User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Best Korean War Documentary, depending on which version
mlovmo-217 February 2008
The original Thames Television version of this documentary is clearly the best of the Korean War documentaries. It is much more engaging and informative than both "Fire and Ice" and "The Forgotten War." This amazing documentary, "The Unknown War", includes interviews with over 100 participants and eyewitnesses in the war: Many important soldiers, civilians, historians and policy-makers from the USA, UK, Australia, North and South Korea, China, the Soviet Union and Eastern bloc. This documentary follows the chronology of military events, interspersed with important issues and controversies that make the Korean War a fascinating subject. It is composed of 6 one-hour episodes that were initially shown on BBC's Channel 4 on the following dates:

Episode 1: "Many Roads to War" June 18, 1988 Episode 2: "An Arrogant Display of Strength" June 25, 1988 Episode 3: "There is No Substitute for Victory" July 2, 1988 Episode 4: "An Entirely New War" July 9, 1988 Episode 5: "The Battle for Minds" July 16, 1988 Episode 6: "Armed Truce" July 30, 1988

After much revision and editing of its original content by WGBH/Boston, it was shown on PBS in the USA two years later. Thanks to some intense lobbying efforts, it went on the air with no sponsor, just the support of "PBS viewers like you."

The historical consultants felt that both the Thames and WGBH versions were deficient on the significance of NSC 68, considered by some to be the most important American Cold War document. NSC 68 put forth a policy of direct military confrontation, through massive capital outlays to either contain America's enemies, or eliminate them altogether. It laid the basis for the great expansion of the military and military industrial complex in the USA, one that still takes a huge percentage of the US federal budget. The Korean War was the event that inaugurated this policy change.

While the Thames version makes some astounding suggestions about the Truman-MacArthur controversy (probably the most interesting event of the war to American audiences), the WGBH version waters them down. The Thames version suggested that the Truman Administration wanted to attack China with atomic weapons, and that the firing of MacArthur was not just about civilian supremacy (as the Truman people insisted), but also an effort to get a reliable field commander in place had the president decided to implement his plans to nuke China.

The US version did expand the segment on the Incheon landing and extended the segment on African Americans in the US military in Korea. The WGBH version also added more of the South Korean's viewpoints on the war and subtracted from the North Korean's views relative to the Thames version. That neither of the Korean sides honors the complete truth of the war, or both claim exclusive possession of the truth, was not taken into consideration by the people at WGBH.

On the whole, the Thames version is better, but both versions are extremely important additions to the documentary treatment of the Korean War.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A comprehensive and thorough television history of the Korean War
Redknight05531 August 2014
"Korea: The Unknown War" was made by Thames Television and was broadcast in the UK in mid-1988, which I suspect was done to coincide with the Seoul Olympics held slightly later that same year. The original UK version was screened in Australia at roughly the same time. What makes this series worthwhile viewing is that it deals with the Korean War from all sides and from most angles. Participants in varying roles and from various countries were interviewed for the series, including from the Communist side. This makes the series particularly interesting as it is not some homogenised, one-sided war documentary series, which too many are, and also allows everyone from all sides to give their own (sometimes propagandist) account of their actions in the war or their view of the war, or some aspect of it.

It proceeds from the Japanese surrender in 1945 to the conclusion of the armistice in July 1953 and in doing so gives a full background of the circumstances of the division of Korea and the origins of the war. It is largely objective and without bias, though one can detect the odd slightly anti-American dig in such exaggerations as 2 million Koreans "probably" died as a result of the U.S. Air Force's bombing of North Korea, which is hardly likely when compared to the Western Allies' ferocious bombing of Germany in the Second World War which killed some 635,000 Germans. Be that as it may, "Korea: The Unknown War" is one of the best documentary series I have seen on any war or military subject and would recommend it to anyone who wants a thorough and comprehensive screen history of this pivotal and bloody mid-twentieth-century conflict.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed