For video and full review click here:
http://wp.me/1oIWP
I remember 'Drip' being a lot scarier, actually, proving that those who watch things through their fingers are actually sparing themselves less scary dodgy animatronics and effectively making films more terrifying than they really are. But the atmosphere of isolation, the rising dread in the creaking house and the gliding, stalking camera that tracks the 'lonely woman' work beautifully. With just two - or perhaps three characters - this is a great short horror film.
It really isn't one for dog lovers - I feel even worse about the dog;s fate than I did the first time I watched it, he's such a sweetheart; but to warn anyone of this before viewing is just spoiling the scare. It is a horror, and pets are usually first in the murder line. I also think most people will already know this story. It's a very well known urban legend, albeit with a very supernatural pay-off, frankly it's is up there with 'hook man' and 'Bloody Mary'. It was even subtly referenced in an episode of Supernatural. It's part of the reason I remembered this short film so clearly.
While I was looking for this piece of nostalgic horror, I noticed several hundred other versions of the 'Drip' story on YouTube alone. The story evolves all the time anyway, when it's being told around the campfire or by an evil older sibling. The version I've heard is the other most common one, which make the creature under the bed the requisite escaped lunatic, and sometimes the lady is inform, very elderly or completely blind. While this was a more down to earth, more scarily possible version of the story, I like the way that in Drip (2006) the thing is a demon of some sort which she has somehow disturbed. Now, the problem with the reveal of a demon, rather than a creepy man, under the bed is mainly that I'm a bit surprised the demon didn't simply nip her fingers off while she was patting it for reassurance. Is it just messing with her? Was it using the dripping noise deliberately, to lure her upstairs? That suggests a level of central plumbing knowledge that demons may or may not possess, whether they're fictional or not. Given how the poor dog ends up, I'm going with 'messing with her'.
The real strength of true horror, and the urban legends in particular, rests in being unaware of how close you are to something evil until its proximity is revealed. The scary thing about 'Drip' is the realisation that she (standing in for us, the viewer) has touched the horror, put herself in danger. That the threat has been barely avoided, but is still lurking somewhere in the house, hiding under the very bed she/you were just sleeping in. And you put your hands on it!
As a final note:
The story ends at its most terrifying point, and leaves me curious about what happens next. Does she run out of the house screaming, driving off? Would she make it as far as the door before it came after her? Is that even what it wants? Is it just under the bed because the previous owners kept it as a pet to keep out burglars? What is it? I honestly remember a more terrifying face under the bed than the one here, but realistically I still wouldn't want to run into it in the dark, on my own, in a house when I'd just found the eviscerated remains of my pet dog. Nope, pretty much anything is a best-case scenario compared to that.
That's why Steven Gomez's 'Drip' is a terrific retelling of an urban legend which refuses to die.
http://wp.me/1oIWP
I remember 'Drip' being a lot scarier, actually, proving that those who watch things through their fingers are actually sparing themselves less scary dodgy animatronics and effectively making films more terrifying than they really are. But the atmosphere of isolation, the rising dread in the creaking house and the gliding, stalking camera that tracks the 'lonely woman' work beautifully. With just two - or perhaps three characters - this is a great short horror film.
It really isn't one for dog lovers - I feel even worse about the dog;s fate than I did the first time I watched it, he's such a sweetheart; but to warn anyone of this before viewing is just spoiling the scare. It is a horror, and pets are usually first in the murder line. I also think most people will already know this story. It's a very well known urban legend, albeit with a very supernatural pay-off, frankly it's is up there with 'hook man' and 'Bloody Mary'. It was even subtly referenced in an episode of Supernatural. It's part of the reason I remembered this short film so clearly.
While I was looking for this piece of nostalgic horror, I noticed several hundred other versions of the 'Drip' story on YouTube alone. The story evolves all the time anyway, when it's being told around the campfire or by an evil older sibling. The version I've heard is the other most common one, which make the creature under the bed the requisite escaped lunatic, and sometimes the lady is inform, very elderly or completely blind. While this was a more down to earth, more scarily possible version of the story, I like the way that in Drip (2006) the thing is a demon of some sort which she has somehow disturbed. Now, the problem with the reveal of a demon, rather than a creepy man, under the bed is mainly that I'm a bit surprised the demon didn't simply nip her fingers off while she was patting it for reassurance. Is it just messing with her? Was it using the dripping noise deliberately, to lure her upstairs? That suggests a level of central plumbing knowledge that demons may or may not possess, whether they're fictional or not. Given how the poor dog ends up, I'm going with 'messing with her'.
The real strength of true horror, and the urban legends in particular, rests in being unaware of how close you are to something evil until its proximity is revealed. The scary thing about 'Drip' is the realisation that she (standing in for us, the viewer) has touched the horror, put herself in danger. That the threat has been barely avoided, but is still lurking somewhere in the house, hiding under the very bed she/you were just sleeping in. And you put your hands on it!
As a final note:
The story ends at its most terrifying point, and leaves me curious about what happens next. Does she run out of the house screaming, driving off? Would she make it as far as the door before it came after her? Is that even what it wants? Is it just under the bed because the previous owners kept it as a pet to keep out burglars? What is it? I honestly remember a more terrifying face under the bed than the one here, but realistically I still wouldn't want to run into it in the dark, on my own, in a house when I'd just found the eviscerated remains of my pet dog. Nope, pretty much anything is a best-case scenario compared to that.
That's why Steven Gomez's 'Drip' is a terrific retelling of an urban legend which refuses to die.
