I find in many movies in this genre there always seems to be a lack of talent in the acting department. I was pleasantly surprised that Neighbor left me actually caring about the characters that normally seem to be an annoyance in any slasher flick. In this case the acting and screen writing was way above my expectations and the character development was such a welcome break from the "don't go in there" throw away characters you normally expect. You really actually do not WANT these characters to "go in there" because they seem like real people!

America Olivo was the perfect actress to portray "The Girl" with her easy control of seemingly "teasing" the people around her to instantly open up to her, inviting them to their doom. Her timing and delivery was spot on when she "did her thing" making you not sure why you hated her and somehow felt for her. Her eyes seemed to try to give away just enough pain and emotional scarring she had buried deep into her personality to create the knowledge it was there but, they never quite did tell the whole story making the movie much creepier.

Christian Campbell did an excellent job portraying the tortured (in so many ways) victim and his character was so easy to root for. Surrounded by his best friends throughout the film, he is sent on a roller-coaster ride in and out of his perception of reality making this movie a psychological thriller with twists and turns that keep you on the edge of you seat.

All that being said, the movie Neighbor, even with the great story and acting is THE Sickest Goriest movie I have ever saw. If you like Gory, You MUST SEE this movie. It should IMHO be given a top award for goriest special effects. If you don't like Gory, don't even be within a mile of it...It might reach out and getcha! My brother, who also went to this film with me, summed it up perfectly. He said, "Neighbor was Alfred Hitchcock meets Quentin Tarantino ". He was so right.

Neighbor will be out on DVD on July 27th and I highly recommend the Directors cut simply because the gore is way beyond rated R.
8 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Killer Queen
julestruman23 November 2020
A different idea on the Horror genre ..I think it's cool to see a female baddie also..doing the deeds..
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A dreadfully odious pile of rubbish
pickles5529 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I read one review here...someone actually claimed this was done by a guy who is a mixture of Hitchcock and Tarantino. There isn't a dimension in the spectrum of dimensions that this would be true. This clearly was written by someone who worked on this pile of twaddle. Even Tarantino, whose tastes are of a 15 year old fanboy, would have been insulted. To put this in perspective, it would be like saying the cat playing piano video on youtube was done by someone who is a mixture of Spielberg and John Ford. It's insulting.

The acting in this rigmarole border on high school playish...the director has zero clue what he's doing. I haven't looked at his credits yet but I find it hard to believe this wasn't some guy who was just plucked off the street. He has no skills yet his name is above the credits. So not only is he taking credit for this ludicrousness, but somehow thinks his name will bring in viewers. I can see no other reason why his name would be in the title. At least we know that name is now synonymous with terrible cinema. He makes Uwe Boll look like Frank Darabont.

We could not finish this, it was too amateurishly written, directed and acted...it's clear we've reach a new age in DVDs...literally anyone can make a movie and get it on a DVD. If you stay away from one rental in 2010, make it this movie. Wait...is this a movie?
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Uwe Boll meets Ed Wood
Sleeping_Lion29 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
One of my mates brought this over and we figured the movie was going to be in the slasher genre and expected another low budget, silly, fake blood, snooze fest. Sadly, that would have been an upgrade from what we witnessed. This was as boring a movie as one could possibly find in fact I defy you to find a worse movie than this made in the last 30 years. I find in many movies in this genre there always seems to be a lack of talent in the acting department, however in this case, if you call this "acting" you are easily entertained. There wasn't an actor in the bunch. The acting and screen writing was WAY below my expectations, quite possibly the worst I've ever seen. As I write this I'm trying to think of a movie to compare this too that was awful and I can't think of one at the level of this garbage.

Worst is the direction. I don't know who directed this but I would guess they went to Hollywood Upstairs Directing School because it's the worst directed straight-to-DVD movie I've ever seen. Honestly, you have to wonder if this was funded by the "directors" uncle because there's no way any legit source would have given this guy money to make this movie. When you think you can't be amazed, you see this.

One of my mates who was watching this with me summed it up perfectly. He said, "Neighbor was Uwe Boll meets Ed Wood ". He was so wrong. Uwe Boll and Ed Wood were far better filmmakers than the people who put this thing together. I think we have found the new "Worst Director of all Time."
14 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
wanted to give a zero
skochko15 January 2011
No plot , no storyline , disjointed, bad acting , poor special effects and not scary in the least. Disgusting , yes.

Who are any of these people? There is no explanation at all into any of the characters especially the hot torturer/murderer lady.

Maybe it should have been a short there is no reason for it take 90 minutes to tell the story of guys planning party , lady showing up torture and murder a bunch of idiots.

What happened in the middle she is killed off then just pops back in all okie dokie killing off the same idiot as before earlier in the movie. it is like they made two movies of the same topic changed it a bit and stuck them together.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just when you thought it was safe to rent a DVD
Mariah_Livingston1 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a girl, ya, and I like horror movies. I like gory movies. I like Saw and Hostel and I saw someone compared this to them and I was excited and then I saw this and I have to say I cant believe how awful this is. It was bad. I would be embarrassed to say I had anything to do with this. The directors name is over the title so he must be proud but I don't know why because this stinks. There were two guys in my school who ended up making a movie with some friends and it got on DVD and got on Cinemax and now they're making money and I guess thats how this movie got made because its really got cheap production values and no script and no one seems to know what their doing. this gives me hope that i can make a movie that can get on DVD. If something this amateurish got on DVD, anyone can do it. I have seen some bad straight to DVD movies lately and then I saw some good ones for a while so I thought the quality of filmmaker out there was getting better and then I saw this and that good feeling was lost. But on the positive, Im getting together with my friends to make a movie, at the worst it will be better than this, so look out for it! PS - someone PMd me and told me the director flags all the reviews he doesn't like. Mine just got flagged and I reposted. I'm reporting this guy. Please, if you have been flagged, please PM me. This is wrong.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The reviews here are correct
Contractor_Mike1 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I wish I had read the reviews here before attempting to watch this.

This is another in a recent wave of "torture-porn" movies following the likes of Hostel, which was well done. This one wasn't. The first couple minutes show promise and then it's all down hill. It becomes a chore to watch and after a while, it's so poorly done it's impossible to get through without a fast forward button.

The "torture" is not very well done here and the actor (who is the brother of Neve Campbell, the Don Swayze to her Patrick) is really terrible at conveying pain (or reciting dialog for that matter). If the whole attraction of your movie is "torture porn" you better get actors who are believable in the torture and this actor was not. In fact the woman doing the torture wasn't real good either but that could have been the material she had to work with. The rest of the cast are clearly amateurs, there wasn't an actual actor in the bunch. And if your movie is about torture and the torture itself is amateurish, what do you have then? It's like doing a movie about the old west but having your actors just point their fingers and go "bang." It's unbelievably poorly written, which is sad when there are people who will give movies like this a chance. I honestly don't know how it ended because I gave up after an hour, it was boring as hell and that was the real torture. So referring to this movie as "torture porn" has a whole new meaning.

The moral is to always read the reviews in the Internet Movie Database first, which I did not. I stupidly came in here after. Now seeing how this movie was ripped in here, it would have saved me the time of having to sit through this and write this to warn others.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
the worst of the worst
patchworkmind3 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is by far, by leaps and bounds, and without question the worst movie I have ever had the misfortune to endure. (Note that I've seen well thousands of movies over the course of over forty years of movie-going.) Everything about it that counts is plainly and simply dreadful. The rest is just middling, not bad but not good, just kind of... there. None of the characters are likable or even interesting, not even the titular villain, and so there is no tension, none whatsoever in the whole thing. The villain's M.O. is the usual for torture porn, good old casual sadism. It's the writer/director's M.O. as well. He doesn't seem to care about his story or want us to care about it either. His name credited as the writer/producer/director (in flashing graphics, no less) is all he cared about. (He does it for the special features on the DVD, too.) This movie is so abominably bad it's insulting. The box art is the best thing about it.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
About time the crazy one was a girl
jennifer-25-96523127 July 2011
If you are looking for an all out torture movie, this is one movie I would recommend. Being a woman it was refreshing to finally see the crazy "guy" replaced by a girl.

The movie did not really have a storyline and there are no explanations for why this chick was crazy, but that was OK. The main character was a little too happy which added some character… and some laughs, to tell you she enjoyed her work would be an understatement.

The twists were a little confusing, but pretty neat overall. I really enjoyed this movie; it takes a lot for me now a days to cringe and this movie made me cringe a few times. I have to give credit for some very inventive torture scenes.

ZombieSteak.com - Discover a new world of horror films, designed just for you.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intteresting if cringe worthy entry into torture porn genre
rhaynes19744 August 2010
Now I've never been a huge fan of the torture porn genre, the first Hostel with it's rampant homophobia offended me and the second one was a little better, but this is a genre that's been "bloodied" with a stick already. Every low-budget horror film-maker out there thinks that by throwing as much gore in the audiences faces they'll keep 'em coming. Now true! Good gore has gotten too easy to find these days but what this had was an interesting premise, an interesting narrative style and a nice "look". Performances were a little sketchy here and there but the lead was a true standout, she performed her heinous acts with the ultimate relish and clearly had a blast making this little atrocity.

I've never heard of the director before but will be making a point of keeping my eyes open for future projects. Now on to this film's most controversial aspect it's violence. I don't wince or cringe easily and have been a hardened gore-hound for quite some time but this one had even me wincing in my armchair and making vague attempts to cover my eyes every now and again - truly brutal - but - I think within context.

I honestly can't understand the low rating on the IMDb for this one - it's a damn side better than most of the straight to DVD dreck out there at the moment that passes for horror. And I should know - I've been a horror fanatic now for 36 years. This one's a keeper folks - a solid 7/10.
9 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How do movies like this get made?
Slapfork13 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Can anyone tell me? This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. I think it was made by some amateurs who got an HD camera and decided to make a movie. I'm guessing they were making it up as they went along. They got a Savini book on make up or something for the torture scenes. I'm sure the directors mom made the home made blood in the sink. There's just no way there was a script for this.

And why is the main person doing all the torturing? She just keeps torturing and after a while you're looking at your watch. This would be where having a script would have been handy, not that anyone involved in this actually had ever seen a real script before.

There should be a new rating along with G, PG, R, X, etc. It should be A, for Amateur, so when someone regular people are watching a movie, like we were, you know you're not watching an actual professional movie, but an Amateur made movie, like this one was.

And can someone tell me how this got on a DVD that you can rent? I guess the guy who owned the camera either has an uncle a Lionsgate or has some incriminating photos.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Watch with friends well after you've eaten
Kevin-739-13599221 May 2010
I liked this film a lot...of course it's not something I'd recommend if you plan on eating while watching it...or soon there after.

This is a great film which manipulates time, and the perception of the "fairer sex." America Olivo is despicably awesome as "the girl," and will make you think twice if you're in the dating market. Think Fatal Attraction meets Hostel...with a bit of the ultra violence thrown in for good measure.

Great date movie, as long as it doesn't give her any ideas!

I enjoyed the simple storyline of boy meets girl, and girl breaks boys heart as well as some other important boys parts.
9 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Highly effective shocker
carfy27 October 2009
Neighbor is the kind of film that defenders of the so-called "torture-porn" genre have been waiting for. It would be very easy to be dismissive of a film such as this because of all that have come before it, but "neighbor" requires a deeper analysis.

First is the inclusion of character development. Whereas any previous entry in this genre have discarded or ignored any kind of depth in their characters, "neighbor" has gone out of its way to make three likable protagonists in its small-time band mates. Christian Campbell plays the lead, and his everyman good looks and charm can easily lead an audience member to grow fond of him within his first few moments of screen time.

The characters are not given the amount of depth that the characters on LOST have, but they make sense, and that is all that matters. You grow to like these characters even with their flaws (Don does mushrooms, Sam can be kind of creepy at times, etc).

And then you feel so so SO horrible for them as they go through their unfortunate circumstances throughout this film. This isn't Hostel, where one barely gives a rats behind over what happens to any of the three womanizing and boorish American tourists. This isn't SAW where you have an ensemble of unknown entities being tortured one by one.

What writer/director Masciantonio has done is craft a movie where you want to reach into the screen and SAVE these characters. And he has also created a shift in time/consciousness in the film that may confuse those who are not giving the movie their full attention. I found it very easy to figure out what was going on, however I can understand that some people may be thrown on a first viewing.

One of the main reasons there are so many bad horror movies out there is that they are very cheap to make (relative to other films) and they make their money back easily most of the time. Any idiot can make a horror film, but when somebody with a true vision has a reason and a drive to make a good one, it can transcend the genre and become something better. Masciantonio's work on this film reminds me of David Cronenberg in many ways. You have the cerebral story element mixed with pure body horror. This is Masciantonio's "Scanners." It is low budget and it isn't very polished, but it may be a sign of good things to come.

Finally, America Olivo might just play the scariest serial killer since Hannibal Lecter.

===========

UPDATE: Having seen the finished DVD version (as opposed to the screener/film festival version) I can say that on the second viewing I still cringe with every horrific shot and still feel so bad for the people on screen. The only problem is the lack of reward one gets in rewatch value. It's still rewatchable, but not on the level that other horror movies like The Mist are. Still much better than Hostel or Saw, though.
10 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Amateur director/writer gets DVD deal
Permanent_Ink8 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I've seen a lot of movies. I've seen a lot of bad ones. You see a lot of people who get a video camera for Christmas, get their friends and make a little movie which is pretty much what happened here. I'm sure there was some budget because the FX are not too bad. But everything else is.

The person who wrote and directed this video (it's not a film, it was shot on video so it should be called a video) has absolutely no idea what he's doing. Scenes are set up for shock value and nothing else and after a while you're simply begging for a story. Anything. Give us a reason to keep watching. This is the day and age where the general public is so desensitized to violence because they see so much of it, real and fake on the TV and the computer, simply having someone tortured for 90 minutes isn't going to hold even the dumbest viewer, which is what you'd have to be to find any entertainment value in this.

The "dialog" and I use the term lightly, is awful. I find it hard to believe it was written - it seems like the "director" just told the people what to talk about.

Do NOT waste your money on this. There are so many new DVDs out there these days, you need to have something worth watching if you're competing for that dollar and this certainly is not it
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed