It is wonderful to see a film about the heroic struggle of the people of Taiwan for democracy and independence, even if I and my wife were the only people in theater at a 7:20 p.m. Saturday showing on the day of its release in Michigan. Unfortunately, the best thing I can say for it is that the backstory is basically true - there was a Taiwanese-American murdered in the U.S. by a Taiwanese gang, apparently at the instigation of Republic of China's government, possibly because he had embarrassed it by writing an unflattering biography of then R.O.C. President Chiang Ching-Kuo, and the atrocities portrayed in the film did largely happen, albeit at different times and under different circumstances. The film systematically garbles and almost trivializes a series of horrible crimes against the Taiwanese which actually occurred over a period of years by making virtually every crime of the late KMT period seem to occur within the same week as part of an effort to stymie an FBI investigation of the murder. Equally annoying was the gross parody of how actual criminal investigations in foreign countries are conducted. U.S. criminal investigators abroad always at least appear to cooperate (and show respect for) their foreign counterparts even when they suspect, as is often the case, that they are less than enthusiastic about the investigation. No FBI agent is going to charge into a foreign government's takedown of a suspect, and fight his way past a army of armed soldiers to try to get to the perpetrator first. The agent's other activities in the film are equally preposterous, going way beyond "cowboyish" to simply suicidal, both for himself and his informants. In short, the film provides a very garbled overview of recent Taiwanese history combined with the most absurd portrayal of a U.S. overseas criminal investigation since Rush Hour.
35 Reviews
Odd mix of good production values and mismanaged narrative work
rzajac26 November 2010
I had to hang with the film for a while before it started to pay off. Until then, it sort of felt like a well-funded political action thriller directed and constructed somewhat less than professionally.
In the end, you could do worse if you dig political action. But lapses in narrative work and character development prevent me from calling this a truly fine film.
I live in Taiwan. I have to say that the film rather does succeed in putting some faces and blood and sweat and tears behind the bits of history that I've learned since I came here.
If you're thinking of renting it, I'd recommend at least a quick peruse of some online materials related to Taiwan in the post-War period, up to the time depicted (the '80s).
In the end, you could do worse if you dig political action. But lapses in narrative work and character development prevent me from calling this a truly fine film.
I live in Taiwan. I have to say that the film rather does succeed in putting some faces and blood and sweat and tears behind the bits of history that I've learned since I came here.
If you're thinking of renting it, I'd recommend at least a quick peruse of some online materials related to Taiwan in the post-War period, up to the time depicted (the '80s).
Educate yourself
Leofwine_draca29 March 2016
FORMOSA BETRAYED is better as teaching material than it is a thriller. It's an unashamedly political movie that aims to explore the complex and often murky goings-on in early 1980s Taiwan, where government-sponsored assassinations were more often than not the norm and where the secret war with China continued unabated.
Onto this admittedly intriguing backdrop has been stapled a somewhat straightforward thriller, with American import James Van Der Beek investigating a murder. A whole host of Asian-American actors play in support to either help or hinder him along, and there are some admittedly exciting and/or shocking moments thrown in along the way. However, this is very much a B-picture in feel in terms of style and execution, although that unusual backdrop makes it worth watching.
Onto this admittedly intriguing backdrop has been stapled a somewhat straightforward thriller, with American import James Van Der Beek investigating a murder. A whole host of Asian-American actors play in support to either help or hinder him along, and there are some admittedly exciting and/or shocking moments thrown in along the way. However, this is very much a B-picture in feel in terms of style and execution, although that unusual backdrop makes it worth watching.
Fact Events in Taiwan that inspired the making of the movie
mskung20038 March 2010
1) Kaohsiung Incident (1979) - A demonstration led by Formosa Magazine staff resulted in the Martial Law arrest of dozens of dissidents.
2) Lin Family Massacre (1980) - A grim murder of the 7 years old twin girls and their 70 years old grandma in their house then under 24-hour surveillance by the Garrison Command (Taiwan secret police). The day before her murder, the grandma had managed to reach out the international human right organizations about the brutal treatment received by her son in jail. Her son Lin Yi-Hsiung was among the Kaohsiung Incident dissidents arrested.
3) The Murder of Chen Wen-Chen (1981) - Carnegie Mellon University professor Chen Wen-Chen, while visiting Taiwan, was interrogated by the Garrison Command agents two days in a roll. He never returned home. Dr. Chen had been an active Taiwan independence advocate.
4) The Assassination of Henry Liu (1984) - California resident and Journalist Henry Liu was killed in his garage by mafia killers sent overseas by the Taiwan Garrison Command (the secret police head was later sentenced to life by Taiwan authority). Liu had just released a book about the reigning president Chiang Jing-Guo, son and successor of Chiang Kai-Shek.
2) Lin Family Massacre (1980) - A grim murder of the 7 years old twin girls and their 70 years old grandma in their house then under 24-hour surveillance by the Garrison Command (Taiwan secret police). The day before her murder, the grandma had managed to reach out the international human right organizations about the brutal treatment received by her son in jail. Her son Lin Yi-Hsiung was among the Kaohsiung Incident dissidents arrested.
3) The Murder of Chen Wen-Chen (1981) - Carnegie Mellon University professor Chen Wen-Chen, while visiting Taiwan, was interrogated by the Garrison Command agents two days in a roll. He never returned home. Dr. Chen had been an active Taiwan independence advocate.
4) The Assassination of Henry Liu (1984) - California resident and Journalist Henry Liu was killed in his garage by mafia killers sent overseas by the Taiwan Garrison Command (the secret police head was later sentenced to life by Taiwan authority). Liu had just released a book about the reigning president Chiang Jing-Guo, son and successor of Chiang Kai-Shek.
Needs a higher budget and better actors.
deloudelouvain7 January 2019
For the story Formosa Betrayed deserves a good rating as it was an interesting and informative story because it was based on true events. But it isn't a great movie, for that the acting was just too average. I've nothing against soap or series actors as their is a demand for it but sometimes it just clearly shows. In this case James Van Der Beek will always be seen as Dawson. The rest of the cast did their best but they're just not top actors and that is something that would have made this movie better. But like I said the story was interesting and that's the most important. I had the feeling I was watching a television movie, so with a higher budget and better actors it could just have been much better.
An Almost Wasted Effort
A Good Try, But...
LeonLouisRicci24 June 2014
So Much History in such a Little Movie is the Problem with this Well Intentioned "Mind Opener". It Wants so Badly to Inform that it Overloads its Message with Everything and Anything Concerning the Recent and Not So Recent History of Taiwan, Formerly Known as Formosa.
The Filmmakers are Noticeably Nervous here as it Tries with its Low Budget and B-Movie Actors to Concoct a Watchable, Intriguing, Fact-Based Story in the Form of a Political Thriller. It Somewhat Succeeds but the End Result is a lot Less Successful and Fitting for the Very Serious Subject Matter.
A Documentary would have been a Better way to get the History Lesson across to the Apathetic and Uninformed because this is just so much Low-Budget Muddle the Lesson is Buried Among the Rubble of a Condensed and Complicated Story Fit.
The Taiwanese Situation During the Cold War was an Important History Concerning Communism, Police States, and China's Mainland Bullying of the Little Island and are all Historically Important Deserving a Much Clearer Exposition and Explanation. Something Like this is just too Easily Dismissed and Therefore an Almost Wasted Effort.
The Filmmakers are Noticeably Nervous here as it Tries with its Low Budget and B-Movie Actors to Concoct a Watchable, Intriguing, Fact-Based Story in the Form of a Political Thriller. It Somewhat Succeeds but the End Result is a lot Less Successful and Fitting for the Very Serious Subject Matter.
A Documentary would have been a Better way to get the History Lesson across to the Apathetic and Uninformed because this is just so much Low-Budget Muddle the Lesson is Buried Among the Rubble of a Condensed and Complicated Story Fit.
The Taiwanese Situation During the Cold War was an Important History Concerning Communism, Police States, and China's Mainland Bullying of the Little Island and are all Historically Important Deserving a Much Clearer Exposition and Explanation. Something Like this is just too Easily Dismissed and Therefore an Almost Wasted Effort.
Quite Good, Then Fails
Easygoer1022 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This film started well. The first half is told in a present/past/present form, which gets old fast. It does pick up near the latter parts; however, it does a fast nose dive, ultimately crashing to boredom. If the last part had been written better, it could have been a much better film. I get the feeling the screenplay changed writers. Whether it did or not is irrelevant. Bombs out, friends.
Made in Taiwan
tim-764-29185613 August 2012
This film was on Sky Movies.
For those that don't know, Formosa has been called Taiwan since 1945 and under Chinese jurisdiction, though attempts at independence has been a stormy affair. This is relevant as it's key to the film, as a distinguished Taiwanese professor is murdered in the U.S.
Stated to be based on actual events, and set in the 1980's, an FBI agent - a quite undistinguished James Van Der Beek, is sent to 'observe and report', which of course he doesn't just do. When his key inside mole is murdered in front of him, a whole can of worms is uncovered, revealing conspiracies from deep within both the U.S and Taiwanese governments.
The movie starts off smartly but soon resorts to bog-standard TV episode crime thriller standards, albeit with a few interesting and unusual locations thrown in. The cast are almost all average and bland. As the film tapered off, one expected some kind of finale to give a memorable boost, but it just blacked out to message boards, telling us that Taiwan is still attempting to break free from China and at this particular moment, the U.S do not acknowledge Taiwan as an independent state.
For those that are concerned by this, then it will obviously be of significance, but I for one, wasn't, really. The story within may hold one's interest and if so, you may enjoy this, but otherwise, I'd have to say don't bother.
For those that don't know, Formosa has been called Taiwan since 1945 and under Chinese jurisdiction, though attempts at independence has been a stormy affair. This is relevant as it's key to the film, as a distinguished Taiwanese professor is murdered in the U.S.
Stated to be based on actual events, and set in the 1980's, an FBI agent - a quite undistinguished James Van Der Beek, is sent to 'observe and report', which of course he doesn't just do. When his key inside mole is murdered in front of him, a whole can of worms is uncovered, revealing conspiracies from deep within both the U.S and Taiwanese governments.
The movie starts off smartly but soon resorts to bog-standard TV episode crime thriller standards, albeit with a few interesting and unusual locations thrown in. The cast are almost all average and bland. As the film tapered off, one expected some kind of finale to give a memorable boost, but it just blacked out to message boards, telling us that Taiwan is still attempting to break free from China and at this particular moment, the U.S do not acknowledge Taiwan as an independent state.
For those that are concerned by this, then it will obviously be of significance, but I for one, wasn't, really. The story within may hold one's interest and if so, you may enjoy this, but otherwise, I'd have to say don't bother.
Not a documentary. For non-Taiwanese
borcheng-816-6520116 August 2010
Its not hard to understand why some people took the movie as offensive. Although not a documentary, the movie has events that actually occurred in Taiwan's recent history. Those brought up under KMT's propaganda can't believe such capable government can do such nasty things behind people's back. :D
There are so basic facts about the movie.
1. Not a documentary: Inspired by actual events, but not actual events. 2. For non-Taiwanese audiences: Or those not-familiar with Taiwan and her background. This "Free China" was backed by the US to fight communists but at the expense of severely restricting human rights in Taiwan. 3. Not actual scenes: Unfortunately, due to funding and the political situation in Taiwan, the set needs to be filmed elsewhere than Taiwan.
This movie is a must-see for those who wants to know more about Taiwan and even for those who knows nothing about Taiwan and wants to know the island that makes everything in the 70s and 80s. People who calls it a propaganda is probably afraid of viewers will become interested and search for more info on the background of Taiwan, especially those times under the rule of KMT. Human rights and justice are universal common values, however, the Taiwanese people was not able to enjoy such.
There are so basic facts about the movie.
1. Not a documentary: Inspired by actual events, but not actual events. 2. For non-Taiwanese audiences: Or those not-familiar with Taiwan and her background. This "Free China" was backed by the US to fight communists but at the expense of severely restricting human rights in Taiwan. 3. Not actual scenes: Unfortunately, due to funding and the political situation in Taiwan, the set needs to be filmed elsewhere than Taiwan.
This movie is a must-see for those who wants to know more about Taiwan and even for those who knows nothing about Taiwan and wants to know the island that makes everything in the 70s and 80s. People who calls it a propaganda is probably afraid of viewers will become interested and search for more info on the background of Taiwan, especially those times under the rule of KMT. Human rights and justice are universal common values, however, the Taiwanese people was not able to enjoy such.
more of a history lesson
SnoopyStyle12 May 2016
It's 1983. University professor Henry Wen is killed in Chicago. FBI agents Jake Kelly (James Van Der Beek) and Tom Braxton (John Heard) are assigned the case. They join police detective Lisa Gilbert (Leslie Hope). Henry was rumored to be writing a book. His widow gives Kelly the name of Dr. Huang Li Pei at the National Palace Museum. The two suspects injure Gilbert and escape back to Taiwan. There is no extradition process but Kelly is allowed to assist. Susan Kane (Wendy Crewson) is the American liaison and Kuo (Tzi Ma) is the Taiwanese liaison. Superintenant Loh and Captain Chen are investigating. The country is under a rabid anti-communist military government who is pushing the local mob as the culprit.
This is more a history lesson than an action thriller. There is a bit of international political intrigue but it's all pretty straight forward pro democracy stuff. It isn't much of a crime story. The tension never gets too high. There is action but this ain't no Jason Bourne. Van Der Beek is functional. Nothing is outstanding but there is a bit of local insights.
This is more a history lesson than an action thriller. There is a bit of international political intrigue but it's all pretty straight forward pro democracy stuff. It isn't much of a crime story. The tension never gets too high. There is action but this ain't no Jason Bourne. Van Der Beek is functional. Nothing is outstanding but there is a bit of local insights.
Pure garbage propaganda
Suestonto20 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Never have I seen a propaganda film release to the public like its a Hollywood film. I repeat, it's a propaganda film. Nothing in the film is base on true history.
There's a group of radical Taiwanese who wants the independence of Taiwan. It's a very minor group. The best comparison in American history is the people of modern South who still believed in Confederacy.
This radical group of Taiwanese wants international attention, so it decided to package a propaganda film into a Hollywood dramatized product.
It cannot find any Taiwanese who take its idea seriously, so the people of the Pro TI group decided to go to Thailand to hire a bunch of cheap labors to do its deed. The Thai people don't care about Taiwanese politic, so some demonstration scenes contain many paid Thai lethargically raising their hands on a topic they have no interest.
There's many dialogs about Taiwanese that's absolutely misleading. I repeat, it's propaganda film, so it doesn't surprise anyone. One of the actors claimed Taiwanese was speaking their native language "Taiwanese", and NOT Chinese. It's not true. These Taiwanese were speaking "Min Nan", which is the language derives from Fujian, a province of China.
There's also an over emphasis of the 228 incident. The people who were killed were highly educated rich folks and land owners. Normal Taiwanese at that time didn't have free time to demonstrate politically. Of course the decedents of the rich folks decided it was bad for them in Taiwan. That's why they abandoned Taiwan and immigrated to US. You have to be ultra rich guy to be able to travel abroad back then. I believe the producer is one of the decedents. Of course, no real normal people care about this 228 stuff.
Finally, Henry Wen (Liu in real life)in the film was murdered because he was a triple agent (PRC, Taiwan and FBI).
There's a group of radical Taiwanese who wants the independence of Taiwan. It's a very minor group. The best comparison in American history is the people of modern South who still believed in Confederacy.
This radical group of Taiwanese wants international attention, so it decided to package a propaganda film into a Hollywood dramatized product.
It cannot find any Taiwanese who take its idea seriously, so the people of the Pro TI group decided to go to Thailand to hire a bunch of cheap labors to do its deed. The Thai people don't care about Taiwanese politic, so some demonstration scenes contain many paid Thai lethargically raising their hands on a topic they have no interest.
There's many dialogs about Taiwanese that's absolutely misleading. I repeat, it's propaganda film, so it doesn't surprise anyone. One of the actors claimed Taiwanese was speaking their native language "Taiwanese", and NOT Chinese. It's not true. These Taiwanese were speaking "Min Nan", which is the language derives from Fujian, a province of China.
There's also an over emphasis of the 228 incident. The people who were killed were highly educated rich folks and land owners. Normal Taiwanese at that time didn't have free time to demonstrate politically. Of course the decedents of the rich folks decided it was bad for them in Taiwan. That's why they abandoned Taiwan and immigrated to US. You have to be ultra rich guy to be able to travel abroad back then. I believe the producer is one of the decedents. Of course, no real normal people care about this 228 stuff.
Finally, Henry Wen (Liu in real life)in the film was murdered because he was a triple agent (PRC, Taiwan and FBI).
A murder-mystery that offers an intriguing insight into the complexities and brutalities of Cold War relations between the US and Taiwan.
eiggsmith5 September 2009
I didn't know what to expect with this film. Murder-mysteries are not generally my thing, but this one pulled it off with a truly insightful look into Taiwan in the early 1980s. Objective viewers of this movie will appreciate its fresh perspective on a sometimes tired Cold War theme.
Rather than presenting a documentary explaining the compromising complexities of relations between the US and its less-than-democratic allies in Taiwan in their fight against the "Reds", Formosa Betrayed hooks the viewer with dramatic events that keep us waiting to peel away the layers of characters we see to figure out what's going on. In the process, we learn of their individual hardships, heartaches, and disillusionment; as well as their hope, courage, and betrayal. While the limited depth of some characters may leave viewers wanting more, the basic story keeps us captivated.
Formosa Betrayed does a good job of piecing together scenes in a modified chronology of events to provide an enticing but very smooth flow. Attention to details like uniforms, posters, architecture, and nature provides scenery that keeps us transported in the appropriate space in time. Combined with these elements is an excellent soundtrack that completes a well-done film.
While the story's plot - like its characters or the actors that played them - could have been sharpened to provide more astute answers to the many questions that are raised, it makes me think there is room to explore similar themes in the future.
Rather than presenting a documentary explaining the compromising complexities of relations between the US and its less-than-democratic allies in Taiwan in their fight against the "Reds", Formosa Betrayed hooks the viewer with dramatic events that keep us waiting to peel away the layers of characters we see to figure out what's going on. In the process, we learn of their individual hardships, heartaches, and disillusionment; as well as their hope, courage, and betrayal. While the limited depth of some characters may leave viewers wanting more, the basic story keeps us captivated.
Formosa Betrayed does a good job of piecing together scenes in a modified chronology of events to provide an enticing but very smooth flow. Attention to details like uniforms, posters, architecture, and nature provides scenery that keeps us transported in the appropriate space in time. Combined with these elements is an excellent soundtrack that completes a well-done film.
While the story's plot - like its characters or the actors that played them - could have been sharpened to provide more astute answers to the many questions that are raised, it makes me think there is room to explore similar themes in the future.
distorted facts with a mixture of events roll into one
ahab62512 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The movie is full of misleading ideas and fictional information. With poor casts selection and bad acting.
When did FBI agent authorize to handle cases oversea? And a Taiwanese waiter that speaks better English than Chinese? A museum director knows when the police raid takes place? Combining multiple events that happens in different years into one event.
Adds none existing fiction to dramatize the story.
The list goes on and on.
It is a film made to promote certain political interest.
It holds no more truth than most fictional movies.
It was a pain to sit through the 1hr 45min.
When did FBI agent authorize to handle cases oversea? And a Taiwanese waiter that speaks better English than Chinese? A museum director knows when the police raid takes place? Combining multiple events that happens in different years into one event.
Adds none existing fiction to dramatize the story.
The list goes on and on.
It is a film made to promote certain political interest.
It holds no more truth than most fictional movies.
It was a pain to sit through the 1hr 45min.
Let's Unleash Them On The Chincoms.
rmax3048232 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The political framework on which the story hangs is evidently drawn from historical incidents, but the story sucks. The film is a sort of true-crime docudrama of the sort that shows up on TV from time to time. It can't make up its mind whether it wants to be more docu or more drama, and the result is a pretty choppy piece of work.
A renowned Chinese professor is assassinated in Chicago and the FBI investigation leads one agent (Van Der Beek) to Taiwan, formerly Formosa, homeland of the now dead scholar. The authorities greet him, promise him observer status, but make it clear he will not carry out any independent investigation. Then they quickly try to shuffle him aside with restaurants and parties. "Enjoy the many pleasures of Taipei." The rest of the film demonstrates that the government of Taiwan is thoroughly corrupt, murderous, lying, greedy, and given to exploitation of the United States. Since the events described are true, or close to it, I'm sympathetic to the native Taiwanese' desire for independence, but the movie is so clumsily written and edited that I was never really sure who they wanted independence from. From the mainland Chinese? They're already independent of the PRC. From the residue of the government of Chiang Kai Shek? That makes more sense. Chiang lost the war against the Chinese communists led by Mao Tse Tung in 1947 and moved what was left of his army to Taiwan, where he became a ruthless dictator. It was like some third world country in Latin America. He was roundly hated by the Taiwanese whom he hadn't yet exterminated. No reason to doubt that, according to some anthropologists I know who did field work on Taiwan during the early 60s. We supported him not because he was the model of a democratic leader but because he wasn't a communist. During the Korean War, General Douglas MacArthur wanted to "unleash" Chiang Kai Shek and let him invade the mainland, which was pretty funny, even at the time.
But back to the movie. There are so many threads involved that it's awfully confusing. Van Der Beek's principal contact in Taipei is an embassy official, a woman who is somehow involved in secret deals to buy arms from Nicaragua. The guy who assassinated the professor tries to assassinate Van Der Beek but then changes his mind, decides to testify for the independence movement, and is himself assassinated by parties unknown but probably impolite.
I didn't like the acting. Will Tiao as Ming is okay, sympatico in appearance and demeanor. Mintita Wattanakul, a Thai actress, is almost edible. But the audience proxy is poor James Van Der Beek. He cannot act. He lends the movie's center a ligneous presence, a la David Duchovny in "The X Files", which might pass for being cool. But one or two scenes call for outrage and he can't handle it.
The direction by Adam Kane is very fashionable and it's terrible. The palette is ghoul green. The camera never stops moving. That's okay for the inevitable chase through an open Chinese market but not for a medium two shot of people trading lines. There are gigantic close ups, for the sight challenged. Van Der Beek is young, handsome, outfitted in tailored suits, his hair perfectly styled and dry blown, and he wears an a la mode day's growth of beard whose density and length don't vary -- no matter if he's spent the night in jail or in a ritzy hotel room. You know, your typical FBI agent who looks exactly like a Hollywood movie star?
It's a dumb movie about how bad Chiang's government was, rather in the same way that Richard Gere's "Red Corner" was a dumb piece of anti-Chinese propaganda. (Gere likes Tibet.) It's not impossible to make decent movies about intrigues in exotic lands. "The Killing Fields" managed it, though it was more drama than docu. "The Year of Living Dangerously" gave us another glimpse of how it can be carried off and so, in its own abominable way, did "Casablanca." "The Sorrow and The Pity" was straight docu. It CAN be done, but "Formosa Betrayed" just throws too much information at the viewer, as if anxious to win our sympathy quickly and completely, and in doing so it alienates us. Or me, anyway.
A renowned Chinese professor is assassinated in Chicago and the FBI investigation leads one agent (Van Der Beek) to Taiwan, formerly Formosa, homeland of the now dead scholar. The authorities greet him, promise him observer status, but make it clear he will not carry out any independent investigation. Then they quickly try to shuffle him aside with restaurants and parties. "Enjoy the many pleasures of Taipei." The rest of the film demonstrates that the government of Taiwan is thoroughly corrupt, murderous, lying, greedy, and given to exploitation of the United States. Since the events described are true, or close to it, I'm sympathetic to the native Taiwanese' desire for independence, but the movie is so clumsily written and edited that I was never really sure who they wanted independence from. From the mainland Chinese? They're already independent of the PRC. From the residue of the government of Chiang Kai Shek? That makes more sense. Chiang lost the war against the Chinese communists led by Mao Tse Tung in 1947 and moved what was left of his army to Taiwan, where he became a ruthless dictator. It was like some third world country in Latin America. He was roundly hated by the Taiwanese whom he hadn't yet exterminated. No reason to doubt that, according to some anthropologists I know who did field work on Taiwan during the early 60s. We supported him not because he was the model of a democratic leader but because he wasn't a communist. During the Korean War, General Douglas MacArthur wanted to "unleash" Chiang Kai Shek and let him invade the mainland, which was pretty funny, even at the time.
But back to the movie. There are so many threads involved that it's awfully confusing. Van Der Beek's principal contact in Taipei is an embassy official, a woman who is somehow involved in secret deals to buy arms from Nicaragua. The guy who assassinated the professor tries to assassinate Van Der Beek but then changes his mind, decides to testify for the independence movement, and is himself assassinated by parties unknown but probably impolite.
I didn't like the acting. Will Tiao as Ming is okay, sympatico in appearance and demeanor. Mintita Wattanakul, a Thai actress, is almost edible. But the audience proxy is poor James Van Der Beek. He cannot act. He lends the movie's center a ligneous presence, a la David Duchovny in "The X Files", which might pass for being cool. But one or two scenes call for outrage and he can't handle it.
The direction by Adam Kane is very fashionable and it's terrible. The palette is ghoul green. The camera never stops moving. That's okay for the inevitable chase through an open Chinese market but not for a medium two shot of people trading lines. There are gigantic close ups, for the sight challenged. Van Der Beek is young, handsome, outfitted in tailored suits, his hair perfectly styled and dry blown, and he wears an a la mode day's growth of beard whose density and length don't vary -- no matter if he's spent the night in jail or in a ritzy hotel room. You know, your typical FBI agent who looks exactly like a Hollywood movie star?
It's a dumb movie about how bad Chiang's government was, rather in the same way that Richard Gere's "Red Corner" was a dumb piece of anti-Chinese propaganda. (Gere likes Tibet.) It's not impossible to make decent movies about intrigues in exotic lands. "The Killing Fields" managed it, though it was more drama than docu. "The Year of Living Dangerously" gave us another glimpse of how it can be carried off and so, in its own abominable way, did "Casablanca." "The Sorrow and The Pity" was straight docu. It CAN be done, but "Formosa Betrayed" just throws too much information at the viewer, as if anxious to win our sympathy quickly and completely, and in doing so it alienates us. Or me, anyway.
One of the best political thrillers I've seen in a long time
tywang8011 September 2009
Saw this film at the Montreal Film Festival. I think it's one of the best political thrillers I've seen in many years. Did not know much about the history of Taiwan, but the film brought me back to the early 80s with it's Cold War references. The cinematography was excellent and you felt the film was epic in scope.
Was particularly impressed by the performances. James Van Der Beek makes a starring turn as FBI Agent Jake Kelly. He does a great job carrying the film. Wendy Crewson and John Heard remind me of many bureaucrats I've met over the years. Will Tiao gives a heartbreaking performance as Ming, the waiter/dissident. What happens to his character is so devastating it made me cry. Reminds me of Haing Ngor's performance in "The Killing Fields." The rest of the supporting cast is outstanding.
In fact, this movie reminded me a lot of "The Killing Fields" which I think this movie is for Taiwan as that movie was for Cambodia. Definitely a must see film if you love political thrillers.
Was particularly impressed by the performances. James Van Der Beek makes a starring turn as FBI Agent Jake Kelly. He does a great job carrying the film. Wendy Crewson and John Heard remind me of many bureaucrats I've met over the years. Will Tiao gives a heartbreaking performance as Ming, the waiter/dissident. What happens to his character is so devastating it made me cry. Reminds me of Haing Ngor's performance in "The Killing Fields." The rest of the supporting cast is outstanding.
In fact, this movie reminded me a lot of "The Killing Fields" which I think this movie is for Taiwan as that movie was for Cambodia. Definitely a must see film if you love political thrillers.
not true
usagilberthong8 August 2010
Don't waste your time watching this movie. Its sucks. We all know the 228 and Kaohsiung Incident, the victims promoted and demanded democracy and self-determination from KMT in Taiwan. However,in the movie,people become to ask for independence (which this movie keep emphasizing)with China. And also the scenes and even the people are not real in 1980s of Taiwan. Funny thing is the Chinese and Taiwanese spoke awfully. As a Taiwanese,it's a shame to see such a untruthful and full of political propaganda movie. I do really hope we can have peace between Taiwan Strait,but not in this way taking advantage of the history and misleading the audiences!
WOW Why Isn't This Getting a Larger Release
ilikegreatmovies18 February 2010
I managed to see Formosa Betrayed at a film festival and was really blown away. Political suspense films rarely grip you this much while still holding onto their intelligence. Wherever you are you must try to get to a theater to see this or anticipate the DVD release because it is not one to miss. Many political thrillers get bogged down in technicalities or are just idiotic in their execution, but Formosa Betrayed hits every right note. I was skeptical too when I saw James Van Der Beek was the star, but he truly rises to the occasion. Will Tiao also amazed me despite the fact that he is essentially unknown. Formosa Betrayed takes you through a whirlwind of action, suspense, and the fight for justice. Get out to the theaters on February 26th to see it; you won't regret it!
WHY did this get good reviews? Slow and unwatchable
sanjsrik30 March 2014
I read some other reviews of this movie. I don't get it. It was AWFUL. I tried my best to watch it. I soldiered on, and yet, it was bad, and got worse with every second. For a movie about intrigue and government espionage, I've never been SO bored in my life. it assumes you know all about the history of Taiwan, that you care WHY or when it was made (the movie), and even worse, that the movie while billing itself as a thriller, plays like a bad history re-enactment. There are NO redeeming values in this movie. It is slow, boring, badly acted, confusing, and worst of all, takes itself MUCH too seriously.
I found myself falling asleep numerous times throughout the movie. I finally couldn't take it and turned it off.
Save 2 hours of your life, read a book, it will be more interesting than this snoozer.
I found myself falling asleep numerous times throughout the movie. I finally couldn't take it and turned it off.
Save 2 hours of your life, read a book, it will be more interesting than this snoozer.
Message to Adam Kane:
kristin_carter16 September 2011
After watched your film, "Formosa Betrayed," I have another great idea for you. It is for you to make your next daring one. It is titled, "American Food Stamp." It is story about there are shameless people who have no attention to find a job but rather to lose the benefit, they stay home. These men have nothing to do but beat up their wife and kids, and their women are just having kids after kids. And these kids are running around on the street and becoming a gang member, and eventually, they are in jail. The Republican Party recognizes the problem and cut the food stamp benefit off in the year of 2011. And, then, for making the story more interesting, let's make the entire Republican Party are white men and all of the food stamp benefiters are black men, and the real main reason to cut off the food stamp benefit is because of these white men hate these black men. Make sure to use some of the black and white films that are showing how KKK beat up the black men and burn down their houses. Yes, in the year of 2011. Since we all know "Food Stamp," "Racism," "Republican Party," do exist, I do not think you would care how to manipulate the story regardless of historical time line and other facts, as you had great dare, and how did you make your "Formosa Betrayed" film in an insulting way to all of Taiwanese.
INSULT ANY ENTIRE RACE IS A VERY SERIOUS CRIME!!
About the ending, put this on: "as so many violent incidents like this had happened, The United State became a democratic country . As today, no black men are walking on the street with fear. The fear of be killed." It is the same misleading style you had for your ending in your "Formosa Betrayed" film. I know you will be filming your new movie, "American food stamp," outside of The United States, as you did not film your "Formosa Betrayed" in Taiwan. And, I am also sure that you will not release your new movie in The United States. So, you don't need to worry about how American people are going to say about your new movie, "American food stamp." But you will be so surprised about how many educated people are outside of The United States, and they will recognize that your new movie is another mistake one, and it is the copy cat of your "Formosa Betrayed." And, good luck to your career.
As a media worker, I would think you should give yourself a great responsibility to provide correct information to public, as a media worker is a great educator, so, we can have educated generations. And, that is a great thing to do for our offspring.
INSULT ANY ENTIRE RACE IS A VERY SERIOUS CRIME!!
About the ending, put this on: "as so many violent incidents like this had happened, The United State became a democratic country . As today, no black men are walking on the street with fear. The fear of be killed." It is the same misleading style you had for your ending in your "Formosa Betrayed" film. I know you will be filming your new movie, "American food stamp," outside of The United States, as you did not film your "Formosa Betrayed" in Taiwan. And, I am also sure that you will not release your new movie in The United States. So, you don't need to worry about how American people are going to say about your new movie, "American food stamp." But you will be so surprised about how many educated people are outside of The United States, and they will recognize that your new movie is another mistake one, and it is the copy cat of your "Formosa Betrayed." And, good luck to your career.
As a media worker, I would think you should give yourself a great responsibility to provide correct information to public, as a media worker is a great educator, so, we can have educated generations. And, that is a great thing to do for our offspring.
A much-needed reality check for many Americans.
katds10281 December 2009
I saw this film at the St. Louis International Film Festival and could not have been more impressed. I left the theater with countless questions and consequently could not stop talking about US-Taiwan relations for weeks. I am sure this is what the filmmakers intended.
I find it shocking that I do not know a single person from my generation (even among student peers who claim to be more passionate about foreign affairs than the average American) who has even heard of the name "Formosa"—not to mention that China currently has hundreds of missiles pointed at the island from its side of the Taiwan Strait, or that the U.S. has promised to unconditionally defend Taiwan in any situation of armed attack. I therefore feel certain the majority of Americans will relate perfectly to James Van Der Beek's character, Agent Kelly, who also knows absolutely nothing about the subject matter.
Agent Kelly receives a brutal reality check in Taipei, and so will American audiences when they see this film. I am sure my peers will leave the theater just as eager to ask questions and to learn more about Taiwan as I was. The filmmakers do not seek to teach a perfect history lesson through documentary but rather to tell a dramatic story that will catch Americans' attention, inspire dialogue, and encourage them to better educate themselves on this important issue. In this regard, James Van Der Beek, Will Tiao and Wendy Crewson's performances are all highly effective. The nonlinear narrative furthermore forces audiences to more actively engage themselves with the film and accordingly with the larger issues presented. Overall, I would call "Formosa Betrayed" a huge success.
I find it shocking that I do not know a single person from my generation (even among student peers who claim to be more passionate about foreign affairs than the average American) who has even heard of the name "Formosa"—not to mention that China currently has hundreds of missiles pointed at the island from its side of the Taiwan Strait, or that the U.S. has promised to unconditionally defend Taiwan in any situation of armed attack. I therefore feel certain the majority of Americans will relate perfectly to James Van Der Beek's character, Agent Kelly, who also knows absolutely nothing about the subject matter.
Agent Kelly receives a brutal reality check in Taipei, and so will American audiences when they see this film. I am sure my peers will leave the theater just as eager to ask questions and to learn more about Taiwan as I was. The filmmakers do not seek to teach a perfect history lesson through documentary but rather to tell a dramatic story that will catch Americans' attention, inspire dialogue, and encourage them to better educate themselves on this important issue. In this regard, James Van Der Beek, Will Tiao and Wendy Crewson's performances are all highly effective. The nonlinear narrative furthermore forces audiences to more actively engage themselves with the film and accordingly with the larger issues presented. Overall, I would call "Formosa Betrayed" a huge success.
An Exciting History Lesson
FilmRap27 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
An FBI agent in the 1980s is following the clues of a murder of a mid-western university professor in search of the killers. If you didn't know anything about the history of Taiwan alias Formosa, you would still no doubt find this a very riveting, suspenseful, exciting thriller. However, if you know the history of this embattled country or as you may be able to figure it out from the unfolding story, the intrigue becomes even more meaningful. You may remember that little island off the coast of mainland China was the refuge of Chiang Kai-shek and his followers after the communists took over the mainland of China. It became a very strategic location as the United States made a commitment politically, financially and militarily to protect it from the Communists. What you may not have appreciated is that this government was corrupt and oppressed its people in the worst ways possible in order to keep itself in power. His son continued the martial law after Kai-shek's death in 1975. It was not until a time frame after this movie that Taiwan became a true thriving democracy. Will Tiamo, a co-star of the film was also one the creative forces behind the movie as one of the writers and the person most responsible for raising enough money to make the film before it was even written or cast. He wanted to tell the story of his parent's generation and the oppressive environment which existed in the land of their birth. FBI agent Jake Kelly played by James Van Der Beek encounters deception, murder, and torture. He also realizes that his own government, for political reasons, is not keen on exposing these terrible things. This all adds up to a top rate adventure story with conflict and a moral dilemma of the main character. The screenplay was based on various true events and was skillfully directed by Adam Kane. Although the movie has just received a distribution deal with a release date at the end of February, 2010, we suspect that it may not make it to your local theater or hang around there very long. So if you are at all inclined to see an exciting history lesson, be sure to look for it or put it on your Netflix queue.
Incredibly well done movie
leiser189 March 2010
When I saw a small advertising in my local paper for this movie, I had no idea what it was about. I thought it might be a documentary on Formosa before it became Taiwan. How wrong I was! I was totally blown away by its contents, the actors, and the cinematography. I had little knowledge of Taiwan's history prior to seeing this film. It was a real eye opener. I also didn't recognize most of the actors, except for John Heard. James Van Der Beek did an excellent job as the FBI agent Jake Kelly. I am really surprised that the film was shown in San Jose (CA) at all because it seems most viewers have seen 'Formosa Betrayed' at film festivals. This movie should get a wider distribution since, in my opinion, it is very important to let everyone know what happened. An absolute MUST-SEE!
Great Movie. Surpassed my expectations!!!
AlexFURD27 October 2009
Hey Crapone! You should see the movie for yourself instead of making things out from the internet! Obviously you haven't read Formosa Betrayed book either.
Uganda Genocide, Armenian Genocide, Tibetan Genocide, Darfur Genocide, Muslim Uyghur Turks Genocide... The truth will always prevail. When people learn to admit the truth, then we can all forgive and move on.
Movies have a way of teaching us the truth in people and this movie should be recognized for it's excellence in story, acting, filming and for showing the truth.
Thank you for putting your money, time and effort in making this film!
Peace to all : ) ... even for all you haters out there!
Uganda Genocide, Armenian Genocide, Tibetan Genocide, Darfur Genocide, Muslim Uyghur Turks Genocide... The truth will always prevail. When people learn to admit the truth, then we can all forgive and move on.
Movies have a way of teaching us the truth in people and this movie should be recognized for it's excellence in story, acting, filming and for showing the truth.
Thank you for putting your money, time and effort in making this film!
Peace to all : ) ... even for all you haters out there!
Great movie
alvin353524 July 2010
I like this movie. I agree with some people that the scene doesn't look like Taiwan in 80'. It should've been more modern look, but the story is just so good so I can forgive the settings. It reminds us not to forget that we are TAIWANESE, nothing to do with China. We have been using the name "Taiwan" for 100 years, and I am proud of it. We have our own culture, language, food, government, law system, not to mention democracy. How can you deny it is a country and very different from China. It is a shame that still some people don't recognize Taiwan as a independent country, even some Taiwanese, but I appreciate that a lot of people are trying to let people see us and value us.
The acting and editing are excellent. Also, the music at the end "Desire for Spring Breeze", the traditional Taiwanese song, just makes me cry.
The acting and editing are excellent. Also, the music at the end "Desire for Spring Breeze", the traditional Taiwanese song, just makes me cry.
Please go see this film!
SacTai-Am1 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I saw "Formosa Betrayed" opening weekend in Berkeley, CA on 2/28/2010. There were many Taiwanese-Americans in the audience, some 60-75ish. During one point in the film where the story of the 2-28 incident is told to the main character, you could hear sniffling, coughing and people blowing their noses. This was an emotional moment for me and for many in the audience. An entire generation of Taiwanese was murdered, brutalized, and silenced. Those who attempt to write this movie off as mere profit-motivated propaganda are no different than those who would deny that the Holocaust ever happened. Don't be fooled. This movie is important just as it is entertaining.
If you enjoy political thrillers, you will love this film. The non-linear narrative is excellent, and the story telling superb. The use of actual historical photos of the descent of Chiang Kai-Shek's army on Taiwan, as well as photos of the brutality surrounding 2-28, and Nixon's meeting with Mao are powerfully chilling.
James Van Der Beek's performance as FBI Agent will blow you away. In all honesty, Will Tiao's acting could have been better, but give him credit for the monumental task he accomplished in raising over $6 million USD in private investor funds to get this independent film made. It was obviously a labor of love, and this fact shines through in every moment of the final product, from the opening image of a satellite map of Taiwan to the the closing montage. For movie-goers who prefer to learn something intellectually challenging through a thought-provoking and entertaining film, please go see this movie.
If you enjoy political thrillers, you will love this film. The non-linear narrative is excellent, and the story telling superb. The use of actual historical photos of the descent of Chiang Kai-Shek's army on Taiwan, as well as photos of the brutality surrounding 2-28, and Nixon's meeting with Mao are powerfully chilling.
James Van Der Beek's performance as FBI Agent will blow you away. In all honesty, Will Tiao's acting could have been better, but give him credit for the monumental task he accomplished in raising over $6 million USD in private investor funds to get this independent film made. It was obviously a labor of love, and this fact shines through in every moment of the final product, from the opening image of a satellite map of Taiwan to the the closing montage. For movie-goers who prefer to learn something intellectually challenging through a thought-provoking and entertaining film, please go see this movie.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
