Battle 360 (TV Series 2008– ) Poster

(2008– )

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Superb documentary series
grantss26 April 2018
A documentary series on one of the most famous ships in history - the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CV-6). The Enterprise fought in almost every major naval battle in the Pacific theatre of WW2, escaping serious damage on many occasions, often by the narrowest of margins. Through CGI and film footage, we see the Enterprise's action-filled WW2 history.

Superb documentary series. Captures well USS Enterprise's legendary WW2 career: its close escapes and glories, its massive contribution to the Allied victory over Japan and its damage and losses. Good use of historic film footage as well as CGI.

Stirring, action-filled series.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Loads of fun!
Bry-28 March 2008
The CGI isn't up to current standards, and they tend to flip and re-use many shots, but given that it's a History Channel production, and therefore doesn't have an HBO-sized budget, this is a very interesting and fun show.

The CGI is good and more than adequate to the task (although a scene of the carrier Akagi taking a direct hit on a Japanese plane on the flight-deck shows the plane engulfed in flames but not blown to smithereens). My only real criticism is that the narration skips a lot of detail.

Those of us who have read a lot on the Battle of Midway know Soryu was sunk a little after Kaga and Akagi, but that knowledge seems to be assumed by the writers -- of course, these first episodes focus almost entirely on USS Enterprise, CV-6, and not the battle as a whole, so maybe a "Battle 360" just on Midway would clear that up. That kind of omission is forgivable for viewers who know this stuff and just like to see things blow up (like me), but for neophytes, it may be confusing.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The most revered ship of world war 2
nickenchuggets8 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
To be honest, I should have reviewed this show a very long time ago, since it is one of the earliest well made second world war series I remember watching. It is very similar to Dogfights, a show that I talked about a few months ago and used to have good memories watching. It's one of those programs that I can see again and again without getting tired of it, because it focuses on world war 2 and uses advanced computer animation to recreate important aerial battles. Battle 360 on the other hand is not really air combat focused, but does involve a great amount of it. This show follows the real life exploits and adventures of the USS Enterprise, the most successful ship the US Navy had during world war 2. As you'll find out, the Enterprise was at the top of the japanese hit list, and was hunted relentlessly by submarines, planes, and other ships wherever it went. It was also the highest performing ship of the entire war, period. The series gets us familiar with how legendary the ship was very quickly. It states how the Enterprise (or Lucky E as she was called) acquires one battle star for every major engagement she participates in. By the end of the war, Enterprise will have 20 of them, way more than any other ship. This carrier was there for everything, from the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, to the doorstep of Japan. This show means a lot to me (even if the animation looks a bit dated now) because the stories it tells are timeless. The people who signed up and served on this ship were very courageous men, and even though most were scared to death, they did what they had to do. Battle 360 also features interviews with Enterprise sailors, including Don "Flash" Gordon, who was a Hellcat pilot onboard the ship and one of the best flying aces of the Pacific theater. As for the historical accuracy itself, Battle 360 does a great job of conveying America's war against the Japanese Empire to the audience in a clearly understandable manner. The fighting in the Pacific was pure hell, and no matter how many islands Marines took, they could always be assured the next one was going to be worse. The closer to Japan America got, the more desperate their fighting became. By the final episode of the series, the Enterprise is off the coast of Okinawa in 1945, and the war is almost over. The japanese, knowing they can't hold America's industrial might back much longer, turn to suicidal means of accomplishing their goals. Suicide planes are flown right into the decks of US warships, with their pilots knowing full well that they'll die. One of these actually strikes the Enterprise, causing more damage to it than any other enemy attack so far. Unfortunately, this is the end of the line for the ship, and even though it would survive to be repaired, the war ended before it could be returned to service. Post war, Enterprise was (tragically) recycled for spare parts, as the US Navy was looking towards the future (jet aircraft) and didn't want an old 1930s ship to accommodate these. It's a very sad end to the most iconic warship in american history, but as this series demonstrates, the Enterprise may be gone, and her veterans may die, but its memories live forever. World war 2's naval history wouldn't be complete without the mention of this vessel. Overall, Battle 360 is not only a very informative series, but also manages to entertain longtime ww2 enthusiasts (like me) with its realistic animation and accurate retelling of important battles.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some errors
SipteaHighTea14 March 2008
The episode about Guadacanel has a couple of errors. First of all, Saburo Sakai, the Japanese fighter ace was wounded; however, in his book Samurai, he stated that he was attacking a group of F4F Wildcats. However, he saw them bundle close together and when he came closer and closer to the formation, he saw that they were TBM Avenger torpedo bombers. The bombers tighten their formation so their ball turrets could throw up a wall of fire. Becauase he was going so fast, Saburo had to go right through the formation instead of evading it. The end result was he was wounded as stated in the show.

Before the encountering the torpedo planes, Sakai did shoot down a Dauntless, and he engage in a dogfight with an F4F Wildcat piloted by James Pug Sutherland for several minutes before shooting him down. These facts were not shown in the show. There was nothing mention in Sakai's book about shooting another F4F Wildcat. The pilot who was shot up by Sakai look a lot younger than those other guys that were telling their stories.

In the espisode about the Battle of Santa Cruz, they stated that Lt. Stanley Swede Vejtasa shot down 5 Val dive bombers and 2 Kate torpedo planes. Actually, he shot down 2 Val dive bombers and 5 Kate torpedo planes. I don't know why they can't get their facts straight. It makes you wonder how much they are distorting the facts in the war stories.
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
WW2 as Low Attention Span Theater
Steve_Nyland16 March 2014
Stumbled upon this series by coincidence; Had been reading up on the Battle of Santa Cruz and what the hey, gave the episode on it a try via the marvel of YouTube. It's hypnotic viewing with a compelling lead character in the WW2 era U.S.S. Enterprise, easily the greatest warship to prowl the seven seas. What's interesting and somewhat different is the high-octane barrage of busy action scenes visualized by computer animators who had seen "Return of the King". If you've ever wondered what it might have looked like to see 100 plane wave attacks from every possible angle here you go, with one of the most interesting aspects being the depiction of the anti-aircraft efforts flung into the air, something that still photos & grainy archival films from the era never make clear. Like, wow.

Brings the harrowing nature of this form of combat to home, though all of the hyperactivity succeeds at the expense of subtlety. No shot in the series lasts for more than a second, with animation effects adding flourishes to the stream of layered visual information which never lets up. And after watching a couple three episodes one gets familiar with certain sequences used as stock footage (a cost saving measure for the then expensive GCI renderings). Every last moment is also orchestrated with booming music, giving WW2 a techno metal beat between outbursts of "Victory at Sea" type strings.

I guess all this is a good thing however, since here for once is a living color version of WW2 that viewers raised in the electronic/digital age can watch both as a pop culture entertainment and historical document. The final ingredient being something to remind the attention deficit oriented viewers that the events, places & actions depicted were real, a job honorably seen through by the inclusion of veterans adding their color commentary, reflecting on what it was like to be there. It's engaging viewing, not sure how much memory retention of the facts presented will take place but that's why you hit the web after to read up a bit more. Or maybe even go find a book? Hey, you never know.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Informative and Irritating.
rmax30482321 April 2014
I'm just judging from the first episode, "Call to Duty," which covers such subjects as the building of the USS Enterprise and the beginning of World War II in the Pacific, up Doolittle's raid on Japan early in 1942.

I doubt that the remaining episodes will be much different in their presentation, but I intend to watch them because some of the incidents, all seen from the perspective of the ship, are given short shrift in other documentaries. After all, how often do you hear about a raid on Kwajalein by Enterprise's torpedo bombers and dive bombers? It wasn't glamorous, the damage was not strategic, and it was over with quickly and without drama. And there is no combat footage of the raid. Here, it's given fairly extensive treatment -- about five minutes' worth.

Structurally, it blends CGIs, newsreel footage, and several talking heads, including some participants. It's a healthy mixture. Of course, choices had to be made and the overall picture of the Pacific war is neglected in favor of the career of the Enterprise. The newsreel footage doesn't always match the events being described. A description of Pearl Harbor after the Japanese attack is accompanied by color film of the battle for Midway. But that's niggling. The CGI's are impressive, given the period and the budget. And the viewer will learn some details about the ships and airplanes, as well as what it feels like to pull out of a seventy-degree dive at one thousand feet.

What almost ruins an otherwise fine documentary are the editing and the tone of the narration. Maybe the director and the editor were on mushrooms. I don't think a single shot lacks camera motion or lasts longer than two seconds. The camera zig zags, and sometimes the image switches rapidly from positive to negative and back again. Often one irrelevant image (say, a compass) is superimposed on footage of men loading a gun. Except for the computer's reconstructions, every frame seems to be speckled with drifting snow.

It's not just distracting, and it's not just irritating. It's insulting. The ultimate effect is that of a child's video game with constant action, and loud bangs on the sound track, or maybe a TV commercial for a male enhancement product.

The narration, although largely accurate in its historical aspects, is likewise aimed at high schoolers, or so it seems. "The pilots now had a chance to indulge their taste for revenge". "They slammed into the zeros." One expects that from a war-time flag waver but not from a serious treatment of a serious subject sixty or seventy years after the fact. I can't wait for the last episode when our football team tears down the opponent's goal posts.

The "Battlefield" series, also available on YouTube, has its own weaknesses but it's not offensive. A larger question is, if the media increasingly treat the audience like impatient ten-year olds, how should the viewers be expected to respond?
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed