The Last Warrior: Root of Evil (2021) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A Fine Fantasy Sequel
Imdad_Palijo9 July 2022
This is a sequel to 2017 movie 'The Last Warrior'; also called 'The Last Warrior 2'. The movie is full with fun and adventure. It nicely portrays some of the regional folklore characters. A production of Russian chapter of Walt Disney, the movie takes us along a wonderful adventure to exotic places.

We are transported into the modern world as well on occasions during the movie. This pattern is not new to this movie; it however, disrupts your fun when you are immersed in a fantasy world. Touch of comedy is prevalent throughout the movie, which increases fun and interest altogether.

A bit poorly rated from my perspective and needs to be recognized accordingly.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Unfortunately, not the last warrior.
thatfilmperson30 January 2021
If you liked: The Last Warrior The Book of Masters

As soon as you give Russian cinema a chance, it immediately sinks back to the bottom, right into the dirt room. "The Last Warrior: Root of Evil" is a Russian fantasy-comedy family film, produced by the Russian representative of Disney; the same people that made "The Book of Masters", dramatically failed at the box office, and after 8 years raised money for these "The Last Warrior" films. This film is a continuation of the 2017 film of the same name, in which the lost son of Ilya Murometz (an epic knight from Russian folklore), enters the world of Slavic fairy tales and remains there to protect the world from evil. I remember the first film being actually quite amazing, but I wasn't yet writing revies at the time, so it's possible that I just didn't pay proper attention to anything that might have been bad. The very idea of taking the rich Russian folklore - Baba Yaga, Koschei the Deathless, the Frog Princess, Kolobok, etc., and make a whole cinematic universe out of it with unique, memorable characters - it's just so darn cool. I had accordingly high expectations for the sequel, and just how it was possible to fail so spectacularly is beyond my understanding. It's budget was $8,5 million - almost twice as much as the first film's. So, they've got money for decorations, they've got money for an excellent cast; they apparently didn't have enough money for decent CGI (Kolobok is just terrifying to look at), but this part could be neglected - it's not the main aspect of the film. And this situation is similar for most Russian films, with these resources and actors you could make excellent movies. So, what's the problem? Abominable screenwriters. "The Last Warrior" is an archetypal story about the awakening of an ancient evil, that only our main character and only with love, friendship and support of his environment could stop. Everyone knows this story, it has been played out in countless books and films (The Lord of the Rings, for example), and still, with a ready-made template, one had to manage to write such cr@p. From the very beginning of the film, from the very first minutes of it, an illogical development of a confusing, fragmented and limited plot begins. The scenes jump back and forth without any thought put into the pacing and structure; it's like a hastily chopped-up salad, just throw everything in the pile. For the first time in my life, after ~ 700 films, the editing of a film got my attention (how scenes are glued together), that's how bad it was. And no wonder - in any decent film, such element as editing is there to make the transitions smooth and unnoticeable. Everything about the plot is uncoherent - what does this "Evil" want? Why did it come here, what's the motivation? It's just: "Here comes the Evil, beat anyone who gives pretentious speeches and is dressed in black." "The Villains" are absolutely useless and stone-cold emotionless. One of them appears on the screen for 5-10 minutes at max and has like 5 lines of dialogue throughout the entire movie. The heroes are a little better off, at least they are occasionally funny, but every time the plot needs to go beyond silly, mostly out-of-place jokes; its just cringe all the way. The film resembles an animated theater play for elementary school kids - no expectations of decent acting, everyone is there just to entertain the children. And I would like to point out that it isn't the fault of the actors, but of the poor scribble they got instead of a script. Each of the actors has potential, but if the writing is awful, your acting skills can't help you much (exactly what happened to Pattinson in "Twilight", you need years of rehabilitation after that). Unfortunately, by the end of this year there will be a part three released. Brace yourselves.
14 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Posledniy bogatyr Koren'Zla
eva3si0n19 June 2022
Posledniy bogatyr Koren'Zla is a sequel that failed to surpass the original. It's nothing new. If the first film could somehow surprise the viewer, Posledniy bogatyr. Koren'Zla is completely devoid of it. The plot is even more boring, and there are no other changes. You can recommend strictly to children who liked the original. I don't understand how they were able to do this trilogy. It became even interesting what will be shown in 3 films.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nice film
denisanelle19 January 2022
Well, the third part of the trilogy about the Last Hero is ripe. Fashionable emotions, gestalt closed. It seems like. But... The first film was very good. And cheerful, and funny, and for all that, not stupid at all. The characters were alive too. And the adventures are well written. That's why the story is a success.

The second film was weaker, they slightly exploited the theme of all sorts of games that had already died out on the Western cinema slope (but our current young filmmakers are epigones and enthusiastic barbarians, prostrate before shining Hollywood falling with delight). Nevertheless, the fairy tale was a success even then.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolutely lovely. Even better than part one.
rainfollower-95-64632420 December 2021
I've seen the first movie and I loved it. I love this one even more.

Thee are many things about the movie that can only be understood if you're Russian. But not only that. The movie is great for all kind of people and great on many levels: the direction, the cast, the acting, the make up, the costumes, the 'message' and the morals. The writing may be a bit simplistic, still it's no worse than your average superhero story. Better, I dare say. The visual effects may be not the best in the world, still they are good enough. The overall style may be a bit too much of a sweet 'fairy-tale', but a fairy-tale is what this movie is, basically!

My biggest praise goes to the director who managed to tell this visual story so wonderfully. And my second biggest praise goes to the actors. Ivan Khorinyak managed to pull out the most truthful fairy-tale Ivan character: 'Ivan the fool' who is also the hero at the same time. Baba Yaga played by the famous and loved Elena Yakovleva is the best new vision of this traditional character since... 70-s, I believe? Mila Sivatskaya as Vasilisa is absolutely lovely, the very symbol of Slavic beauty. Others are also wonderful.

Again, I will repeat: this "Last warrior" is the best thing that happened to the Russian cinema in decades! The triumphant comeback of the 'fairy-tale movie'. I love it!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed