Boston Strangler: The Untold Story (Video 2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Will the real Boston Strangler stand up.
michaelRokeefe31 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Michael Feifer writes and directs this "untold" story revolving around the terrifying serial killings of thirteen women in Boston in the early sixties. Police thought they had once and for all captured the infamous Boston Strangler in Albert DeSalvo(David Faustino). The women were sexually assaulted and left displayed with no shame and most strangled with their own nylon stockings. DeSalvo, psychotic and proud of the notoriety was convicted and later found stabbed to death in prison. The police were never fully convinced the killings were committed by just one man. This movie wants you to think you know who really did the killings other than DeSalvo.

This movie does not carry the intensity or even the interest possessed by the 1968 BOSTON STRANGLER starring Tony Curtis. And Faustino is damn sure not a Tony Curtis. His casting as DeSalvo seems so ludicrous; and at times comes off as a cocky buffoon instead of a "psycho" killer. I kept waiting for this movie to get better and it never did. Also in the cast: Andrew Divoff, Kostas Sommer, Joe Torry and Corin Nemec.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Tedious low budget which tell the truth
OJT10 February 2014
When U bought this, I actually though I bought the original movie from 1968, which has a cover almost like this one. It's not the American cover showed here, but almost identical to the poster shown on the 1968 movie. I realize this was done to confuse us Scandinavian DVD buyers, and I'm afraid to say they succeeded in fooling me.

No doubt the instructor of this failed in telling a story which you believe in, even though this is a true story, told quite truthfully. How's that possible? Well, simply by make a B-casting which aren't directed like it should have been.

The film is not very interesting. Still there is some effort put into it from some of the crew and the actors. But the talent is lacking from the film maker (and producer) which is spewing out films. I paid a dollar to see this, and I'm afraid to say that was at least a dollar too much.

If you still like watching bad movies, it has some qualities in the efforts from the actors, really trying their best.

Be wise, stay away from this! Wrote this to help you getting through the jungle, if you want to survive a world full of bad movies! If you bought this on DVD, which you probably did, throw away the CD and the paper, and use the plastic cover off one if your own CDs.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Atrocious Boston Accents all Around
kedo8818 December 2018
These actors better have received reimbursement for their dialogue coaches for telling them to drop all "r's". Hard and soft. This makes these people sound like idiots not Bostonians. The plot is convoluted at best.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Strangle me!
redcup18 December 2008
Boston Strangler: The Untold Story has been told. Not by this movie. It has been told by numerous docs and news shows. This movie is another example of low rent studios try to cash in on serial killer exploits no matter if it is a bad movie. Spike Lee showed with Son of Sam how to make a great movie based on a serial killer that has been covered from head to toe by docs and news shows. Nothing was shown that grabbed me by my collar.

No tension existed. Either who ever made this didn't know how to build up to the murders or didn't care. They collected their money from the studio. They don't care what people think. I am pleading directly to the director and studio chief of this movie to stop this. Planet earth is over run with waste. We as a people do not need to add to it with this sorry movie. Where do disappointed people write to get a refund? Who is with me?
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely terrible
twitchyx7 August 2008
"Boston Strangler : The Untold Story" is a poorly acted, horrendously written, low budget, garbage movie. This film fails on so many levels, it's difficult to know where to start. The acting is about on the level you would expect from a high school theater. As to why Bud Bundy was cast as the lead in this role, I'll never know. But to the actor's credit, they didn't have much to work with. The writing in this film is among the worst I've ever seen. We are forced to sit through many long pointless scenes and terrible, self-serving, completely unrealistic dialog sequences.

I recommend no one see this movie. Doing almost anything else for an hour and a half would be a better use of your time.
26 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just finished watching this film and doing a little research on the Boston Strangler.
jhpstrydom15 March 2009
After watching this film I did a little research of my own, if the info I got while viewing the web page on wikipedia is correct, then the self confessed Boston Strangler Albert DeSalvo was clearly full of sh**t, although DeSalvo himself was a piece of sh**t, but he was not the strangler, my reasons for saying this, is because my research revealed that some of the women DeSalvo said he raped showed no signs of sexual activity, and although DeSalvo supposedly revealed details of the murders that were not made public, none of his descriptions of the crimes were ever confirmed, yet their speculating on whether DeSalvo really was the strangler.

So I ask, what is so hard to grasp about the fact that DeSalvo took advantage of the Boston murders just so that he could get rich and famous or "infamous"? I for one would've supported the Sullivan family in saying that DeSalvo was not Mary Sullivan's killer.

As for this film, its nothing more than a worn out subject, and the films that depict real life serial killers have never really been anything to write home about, and this one is just following the trend.

Plus, people usually tell me to think a bit outside the box, if I had to give a profile, I'd say the strangler was pretty good at working his way into the lives of his victims, he was probably some secret love interest that the victims family and friends didn't know about, and probably preyed on a certain weakness, and he could've been a potential stalker watching his victims for days, one more thing, he might have more than a mother fixation, based on the fact that he also murdered elderly women, might want to look at someone else in the family or someone close to the family, and DeSalvo didn't go for elderly women.
1 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Won't watch again
crich-6971920 August 2018
I love movies based in Boston, since I am from the Boston area I have high expectations. This looked good but wasn't. The acting was not good also many plot holes. All around disappointment. Will not be watching this again.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"I don't think it's one man"
Clintborari13 March 2022
I must say that these particular films are, B-Grade horror movies, on very low budgets, and with some insufferable acting. So with that in mind don't expect this is going to be an accurate or astonishing depiction of the strangler. It's more a story of fiction, with a dramatized twist to make it more appealing.

There's an early scene in the apartment complex where I honest though, I was watching the start of a porno. The story was so similar that I couldn't distinguish the difference.

A naïve girl gets asked by a stranger if she would be perfect for modeling. She doesn't question anything about this man and agrees to take him, man, to her room. Some fondling occurs, and all of a sudden she accuses him of not being a modeling agent at all. Seem familiar?

At this stage, rather than being in the horror category, this could be in the comedy/softcore porn category.

The prison sequence in the last twenty or so minutes was my highlight of the film. It was a little more engaging, and the ending took me by a much-needed surprise.

This is a vastly different view of the Boston Strangler told from someone's perspective.

It tells a story of a petty criminal Albert De Salvo who cannot control his high sex drive. Albert is manipulated by an unusually intelligent inmate Frank Asarian (Presumed to be the actual Boston Strangler) to confess to the slew of strangler murders.

This film has some big flaws, starting with the flow. For example, the police force, namely John Marsden had little relevance. Despite being billed as a lead role, he was emotionless and served no real purpose in this particular story whatsoever.

Most of the other character arcs were just there to fill gaps. Such as the new police lead on the Boston Strangler case. Therefore, we were left with just the two characters who we despise for almost the whole second half of the movie and a bunch of people who just filter throughout the background.

The most colorful performance was by lawyer Stuart Whitmore played by Corin Nemic. He was cool, corrupt, and sophisticated.

I would say The Boston Strangler, the untold story is nothing more than a time filler. You can sit through It for some light-hearted entertainment. But only if you were desperate to kill an hour and a half, and don't care much for your time.

4/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An acceptable time-filler
Leofwine_draca30 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
BOSTON STRANGLER: THE UNTOLD STORY is a true crime flick made on a tiny budget just one step up from an indie feature. It's another look at the series of brutal murders that shocked America back in the 1960s, focusing on a disturbed young man who finds himself accused of the crimes, but might well be innocent. The staging looks very cheap here, and there are a few anachronisms to boot, but I found this largely watchable, if unsurprising. The cast is unknown aside from the underrated Andrew Divoff, who's good value as the detective on the case. This is no masterpiece, but it's an acceptable time-filler regardless.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bud Bundy Surprised Me!
Sylviastel11 June 2012
David Faustino surprised me as Albert De Salvo in this low budget film. Forget Bud Bundy, he really does a great job in bringing this suspect to life on screen. Short, illiterate, and possibly had a low I.Q. Albert De Salvo took a giant leap by being labeled the Boston Strangler. Although he had a wife and two kids, Albert De Salvo was a deeply troubled man and plagued with guilt. This film tells part of the story since it's possible that he wasn't the Boston Strangler after all. This film begins with a phone call to a doctor to talk about the Boston Strangler. During the course of the film, we see the frustrated Boston police, mayor, and journalists pressured to catch a serial killer. One police man had his doubts and he had every right to wonder if he had placed an innocent man in prison. Although De Salvo wasn't innocent entirely, this film depicts a man who would have been tortured by his conscience and guilt of other crimes. This film highlights Faustino's dramatic abilities. The story of this film has some holes and nobody in the cast is recognizable perhaps Corin Nemec who played the lawyer, Stuart Whitmore. There are still lots of questions about the Boston Strangular. But I'll leave it up to the audience. It's not a bad film but it's a low budget film.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Depalma should study this for his upcoming film on the same subject.
horrorcritic725 August 2008
Brutal Kills,Tension,Scares,Beautiful Women, and a well thought out story make this a 10 in my book.

For any of those of you who aren't familiar with Mike Feifer's past true crime/serial killer productions (Ed Gein:The Butcher of Plainfield, Chicago Massacre Richard Speck,and upcoming Ted Bundy)he's fast making a name for himself as one of the best horror directors in the business.

In "The Boston Strangler:The untold story" Feifer explores the dark psychology consuming Albert Desalvo and brings a completely fresh take to the story by expanding on the possibility that Albert Desalvo wasn't really the Boston Strangler. The film suggests that Desalvo was seeking notoriety as his motive to confess to the crimes committed by the Strangler and brings in another possible suspect (played to a tee by Kostas Summer)as the true strangler. This theory was discussed for years in newspapers following the Strangler Murders but has since faded from the public's memory until now. A MUST SEE FOR THE HARDCORE HORROR AND TRUE CRIME CROWD!!!
12 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Certainly Worthwhile If You're Interested In The Real Story
TheAnimalMother12 March 2022
How this film has only a 3.9/10 rating on this site right now is beyond me. It's really not nearly that bad. In fact, it is quite interesting and it's also probably the most accurate film made on the Boston Strangler case so far. The 1968 film is far better entertainment and of better quality for sure, it's a pretty strong film in many ways. But at the same time, the 1968 film has little concern for the reality of the actual true story. So in terms of the facts, this film is actually superior. This is definitely more of a drama than a horror. There really isn't many tense or graphic moments in this film. If you're interested in the actual real story and you don't mind your serial killer films being dramas, then this is likely worth a watch for you. The production quality and the acting are nothing special here, but neither are all that bad either. For me, this didn't make the story any less significant or watchable. I found it to be easily watchable in fact, and as I previously said, it's quite interesting. 6/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
boston strangler revisited in another serial killer movie
mrcibubur21 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
There are so many movies to watch these days I can be forgiven if I missed the earlier versions of the Boston Strangler. As a Brit, I had heard of the Strangler in childhood but didn't really know the story (true or otherwise). Just done a little bit of extra research to back up my thought process.

I actually enjoyed this film though I totally agree that David Faustino is no Tony Curtis, that this film is no blockbuster and Albert is portrayed as too cocky and unlikely to be the actual Strangler. Perhaps Mr Feiffer wanted us to think that from the beginning, more a scenario of who was the strangler but who it wasn't - and it couldn't be Albert, although the evidence in the film pointed to him.

The use of the newspaper cutting was clever and even subtle reference to the 1968 Tony Curtis movie itself. The guy in the cell with Albert and who collaborated with him, the name in the movie is different, real life is George something? A man of high IQ.

Obviously it prompts further research to understand background and I would like to see the 1968 curtis film plus a later one of 2006. What I am curious about is that the crimes of strangulations stopped, did they not, after Alberts arrest and detention - or did they continue? At the end of the movie (and this is hardly a spoiler in the circumstances) it is declared that there is conclusive DNA evidence against Albert being the killer of a couple of the ladies strangled and the film itself suggests that there were copycat crimes, as indeed there were for Jack the Ripper in London.

The film should be seen. it is not a powerful drama but I do believe that it does what it sets out to do (to tell the untold story) and sets the ever curious among us to do more research on the subject.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Your not famous Albert your infamous!
sol-kay7 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** The film "Boston Strangler: The Untold Story" doesn't take for granted that Albert De Salvo, David Faustina,is in fact that infamous serial murderer who terrorized the city of Boston from June 1962 to January 1964 murdering 13 women, ranging from 19 to 85, in the process.

We get to see De Salvo as a petty criminal who got caught up with the frenzy of the strangler murders long after they stopped. Having been arrested for a series of crimes from attempted rape to breaking and entering and robbery De Salvo got influenced by his cell-mate convicted murderer Frank Asarian, Kostas Sommers, who convinced De Salvo that there was big bucks in him confessing to the strangler murders. ***SPOILER ALERT***It was then that a weak willed and desperate, in taking care of his family, Albert De Salvo fell hook line and sinker for it which eventually, in making himself a marked man behind bars, lead to his murder.

We get to see De Salvo and Asarian cook up a number false claims and phony evidence in trying to prove that De Salvo was actually the notorious Boston Strangler. De Salvo who claimed that he had a photographic memory crammed all the evidence he could find, with the help of cell-mate Asarian, in his not so accurate mind that had him make a total fool of himself when he was asked by a state appointed psychiatrist to recreate the events.

It's later in the film after De Savlo was given a life sentence for his rape and robbery convictions that he soon realized in talking with his, and Asarian,lawyer Stuart Whitmore, Corin Nemec, what a total mess he made for himself. Even though De Salvo was never tried or convicted, or in fact even indited, for the Boston Strangler killings the fact that he tried so hard to take credit, as well as make himself rich, for them influenced his jury to give him the ultra harsh sentence that he untimely received!

We already see where De Salvo is going at the very beginning of the movie in his attempt, through the prison psychiatrist, to come clean and tell the truth about his involvement or non involvement in the killings that he so readily took credit for. As we all know De Salvo never lived to tell the story in him being found murdered in the maximum security Walpol Prison infirmary on the morning of November 25, 1973; De Salvo who took the secret of the strangler murders, and what he had or had not to do with them, to his grave was only 42 years old.

Even though it's nowhere as well known or effective as the far more popular 1968 blockbuster version of "The Boston Strangler" staring Tony Curtis as Albert De Salvo this straight to DVD treatment of the story is more accurate given all the evidence that came to light, like DNA evidence disputing at last one of De Salvo's murder claims, over the last 35 or so years after De Salvo death. Nobody on the case ever took De Salvo's claims in being the infamous serial killer seriously especially the man in charge of the case Det. Jon Marsden, Andrew Divoff.

It seemed that De Salvo was the perfect pasty in his willingness to take responsibly in the stranglers murders and the higher ups in both the Boston Police Department and City Government, in order to cover their behinds in them not being able to solve the case, gladly went along with him. If in fact De Salvo wasn't the Boston Strangler, as the movie claims, then who was? And if so did he, the real Boston Strangle, not only escape ultimate justice but kept on committing more horrendous crimes that escaped the eye of both the Boston Police and the local and National News media?
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
NOT A SLASHER FILM
nogodnomasters4 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I was expecting a slasher type of film from the DVD cover. Instead what I got was more akin to a historical drama. This is what we believe is the story of Albert De Salvo (David Faustino), the man who confessed to being the Boston Strangler. The film shows several women being strangled, but not really grindhouse style, more of a Hitchcock style. The accents were good. The acting and plot was decent, although the story just never grabbed me. There is no nudity and no graphic rape scenes, just disturbing strangling scenes. It is interesting from an historical sense, but not overly entertaining, yet not a bad film. Hence the so-so rating.

F-bombs.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
low budget aside, this is a decent crime/thriller and based on true events
daworldismine31 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
there have been a few movies about the boston strangler, but the other movies have been portrayed as albert desalvo bieng convicted of and bieng the boston strangler, even though it's widely known that he more than likely wasn't't and only admitted to bieng the strangler for notoriety, and money, this is what this movie is about and even if it isn't 100 percent accurate, its no lees accurate than the others, in fact this is probably still the most closest version to the truth so far. the movie isn't a masterpiece and at times the low budget is apparent, bur for the most part there is good acting, good script, and a good movie, not one of the best no, but for fans of true crime and serial killer movies, this is good stuff
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mixed feelings
nicholls_les17 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
David Faustino tried his best to act as the sick individual that Albert Desalvo was, regardless of whether he was the man who committed all murders associated with 'The Boston Strangler', he committed at least one, proved by later DNA evidence. But I could not stop thinking 'what's Bud Bundy doing using such foul language?' The story itself was however interesting and you were left concluding Desalvo probably did not commit all murders attributed to 'The Boston Strangler', Andrew Divoff was the stand out actor as the detective who believed there was more than one killer.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed